Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Instrumentation and controls challenges Juan Casas CERN AT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
André Augustinus 16 June 2003 DCS Workshop Safety.
Advertisements

Data Acquisition Risanuri Hidayat.
TE / CRG / Paulo Gomes The Control System for the LHC tunnel cryogenics, p. 1 CERN Portuguese Teachers Programme, 7 Sep 2011 Dr. Paulo Gomes on behalf.
PLC DEVELOPMENTS FOR NEW VACUUM DEVICES IN THE LHC AND NA62
FUNDAÇÃO PARA A CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA FCT Trainee Program Follow Up João Rodrigo Alvelos Ferreira | Started March 2013 October 2014 TE-VSC-ICM.
UNICOS Objects (CPC) 11/02/14 UNICOS, CERN1 CERN, EN/ICE, UNICOS Team.
1. Commissioning of cryogenic crates using Mobile Test Bench 1. The Mobile Test Bench 2. Cryogenics crates and equipment – types of transducers and actuators.
Lukasz ZwalinskiLHCb CO 2 cooling; 1 IBL CO 2 cooling control system Bart Verlaat, Lukasz Zwalinski, Maciej Ostrega, Michal Zimny,
DCS LEB Workshop ‘98, Rome, Detector Control System, H.J.Burckhart,1 Detector Control System H.J Burckhart, CERN u Motivation and Scope u Detector and.
Distributed Control Systems Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King SAUD University.
The Detector Safety System for LHC Experiments Stefan Lüders ― CERN EP/SFT & IT/CO CHEP03 ― UC San Diego ― March 27 th, 2003.
Hall C’s HMS PLC Controls by Steven Lassiter. What Constituents a PLC System PLC (processors) Programming. I/O modules. Field Device Signals (sometimes.
SCADA and Telemetry Presented By:.
Cryogenic Systems Juan Casas (TE-CRG-CI) In behalf of the CRG team R2E and Availability Workshop - Cryogenic Systems - JCC
LHC Beam Screen Heaters: System overview, consolidation needs and project planning 4 February TE-CRG/JCC (Beam Screen Heater Review) 1.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Progress Report on CGSE Control System Project Team of SJTU for AMS-02 Yang Yupu AMS JSC, Jan 8-12, 2007.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
DCS TCSG November 10th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 Status of the general purpose I/O system LMB u DCS Architecture u LMB u Local Monitor Box (LMB) u Concept u.
Towards a Detector Control System for the ATLAS Pixeldetector Susanne Kersten, University of Wuppertal Pixel2002, Carmel September 2002 Overview of the.
LHC ARC Commissioning report during LS1 Agenda: VRGPE documentation (former VRJGE) Active Penning modification By-Pass Valves modification LHC ARC commissioning.
9th September 2001R. BARILLERE - IT-CO1 Industrial and Custom Front-End solutions for Process Controls.
HWCR, AT-ACR-IN, 12 May Cryogenic Instrumentation & Controls Commissioning Hardware Commissioning Review Juan CASAS.
Seminar ON SMART SENSOR Submitted by : SUBIR KUMAR GHOSH Roll No. IN-14/04 Electrical & Instrumentation Deptt. B.E 7th Semester JORHAT ENGINEERING COLLEGE,
AB-CO review Support for Cryogenics. Philippe Gayet AB/CO IS CERN, 20/09/05 Outline Scope Hardware Type, Responsibility sharing, Status Basic software.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Technology Overview What is out there to fulfil our requirements? (with thanks to Tarek)
The Radiation Tolerant Electronics for the LHC Cryogenic Controls: Basic Design and First Operational Experience J. Casas, G. Fernandez Peñacoba & M. A.
FAIR Accelerator Controls Strategy
Controls-related R&D options Etienne CARLIER 18 th ABTEF meeting
Introduction to LHC cryogenic system (layout, architecture) Preparation before cool-down (Purge, flushing) Transient operations to reach nominal operating.
LHC Cryogenics Control: INTEGRATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS (UNICOS) AND FRONT-END SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (FESA) APPLICATIONS Enrique BLANCO Controls.
