Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
Advertisements

Integrated Coastal Zone Management Unit 7: Integrated coastal planning.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
2A. Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.
Objectives Define collaboration as it relates to parent leadership and collaboration in a variety of settings Learn about the defining characteristics.
Educational Psychology revision session
Implementing the ASCA National Model
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
2A-1. Develop a Formal Action Plan: Strategy Selection Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
The Why, What, When & How The Why, What, When & How Midori Paxton & Doley Tshering Regional Technical Adviser Ecosystems and Biodiversity CBPF-MSL Programme.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
©2013 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Reflection and roadmap: CFR assessment and roadmap development.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Working sessions: Case example.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Stakeholders and institutions. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
LEADERSHIP. Bass' (1989 & 1990) Theory of Leadership (1989 & 1990)(1989 & 1990) There are three basic ways to explain how people become leaders. Some.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this lesson is to acquaint learners with the roles of the ‘STAKEHOLDERS’ in the business environment. The typical high street.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Goals & Strategies © Foundations of Success December 2008.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Implementing the ASCA National Model The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 7 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use.
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Module II.1 Stocktaking Trainer: [Name]
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
WORLD HERITAGE - EXPERT MEETING ON BENCHMARKS
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
Module IV.3 NAP Implementation Trainer: [Name]
Module I.5 Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In Trainer: [Name] Country teams that want to realize key NAP tasks need to have a good.
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
Step 4 Intervention design
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
Four-step approach (2) Identify adaptation options
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch 2013

Credits and conditions of use 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. - The Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors3

Learning objectives Participants are able to explain the rationale for this step important to assess future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors as a basis for the formulation of proactive strategies. Participants have the skills to guide the project team through the rating process using the relevant rating criteria for future criticality. 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors4

? Outline What does analysing the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors mean? Why do we analyse the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors? How do we analyse the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors? Practical Tips 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors5

? What does analysing the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors mean? Attempt to add information to stresses/ threats/ contributing factors in order to recognise most relevant impacting factors to biodiversity object Taking possible future developments into account 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors6 Today Tomorrow ? © Christina Lehmann 2014

? Why do we analyse the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors? To judge about the future criticality of certain elements in the conceptual model and identify lever elements that may become more important in the future (increasing relevance) To be able to focus on certain elements in the strategy development in order to achieve sustainable/ conservational goals To increase the awareness towards possible future trends that e.g. need to be kept or improved 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors7

? How do we analyse the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors? Discussions and consensual decisions about the future criticality of each factor, threat and stress → how “dangerous” will this factor/ threat/ stress possibly be for the biodiversity object and its key ecological attributes? 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014 Based on: best-guess approach → no empirically derived out- comes necessary Most plausible (current) future scenarios The judgement for future criti- cality does not imply a separate ranking of scope, severity, irreversibility (just as for past criticality), as it is done for current criticality

? How do we analyse the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors? Results are recorded in rating matrix of MARISCO cards as well as in an Excel spreadsheet Rating categories for “Future criticality”: 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors9 © CEEM 2014

? Practical Tips The participants should rate this aspect according to the current situation → They should imagine the future condition without any management or intervention from humans → It is supposed to show how dangerous a continuation of the present behaviour can be 12. Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors10