Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Amber Malik Director Cath Lab Services Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore.
Advertisements

Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Chapter 26 Jean-Claude Tardif, Phillipe L. L’Allier, David.
North of Tyne anti-platelet guidelines: use in primary care Jane S Skinner Consultant Community Cardiologist.
Montalescot G et al. Lancet 2008;372:1-9. Mid- and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients treated with prasugrel, compared with clopidogrel and undergoing.
On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Long-term Outcomes of Patients with ACS and Chronic Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI and being treated with Bivalirudin vs UFH/Enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa.
A Risk Score for Predicting Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Sai Sadanandan, MD*; Christopher.
Current and Future Perspectives on Acute Coronary Syndromes Paul W. Armstrong MD AMI Quebec Montreal October 1, 2010.
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luigi Oltrona Visconti Divisione di Cardiologia IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo Pavia Sindromi coronariche acute nei pazienti con fibrillazione.
TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel TRITON-TIMI 38 TRITON-TIMI 38 Elliott M. Antman, MD.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Anterior Depressions Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Presenting with Anterior ST-Segment Depressions C.
Outcomes and Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Women Undergoing Fibrinolysis for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Jessica L. Mega, MD; David A. Morrow,
ACS is a major public health challenge In the US:  Over 1.5 million people experience ACS annually 1 In the EU:  ACS is the most common cause of death,
1 UFH is Superior to Placebo for Reducing Mortality and Reinfarction in MI Pts Effect / 1,000 Pts Rx’d Routine ASA 68,000 Pts 93% Lysis Rx Collins R, et.
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Zhen Huang, Pierluigi Tricoci, Frans Van de Werf, Harvey D. White, Paul W. Armstrong, Claes Held, Sergio Leonardi, Philip E. Aylward,
The Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Agents 2009 George D. Dangas, MD, PhD, FSCAI, FACC Associate Professor of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
Jacob A. Udell, MD, MPH, Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH, Jean-Philippe Collet, MD, PhD, A. Michael Lincoff, MD, Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, Francesco Costa, MD, Cheol.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Robert F. Storey Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Stent thrombosis Future directions.
1 Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction ExTRACT- TIMI 25 ACC 2006 Atlanta, GA Disclosure Statement: Dr. Antman received.
1 PCI in Patients Receiving Enoxaparin or UFH Following Fibrinolytic Therapy for STEMI: PCI ExTRACT-TIMI 25 C. Michael Gibson, Sabina A. Murphy, David.
TCT 2009 Stent Thrombosis Following Primary PCI in STEMI: Predictors, Clinical Impact and Preventive Strategies from the Horizons AMI Trial George D. Dangas,
Karlis TRUSINSKIS Interventional Cardiologist Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga, LATVIA ANTIAGREGANTS IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME.
What’s New in Acute Coronary Syndromes? Claudia Bucci BScPhm, PharmD Clinical Coordinator, Cardiovascular Diseases Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre 13.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
Baseline Characteristics Current or Former Smoker Diabetic Hypertension 25.7 Prior MI Prior Heart Failure.
TAXUS Landmark Analysis Impact of Long-Term Clopidogrel Usage on Death, Myocardial Infarction and Stent Thrombosis Gregg W. Stone, MD Stephen G. Ellis,
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Safety and Efficacy of Switching from Either UFH or Enoxaparin Plus a GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor to Bivalirudin Monotherapy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation.
The Risk of CV Events for Patients Treated with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in Combination with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Results from the TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial.
A Review of – Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ted Williams Pharm D Candidate Monday Lab.
1 Advanced Angioplasty London, England 27 January, 2006 Jörg Michael Rustige,MD Medical Director Lilly Critical Care Europe, Geneva.
Enoxaparin in primary PCI From FINESSE to ATOLL G. Montalescot Institut de Cardiologie Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Paris, France The FINESSE Trial is supported.
Trial Vignettes Cameron G Densem TRITON-TIMI 38 ARMYDA OPTIMA.
VBWG OASIS-6 The Sixth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Primary End Point (CV death, MI and stroke at 15 months) Adapted from Montalescot et al. ESC Time (days)
Gender Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following PCI of Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS: Results from the ACUITY Trial Alexandra J. Lansky on behalf.
Copyright ©2007 American Heart Association Wiviott SD et al, Circulation 2007 Copyright ©2007 American Heart Association Wiviott SD et al, Circulation.
M. Valgimigli, MD, PhD University of Ferrara, ITALY On behalf of the PRODIGY Investigators PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced.
TRITON-TIMI 38 AHA 2007 Orlando, Florida
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Clopidogrel Under Fire: Is Prasugrel in Primary PCI or Recent MI Superior? Insights From TRITON-TIMI-38 Gilles Montalescot,
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
Duration Safety and Efficacy of Bivalirudin in patients undergoing PCI: The impact of duration of infusion in ACUITY trial Dr. David Cox Lehigh Valley.
Reduction in recurrent cardiovascular events with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes from the TRITON-TIMI 38.
CHU TIMONE, Marseille, FR
Heparin Should be the First-line Therapy for Patients with ACS/AMI
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
Should We Preload STEMI Patients with Antiplatelet Therapy?
Which Antiplatelet Therapy for PCI?
The GRAVITAS trial Matthew J. Price MD, FACC, FSCAI
ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION 2-year- Versus 1year Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After DES implantation The randomized ARCTIC-Interruption Study JP Collet.
The Big Antiplatelet Debate Why I Prefer Prasugrel Over Ticagrelor
The ANTARCTIC investigators
Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives Variable Response to Clopidogrel.
Table. Clinical Efficacy and Safety
ANTARCTIC Trial design: Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting were randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n = 435) versus conventional.
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
Impact of Platelet Reactivity Following Clopidogrel Administration
Implications of Preoperative Thienopyridine Use
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
TRITON-TIMI 38 AHA 2007 Orlando, Florida
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Presentation transcript:

Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D. Wiviott, Elliott M. Antman, Ivan Horvath, Matyas Keltai, Jean- Paul R. Herrman, Frans van de Werf, William Downey, Benjamin M. Scirica, Sabina A. Murphy, Carolyn H. McCabe, Eugene Braunwald SCAI – ACCi Chicago, Illinois Disclosure Statement: The TRITON-TIMI 38 trial was supported by a research grant to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd and Eli Lilly & Co. STENT ANALYSIS

Main Trial Design Double-blind ACS (STEMI or UA/NSTEMI) & Planned PCI ASA PRASUGREL 60 mg LD/ 10 mg MD CLOPIDOGREL 300 mg LD/ 75 mg MD 1 o endpoint: CV death, MI, Stroke 2 o endpoint: Stent Thrombosis Safety endpoints: TIMI major bleeds, Life-threatening bleeds Duration of therapy: 6-15 months N= 13,608 Wiviott SD, Antman EM et al AHJ 2006 STENT ANALYSIS

Trial Organization Trial Leadership: TIMI Study Group Eugene Braunwald,Chairman, Elliott M. Antman, PI, Carolyn H. McCabe, Director, Stephen D. Wiviott, Gilles Montalescot, Sabina A. Murphy, Susan McHale Sponsors: Daiichi Sankyo and Eli Lilly J. Anthony Ware, Jeffrey Riesmeyer, William Macias, James Croaning, Govinda Weerakkody, Francis Plat, Tomas Bocanegra J. Anthony Ware, Jeffrey Riesmeyer, William Macias, James Croaning, Govinda Weerakkody, Francis Plat, Tomas Bocanegra Data Center and Site Management: Quintiles Inc Data Safety Monitoring Board David Williams (Chair), Christophe Bode, Spencer King, Ulrich Sigwart, David DeMets David Williams (Chair), Christophe Bode, Spencer King, Ulrich Sigwart, David DeMets STENT ANALYSIS

HR 0.81 ( ) P= Prasugrel Clopidogrel Days Endpoint (%) HR 1.32 ( ) P=0.03 Prasugrel Clopidogrel Main Trial: Primary Results CV Death / MI / Stroke TIMI Major NonCABG Bleeds Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al NEJM2007

Goals of Stent Analysis To compare the efficacy and safety of PRASUGREL and CLOPIDOGREL in 12,844 patients with at least one stent as part of the index procedure with respect to: Stent Thrombosis (ARC definitions) Ischemic Events, Bleeding Overall and stratified by stent type received STENT ANALYSIS

Patient Population Randomized 13,608 Stent Placed 12,844 (94%) STENT ANALYSIS BMS Only 6461 (47%) DES Only 5743 (42%) Both BMS/DES 640 (5%) PES Only 2766 (20%) SES Only 2454 (18%) Other/Mixed 523 (4%)

Any Stent (N=12844) 94 % UA/NSTEMI75 STEMI25 Age, median (IQR) > 75 y 60 (53,69) y 13 Female26 Diabetes23 Smoker38 North America32 Prior MI17 CrCl (ml/min) >60 < Baseline Characteristics STENT ANALYSIS

Key Efficacy, Safety EP: Stratified by Stent Type CVD/MI/CVANon-CABG TIMI Major Bleeding STENT ANALYSIS HR 0.80 ( ) p=0.003 HR 0.82 ( ) p=0.02 HR 1.37 ( ) p=0.09 HR 1.19 ( ) p=0.34 N=6461 N=5743 CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL % of Subjects

