Teachers for a New Era Arts Design Team Report (2004-05)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mountain View High School GATE Program
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Parents as Partners in Education
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.
A Collaborative Approach to Planning for DDM’s Kristan Rodriguez, Ph.D Chelmsford Public Schools.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Web Conferences to develop awareness of the Ministry of Education’s Financial Literacy Initiative Financial Literacy… Continuing the conversation.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Curriculum Transformation Moving towards the Reality.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Together Twenty-first Century Learning Environment Washington Elementary Federal Grant.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
TNE Program Assessment Creating the Culture and Practice of Performance Assessment.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
California County Superintendents Arts Initiative CCESSA Statewide initiative launched in 2006 The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation “CCSESA urges every.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
UWM Fall Institute WELCOME Substantial realignment of content courses to fit content requirements Several new or revised courses being planned to support.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
English Language Arts Instructional Materials Presentation to the School Board - May 2016.
10/24/11 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
A Developmentally Responsive Middle Level Education Kimberly Frazier November 20 th, 2009.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Civic Advocacy Network Award Making Civic Engagement Part of Our School’s Culture Six Proven Practices Instruction in history, government, law,
Using Evidence to Refine a Partnership
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
The Need Why is the UW-Whitewater Teacher Residency Program needed?
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
“Read by Grade Three” Law
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Teachers for a New Era Arts Design Team Report ( )

Background

Members: UW-Milwaukee Arts Education methods faculty, MPS Curriculum Directors (art and music), UW-Milwaukee Letters and Science faculty, School of Education faculty, and MPS Teachers

Our fearless leader, the lovely and talented, Scott Emmons

Summer and Fall, 2004 Team members began monthly meetings to begin the process of comparing: Wisconsin Academic Content Standards, Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) Learning Targets, Wisconsin Teaching Standards UWM Guiding Principles With UW-Milwaukee methods class content.

Spring 2005 Arts Design Team shifted focus to planning programs for MPS teachers. Although the team meetings have been productive, challenges remain in coordinating the schedules of this broad range of individuals.

Findings on Content Alignment Comparing the Wisconsin Academic Content Standards, Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) Learning Targets, and UW-Milwaukee methods class content, we determined that, overall, these three indicators are well aligned. We found it troubling, however, that MPS learning targets do not specifically exist for the theatre and dance programs.

Visual Art Education Alignment State standards and MPS Learning Targets have been used as benchmarks for the revision of the UW-Milwaukee Art Education program, which began in Throughout the program, UW-Milwaukee art education students benefit from ongoing, formative assessment of the knowledge, skills, and dispositions they are developing to become effective teachers of art in Kindergarten through 12 th grade. The Art Education Community Engagement Initiative

Music Education Alignment The MPS Music Learning Targets, adopted in the Spring of 2003, meet the Wisconsin Academic Model Content Standards for Music which parallel the National Standards for Music Education adopted in Beginning in 1994, the UW-Milwaukee Music Education area began course revision based on these national standards. Music education students are supervised in extensive fieldwork experiences in the elementary and secondary schools of Southeast- Wisconsin. Participants in this program have been featured in national and state music education conference presentations.

Theatre Education Alignment In February 2000, the K-12 Theatre Education Program was fully approved under the new PI34 regulations drafted by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) and graduated its first cohort of qualified teachers in the spring of that year. The Theatre Education program has aligned its curricula with more standards than you can shake a stick at. Unfortunately, the program is unable to connect its course work to MPS Learning Targets due to the fact that they do not exist for theatre in MPS. In addition, there is no administrator for theater in MPS (Music Education and Art Education do have administrators who oversee the city’s programming). TEP is very concerned about this and considers these data an indication that MPS does not value theatre education.

