A Theoretical Framework for Calibration in Computer Models: Parametrization, Estimation and Convergence Properties Rui Tuo and C. F. Jeff Wu CAS and Oak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improved Joint Efficiencies in Aluminum Alloys
Advertisements

Efficiency and Productivity Measurement: Index Numbers
Bayesian tools for analysing and reducing uncertainty Tony OHagan University of Sheffield.
1 -Classification: Internal Uncertainty in petroleum reservoirs.
Generalized Method of Moments: Introduction
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 05: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION Objectives: Discrete Features Maximum Likelihood Resources: D.H.S: Chapter 3 (Part.
On time invariant probabilistic modelling of duration of load effects for timber Sven Thelandersson Structural Engineering Lund University.
This presentation can be downloaded at – This work is carried out within the SWITCH-ON.
Maximum Likelihood And Expectation Maximization Lecture Notes for CMPUT 466/551 Nilanjan Ray.
Information Bottleneck EM School of Engineering & Computer Science The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Gal Elidan and Nir Friedman.
Markov-Chain Monte Carlo
Gaussian Processes I have known
Rob Fergus Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University A Variational Approach to Blind Image Deconvolution.
Paper Discussion: “Simultaneous Localization and Environmental Mapping with a Sensor Network”, Marinakis et. al. ICRA 2011.
Parameter Estimation: Maximum Likelihood Estimation Chapter 3 (Duda et al.) – Sections CS479/679 Pattern Recognition Dr. George Bebis.
A Framework for Discovering Anomalous Regimes in Multivariate Time-Series Data with Local Models Stephen Bay Stanford University, and Institute for the.
Predictive Automatic Relevance Determination by Expectation Propagation Yuan (Alan) Qi Thomas P. Minka Rosalind W. Picard Zoubin Ghahramani.
CE 498/698 and ERS 685 (Spring 2004) Lecture 181 Lecture 18: The Modeling Environment CE 498/698 and ERS 485 Principles of Water Quality Modeling.
Statistical analysis and modeling of neural data Lecture 4 Bijan Pesaran 17 Sept, 2007.
Value of Information for Complex Economic Models Jeremy Oakley Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield. Paper available from.
Expectation-Maximization (EM) Chapter 3 (Duda et al.) – Section 3.9
Circular statistics Maximum likelihood Local likelihood Kenneth D. Harris 4/3/2015.
CSE 221: Probabilistic Analysis of Computer Systems Topics covered: Statistical inference.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
Methods in Medical Image Analysis Statistics of Pattern Recognition: Classification and Clustering Some content provided by Milos Hauskrecht, University.
Gaussian process modelling
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
Calibration of Computer Simulators using Emulators.
ITAM CAS, IEAP CTU IWORID 2004Glasgow, th July IWORID 2004 OPTIMIZATION OF X ‑ RAY DYNAMIC DEFECTOSCOPY USING MEDIPIX-2 FOR HIGH FRAME RATE READ-OUT.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
Disease Prevalence Estimates for Neighbourhoods: Combining Spatial Interpolation and Spatial Factor Models Peter Congdon, Queen Mary University of London.
Aug. 27, 2003IFAC-SYSID2003 Functional Analytic Framework for Model Selection Masashi Sugiyama Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan Fraunhofer FIRST-IDA,
WE 602 Resistance Welding Processes Review & Physics of Spot Welding Reference Web Site for Review: www-iwse.eng.ohio-state.edu/we601.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
17 May 2007RSS Kent Local Group1 Quantifying uncertainty in the UK carbon flux Tony O’Hagan CTCD, Sheffield.
Scaling Laws in the Welding Arc P.F. Mendez, M.A. Ramírez G. Trapaga, and T.W. Eagar MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA October 1 st, 2001, Graz, Austria.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
Michael Fay VP, Software Development. Well Production Forecasting Requirements For efficiency, the method should be simple (e.g. no simulation or complex.
Concept Learning and the General-to-Specific Ordering 이 종우 자연언어처리연구실.
MACHINE LEARNING 8. Clustering. Motivation Based on E ALPAYDIN 2004 Introduction to Machine Learning © The MIT Press (V1.1) 2  Classification problem:
Additional Topics in Prediction Methodology. Introduction Predictive distribution for random variable Y 0 is meant to capture all the information about.
- 1 - Overall procedure of validation Calibration Validation Figure 12.4 Validation, calibration, and prediction (Oberkampf and Barone, 2004 ). Model accuracy.
- 1 - Calibration with discrepancy Major references –Calibration lecture is not in the book. –Kennedy, Marc C., and Anthony O'Hagan. "Bayesian calibration.
CLASSICAL NORMAL LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL (CNLRM )
At what level do I trust the outcomes of the model? Verification Calibration Validation Exploration of the model structure. the activity of adjusting the.
Gaussian Process and Prediction. (C) 2001 SNU CSE Artificial Intelligence Lab (SCAI)2 Outline Gaussian Process and Bayesian Regression  Bayesian regression.
1 Chapter 8: Model Inference and Averaging Presented by Hui Fang.
Hmm, HID HMMs Gerald Dalley MIT AI Lab Activity Perception Group Group Meeting 17 April 2003.
DENCLUE 2.0: Fast Clustering based on Kernel Density Estimation Alexander Hinneburg Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany Hans-Henning Gabriel.
Fitting normal distribution: ML 1Computer vision: models, learning and inference. ©2011 Simon J.D. Prince.
Downscaling of European land use projections for the ALARM toolkit Joint work between UCL : Nicolas Dendoncker, Mark Rounsevell, Patrick Bogaert BioSS:
R. Kass/W03 P416 Lecture 5 l Suppose we are trying to measure the true value of some quantity (x T ). u We make repeated measurements of this quantity.
WEEK 1 E. FACHE, A. GANGOTRA, K. MAHFOUD, A. MARTYSZUNIS, I. MIRALLES, G. ROSAT, S. SCHROERS, A. TILLOY 19. February 2016.
Introduction to emulators Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences In Defense of a Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 26 July 2005 Regression Model.
Multi-state Occupancy. Multiple Occupancy States Rather than just presence/absence of the species at a sampling unit, ‘occupancy’ could be categorized.
8 Sept 2006, DEMA2006Slide 1 An Introduction to Computer Experiments and their Design Problems Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
Process and System Characterization Describe and characterize transport and transformation phenomena based reactor dynamics ( 반응공학 ) – natural and engineered.
A Primer on Running Deterministic Experiments
CS479/679 Pattern Recognition Dr. George Bebis
2. Industry 4.0: novel sensors, control algorithms, and servo-presses
Machine Learning Basics
Outline Parameter estimation – continued Non-parametric methods.
SMEM Algorithm for Mixture Models
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Function Notation “f of x” Input = x Output = f(x) = y.
An algebraic expression that defines a function is a function rule.
Recursively Adapted Radial Basis Function Networks and its Relationship to Resource Allocating Networks and Online Kernel Learning Weifeng Liu, Puskal.
A Gentle Tutorial of the EM Algorithm and its Application to Parameter Estimation for Gaussian Mixture and Hidden Markov Models Jeff A. Bilmes International.
A Gentle Tutorial of the EM Algorithm and its Application to Parameter Estimation for Gaussian Mixture and Hidden Markov Models Jeff A. Bilmes International.
Presentation transcript:

A Theoretical Framework for Calibration in Computer Models: Parametrization, Estimation and Convergence Properties Rui Tuo and C. F. Jeff Wu CAS and Oak Ridge Nat Labs Georgia Institute of Technology 1  Supported by NSF DMS and DOE ASCR programs

Calibration Parameters Consider a computer experiment problem with both computer output and physical response. –Physical experiment has control variables. –Computer/simulation code is deterministic. –Computer input involves control variables and calibration parameters. Calibration parameters represent inherent attributes of the physical system, not observed or controllable in physical experiment, e.g., material porosity or permeability in comp. material design. 2

Calibration Problems In many cases, the true value of the calibration parameters cannot be measured physically. Kennedy and O’Hagan (2001) described the calibration problems as: –“Calibration is the activity of adjusting the unknown (calibration) parameters until the outputs of the (computer) model fit the observed data.” 3

A Spot Welding Example Consider a spot welding example from Bayarri et al. (2007). Two sheets of metal are compressed by water- cooled copper electrodes under an applied load. Control variables –Applied load –Direct current of magnitude Calibration parameter –Contact resistance at the faying surface 4

Notation and Assumptions 5

Parameter identifiability 6

7

Physical and Computer Experiments 8

Fill distance 9

Kernel Interpolation and Gaussian Process Models 10

Kennedy-O’Hagan Method 11

Technical Assumptions 12

Simplified Kennedy-O’Hagan Method 13

Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space 14

Limiting Value of Likelihood Calibration 15

Insight on calibration inconsistency 16

Comparison between two norms 17

An Illustrative Example 18

An Illustrative Example (cont’d) 19

Estimation Efficiency 20

21

22

Convergence Rate 23

Conclusions 24