Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois 62777 1-866-317-6034

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Navigating the Changing Landscape of WV Assessments 2013 WVDE Spring School Counselor Conferences Dr. Beth Cipoletti, Assistant Director Office of Assessment.

Advertisements

Teaching to the Standards: Math A Literacy-Based Approach for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities by Katherine Trela, PhD, Bree Jimenez, MS.

Supporting, Accommodating, & Scaffolding Instruction in the Common Core Presented by: Northwestern Illinois Association for Paraprofessional Training Sheri.

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium Patti Whetstone Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation University of Kansas The present publication.

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois www.isbe.net/assessment.

Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.

Division of Student Assessment Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) Illinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.

Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.

DPI UPDATE: SPECIAL EDUCATION ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT-DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 1.

Setting Alternate Achievement Standards Prepared by Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education NCEO Teleconference March 21, 2005.

Challenging All Students to Meet High Expectations: Supporting Schools in Raising the Bar for Students with Disabilities Office of Special Education Programs.

KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

Overview of the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment System

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education,

Assessing Student Learning

Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.

Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 

Michigan K−12 Statewide Assessments Division of Accountability Services (DAS) Office of Special Education (OSE) MDE Office of Special Education and ISD.

Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.

Division of Student Assessment IAA SchoolSuccess for Teachers Illinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois

Statewide Assessment Update Vince Dean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Standards & Assessment January 30, 2013 SIFN.

A LTERNATE P ROFICIENCY A SSESSMENT AND D YNAMIC L EARNING M APS.

State Assessment Results CCR = ACTE T E A E C A C T A.

NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.

Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.

NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,

Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards

Activity 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Close Reading, Academic Language, and Text-based Discussion.

CURRICULUM MAP REDESIGN. Title Box Unit Course Grade.

ASSESSMENT SUMMARY. Public Service Announcement.

The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.

Common Core State Standards June 2013IDEA Partnership1.

Common Core State Standards January 2014IDEA Partnership1.

Next Generation Standards April 27, 2012.

The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.

DECEMBER 2013 Dynamic Learning Maps: Claims and Conceptual Areas and Common Core Essential Elements Update The present publication was developed under.

Unwrapping the Common Core (Oklahoma Academic Standards) Moving Forward One Step At A Time Standards.

Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.

SLIP Winter Conference Crowne Plaza Hotel Lansing January 24, 2014 Joanne Winkelman, Office of Special Education Linda Howley, Office of Standards and.

Dynamic Learning Maps Update Linda Howley, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Joanne Winkelman, Office of Special Education.

Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.

Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.

State Board of Education Presentation Jeffrey Hauger, Ed.D. Peggy McDonald, Ed.D. Elizabeth Celentano, M.Ed. January 11, 2016 NEW JERSEY DYNAMIC LEARNING.

TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.

Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.

Jessica Bowman, USBE. Share one thing about your special education program that you are proud of. Share one thing you are excited to do this summer. Get.

Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) Changes

Science Assessment Development and Status

Dynamic Learning Maps: Using Essential Elements to plan instruction

Illinois Alternate Assessment Participation Guidelines

Welcome Teachers! Jessica Bowman, USOE.

Mary O’Brian Jessica Dare Director of Assessment IAA Coordinator

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium

State Board of Education Presentation Jeffrey Hauger, Ed.D.

Lindsay Ruhter, Lori Andersen, & Allison Lawrence

Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.

Science Assessment Development and Status

Common Core State Standards

Getting to Know Dynamic Learning Systems (DLM)

Presentation transcript:

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois The Common Core State Standards: An overview for teachers of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities Jessica Dare IAA/DLM Coordinator

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 1 Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education What is Dynamic Learning Maps? The DLM™ project is guided by the core belief that all students should have access to challenging grade-level content. –Structure of the test will allow students to show what they know and can do The DLM™ system is designed to map a student’s learning throughout the year. –Tasks are embedded in day-to-day instruction –An end of year summative assessment 2

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education Common Core Essential Elements Specific statements of the content and skills Linked to the CCSS Provide links between the CCSS and grade specific expectations 3 (CCEE)

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education DLM Test Features: Instructionally Embedded Assessment Embedded items and tasks are given to a student and the student’s learning is mapped throughout the year. –Testing and teaching happen at the same time. –Teachers can see what students know and can change instruction to better support student learning. 4

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 5

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education DLM Test Features: Accessibility Tests will be flexible enough to accept a variety of responses, such as: –Keyboard-entered responses –Drag-and-drop responses that use the mouse to sort or label –Responses using touch-screen technology (when available) The system will be compatible with a variety of assistive technologies 6

Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education DLM Field Test Field Test 1: January 15th – 31st –Two Essential Elements assessed per grade and content area. All students are assessed on both EEs, at levels of complexity that target the student. –Focus: Testing initialization into the map using data from the pilot; testing paths within the map; assessing opportunity to learn. Field Test 2: March 17th – April 11th –Five to ten Essential Elements assessed per grade and content area. Each student is assessed on two EEs per content area, at levels of complexity that target the student. –Focus: Testing first version of dynamic routing from one testlet to the next; trying new interface for teachers to select testlets from a limited range of options; offering first version of a report for teachers. Field Test 3: May 1st – end of academic year –Five to ten Essential Elements assessed per grade and content area. Each student assessed on two EEs per content area, at levels of complexity that target the student. –Focus: Trying new function that allows the teacher to adjust a recommendation made by the system; offering a usage report for teachers. 7