Eugenia Hatziangeli Beams Department Controls Group CERN, Accelerators and Technology Sector E.Hatziangeli - CERN-Greece Industry day, Athens 31st March.
Acquisition Crate Design BI Technical Board 26 August 2011 Beam Loss Monitoring Section William Vigano’ 26 August
1 UNICOS PVSS Evolution Cryogenics Control Enrique BLANCO Industrial Controls & Electronics Group.
Chiller control system Lukasz Zwalinski – PH/DT.
Chiller control system Specification meeting Lukasz Zwalinski – PH/DT.
“The LHC GCS Framework” Geraldine Thomas CERN, IT-CO A complete PLC and PVSS automatic code Generation.
ATLAS DCS ELMB PRR, CERN, March 2002Fernando Varela ELMB Networks CAN/CANopen Interoperability of the ELMB Usage of the ELMB in ATLAS ELMB Networks Full.
60kW Thermosiphon control system
CEA DSM Irfu SIS LDISC 18/04/2012 Paul Lotrus 1 Control Command Overview GBAR Collaboration Meeting Paul Lotrus CEA/DSM/Irfu/SIS.
European Organization for Nuclear Research LHC Gas Control System Applications Generation to Deployment phases Strategy/Principles.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
The Control System for the LHC tunnel cryogenics Controlling Cool Accelerators Controle da Criogenia de Aceleradores de Partículas Dr. Paulo Gomes CERN.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
JCOP - 17 October 2001NA60_GAZ - E. Mazel J. Rochez1 A Project for the GAS control System At NA60.
ATLAS DCS ELMB PRR, March 4th 2002, H.J.Burckhart1 Embedded Local Monitor Board ELMB  Context  Aim  Requirements  Add-ons  Our aims of PRR.
1 Radiation worries in the cavern L.Jirdén
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
Tunnel Cryogenics Instrumentation & Controls for the LHC Enrique Blanco AB/CO IS.
Report on Controls, TCC meeting 23 th June 2005 – Cl.Dehavay & Co - AB/CO/HT 1 Claude DEHAVAY - CERN/AB/CO/HT Installation Readiness Report - Controls.
TWEPP Paris, 09 Radiation Tests on the complete system of the instrumentation electronics for the LHC Cryogenics at the CNGS test facility Evangelia Gousiou.
ATLAS DCS Workshop on PLCs and Fieldbusses, November 26th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 CAN and LMB in ATLAS u Controls in ATLAS u CAN u Local Monitor Box u Concept.
MARCO control system Munich Lukasz Zwalinski – PH/DT Maciej Ostrega – PH/DT.
Programmable Logic Controller & Distributed Control System Yoon-Je Choi 17 th June 2006.
ESS (vacuum) control system Daniel Piso Controls Division February 20, 2013.
February 4 th, Quality assurance plan: production, installation and commissioning N.Vauthier TE-CRG Technical Review on Beam Screen Heater Electronics.
C. Kiesling, 11th B2GM PXD Session, KEK, March , Slow Control System for the PXD PXD Support Systems & Control UNICOS Standard PVSS User Interface.
1 Cryogenics Instrumentation & Controls Commissioning for the LHC AB/CO viewpoint Enrique Blanco AB/CO IS.
Redundancy in the Control System of DESY’s Cryogenic Facility. M. Bieler, M. Clausen, J. Penning, B. Schoeneburg, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
Instrumentation for cryogenics at CERN
UNICOS: UNified Industrial COntrol System CPC (Continuous Process Control) Basic course SESSION 3: PLC basics UCPC 6 UNICOS-Continuous Process Control.
Cryo equipment strategy in the R2E context
L'instrumentation et le contrôle de la cryogénie
How SCADA Systems Work?.
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Irradiation test of Pressure Transducers for the LHC machine
CERN with UNICOS M. Pezzetti AT_ECR_CE 27 June 2005.
Instrumentation and control
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Instrumentation and controls challenges Juan Casas CERN AT

