Inference for Two Proportions Chapter 22

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10, part D. IV. Inferences about differences between two population proportions You will have two population proportions, p1 and p2. The true.
Advertisements

Inference on Proportions. What are the steps for performing a confidence interval? 1.Assumptions 2.Calculations 3.Conclusion.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Remember: We will be intereste d in the differen ce of means, so we will use this to find standard error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Hypothesis Testing Using a Single Sample.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 22 – April 10, 2008.
H0: p1 = p2 Ha: p1 > p2 WARM – UP
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II. Chapter Outline  Introduction  Hypothesis Testing with Sample Means (Large Samples)  Hypothesis Testing with Sample.
5-3 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Unknown
Two-Sample Proportions Inference Notes: Page 211.
One Sample  M ean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples  M eans, Variances, Proportions μ1 vs. μ2 σ12 vs. σ22 π1 vs. π Multiple.
Two-Sample Proportions Inference. Sampling Distributions for the difference in proportions When tossing pennies, the probability of the coin landing on.
Ch 10 Comparing Two Proportions Target Goal: I can determine the significance of a two sample proportion. 10.1b h.w: pg 623: 15, 17, 21, 23.
10.3 Estimating a Population Proportion
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
CHAPTER 21: Comparing Two Proportions
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 2 – Slide 1 of 25 Chapter 11 Section 2 Inference about Two Means: Independent.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Two-Sample Procedures with means two treatments two populationsThe goal of these inference procedures is to.
Comparing Two Population Means
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis tests with Proportions.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
Chapter 10 Inferences from Two Samples
Inference for Proportions One Sample. Confidence Intervals One Sample Proportions.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Suppose we have a population of adult men with a mean height of 71 inches and standard deviation of 2.6 inches.
Biostatistics Class 6 Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Inference 2/29/2000.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section Inference about Two Means: Independent Samples 11.3.
Confidence Intervals and Tests of Proportions. Assumptions for inference when using sample proportions: We will develop a short list of assumptions for.
Chapter 22 Two-Sample Proportions Inference. Steps for doing a confidence interval: 1)State the parameter 2)Assumptions – 1) The samples are chosen randomly.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Remember: We will be interested in the difference of means, so we will use this to find standard error.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions. Yet Another Standard Deviation (YASD) Standard deviation of the sampling distribution The variance of the sum or.
Inference about a Population Proportion BPS chapter 19 © 2010 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Section A Confidence Interval for the Difference of Two Proportions Objectives: 1.To find the mean and standard error of the sampling distribution.
2 sample interval proportions sample Shown with two examples.
Inference on Proportions. Assumptions: SRS Normal distribution np > 10 & n(1-p) > 10 Population is at least 10n.
Suppose we have a population of adult men with a mean height of 71 inches and standard deviation of 2.6 inches. We also have a population of adult women.
Two-Sample Proportions Inference. Sampling Distributions for the difference in proportions When tossing pennies, the probability of the coin landing.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Warm Up In May 2006, the Gallup Poll asked 510 randomly sampled adults the question “Generally speaking, do you believe the death penalty is applied fairly.
Chapter 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups Sect 10.1 Comparing two proportions.
Comparing Two Proportions Chapter 21. In a two-sample problem, we want to compare two populations or the responses to two treatments based on two independent.
Two-Sample Proportions Inference. Conditions TwoindependentTwo independent SRS’s (or randomly assigned treatments) Populations > 10n Both sampling dist.’s.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Two-Sample Procedures with means two treatments two populationsThe goal of these inference procedures is to.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Two-Sample Procedures with Means two differentGoal: Compare two different populations/treatments INDEPENDENT.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Two-Sample Proportions Inference
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Two-Sample Proportions Inference
Two-Sample Proportions Inference
STAT 312 Chapter 7 - Statistical Intervals Based on a Single Sample
Comparing Two Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 8: Inference for Proportions
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Interval Estimation Part II
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Inference on Proportions
Two-Sample Proportions Inference
Two-Sample Hypothesis Test with Means
Two-Sample Hypothesis Test of Proportions
Two-Sample Proportions Inference
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Inference on Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Inference on Proportions Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Test
Inference on Proportions
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means
Presentation transcript:

Inference for Two Proportions Chapter 22

Conditions: Two, independent SRS’s from populations Each sample <10% of Population 10 successes and failures for each

Formula for confidence interval: Margin of error! Standard error!

