Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Directory and Trust Services (D&TS) Define an Abstract Model Purpose: Document a common terminology that the group can use between the various tracks Identify.
Advertisements

2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Summary of Comments on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, co-chair Cris Ross, co-chair April 24, 2014.
Summary of Care Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
2015 Edition Proposed Rule Modifications to the ONC Health IT Certification Program and 2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria.
Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup December 2, 2013.
Supporting Meaningful Use Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements
Understanding and Leveraging MU Stage 2 Optional Transports (SOAP)
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup May 22, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Audits for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Vidya Sellappan HIT Initiatives Group, CMS 1.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Direct Exchange An Introduction for Providers Engaged in Stage 2 Meaningful Use David.
Beacon Community and EHR Vendor Collaboration: A Catalyst for Interoperability and Exchange ONC CMS Meaningful Use Stage 2 Exchange Summit March 18, 2013.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group August 2, 2013.
Cross Vendor Exchange Testing and Certification Plans April 18, 2013.
NHIN Direct Project Communications Work Group Messages for Physicians August 24, 2010.
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 28, 2013.
Cross Vendor Exchange Testing and Certification Plans April 18, 2013 Meaningful Use Stage 2 Exchange Summit Avinash Shanbhag, ONC.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families June 17, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group August 9, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group August 16, 2013.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group July 19, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Proposal CCITI NY 01/27/2014.
Transition of Care Summary Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group July 26, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group September 13, 2013.
Christopher H. Tashjian, MD, FAAFP July 23, 2013, Washington D.C.
Clinical Operations Workgroup Update Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013.
SCHIEx Implementation Acceleration Program Rural Health Conference, October 2013.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup May 14, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 3, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group June 14, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group June 7, 2013.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 24, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Standards and Certification Requirements for Certified EHR Modules Dixie Baker, Chair Walter Suarez,
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
The NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Presented by: Rachael Williams, Program Manager Layne Roberts, Data Specialist.
CDSS, queries and statistics FLL July 2011 Claudia Wente-Waedlich.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group April 12, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group April 19, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 10, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 24, 2013.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 – Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July.
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 17, 2013

Roll call – Lynda Rowe User Stories Update VDT User Story review – Kim & Alan (Displayed on Webex) Outline MU 2 Numerator/Denominator Tracking Responsibilities – Lynda Rowe Pilot Scenario Discussion – Lynda Rowe Outline of Possible Pilots – Lynda Rowe Beacon Pilot Form (Displayed on Webex) – Lynda Rowe Identification of Beacons/Vendors that will fit into each Transport Use Case – Lynda Rowe Paul Tuten Presentation Update – Chuck Tryon HealtheWay Update – Chuck Tryon/Lynda Rowe WIKI Development Update – Greg Dengler (Displayed on Webex) Work Plan Progress – Chuck Tryon Wrap up/Next Steps – Lynda Rowe Today’s Goals 1

Possible Pilot Scenarios Pilot # Query OR Push Provider A Transport Method Certified Transport Entity Transport Method To Provider B C-CDA Generation MU 2 Metric Reporting Description Pilot 1 PushDirect (SMTP + S/MIME) EHR TechnologyTransport is directly from provider A Provider A EHR EHR Supports all aspects of DIRECT Transport Pilot 2 PushAny Edge Protocol HISP /HIE/HIODirect (SMTP + S/MIME)HISP/HIE/HIOHISP/HIO/HIEHISP/HIE/HIO must be certified to the TOC objective, i.e. support The Direct Applicability statement/produce a C-CDA Pilot 3 PushAny Edge Protocol EHR module Certified with Associated HISP/HIO (relied upon software) Direct (SMTP + S/MIME)EHR Vendor and relied upon software EHR vendor + relied upon software must meet MU2 criteria Pilot 4 PushDirect (SMTP + S/MIME)+ XDR/XDM EHRTransport is directly from provider A Provider A EHR Same as Pilot 1, except adding the optional XDR/XDM transport Pilot 5 PushAny Edge Protocol HISP /HIE/HIODirect (SMTP + S/MIME)+ XDR/XDM HISP/HIE/HIOHISP/HIO/HIEHISP/HIE/HIO must be certified to the TOC objective, i.e. support The Direct Applicability statement/produce a C-CDA

