Daniel Flynn 1, Mary Kells 1, Mary Joyce 1&2, Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing NICE guidance
Advertisements

Foundation Competencies New CSWE procedures
5 th Annual Forum Wednesday 28 th April 2010 Royal Hospital Kilmainham ‘Promoting Positive Mental Health and Reducing Stigma’
Mental Health Tele-Triage Literature Review Overview
Aim To investigate if the services provided at one mental health outpatient clinic, gives its’ clients the capacity to promote their own mental health.
The Standards of Practice for a Tobacco Treatment Specialist (TTS) Gaylene Mooney, M.Ed., RRT-NPS, CTTS Program Director, Respiratory Therapy San Joaquin.
MIND RESTRAINT REPORT INITIAL RESPONSE
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
99.98% of the time patients are on their own “The diabetes self-management regimen is one of the most challenging of any for chronic illness.” 0.02% of.
SOAR: Mental Health Trauma Intervention Program Robert Niezgoda, MPH Taney County Health Department September 2014.
The situation The requirements The benefits What’s needed to make it work How to move forward.
Conclusions and Implications
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Visit our websites: PhD Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Incredible.
Texas Diabetes Education & Care Management Project Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Bureau of Primary Health, HRSA CDC Diabetes Prevention (in-kind.
Dr. Elaine Dunnea, Dr. Maura Dugganb, Dr. Julie O’Mahonyc
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Behavioral Health Services for Injured or Ill workers – Collaborative Care Analysis and Recommendations January 22, 2015.
Adult Short Term Assessment and Treatment (ASTAT) & Group Therapy Services (GTS)
Facing the Challenge The Impact of Recession & Unemployment on Men’s Health in Ireland June 2011 Prepared by Nexus Research for the Institute of Public.
“ GP/Consultant Pairings Bridging the gap” Presented by Dr Paul Williams Wyre Forest GP.
1 A strategic approach to data and research – implications for Children’s Services Committees in Ireland Anne-Marie Brooks Sinéad Hanafin Gillian Roche.
Engaging Service Users – Resources for Qualitative Research (CRSI Workshop 10 th June 2009) An example of qualitative research Helena O Connor.
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
Evaluating Services & Expenditure in Social Sectors Approaches supported by The Atlantic Philanthropies Gail Birkbeck Feb 1, 2013.
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: THE SOUTH AFRICAN EXPERIENCE Ann Watts Univ of KwaZulu-Natal; Univ of Zululand ICTP-2008.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
Implementing NICE guidance
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Janine Margarita R. Dizon, PhD Research Supervisor Center for Health Research and Movement.
Implementing NICE guidance
Can Bright Futures Be Implemented in a Busy Clinical Setting? Lessons Learned from the Preventive Services Improvement Project: A National Collaborative.
Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.
Priorities for prison health and social care research Clair Chilvers Research Director Health and Offender Partnerships Director Forensic Mental Health.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
CTxCPCRN Central Texas Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Kick Off Grantee Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 15-16, 2009.
REAL WORLD RESEARCH THIRD EDITION Chapter 8: Designs for Particular Purposes: Evaluation, Action and Change 1©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
MSW Field Education Model: Opportunities and Benefits for 301’s Melissa Reitmeier, PhD, LMSW, MSW Candice Morgan, MSW, PhD Candidate College of Social.
Epilepsy and WHO | 17 Oct |1 | WHO's six-point agenda The overarching health needs 1.Promoting development 2.Fostering health security The strategic.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
1 The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management Julie Schmittdiel, Ph.D., Stephen M. Shortell, Ph.D., