THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. 37 Separate Death Penalty Systems in the United States Each of 35 states has a death penalty system The federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appeal and Postconviction Relief
Advertisements

by Ross Wolf, Charles Mesloh, Robert Wood
The Court System.
COURTS OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
16.2- Criminal Cases.
Criminal Justice Proces
The Anatomy of a Criminal Case Government – Libertyville HS.
Sentencing, Appeals, and
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
The Organization of the Criminal Justice System
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) Defendant pled guilty to offense punishable by imprisonment between 5 and 10 years Judge at sentencing hearing.
Law and the Courts The Administration of Justice The Courts.
Judicial Process Do you Remember What is the highest court in the Land? What is the highest court in the Land? Who appoints the justices to the Supreme.
Capital Punishment McCleskey v. Kemp 481 U.S. 279.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The state’s highest appellate jurisdiction court It is a court of review (Court for correction of errors of law – Not a trial.
Chapter 5 – A Dual Court System
The Federal Court System
Objective Review. The US Court of Appeals Cases are decided by a panel of how many judges? 33.
The Court System Chapter 5.
Judicial Do you Remember What is the highest court in the Land? What is the highest court in the Land? Who appoints the justices to the Supreme Court,
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 15 Death: The Ultimate Sanction 1.
Law and the Legal Process. Jurisdiction What is Jurisdiction? What is Jurisdiction? The authority of a court to hold a trial and decide a case The authority.
The Judicial Branch.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
Criminal Justice Process: The Trial Chapter 14. Due Process of law Constitutional guarantee ▫ that all legal proceedings will be fair ▫ that one will.
The Trial Chapter 9 in Your Text John Massey Criminal Justice.
Chapter 5 The Court System
The Death Penalty in Delaware: An Empirical Study John Blume, Ted Eisenberg, Valerie Hans & Sheri Johnson Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Introduction to Criminal Justice
Rights of the Accused Under the Criminal Due Process System Rights when 1 st Apprehended: 1.Free from “bills of attainder” – to put someone in jail without.
Criminal Courts may be State or Federal Government. Always involve the violation of some standing law. Unlike a civil case, if no law was broken, a Criminal.
The United States Court System. Dual Court System Separate Judicial Court System for each state and a separate federal system –Federal Courts –State and.
Jurisdiction 3: Original & Appellate. Major Classes of Jurisdiction Legislative jurisdiction –Congressional (Federal) –State –Municipal Executive Jurisdiction.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
Presented by Mr. Eash.  9 Members of the court  1 chief justice  8 associate justices  Justices appointed by president and confirmed by congress 
Law and Justice Chapter 14 - Trials. Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Due Process of Law Means little to people unless they are arrested Means little.
TYPES OF LAW. CIVIL LAW Civil Law deals with wrongs against a group or individual. The harmed individual becomes the plaintiff in a civil law suit and.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
Chapter 8 NOTES The Federal Court System In The United States.
State and Federal Court Systems. Dual Court System There are separate state and federal court systems Federal courts deal with matters of federal law.
COURTS, JUDGES AND THE LAW Key Terms on Judicial Branch.
THE COURT SYSTEMS Chapter 18. The Dual Court System ■In the United States there are two types of court systems under which every court in the nation can.
The Judicial Branch. I. Two Types of Law In America A. Criminal Law – Laws protecting property and individual safety 1. Most of these laws are made at.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
Chapter 14 – Criminal Justice Process: The Trial.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
COURTROOM WORKGROUP I: STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS
The Federal Court System In The United States
JUDICIAL BRANCH Ch. 18.
Let’s Review LAW!!!!!.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Criminal Cases
The Federal Court System
Objectives 1. Circumstances required for a case to be brought before the Supreme Court. 2. How do politics enter into Supreme Court decisions? 3. Why is.
Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty
Criminal Justice Process
VIII. DEATH PENALTY CONSIDERATIONS
The Federal Court System
CHAPTER 5 THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, IN THE MILITARY, AND GLOBALLY Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Court Case Proceedings
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
The American Court Structure
The Federal Court System
The Court System Appeals.
Government Notes The Judicial Branch.
Capital Punishment.
The American Court Structure
Presentation transcript:

THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL

37 Separate Death Penalty Systems in the United States Each of 35 states has a death penalty system The federal government has a death penalty system The U.S. military has a death penalty system No two systems are exactly alike.

The Federal Court Structure 94 U.S. District Courts 13 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court

Death Penalty Cases and the Supreme Court Court of Last Resort Hears death penalty cases appealed from U.S. circuit courts of appeals and from the high court of a state 4 of 9 justices must vote to hear a case (the rule of four) It takes 5 justices to stay, or stop, an execution

Death Penalty Cases and the Supreme Court (cont.) When required number of votes has been achieved, Court issues a writ of certiorari to lower court whose decision is being appealed, ordering it to send the records forward for review.

Death Penalty Cases and the Supreme Court (cont.) Supreme Court will only issue writ of certiorari if defendant has exhausted all other avenues of appeal and the case involves a substantial federal question (either the constitutionality of a state or federal death penalty statute is challenged or constitutional rights have been violated).

Actions That Can Be Taken by the Supreme Court 1. Affirm the verdict or decision of the lower court and let it stand; 2. Modify the verdict or decision of the lower court, without totally reversing it; 3. Reverse the verdict or decision of the lower court, requiring no further court action; or

Actions That Can Be Taken by the Supreme Court (cont.) 4. Reverse the verdict or decision of the lower court and remand the case to the court of original jurisdiction, for either retrial or resentencing.

Filing a Writ of Habeas Corpus  Is a court order directing a law officer to produce a prisoner in court to determine if the prisoner is being legally detained or imprisoned  In some cases, can be filed by death row inmate whose appeal has been denied.

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require a minimum of two attorneys be appointed to represent federal capital defendants (at least one of the attorneys must have experience in capital defense work)

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require the government to inform the defendant of its intention to seek death within a reasonable time before trial or before the court accepts a defendant’s guilty plea

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require the government, before trial or plea, to list the aggravating circumstances that it proposes to prove to justify a death sentence

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require the weighing of statutorily enumerated aggravating and mitigating circumstances (no method or standard for weighing is prescribed)

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Give the government the burden of establishing aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require unanimity on the part of jurors in the finding of an aggravating circumstance

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require that a sentence other than death be imposed if no aggravating circumstance is found to exist

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Require only a single juror to find a mitigating circumstance before it can be weighed

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Allow victim impact evidence

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Give the right to appeal both the conviction and the death sentence

Three grounds for appeal: (1) The death sentence was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor; (2) the admissible evidence and information adduced does not support the special finding of the existence of the required aggravating factor; or

Three grounds for appeal (cont.): (3) the proceedings involved any other legal error requiring reversal which was properly preserved for appeal under the rules of criminal procedure. No relief may be provided for any error that the government proves to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (shared with some states)  Exempt from the federal death penalty persons less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense, mentally retarded and insane persons, and pregnant women (but only while they are pregnant)

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures  Require authorization from the U.S. Attorney General before federal prosecutors can file capital charges

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.)  Require the court to consider the Federal Public Defender’s recommendation about which attorneys are qualified for appointment in capital cases

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.)  List three different sets of aggravating circumstances: those for espionage and treason; those for homicide; and those for non- homicide drug offenses

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.)  Require federal judges in capital sentencing proceedings to instruct the jury that in considering whether a sentence of death is justified, it shall not consider the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, or sex of the defendant or of any victim

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.)  Require a jury that recommends death to furnish the court with a certificate signed by each juror swearing that discrimination played no part in the decision and that the same sentencing recommendation would have been made regardless of the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, or sex of the defendant or any victim

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.) Restrict the federal government’s ability to impose the death penalty on Native Americans

Unique Federal Capital Punishment Procedures (cont.): Native Americans Capital prosecution of persons subject to the criminal jurisdiction of an Indian tribal government where federal jurisdiction is based solely on Indian country and where the offense occurred within the boundaries of Indian country is prevented, unless the governing body of the Indian tribe waives its sovereign immunity.

Federal Executions First federal execution: Thomas Bird, who was hanged for murder in Maine on June 25, Until recently, federal prisoners were usually executed in the state where the crime occurred because the federal government did not have its own site for executions.

Federal Executions (cont.) In states without a death penalty, a federal judge could choose another state to conduct the execution. All that changed in 1995 when the federal Bureau of Prisons converted an old cellblock at the U.S. Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana into the first national death-row facility in American history.

Federal Executions (cont.) The death-row facility did not become operational until July 13, 1999, the date it received the first group of death row inmates. (The government delayed opening the facility until then because it decided that it took at least 20 inmates to be cost effective.)

Federal Executions (cont.) The first 3 people executed at the Terre Haute facility were Timothy McVeigh on June 11, 2001, Juan Raul Garza on June 19, 2001, and Louis Jones, Jr. on March 18, Since Bird's execution in 1790, and including McVeigh and Garza, the U.S. government has executed 339 men and four women.

Federal Executions (cont.) McVeigh, Garza, and Jones were executed by lethal injection, the only method now used by the U.S. government. The 340 other federal executions were by hanging (81 percent), electrocution (17 percent), and lethal gas (2 percent).

Federal Executions (cont.) The executions of McVeigh, Garza, and Jones were the first federal executions in nearly 40 years. The last federal execution before them occurred on March 15, 1963, when Victor H. Feguer was hanged at Iowa State Penitentiary for kidnapping and murdering an Iowa physician.

Federal Executions (cont.) As of April 11, 2007, 50 people were under a federal death sentence. All of them were male, 50 percent were black, 40 percent were white, 8 percent were Latino, and 2 percent were Native American.