Juan Casas1 st June 2007Summary 1.Main Challenges for selection, qualification, procurement and commissioning 2.LHC Instrumentation for the standard cell: Original P&ID 3.LHC Environmental Constraints 4.Hardware Selection and Qualification 5.Rad-Hard Hardware 6.Rad-Tol Electronics 7.LHC Instrumentation in Operation 8.Non Conformities 9.LHC Controls 10.Conclusion

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Main Challenges The LHC instrumentation and control is distributed over the 27 km long tunnel and about 30 protected areas; requiring extensive use of fieldbus networks and scattered remote IO. The Radiation environment complicates significantly the selection and qualification for the LHC components installed inside the tunnel. Cost Mitigation requested to minimize the cabling budget imposing the procurement of radiation tolerant electronics. The sheer size of the LHC cryogenics is simply enormous requiring state of the art control systems for feedback closed control loops, monitoring and data storage. Requires a robust Quality Assurance policy. Automatic procedures for generation of control programs and for commissioning tasks are a necessity.

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Standard Cell Intrumentation

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Environmental Constraints LHC environment is industrial in what concerns: temperature, humidity, electromagnetic noise, … But very HOSTILE close to the beam in what concerns RADIATION

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Hardware Selection and Qualification Temperature Readout at 1.8 K: TARGET: K (shared between sensors and electronics) over 10 years Measurement uncertainty reduces the control range => Cernox from Lake Shore (USA) Capability to performs large series calibrations with unprecedented metrological quality (see spot)  The most stringent LHC requirements are: Radiation Qualification at ambient and cryo conditions for tunnel equipment: sensors, actuators, electronics and fieldbus Saturated LHeII Pressure Readout at 16 kPa: Requirement: +- 5 Pa over 10 years and Rad-Hard NO SENSOR PASSED THE TESTS! Selection, qualification and procurement delayed for future LHC consolidation Electrical signals for temperature and pressure sensors: few tens of mV required uncertainty on voltage measurement 0.4 % on readout => Resistance Bridge Configuration for RadTol => Require Rad-Tol 14-bit ADC

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Hard/Tol Hardware About 20% of the sensor channels are not equipped with dedicated conditioning electronics; either for redundancy or cost savings.

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Hard Hardware Temperature: 1.6 to 300 K: Cernox; Lake Shore(USA) Individual Calibration Otherwise K (see fig) 50 to 300 K: Platinum 100 Ohm Pressure: Metal-Thinfilm strain gauge on metal; Baumer (CH) LHe level Gauges: Superconducting wire; Cryogenic Limited (UK) Intelligent Valve Positionner: Sipart PS2-PA; Siemens (GE) CERN specific split design with electronics outside radiation area Electrical Heater: Wire-wound; Sfernice (FR) Cartridge; Rotfil (IT) Standard Industrial Equipment: ON-OFF Pneumatic Actuators Valve Manifolds … UNDERLINED: Equipment Qualified for Radiation Radiation Qualification is not always required: list of materials can be sufficient in particular for passive devices.

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Hard Hardware: LHe Radiation Tests 1.8 K Cryostat SARA Cyclotron Beam: deutons (20 MeV, 6  A) Be Target Sensor Under Test Tests Performed on: Temperature Sensors Cryo-pressure Sensors LHe Level Gauges (sample test)

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Hard Hardware : Thermometer Radiation Effects dipole: n/cm2 Quad: n/cm2 DS: to n/cm2 LSS: > to VERY HIGH n/cm2  Radiation Hardness is better for “amorphous materials”

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Tol Electronics Radiation Tolerant Electronics shall be used in the LHC tunnel (apart the Long Straight Sections) Why? : Cost of Cabling & Signal Integrity Expected Total Integrated Dose (TID) over a 10 year lifespan: 10 to 50 Gy (5 E11 to 2.5 E12 neutron/cm^2) Although for DS 1 & 5 doses could increase x 40 Radiation causes: Shifting of analog electronics characteristics (gain, offset, etc.) Single Event Effects (SEE) in digital circuits Irradiation testing were carried at:  CERN: TCC2 area (presently dismantled) for LHC like radiation on complete systems  PSI (CH) and Louvain (BE) for fast particles or SEE on particular Integrated Circuits  ITN (PT) for neutron damage on analog electronics and sub- systems

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Tol Electronics: Front End Design Analog Readout based on: 1.a comparison bridge providing excellent performance against TID and temperature effects 2.a quarter micron ASIC using IBM technology 3.COTS for OP-Amps, ADCs, DACs and passive components 4.Anti-fuse FPGAs with triplicated logic 5.Micro FIP C131 WorldFIP bus controller

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Rad-Tol Electronics: Radiation Tests Digital Circuits are sensitive to SEE and “most” SEE can be corrected by using appropriate algorithms SEE Effects probability depend “0” to “1” or “1” to “0” All circuits are degraded by Total Integrated Dose (TID) The most “fragile” circuit used is the ADC that limits the Radiation Tolerance to about 400 Gy Tests are done with very high dose rates => Annealing may improve the actual radiation tolerance of the electronics

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Instrumentation in Operation: LHC Thermometry in Sector 78