Possible Pilot Scenarios Pilot # Query OR Push Provider A Transport Method Certified Transport Entity Transport Method To Provider B C-CDA Generation MU 2 Metric Reporting Description Pilot 6PushAny Edge Protocol EHR module Certified with Associated HISP/HIO (relied upon software) Direct (SMTP + S/MIME)+ XDR/XDM EHR Vendor and relied upon software EHR vendor + relied upon software must meet MU2 TOC criteria Pilot 7PushSOAP + XDR/XDM EHR – Must be certified for optional SOAP transport Transport Directly From Provider A Provider A EHR EHR Hosted SOAP + XDR/XDM Pilot 8QuerySOAP + XDR/XDM EHR – Must be certified for optional SOAP transport Any Transport via an HIE/HIO/HISP Provider A EHRHISP/HIO/HIEContent may be repackaged by HISP/HIO for provider B Pilot 9Push OR Query Any TransportHIO as an eHealth Exchange participant Query or push to provider via eHealth Exchange certified protocol Provider A EHRHIO eHealth exchange participant HIO must be a certified eHealth Exchange participant Pilot 10 QueryAny Certified Transport CEHRT natively or with relied upon software None- Query basedProvider A EHRHIO/HIE/HISPProvider A must be using CEHRT

Numerator/Denominator for TOC measure #2 Measure 2: The EP, EH or CAH that transitions or refers its patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10% of such transition and referrals either: – Electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient; or – Where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange faciliated by an organization that is an eHealth Exchange participant Denominator: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the CEHRT reporting period for which the EP or eligible hospital’s or CAH’s inpatient or emergency department (Place or Service 21 or 23) was the transferring or referring provider Numerator: Number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is an eHealth Exchange participant. The organization can be a thrid-party or the senders own organization. Of Note: – EP/EHs may only count transmissions in the measures numerator if the are accessed by the provider to whom the sending provider is referring or transferring the patient – An EP or EH may only count in the numerator transitions of care that first count in the denominator – Receipt by the provider occurs when either the clinician receives/queries or the practice/facility at which the clinician works receives/queries the summary of care 4

Numerator/Denominator Calculations 5 Key Points EPs/EHs must use one of two methods to calculate their denominator: Minimal denominators provided by CMS in the Stage 2 Final Rule Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPCore _15_SummaryCare.pdf Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPCore _15_SummaryCare.pdf Minimal denominators PLUS criteria defined and consistently documented by the EP/EH such as all self referrals not just self referrals reported by the HIO

Numerator/Denominator Calculations 6 Counting Concepts Unit of measure for ToC measure 1 and 2 is transition/referral and not individual patient 1:1 relationship between transitions/referrals in the EP/EH’s denominator and numerator. An EP/EH cannot count more than one pull/query in the numerator for just on TOC in the denominator All EPs/EHs contributing data to a patient’s CCDA may receive credit when that document is exchanged/pulled only if the transfer is in the EP/EHs denominator It is likely that an HIO will not have easy access to a particular EP or EH’s denominator unless the HIO is also the EHR vendor, and EHR vendor provides a list of denominator transitions or referrals to the HIO, or the EP or EH provides a list of denominator transitions or referrals to the HIO Approach to calculating the denominator for ToC measure 1 and 2 must be the same

HIO ToC Measure 2 Support 7 EP/EH Calculates NumeratorHIO or eHealth Exchange Calculates Numerator Audit Log Provided by HIO or eHealth Exchange participant Containing: List of patients for which the EP/EH contributed data Dates when data was contributed List of providers that queried the patients’ records The date of each query/view Information reconciled against EHR reports Denominator Documentation Provided by EP/EH Containing: The EP or EH’s denominator, as defined by the EP/EH Which patients the EP/EH contributed data for in the reporting period Which providers queried the patients’ records The date of each query/view so HIO knows the information was pulled after the EP/EH referred/transitioned the patient Actions: Associate each contribution with referrals/transitions in the EP/EH denominator Reconcile date of each query/view to ensure data was pulled after the referred/transitioned date Actions: Match the referrals/transitions in the EP/EH’s denominator to appropriate queries/pulls to count numerator

Wrap Up/Next Steps 8 Final comments All attendees Co-Chairs: Chuck Tryon, Tone Southerland Next steps Conclusion