Deductive Reasoning Pages 402-413 Jason Buatte and Kathy Rey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Employed to develop french versions of questions on english intelligence tests  Became intrigued with the reasons children gave for wrong answers.
Advertisements

1 Philosophy and Arguments. 2Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.
Gender Roles and Development
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD: PIAGET’S COGNITIVE STAGES.
Off to School: Cognitive and Physical Development in Middle Childhood
Learning Theories By Maria Victoria Jauregui EDTC 3320.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Solved the Maze? Start at phil’s house. At first, you can only make right turns through the maze. Each time you cross the red zigzag sign (under Carl’s.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 4 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003.
Cognitive - reasoning.ppt © 2001 Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Reasoning and Decision Making Five general strategies Reasoning and Logic Two hypotheses –inherently.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon
REASONING AND DECISION MAKING Shannon Baker And Alyssa Candelario.
Chapter 2: Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development Jean Piaget ( )
Jean Piaget ( ).
Jean Piaget's Four Stages of Cognitive Development
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development By Christine Giroux 397US397&q=piaget&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1366&b.
Piaget Piagets developmental theories
Thinking and Reasoning The Elements of Cognition Think about what thinking does for you… Concept Concept - a mental category that groups objects, relations,
Piaget’s lifePiaget’s life Born SwitzerlandPhDBinet.
Jean Piaget Constructivism: The Theory of Cognitive Development.
Piaget’s Cognitive Development Cognition: How people think & Understand. Piaget developed four stages to his theory of cognitive development: Sensori-Motor.
Cognitive Development I. What is Cognition? Knowing It involves: attending remembering symbolizing categorizing planning reasoning problem solving creating.
Jean Piaget EDRD 613 Suzanne Peters Lexi Allman Amanda Fecik.
The Four Stages of Cognitive Development 4 June 2001 A briefing by MaryJane Kiefer SENSORI-MOTOR STAGE (Birth to 2 years) PRE-OPERATIONAL STAGE (2 to 7.
Jean Piaget & Cognitive Psychology
Jean Piaget ( ) Started out as a biologist but specialized in psychology. He was interested in the nature of knowledge and how the child acquires.
Introducing Piaget Read the information on Piaget and answer the following questions (on a word document or in your green books): Outline Piaget’s main.
Cognitive Development Piaget’s Cognitive Development Cognition: How people think & Understand. Piaget developed four stages to his theory of cognitive.
Chapter 8: Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development (not supposed to be a) Theory By the group assigned to Chapter 8.
Elementary School Science: Emphasizing the Basics Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Elem. Ed.
Cognitive Development Adolescence. Conceptions of Adolescence Biological perspective (G. Stanley Hall) Biological perspective (G. Stanley Hall) –Biologically-determined.
Theory of Cognitive Development
Piaget’s Cognitive Stages Patsy Hamby. Jean Piaget Belief: – “Only education is capable of saving our societies from possible collapse, whether.
JEAN PIAGET
Instructional Theory Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3230 Math and Science in Education 1.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
Education Emily Robinson Emily Porterfield T Flythe Ross Brigman.
Formal Operations and Rationality. Formal Operations Using the real vs. the possible Inductive vs. deductive reasoning –Inductive: Specific to general,
Evolution of Logical Reasoning
UNDERSTANDING INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF INFANTS Chapter 10.
SOCIAL STUDIES Unit 1: Thinking Critically. Unit Overview Critical Thinking Perception Thought Patterns Problem Solving Facts Vs. Opinions Propaganda.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
REASONING AS PROBLEM SOLVING DEDUCTIVE REASONING: –what, if any, conclusions necessarily follow? INDUCTIVE REASONING: –what is the probability that those.
* 1. Grab your folder and a new Table of Contents * 2. Quietly take your seat * 3. In a moment I will pass back the work from last class * 4. Clear out.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
Module 14: Prenatal and Childhood Development
Journal Entry We are 19 school days away from beginning to work in the schools (Oakwood and Dillard). Make 2 Lists as your journal entry this morning.
INDUCTIVE LOGIC DEDUCTION= DRAWING OUT IMPLICIT “KNOWLEDGE” OR CLAIMS FROM PREMISES. INDUCTION= EXPANDING “KNOWLEDGE” BY TESTING TRUTH OF THE PREMISES.
The construction of a formal argument
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making May 28, 2003.
Development The changes we go through during our lifetime Physical, Social, Cognitive, Emotional, Moral.
Child Development Theories and Theorists
Jean Piaget Psychology.
Schema Activator Who am I? Complete ALL 20 I am statements Can be characteristics, personality traits, cultural identities you associate with Why do you.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Schema Activator Who am I? Complete ALL 20 I am statements Can be characteristics, personality traits, cultural identities you associate with Why do you.
Thinking: Reasoning Reasoning: manipulating internal representations to arrive at new knowledge or to draw new conclusions. Syllogistic reasoning: based.
Theories of Development
Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation.
Teaching the Growing Child Assessment 1 Individual Presentation Nicole Cameron.
How do we reason and solve problems? Psychological factors in solving problems Varieties of problems Algorithms and heuristics Barriers and strategies.
A teacher’s understanding of children’s cognitive and moral development Pip Crowley.
Education Emily Robinson Emily Porterfield T Flythe Ross Brigman.
CHAPTER 4. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT - THOUGHT  JEAN PIAGET– Swiss psychologist “ children are active thinkers”  Child’s mind develops through stages 
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development By: Shuhudha Rizwan (2007)
Cognitive Development
Cognitive Differences in 6th Graders and 12th Graders
Group Magnifiget feat. Abiel C., Chris Y., Freddy G. & Robers M.
Presentation transcript:

Deductive Reasoning Pages Jason Buatte and Kathy Rey

Introduction to Deductive Reasoning Thinking Deductive Reasoning vs. Decision Making

Deductive Reasoning and Cognitive Development Jean Piaget Jean Piaget’s theory states there are basically four levels of cognitive development.  Sensori-Motor : birth to age 2  Pre-Operationa l: age 2 – age 6  Concrete Operational: age 6 – age 12  Formal Operational: age 12 – adulthood

Concrete Operations and Deductive Reasoning The third and fourth stages of Piaget’s model are the most related to deductive reasoning. Stage 3 (Concrete Operations) – logical reasoning replaces intuitive thought. Stage 4 (Formal Operations) – children are now able to hypothesize, and think about the future and what they can be as well as what direction they can go.

Deductive Reasoning Conditional Reasoning  Also referred to as propositional reasoning.

Conditional Reasoning Propositional Calculus Categorizing the kind of reasoning Antecedent – statement/proposition that comes first (the “if” statement).  Affirm Antecedent  Deny Antecedent

Conditional Reasoning Propositional Calculus Categorizing the kind of reasoning Consequent – proposition that follows; the consequence (the “then” statement).  Affirm Consequent  Deny Consequent

Syllogisms Three statements: Two we assume are true, and one conclusion. View this link: A1KH8 A1KH8

Difficulties with Negative Information People handle positive information better than negative information People have trouble processing sentences with negative words (i.e. not, no, never)

Abstract Reasoning Problems People do better with examples that are concrete vs. abstract.

Belief-Bias Effect Making judgments based on prior beliefs and general knowledge This rule is not absolute Republicans vs. Democrats Do you think that everyone should vote a certain way, or do you think it is their choice?

Belief - Bias and Semantic Knowledge Example: A friend of mine had a student in 2 nd grade. She was teaching that police officers are good and keep us safe. A student raised her hand and started crying. She said she was very afraid of police officers and that police officers are bad. Why? The only encounter that this student had with police officers was when they came and hauled her father off to jail.

Schemas are impacted by Belief - Bias As in the previous example, the little girl’s schema and script about law enforcement officials is now and probably will always be, negative. She saw the police beat down her door and have to use force to take her daddy away. She was scared and upset, therefore, she now looks at police in a negative light.

Confirmation Bias Effect People would rather confirm something is true rather than disprove it. If this is an apple, then this is a fruit.

Confirmation Bias and Long Term / Semantic Memory The Confirmation Bias has a direct impact on our Long Term Memory as well as our Semantic Memory. Decisions that we make are influenced by our semantic knowledge. Our semantic knowledge and long term memory is in direct correlation with our biases and beliefs.

Confirmation Bias and Feature Comparison Models The Feature Comparison theory states that people store concepts in their memory according to a list of necessary features. People use a decision process to make judgments about these concepts. Example: True or False….Baseball is a sport.

Confirmation Bias Experiments Wason Selection Task Selection.shtml Selection.shtml

Our Confirmation Bias Experiment We hypothesized that teenagers might disprove this theory because of their rebellious nature. Many teens are interested in proving something wrong. First you get to try…then we will reveal our results!

Directions Follow these directions on the following slide: On the back of the cards with a sport, there is a gender. On the back of the cards with a gender, there is a sport. Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

If a student plays soccer, that student is a girl. Which would you flip? SoccerBoy Volleyball Girl

Directions Follow these directions on the following slide: On the back of the cards with a grade level, there is a sport. On the back of the cards with a sport, there is a grade level. Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

If a student plays football, that student is a senior. Which would you flip? SeniorJunior Volleyball Football

Directions Follow these directions on the following slide: On the back of the cards with an age, there is a school club. On the back of the cards with a school club, there is an age. Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

If a student is a member of student council, that student is over 15. Which would you flip? 15 years17 years Student Council Member Spanish Club Member

How did you do? If you chose soccer, football and student council, you have proven the Confirmation Bias to be correct. If you chose girl, senior or 15 years, you were trying to disprove this statement.

Our Results We were wrong! We surveyed 75 students grades % Confirmed the first statement 52% Confirmed the second statement 56% Confirmed the third statement

Summary Given a hypothesis, people try to confirm rather than disprove. Negative statements require deeper thinking. Concrete examples are easier than abstract examples to solve. Prior knowledge and experiences influence reasoning.

References Madruga, J. A. G., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., Gutiérrez, F. (2000). Deductive Reasoning and Strategies. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Matlin, Margaret W. (2005). Cognition. Danvers, MA: Wiley and Sons. Plucker, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Human intelligence: Historical influences, current controversies, teaching resources. Retrieved [October 30, 2008], from ftp://ftp.prenhall.com/pub/esm/web_marketing/GagliostrS/a shcraft/ch11.doc