Barbara J Pettitt, MD Emory University Dept. of Surgery Atlanta GA April 24, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Course Design Online Course Design EVALUATION AND REVISION
Advertisements

Assessing Student Performance
Understanding Grade Level and School Growth Reports Office of Assessment and Accountability.
S tructured O bjective C linical E xamination SOC E.
Grading. Why do we grade? To communicate To tell students how they are doing To tell parents how students are doing To make students uneasy To wield power.
Clinical Skills Verification rater Training MODULE 2 Training Faculty Evaluators of Clinical Skills: Drivers of Change in Assessment Joan Anzia, M.D. Tony.
Retooling Health Assessment: It Takes More Than a Hammer Cheryl Wilson MSN, ARNP, ANP-BC.
Classroom Assessment (1)
Objective vs. subjective in assessment Jaime Correia de Sousa, MD, MPH Horizonte Family Health Unit Matosinhos Health Centre - Portugal Health Sciences.
UCD School of Medicine “Criterion Based” vs. “Norm-Based” Evaluation David L Gaspar MD October 18, 2008.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Standardized Testing Chapter 14.
CBES Essentials for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty A 10-minute primer on student performance assessment in required clerkships Stanford School of Medicine.
Comparison: Traditional vs. Outcome Project Evaluative Processes Craig McClure, MD Educational Outcomes Service Group University of Arizona December 2004.
Assessment of clinical skills Joseph Cacciottolo Josanne Vassallo UNIVERSITY OF MALTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE - OSLO - MAY 2007.
11/08/ Individualisation-Standardisation 11/08/
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION
PROFESSIONALISM EDUCATION: POSSIBLE COMPETENCIES Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Co-Secretary APHC Conference May 3, 2013.
Fundamentals of Assessment Todd L. Green, Ph.D. Associate Professor Pharmacology, Physiology & Toxicology PIES Seminar
Assessment Tools. Contents Overview Objectives What makes for good assessment? Assessment methods/Tools Conclusions.
Core Competency Assessment in Emergency Medicine from Design to Implementation National Hispanic Medical Conference Christian Arbelaez, MD, MPH Associate.
Educational Psychology, 11 th Edition ISBN © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Classroom Assessment, Grading, and Standardized.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
Establishing Content Validity of a Novel Written Examination to Assess Medical Students on the Surgery Clerkship A Berlin MD, A Reinert BA, A Swan-Sein.
Assessment Tools for EC-8 Summer Institute. Is Assessment for EC-8 Necessary? Why should we make young children “test anxious?” What purpose do assessments.
Instrument Validity & Reliability. Why do we use instruments? Reliance upon our senses for empirical evidence Senses are unreliable Senses are imprecise.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
The World of Assessment Consider the options! Scores based on developmental levels of academic achievement Age-Equivalent scores.
Assessment tool OSCE AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
1 Ambulatory Pediatric Association Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency Tutorial 5 Written by Constance D. Baldwin, Ph.D., Carol Carraccio, M.D.,
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
Background: As students complete their clerkships throughout their M3 year they gain in clinical experience and confidence, which may translate into improved.
Assessment in Education Patricia O’Sullivan Office of Educational Development UAMS.
Understanding the TerraNova Test Testing Dates: May Kindergarten to Grade 2.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Assessment and Grading A student gets a “B” in Chemistry 11. What does this mean?
Inter-Rater Reliability Respiratory Ivy Tech Community College-Indianapolis.
Developing an Assessment System B. Joyce, PhD 2006.
Chapter 7 Instrumentation. Empirical Data We need DATA We can’t rely solely upon our senses We develop INSTRUMENTS to compensate for the limitations of.
John Doe’s Educational Achievement Data Competency based CanMeds ACGME STARs (Statements of Awarded Responsibility) Event based.
Assessment Tools.
Assessing Your Learner Lawrence R. Schiller, MD, FACG Digestive Health Associates of Texas Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
CBEI Essentials for residents, fellows, and faculty A 10-minute primer on the Criterion-Based Evaluation Initiative and student performance assessment.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
Why So Much Attention on Rubric Quality? CAEP Standard 5, Component 5.2: The provider’s quality assurance system relies on relevant, verifiable, representative,
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
New Faculty Orientation August 2015 Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities.
PSYCHOMETRICS. SPHS 5780, LECTURE 6: PSYCHOMETRICS, “STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT”, NORM-REFERENCED TESTING.
Educational Research Chapter 8. Tools of Research Scales and instruments – measure complex characteristics such as intelligence and achievement Scales.
Chapter 7 Criterion-Referenced Measurement PoorSufficientBetter.
GRADING n n Grading that reflects the actual ability of the student n n Grading as a personal communication.
Developing Rubrics Using a Collaborative Interview Naomi L. Lacy & Anna M. Arroyave Paul L Foster School of Medicine Texas Tech University Health Science.
Defining Grades in the Surgery Clerkship Jeremy M. Lipman, MD MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
S tructured O bjective C linical E xamination P ractical.
Remediation & Standard Setting in Clerkships Laszlo Kiraly MD FACS Associate Professor of Surgery Oregon Health & Science University.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
ASSESSMENT METHODS – Chapter 10 –.
FEC Student and Faculty Forum Should We Change the Medical Student Grading System? How we arrived here… and Where we are going… Revisiting Lauren Wolchok’s.
Objective vs Subjective
Evaluating Learners Jennifer L. Middleton, MD, MPH, FAAFP
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
ACGME & OSCE Use of OSCE in Residency Evaluations
Surviving the LCME VISIT Lessons Learned
CBEI Essentials for Residents, Fellows, Advanced Practice Providers, and Faculty A 10-minute primer on student performance assessment in required clerkships.
Competency, Milestones, and Credentialing: Evaluations and Simulation
Evaluation Rating Forms
Weighted as 40% of final clerkship grade.
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Presentation transcript:

