Promising Practices in Coaching OSEP Project Director’s Conference State Deaf Blind Projects Meeting July 24, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:
Purpose of Instruction
Northeast Regional Program in Charles City Questions & Answers.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
One professional provides weekly support to the family, backed up by a team of other professionals who provide services to the child and family through.
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Teaming and Team Meetings. Objectives To understand the characteristics of team based early intervention To understand who is on the early intervention.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
+ REFLECTIVE COACHING APRIL 29, Goals for Today Check in on where everyone is in our self-guided learning and practice with reflective coaching.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Response to Intervention
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
The Process of Coaching Dathan Rush, MA, CCC-SLP M’Lisa Shelden, PT, PhD.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Developmentally Appropriate Practices Cynthia Daniel
D. JAY GENSE & MARK SCHALOCK NCDB: TEACHING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY BARBARA PURVIS NCDB: HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER USING EVIDENCE-BASED.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
Understanding Positive Behavior Support Closing the Gap Conference November 12, 2009 Pamela A. Clark, MSW.
Specialized Personnel Working with Children Who Have Deaf Blindness.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
COACHING IN CHILD WELFARE MARCH 21, DEFINITION OF COACHING.
OSEP Project Director’s Conference State Deaf Blind Projects Meeting July 24, 2008.
We will start shortly. Feel free to relax and chat while you wait for class to begin. Our agenda for tonight’s seminar is to discuss Response to Intervention,
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Kathy Hogan, Ph.D. Early Childhood Advisory April 30, 2015.
MENTORING NEW TEACHERS Heidi Daniels and Jane Meyer Canton City School District ABLE.
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Authentic Assessment in Early Intervention
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Introductions Introduction
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Introductions Introduction
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Promising Practices in Coaching OSEP Project Director’s Conference State Deaf Blind Projects Meeting July 24, 2008

Session is in response to absolute priority… “Provide information and TA, including distance learning activities and ongoing professional development opportunities paired with on-site coaching, to family members…,early intervention, special and regular education, and related services personnel….”

Introduction to coaching Proposed coaching strategies DB project role in state coaching model Examples of distance coaching strategies Examples of current strategies Discussion/problem solving Topics – Back to Basics Agenda

Introduction to Coaching MaryAnn Demchak University of Nevada, Reno Nevada Dual Sensory Impairment Project

Session introduces… Coaching and what it is Purposes of coaching Characteristics of effective coaching Important considerations Thoughts on evaluating coaching programs

What is coaching? “An adult learning strategy in which a coach promotes the learner’s ability to reflect on his or her actions as a means to determine the effectiveness of an action or practice and develop a plan for refinement and use of the action in immediate and future situations.” (Rush, 2003, cited in Rush & Shelden, 2005)

What is an instructional coach? “Someone whose …responsibility is to bring practices that have been studied using a variety of research methods into classrooms by working with adults rather than students.” (From Kowal, J., & Steiner, J. (2007). Issue brief: instructional coaching. Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Retrieved from ew&id=366&Itemid=98 on April 15, 2008.) ew&id=366&Itemid=98

Coaching is an approach that emphasizes… An adult learning model/strategy Evidenced-based topics or focus Reflection on one’s actions Implementation and refinement of actions in immediate and future environments Feedback

Purposes of coaching can be to … Improve test scores; Mentor new teachers; Ensure that curriculum is understood and used correctly; Ensure that appropriate instructional strategies are understood and used; and/or Ensure use of evidence-based practices All of the above: an attempt to bridge the “knowing-doing” gap

Characteristics of Effective Coaching 1. Involves collaborative planning 2. Facilitates development of a vision 3. Characterized by data-based learning (adults and children) (Adapted from Shanklin, 2006)

Characteristics of Effective Coaching 4. On-going, job-embedded professional learning that increases capacity to meet child needs 5. Involves observations 6. Is supportive, not evaluative (Adapted from Shanklin, 2006)

What might a coach do? Meet to plan collaboratively the focus of coaching; establish priorities Model effective strategies Co-plan regarding implementation Observe recipients of the coaching Discuss / reflect / provide feedback Continue to be available and involved

A Few Important Considerations 1. What are the intended purposes of the coaching program? 2. How do you decide on the topics/issues for coaching? 3. What are the intended outcomes of the coaching program for students, families, teachers, coaches, and administrators?

A Few Important Considerations 4. What are the ongoing professional learning opportunities for coaches, families, teachers, and administrators? 5. How will evidence of effectiveness be gathered?

More on Evaluation Do participants value their coaches? Do the participants change their practices? Does child behavior change?

Final Comments Coaching is not a quick fix Coaching is part of an on-going professional development model There are a number of different approaches to coaching  All approaches have common features Ultimate outcome is to change adult behavior in order to enhance child outcomes

Nevada’s Plans for Implementing Coaching

Elko - 2 Eureka - 1 Ely - 2 Winnemucca - 3 Pahrump - 1 Las Vegas – 60 (School district & early intervention) Reno – 11 Carson City & Dayton - 4 Minden - 2 Fallon - 2 Silver Springs - 3

Part B Initiative Year 1 – Pilot  Developing on-site coaching model within on- going professional development approach Selection of one pilot team to receive training (content and how to coach) Face-to-face “kick-off” training On-line training and information continued through a combination of webinars and WebCampus Second face-to-face training about mid-year Continuation of on-line information and training “Visits”- on-site and via technology by project director Evaluate

Part B Initiative Year 2  Summer institute with assistance of Year 1 team Next team targeted to become coaches as well as Broader audience of interested service providers and family members  Year 1 team begins to provide training and coaching (within own district)  Make necessary modifications to Year 1 piloted model  Continue support and training of Year 1 team as well as provide to Year 2 team

Part B Initiative Years 3 thru 5  Continue professional development and coaching model Refine model based on evaluation data Expand to other districts or schools

Part C Initiative Piloting a model within one EI agency  Core team with members with specialized training in sensory impairments, but not deafblindness Project director acting as coach to team members EI members acting as coaches to other EI staff  Training (in-person and on-line) to EI team members  Modeling interaction, instructional, etc. strategies  Regularly scheduled home visits for project director and EI team members  Videotaping