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Instrumentation in Operation: LHe-II Thermometry Data from 25 April :00 AM High Values for Temperature Spread due to High Thermal Loads or Instabilities at the “ends” of S78 (in particular R7) Population: 122 Thermometers LHC cell: “Isothermal” over 107m Temperature reproducibility typ. Better than 0.01 K In-situ calibration is unfeasible within the control requirements (0.01 K)

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 Non Conformities Non conformities can occur at any step from delivery to commissioning.  LHe level gauges and pressure transducers: forbidden internal wire insulation material found during destructive sample tests => All the production was repaired  LHe level gauges fabrication tolerances are worse than expected as found by X-ray tests and field measurements  Apart thermometers and heater all instruments can be replaced => 100% operational status can be obtained  Temperature sensors are fragile and damage rate depend on the mechanical complexity of the sensor “host”: For the cold-masses and QRL the rate of damaged sensors are respectively 3% and <1%  Unforeseen operational status during software commissioning can also damage equipment: one such event concerned the accidental powering of electrical heaters Overall non conformities are well under control and the present status for the instrumentation is adequate for the LHC operation.

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Controls The LHC control is based in the UNICOS framework, it provides: 1.the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and associated hardware 2.Programming rules and code library for common objects (valves, analog inputs, etc) 3.Automated tools for writing control code 4.Gateways based in an industrial pc for WorldFIP based signal conditioners 5.Control level communication via Ethernet between gateways PLC and PLC PLC 6.Event driven communication protocol between PLC SCADA 7.SCADA based in PVSS with generic widgets, look and feel and shared data server. The control system is:  clustered (refrigerators, interconnection boxes, cold-compressors, etc)  distributed (tunnel, over 3.3 km for each sector) WorldFIP gateways provide the instrumentation engineer with a dedicated diagnostics and configuration interface

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Controls: Channel Count The Control system for the LHC cryogenics (excluding the refrigerators for the LHC experiments) is huge with more than 60’000 IO channels. The tunnel represent about 50% of the analog channels and about 75% of the closed control loops. At a refrigerator point it is installed: a cluster of PLCs (each dealing with a cryogenic sub-system) that communicate via a technical Ethernet network and share the SCADA system Hardware requirements are different for clustered and distributed controls. Clustered systems are delivered with a complete instrumentation ready to be connected to the respective PLC inputs/outputs Tunnel4.5 RefrigeratorCold CompressorQUICommonTOTAL Analog Inputs Analog Outputs Digital Inputs Digital Outputs Closed Loop Controllers

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Controls: Architecture Local Cryogenic control room Central Control Room OWS [1..x] PVSS DS Sector78 OWS [1..x] Ethernet PROFIBUS DP networks PROFIBUS PA networks WFIP Networks (7) RadTol electronics UNICOS PLC S7-400 Siemens FECs (FESA) RM sector 81 RM sector 78 PLC QUIC Schneider Return Module CRYO Instrumentation expert tool PVSS DS TT, PT, LT, DI, EHCV Courtesy E. Blanco

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Controls: Tunnel Architecture

Juan Casas1 st June 2007 LHC Controls: Tunnel Software Generation We rely extensively on databases for (1) manufacturing files for the Rad-Tol hardware and (2) software production. Databases provide a robust environment to improve coherence between software parameters, actual equipment characteristics (type, calibration,..) and SCADA The main drawback is that minor modifications are very cumbersome

Juan Casas1 st June 2007Conclusions The instrumentation and control system has been commissioned for sector 78 and for the QRL in sector 81. The thermometer channels performance is within the expectations in spite of a very ambitious goal in what concern targeted uncertainty and large scale deployment. Previously, such an uncertainty was obtained within a laboratory environment or with a much smaller facility. The QA procedures for main component manufacturing permit to track the correspondence between main assembly and sensor serial number; this is required for individually calibrated instruments. The control system is operational: for the first sector it has been able to cope with all the controlled variables but as any new project there are still some bugs to be corrected in order to improve the overall performance. The database environment used for defining the control system is very reliable and it provides a robust frame for long term operation and the related maintenance tasks. However in the initial commissioning phase it lengthens significantly small corrections or improvements as many pieces of code need to be created and then loaded into the controllers. The next challenges are to verify the performance of the instrumentation in what concerns immunity against electromagnetic noise when all LHC systems are operational and against the background radiation that will be present once the particles beam starts circulating.