ARC ST Definitions Blinded CEC review of using source documents incl imaging reports: Definite: total occlusion w/in or < 5 mm of the stent or thrombus w/in or< 5 mm of the stent AND a clinical syndrome <48 h. Probable: unexplained death < 30 days or MI in stented territory w/o angiographic confirmation ST AND w/o alternative cause Possible: unexplained death > 30 days following stenting Early: 0 – 30 days after randomization Late > 30 days after randomization (landmark analysis) Based on ARC Definitions Mauri L et al NEJM 2007 STENT ANALYSIS

Death Following ST Mortality During Follow up (%) Post-Stent Thrombosis STENT ANALYSIS N=210N=12634 HR 13.1 (9.8 – 17.5) P< % of Subjects

Definite/Probable ST: Any Stent (N=12844) % of Subjects HR 0.48 [ ] P< year: 1.06 vs 2.15% HR 0.48 [ ], P< % 1.13% 52% STENT ANALYSIS DAYS CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Definite/Probable ST: Any Stent (N=12844) % of Subjects HR 0.41 [ ] P< HR 0.60 [ ] P=0.03 DAYS EARLY STLATE ST STENT ANALYSIS 1.56% 0.64% 59% 0.82% 0.49% 40% CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Stent Thrombosis By ARC Category (N=12844) STENT ANALYSIS DEF/PROB HR 0.48 ( ) P< DEFINITE HR 0.42 ( ) P< DEF/PROB/POSS HR 0.56 ( ) P< CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL % of Subjects

Stent Thrombosis Subgroups STENT ANALYSIS PRASUGREL BETTER CLOPIDOGREL BETTER PRASCLOPRISK (%) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

Definite/Probable ST: DES Only (N=5743) % of Subjects HR 0.36 [ ] P< year: 0.74% vs 2.05% HR 0.35 [ ], P< % 0.84% 64% STENT ANALYSIS DAYS CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Definite/Probable ST: DES Only (N=5743) % of Subjects HR 0.29 [ ] P= HR 0.46 [ ] P=0.04 DAYS STENT ANALYSIS EARLY STLATE ST 1.44% 0.42% 71% 0.91% 0.42% 54% CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Stent Thrombosis DES Subtypes Trial Duration STENT ANALYSIS N=2454 N=2766 Sirolimus Only HR 0.33 ( ) p=0.004 Paclitaxel Only HR 0.33 ( ) p=0.002 CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL 67% % of Subjects

2.41% 1.27% Definite/Probable ST: BMS Only (N=6461) % of Subjects HR 0.52 [ ] P= year: 1.22 vs 2.27% HR 0.53 [ ], P= % STENT ANALYSIS DAYS CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Definite/Probable ST: BMS Only (N=6461) % of Subjects HR 0.45 [ ] P= HR 0.68 [ ] P=0.24 DAYS STENT ANALYSIS EARLY STLATE ST 1.66% 0.75% 55% 0.78% 0.53% 32% CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Summary Intensive antiplatelet therapy with PRASUGREL in stented patients compared to CLOPIDOGREL: Substantial reduction in ST: Regardless of stent type or ST definition Early and Late A broad range of clinical/procedural characteristics Fewer ischemic events, more major bleeding STENT ANALYSIS

Balance of Efficacy and Safety (Stented Population) STENT ANALYSIS Stent Thrombosis CVD/MI/CVA w/o ST Events per 1000 patients treated

Conclusions/Implications Stent Thrombosis is a rare, but devastating complication of PCI associated with a high mortality. Efforts to reduce ST have focused on compliance w/ and duration of ASA/clopidogrel Our data indicate that an agent w/ more rapid, consistent, and greater inhibition of platelet aggregation (prasugrel) results in major reductions (~50%) in ST across a broad array of clinical procedural characteristics STENT ANALYSIS

STENT ANALYSIS

Clinical Endpoints Net Clinical Benefit STENT ANALYSIS HR 0.88 ( ) p=0.07 HR 0.86 ( ) p=0.002 HR 0.84 ( ) p=0.025 N=12844 N=6461 N=5743 % of Subjects

Primary EP (D/MI/CVA) Not Related to ST % of Subjects 10.3% 8.7% 15% HR 0.85, P=0.005 STENT ANALYSIS DAYS CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL

Key Efficacy, Safety EP: Stratified by Stent Type CVD/MI/CVAMajor Bleeding STENT ANALYSIS HR 0.80 ( ) p=0.003 HR 0.81 ( ) p= HR 0.82 ( ) p=0.02 HR 1.37 ( ) p=0.09 HR 1.27 ( ) p=0.06 HR 1.19 ( ) p=0.34 N=12844 N=6461 N=5743 CLOPIDOGREL PRASUGREL