Example 1: At Community Hospital, the burn center is experimenting with a new plasma compress treatment. A random sample of 316 patients with minor burns received the plasma compress treatment. Of these patients, it was found that 259 had no visible scars after treatment. Another random sample of 419 patients with minor burns received no plasma compress treatment. For this group, it was found that 94 had no visible scars after treatment. What is the shape & standard error of the sampling distribution of the difference in the proportions of people with visible scars between the two groups? Since n1p1=259, n1(1-p1)=57, n2p2=94, n2(1-p2)=325 and all > 10, then the sampling distribution of difference in proportions is approximately normal.

Example 1: At Community Hospital, the burn center is experimenting with a new plasma compress treatment. A random sample of 316 patients with minor burns received the plasma compress treatment. Of these patients, it was found that 259 had no visible scars after treatment. Another random sample of 419 patients with minor burns received no plasma compress treatment. For this group, it was found that 94 had no visible scars after treatment. What is a 95% confidence interval of the difference in proportion of people who have no visible scars after having the plasma compress treatment versus no treatment?

p1 = true proportion of patients who received the plasma treatment and showed no visible scars p2 = true proportion of patients who did not receive the plasma treatment and showed no visible scars Conditions: We have 2 random samples of burn patients It is reasonable to assume that the samples are independent Assume both 316 patients and 419 patients are <10% of their respective populations. The sampling distribution of the difference in proportions is approximately normal since

We are 95% confident that the true difference in the proportion of people who have no visible scars after the plasma compress treatment versus no treatment is between 53.7% and 65.4% We are 95% confident that between 53.7% and 65.4% more patients who receive the plasma compress will have no visible scars than patients who receive no treatment.

SO – which is correct? CIA = (.67, .83) CIB =(.52, .70) Example 2: Researchers comparing the effectiveness of two pain medications randomly selected a group of patients who had been complaining of a certain kind of joint pain. They randomly divided these people into two groups, and then administered the painkillers. Of the 112 people in the group who received medication A, 84 said this pain reliever was effective. Of the 108 people in the other group, 66 reported that pain reliever B was effective. a) Construct separate 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of people who reported that the pain reliever was effective. Based on these intervals how do the proportions of people who reported pain relieve with medication A or medication B compare? b) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of people who may find these medications effective. SO – which is correct? CIA = (.67, .83) CIB =(.52, .70) Since the intervals overlap, it appears that there is no difference in the proportion of people who reported pain relieve between the two medicines. CI = (0.017, 0.261) Since zero is not in the 95% confidence interval, there is evidence of a difference in the proportion of people who reported pain relief between the two medicines.

Example 3: Suppose that researchers want to estimate the difference in proportions of people who are against the death penalty in Texas & in California. If the two sample sizes are the same, what size sample is needed to be within 2% of the true difference at 90% confidence? Since both n’s are the same size, you have common denominators – so add! n = 3383

Hypothesis statements: H0: p1 = p2 or H0: p1 - p2 = 0 HA: p1 > p2 or HA: p1 - p2 > 0 HA: p1 < p2 or HA: p1 - p2 < 0 HA: p1 ≠ p2 or HA: p1 - p2 ≠ 0 Be sure to define both p1 & p2!

Since we assume that the population proportions are equal in the null hypothesis, the variances are equal. Therefore, we pool the variances!

Formula for Hypothesis test: p1 = p2 So . . . p1 – p2 =0

Example 4: A forest in Oregon has an infestation of spruce moths Example 4: A forest in Oregon has an infestation of spruce moths. In an effort to control the moth, one area has been regularly sprayed from airplanes. In this area, a random sample of 495 spruce trees showed that 81 had been killed by moths. A second nearby area receives no treatment. In this area, a random sample of 518 spruce trees showed that 92 had been killed by the moth. Do these data indicate that the proportion of spruce trees killed by the moth is different for these areas?

p1 = the true proportion of trees killed by moths in the treated area p2 = the true proportion of trees killed by moths in the untreated area H0: p1-p2=0 HA: p1-p2≠0 Conditions: Have 2 random samples The 2 samples are independent We assume both samples are <10% of each population. The sampling distribution of the difference in proportions is approximately normal since

P-value = 0.5547 a = 0.05 Since my p-value > a, I fail to reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to suggest that the proportion of spruce trees killed by the moth is different between the treated and untreated areas

Example 5: A Gallup Poll taken in May 2000 asked the question: “In general, do you feel that the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made: more strict, less strict, or kept as they are now?” Of the 493 men who responded, 52% said “more strict,” while of the 538 women who responded, 72% said “more strict.” Assuming these respondents constitute random samples of U.S. men and women, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a higher proportion of women than men in the population think these laws should be made more strict? Justify your answer.