Dance Education Alignment The Dance Education Program at UW-Milwaukee aligns closely with some MPS Physical Education learning targets (MPS has no learning targets specifically for Dance at this time), particularly with reference to overall health and fitness, and in some movement skills; The UW-Milwaukee Dance requirements comply with the Wisconsin Academic Model Content Standards for Dance, Wisconsin Standards for Teachers, and the new PI 34 regulations. The thirty credits of coursework required in addition to the dance BA or BFA include the reading, learning and development, and inclusion studies; dance methods and substantial fieldwork are required.

Recommendations for upcoming work: 1) MPS administrators reexamine district commitment to all arts disciplines 2) UWM Arts Design Team develop courses, workshops, and mentoring programs that will help induction period teachers and veteran teachers to progress to the level of master teacher 3) Strengthen relationships between the UW-Milwaukee School of Education and the UW-Milwaukee/MPS Arts Education community. 4) Collaborative relationships between MPS, UW-Milwaukee, and the Milwaukee Partnership Academy to truly implement change in the teaching and learning that occurs in each institution. UW-Milwaukee faculty, MPS curriculum directors, and MPS teachers need to be empowered to make meaningful changes.

Unanswered Questions 1) Investment of participants. How do we ensure the participation of MPS principals, teachers, and UWM faculty members? 2) MPS Teacher Workload problems. MPS teachers continue to have multiple new programs and initiatives thrust at them. How can TNE gain the trust of overworked teachers to that they do not view it as simply “one more addition to our workload?” 3) UWM Faculty Workload problems. UWM Arts Faculty numbers have diminished over the past 15 years as our numbers have grown. How will TNE design teams be able to implement plans with faculty that are already facing full teaching loads? 4) Research investment. How will TNE participants be encouraged to gather and disseminate information?

Introduction/Program Assessment The Teachers for a New Era Arts Design Team has been actively engaged with MPS faculty, administrators, and a board member to determine need for the district’s Arts Educators and children. Several Arts Design Team members, Marcia Parsons, Kim Cosier, and Robin Mello, are hoping to address these needs during the upcoming summer by planning workshops and writing curriculum to be implemented during the upcoming school year.

Our program plans include: Developing programs, for induction period classroom elementary and specialists teachers, involving technology in arts education, movement in learning, and interdisciplinary arts. The Education Team plans to develop graduate program courses and summer institutes that will: Provide theme-based, summer intensive programming to teach teachers to use storytelling through the arts Support new teachers (both general elementary and arts specialists) in their induction periods by giving them interdisciplinary tools to reach students in meaningful ways Link teaching/learning activities to multiple forms of literacy Infuse and integrate creative process and practice within the various disciplines for the work of teaching and learning—with a possible extra link, for those students who are interested, to action research.

Our program plans include: II. Pilot Assessment Project – Specialist teachers gather information about current MPS teaching in Arts. Portfolios will be gathered and reviewed along TNE lines. Intended outcomes include:  Creating common assessment rubrics cross disciplines that relate to TNE objectives  Creating common evaluation tool for specialist teachers to use in program evaluation  Creating a matrix for data collection and analysis  Creating assessment language appropriate for specialist teachers’ PDP plans  Beginning training for specialist teachers involved in the project to ensure inter-rater reliability.

Our program plans include: III. Development of Research Project between AED and CPE involving test score examination of MPS students involved in arts and not involved in arts. Intended outcomes include:  Joining conversation supported by AED concerning an arts in education “pod”  Reviewing AED and TNE cross-site research and assessment materials  Creating a response to these materials based on arts team expertise and interests  Creating a policy statement to be presented to the CPE that includes AED models and concrete suggestions for data collection and analysis as it relates to arts-based teaching and learning in MPS schools  Reviewing reports from Assessment, Pupil Learning, and Induction teams  Creating a matrix for further data collection and programming that links Assessment, Pupil Learning, and Induction with the Arts Team activities (to be implemented during ).

We have had a busy year In addition to the work described, Arts Education faculty have also been very actively engaged in the Induction, Program and Pupil Assessment Teams. This year, we were selected to represent UWM and TNE at a roundtable session of the American Education Research Association (AERA) We look forward to effecting positive change in through our continued involvement in these projects Thank you