1 RSVP-TE Based MPLS LI & LB J. Dong, M. Chen (Huawei), Z. Li (China Mobile) IETF84 CCAMP July 2012 Vancouver draft-dong-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-li-lb-03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS-TP Alarm Suppression tool
Advertisements

Pseudowire freeze mechanism draft-jin-pwe3-pw-freeze-00 Lizhong Jin Bhumip. Khasnabish.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
RSVP-TE extensions for dynamic hostname traversing OSPF routing areas draft-zheng-ccamp-rsvp-te-dynamic-hostname-00 Zhi Zheng,
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
1 GMPLS RSVP-TE Recovery Extension for data plane initiated reversion and protection timer signalling draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-00 Author list: Tarek Saad
MIP-related aspects of MPLS-TP OAM Greg Mirsky IETF-79.
Draft-li-mpls-global-label-usecases-00IETF 88 SPRING WG1 Usecases of MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-global-label-usecases-00 Zhenbin Li, Quintin Zhao.
IETF 64 – Vancouver, November 2005 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Transfer of Ownership of Label Switched Paths Between the Management and Control.
1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-02 George Swallow IETF78 July 2010.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-00.txt
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping- extensions-00 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray.
MPLS-TP - 78th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
64th IETF Vancouver Nov Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
Label Switched Path (LSP) Data Path Delay Metrics in Generalized MPLS/ MPLS-TE Networks Draft-ietf-ccamp-dpm-01.txt Authors Presenter: Weiqiang Sun
UNI Extensions for Diversity and Latency Support 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando1 Don Dieter.
Draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02IETF 90 MPLS WG1 A Framework of MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02 Zhenbin Li, Quintin Zhao,
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-03 Author list: Tarek Saad
Diagnostic test for MPLS transport profile draft-flh-mpls-tp-oam-diagnostic-test-01 IETF78, Maastricht, 25th-30th, July, 2010 Feng Huang ( Alcatel Lucent)
63nd IETF Paris August 2005 LSP Stitching with Generalized MPLS TE draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching-01.txt Arthi Ayyangar
Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng,
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
Page 1 RSVP-TE based evidence signaling protocol Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco Systems) Marco Anisetti, Valerio Bellandi, Ernesto Damiani, Francesco.
1 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Lou Berger Deborah Brungard Secretary: Dan King 80th IETF CCAMP WG.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
MPLS-TP Loopback Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-02.txt Sami Boutros and a Cast of Thousands.
1 Ping and Traceroute for GMPLS LSPs in Non-Packet Switched Networks draft-ali-ccamp-gmpls-lsp-ping-traceroute-01.txt Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
Luyuan Fang Nabil Bitar Raymond Zhang Masahiro DAIKOKU Ping Pan
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
Page th IETF – Hiroshima, Japan, November 2009 Diagnostic tool-test for MPLS transport profile Feng Huang
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Dave Ward, Malcolm Betts, ed. April 16, 2008.
Expressing LSP attribute in ERO CCAMP WG, IETF 84, draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-01 Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks Dirk Schroetter iX GmbH.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Deborah Brungard : Adrian Farrel :
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
1 77th IETF, CCAMP WG, Anaheim, CA, USA March 2010 Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter- domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-03.txt.
1 73th IETF, CCAMP WG, Minneapolis, MN, USA November 2008 RSVP-TE based Impairments Collection Mechanism Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco Systems) Marco.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
NVO3 Overlay P2MP Ping draft-xia-nvo3-overlay-p2mp-ping-00 Liang Xia, Weiguo Hao, Greg Mirsky July 2014 Toronto.
Indication of Client Fault in MPLS-TP OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-csf-01 IETF 80 th, March 27-April 1, 2011 Jia He Han Li Elisa Bellagamba.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
1 MTU Extended Community for BGP-4 Q. Zeng, J. Dong (Huawei Technologies) IETF81 IDR July 2011 Quebec draft-zeng-idr-bgp-mtu-extension-00.
PC-S(P)C Requirements and Solution Status CCAMP WG, IETF 71 th Philadelphia Diego Caviglia, Dino Bramanti, Dan Li.
PCEP extensions for GMPLS CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks Oscar González.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Diagnostic tool-test for MPLS transport profile
Francois Le Faucheur Cisco
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Greg Mirsky IETF-99 July 2017, Prague
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
PW Control Word Stitching
Jia He Italo Busi Jeong-dong Ryoo Bin Yeong Yoon Peter Park
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks
PWE3/MPLS WG, IETF 80th, Prague
Presentation transcript:

1 RSVP-TE Based MPLS LI & LB J. Dong, M. Chen (Huawei), Z. Li (China Mobile) IETF84 CCAMP July 2012 Vancouver draft-dong-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-li-lb-03

2 In-band/NMS based LI & LB is defined in RFC 6435 LI and LB affect the data plane of the LSP –As enabler of some other OAM functions When dynamic control plane exists, could perform LI & LB through control plane signaling –Ensure control plane & data plane consistency –Does not rely on TTL expiration Mechanism also applicable to other technologies using GMPLS Background

3 The Lock part is changed –Re-use existing bits when possible (Thanks Lou, Fei and Francesco for the discussions) –A (Administratively down) bit in ADMIN_STATUS is re-used for lock/unlock signaling The Loopback part is unchanged in this version –Wait for the discussion & progress of Cyril’s draft-lsp-attribute-ero –Would like to revise this part accordingly when there is consensus Change & Unchange in v-03

RSVP-TE Based LI & LB One re-used & one new flag in ADMIN_STATUS Object –A: Administratively Down, re-used for Lock Instruct –B: LoopBack Lock Instruct is signaled using Path/Resv message –MEP to MEP Loopback is signaled using Notify message –MEP to MIP or MEP to MEP –May be revised in next version 4

5 Revise the loopback part based on the progress of draft-lsp-attribute-ero Further comments are welcome Is this work useful to the WG? Next Steps

Operations – Lock Instruct Lock –Sending MEP: Path message with A and R bit set –Receiving MEP: Success: Resv message with A bit set Failure: PathErr message with new OAM Error Value “Lock Failure” Unlock –Sending MEP: Path message with A bit cleared and R bit set –Receiving MEP: Success: Resv message with A bit cleared Failure: PathErr message with new OAM Error Value “Unlock Failure” 6 LER1 LSR1 LER2 LSR2 perform Lock operation Path with A and R set Resv (success) or PathErr (failure)

Enter Loopback –Sending MEP: Notify message with A, B and R bit set –Receiving MIP/MEP: Success: Notify message with A and B bit set and Error Code “0” Failure: Notify message with new OAM Error Value “Loopback Failure” Exit Loopback –Sending MEP: Notify message with A, R bit set and B bit cleared –Receiving MIP/MEP: Success: Notify message with A bit set and B bit cleared and Error Code “0” Failure: Notify message with new OAM Error Value “Exit Loopback Failure” 7 Operations – Loopback LER1 LSR1 LER2 LSR2 Perform Loopback Operation Notify with A, B and R set Target node is LSR2 Notify the result