Outline Need to communicate WQ data Non scientists History of WQ indices What works My attempt at Report Card Common CWA language.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Turtle Lake Water Quality Index
Watershed Monitoring and Assessment: Federal Regulations and Local Processes Seth Mason.
A GIS Lesson. What is a Watershed? +15 Million People.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Assessment of Utah’s Nonpoint Source control program Nancy Mesner, Doug Jackson-Smith, Phaedra Budy, David Stevens Lorien Belton, Nira Salant, William.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
Obtaining the goals.  Identify realistic future use of all water bodies – drinking water, irrigation water, livestock watering, bathing, fishing, recipient.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Michigan Coordination Team Brian K. Miller – Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Anders Andren – Wisconsin.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
Kyle Abraham Effectiveness Monitoring Coordinator Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
SWRR on the Potomac Rhonda Kranz and John Wells Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 25, 2006 Measuring the Sustainability of Water Management.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Activities, Results and Preliminary Report ACWI Meeting September 14, 2005 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable (SWRR)
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program CCAMP  Summary of CCAMP Monitoring  How we make CCAMP happen  Making data available  Measuring performance.
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
Minnesota Water 2005 John R. Wells Minnesota Environmental Quality Board & Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable October 26, 2005 Measuring the Sustainability.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
HearneNWQMCMay06 1 A Review of Water Management Institutions in The Red River of the North Basin Robert R. Hearne Department of Agribusiness and Applied.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
Environment Environnement Canada Rob Kent, Chris Lochner, Janine Murray, Connie Gaudet Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance Water Science and Technology.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Report Card Scoring Several options under consideration for scoring and aggregating data.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Is algae bad? No! Algae helps us by; taking in waste from the water (ex. Animal poop) providing oxygen and being a food resource for animals.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Challenges, results and experience with cross-border cooperation - local and national level impacts - DRIMON and Transboundary Prespa Lake Basin Crossing.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Effluents Standards In Pakistan Environmental protection agency (EPA) is responsible for all aspects of the environment; regulation of sanitation and.
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Wastewater Treatment.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Global Rivers Environmental Education Network
Presentation transcript:

Outline Need to communicate WQ data Non scientists History of WQ indices What works My attempt at Report Card Common CWA language

“The River is the Report Card of the Watershed”

305b Assessment Needs Standardization Few numerical criteria Documentation Staff turnover Communication Target audiences

Water Quality Index state sanitary engineers 1974-National Sanitation Foundation Massachusetts revision DO and temperature revisions 1996 revisions

Water Quality Index DO pH Temperature Coliform BOD NO3 Total phosphorus Turbidity Suspended Solids

Problems (roll up index) Sense of precision Masking of problems Separating aquatic life/ recreation Incomplete data sets Missing indicators/ compartments

Al Gore 9/25/96 Environmental report card Coordinate monitoring efforts Guide decision-making Account to the public

Revisions Indicator groups Verbal categories Toxics Water Sediment Tissue Habitat/ Flow

Report Card Goals Environmental BaselineStatus Decision-making GuideID problems Prioritize problems Geo-target problems Diagnose/ fix problems ID threats ID remedial action groups Public AccountingTrends Coordinate MonitoringInformation Inventory ID information gaps

Report Card Information Entire basin-Prioritize Segments - Geotarget Water Uses Goals- Response indicators Diagnose -exposure indicators (causes) Fix-Sources Metadata- Confidence

Mass. River Basins 27 Basins 600 total segments segments/ basin 3 rd order streams

Water Uses National Goal Uses (4) Aquatic life Recreation Primary Secondary Fish consumption

GroupLevel Water UseRemedial Action Group Biology6Aquatic Life Water Quality chemistry nutrients toxics 4Wastewater conventional nonconventional priority pollutants Sediments4Hazardous Waste Flow4Water Management Habitat4Wetlands Protection Bacteria6Recreation Aesthetics4Recreation Fish Tissue5EdibilityPublic Health

Index Color Codes Blue - excellent, comparable to reference Green - good,meets criteria Yellow - threatened,may not meet in future Orange - fair, marginally meets Red - poor, does not meet criteria Grey - not assessed

Sources Point Sources Industrial Municipal CSO Nonpoint Sources Agriculture Silviculture Construction Urban Runoff/Stormwater Resource extraction Land disposal Hydro/Habitat modification Other

Source Color Code / 303d Red –Known source for a known cause established cause and effect Orange-Suspected source of a known cause Ex. -Multiple sources for DO problem Yellow-Potential source EX.-Salt pile

Metadata Four levels for each indicator bundle Based in information rigor/completeness (not quality) Assessment Types Levels 1-2 –Official reporting ? Levels 3-4- Suitable for 305b and 303d

Example: Water Column Chemistry Level 1-Summer low flow Level 2-Summer low flow: wet/dry Level 3- Entire hydrograph Summer low flow Spring high flow Fall high flow Winter low flow Level 4- Entire hydrograph for multiple (3+) years

Historical Trends Chemistry 70’s Conventional - DO, pH, temperature 80’s Non-conventional - nutrients 90’s Priority pollutants – toxics 00’s other compartments –sediments/biota

Millers River Sampling Plan

Status Response Indicators ID problems Prioritize problems Geo-target problems Diagnose/ fix problems ID threats ID remedial action groups Colors Columns Rows Causes/Sources Yellow Bundles TrendsMultiple years / Causes better than uses Information Inventory ID Data gaps Metadata card

Report Card Uses Four page 305b report ADB Reporting Water quality managers Group discussions (planning) Priorities for grant funding Coordinating with other monitoring groups Outreach (general public)

AudienceGroupUsesCausesMetadata Sources PublicX MonitorsDEP/EPA Volunteers XXXX XXXX Regulators305b 303d NPDES XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX PlannersFacility NPS WatershedX XXXXXX XXXXXX GrantsXX ManagementBossesXXXX

36 Procedure. Make evaluations on a “Segment Sheet”; then transfer information automatically to report cards “Overall Status” evaluations from a segment sheet are transferred to a single line on a report card

37 Configure the Report Cards. All four report cards are automatically modified; extra segment sheets are hidden.

Coordination in Development 305b reporting Uses Causes Sources Metadata 303d list Sources National Water Quality Monitoring Council Indicator groupings (IFIM)

Current Users (Experimenters) Massachusetts Hilary Snook, Lakes, NELP California Lilian Busse, Monitoring Program, San Diego River John Marshack, Healthy Watersheds Oregon Aaron Borisenko, Program reporting Vermont Neil Kamman, Basin Planning

Joseph Pulitzer Put it before them briefly so they will read it, clearly so that they will appreciate it, picturesquely so that they will remember it, and, above all accurately so that they will be guided by its light.