TOF (and Global) PID F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Html version of the presentation For virtual participants in TOFWEB/ALI-Off/venusians.html.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Anomalous Pion Production in High Energy Particle Collisions Alexander Bylinkin, Andrey Rostovtsev XV Moscow School of Physics XXXX ITEP Winter School.
PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.
MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
PHYSTAT 05P. Catastini Bias-Free Estimation in Multicomponent Maximum Likelihood Fits with Component-Dependent Templates Pierluigi Catastini I.N.F.N. -
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
Previous Work. Gauss fit with pion, proton, electron.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
THE PHYSICS OF THE ALICE INNER TRACKING SYSTEM Elena Bruna, for the ALICE Collaboration Yale University 24 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, South.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Non-identified Two Particle Correlations from Run I Understanding drift chamber tracking – Tracker and candidatory – Two particle efficiencies/ghosts A.
SQM2004, Cape Town, Sept. 16, 2004 STAR 1 Cronin Effect for the identified particles from 200 GeV d+Au collisions Xiangzhou Cai Shanghai INstitute of Applied.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering.
Fast Simulation of TOF Response A.Galoyan, LPP, JINR, Dubna Used model.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
Properties conserved in Strong and EM interactions
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Experimental data by HADES PID method As an example let`s take deuterons and protons with p = 750 MeV/c. Their PDFs are gaussians with mean at β = p/(
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
A search for strange tribaryonic states in the reaction Heejoong Yim Seoul National University For KEK-PS E549 collaboration.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
Light Nuclei Spectra in STAR Run5 62GeV Cu+Cu Experiments Jianhang Zhou Rice University.
P/in BRAHMS at forward y Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Meeting V0 Daughter PID by TPC dEdx:pp real data By AliTPCIDResponse (aleph parameterization), 4 sigma Daughter PID cuts With this K0s candidates,
FRANCESCO NOFERINI (INFN CNAF – INFN BOLOGNA) 08/12/2009 ALICE TOF - general meeting - F. Noferini - GRID and resonances GRID and  analysis in pp 1.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
Fall DNP Meeting,  meson production in Au-Au and d-Au collision at \ /s NN = 200 GeV Dipali Pal Vanderbilt University (for the PHENIX collaboration)
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
for Particle Identification
Kaon and Phi production in p-C and p-W reactions A
Status Report Fenfen An
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
Event “zero-time” determination with TOF detector
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
Λ 1520 Invariant Mass Analisys
for the PHENIX collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p
Presentation transcript:

TOF (and Global) PID F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003

Summary and Highlights TOF-PID Probability approach has been implemented (on time-of-flight basis), so TOF is ready to provide its own probability; A more general approach to TOF PID (based on various particle bands) has been considered; Global (TOF+TPC+ITS) PID is “in fieri” and results are on the way;

Definition of Probability for (from) TOF From track length and momentum (given by reconstruction), and after a mass hypothesis for the current track, it is possible to derive the corresponding (“a priori”) time-of-flight; A gaussian is generated around the measured time-of-flight, with a (fixed for each track) sigma equal to to the current measurement of the (mean) double-stack MRPC resolution; Probabilities (after normalization) are derived from the gaussian in the previously calculated “a priori” times-of-flight

i.e.

General Constraint on Probability Space from previous definition Positivness and unitarity

Distribution of Probabilities for Pions (100 HIJING ev, B=0.4T)

Distribution of Probabilities for Kaons

Distribution of Probabilities for Protons

Expected anticorrelation on Probability space

TOF PID TOF PID “stand alone” is based (at least for kaons and protons) on particle bands in a given scatter plot (usually m vs p); Contour cuts are introduced to define regions where a particle is said to be of a certain type (or not to be of a certain other type); The contour cuts themselves are arbitrary (in the sense that they depend on the physical problem);

TOF PID Moreover, PID based on contour cuts (2D, for the time being) is not the unique way to do PID (see e.g. the probability approach with which a “combination” of different detectors is possible, no cuts at all needed) In any case, it is worth to introduce some generalization on particle bands (and not limit ourselves exclusively on reconstructed mass vs momentum scatter plot)

(e.g.) Time of Flight Spectra (250 HIJING ev., B=0.4T) Momentum vs Time-of-Flight: separation of the “bands” at high momentum (low particle statistics) 1/Momentum vs Time-of-Flight: separation of the “bands” at low momentum (large particle statistics)

More on Bands for TOF PID (as in PHENIX) Momentum vs Mass Momentum vs Square Mass Momentum vs Time-of-Flight difference from electron 1/Momentum vs Time-of-Flight difference from electron 1/() vs Momentum

Mass Hypothesis and time of flight Back step to probability approach based on times of flight; Measured time-of-flight and à priori time-of-flight difference (mass hypothesis: pion, kaon, proton); Bands for different particle types appear also there.

Example of Global PID dE/dX from ITS-TPC Reconstructed Momentum Mass from Time-of-Flight Notice that different combinations are possible (see the section on ‘bands’) Moreover, if dE/dX is profitable for TOF (it provides a separation at low momentum –large statistics-, where TOF PID contamination is “high” for protons and kaons), the reverse is also true (TOF provides a separation in another “direction”, “mass direction” in this case).