Barbara J Pettitt, MD Emory University Dept. of Surgery Atlanta GA April 24, 2015

Objectives  Why, and to whom, is assessment important?  What are the components of good assessment?  What are some common assessment tools used in clerkships?  How is grading different than assessment?  What are some common challenges in assessing students?

Assessing Students: Who Cares?  Students  Faculty and residents  SOM: Dean, P & P, other CDs  LCME  Program Directors  Public and Future Patients!

Assess for…  Level of achievement: pass/fail, competence, mastery  Trajectory  Need for remediation  Those who should not continue  LORs  Grade assignment

Components of Good Assessment  Know the student  Agree on expectations/outcomes  Agree on assessment tools, their use & limitations  Multiple observations: tasks, occasions  Observe after feedback Give early, give often, sit down, say “I am…”

Types of Assessment  Formative Objective, non-evaluative Meant to improve skills/performance Feedback given early and often  Summative Judgment about how well/poorly student has met goal(s) Pass/fail or grade High stakes

Assessment tools should be…  Valid Measures what you intend it to, distinguishes novice and expert performance  Reliable Over time and rater  User-friendly Do I have the time, faculty, money, etc.?

Even the Romans recognized… …the problems of inter- and intra-rater reliability: “Si duo idem vident, non est idem” If two people see the same thing, it is not the same thing (Like the blind guys & the elephant)

Assessment tools should be…  Easily understood By raters & students  Faculty agreement Requires training! Scales, descriptors, behaviors, levels, standards Use of national/organizational standards Local consensus Don’t ask faculty to assess what they can’t observe!

Above all…  Be transparent  Be consistent

Common Tools in Clerkships  NBME Surgery Subject Examination Vs. self-written MCQ exams  Objective, standardized exams OSCE OSATS  Oral exams  Clinical evaluations Scaled items Global scores

Common Tools in Clerkships  Case reports/write-ups  Patient logs  Checklists Good for behaviors that can be broken down, sequenced

Some thoughts on grading…

“Assessment is objective… …Grading is a political act.” Steve Downing, PhD Psychometrician

Grading Implies comparison  To external (“gold”) standard: “criterion- referenced”  To others in a group: “norm-referenced” or “normative”

Grading Implies value judgment  What is failing? (“Cut point”)  How many might be expected to or should fail?  How many can be permitted to fail? Some? None?

Grading Implies stratification  Levels above passing Honors, high pass, pass A, B, C, D  Who sets levels? How? Percent students assigned each level? Is A the very highest student(s) or students achieving mastery?

Grading Normative  Good: large population, “bell-shaped”  Not so good: small, homogeneous  Students uncertain where they stand  Competition for limited resources (i.e., A’s)

Grading  Grading “on the curve” Normative grading at it’s best or worst Compensating for an inadequate assessment tool (test)???

Grading Criterion-referenced  The bar is set  Theoretically, every student could get an A (or could fail)  No uncertainty  Collaboration encouraged

Grading  Problem: where the bar is set Consensus Normative standards (!) Other factors  Example: grading the Surgery Shelf Exam

Grading the Surgery Shelf Exam  100 questions  Raw score compared to previous academic year same-quarter national cohort  Yields percentile  75 th percentile is an A – why 75 th ? Why percentile?

Common challenges Faculty who don’t, or won’t agree Getting clinical evaluations back Resources to do OSCEs, oral exams or just about anything else Logistical help Knowing how to assess the assessments Setting grades “But I worked REALLY hard!”

Summary  Many stakeholders and multiple uses for student assessments  Good assessment: multiple data points, valid tools, agreement on outcome, knowledge of student  Grading: comparison and value judgment  Transparency and consistency are key

Questions?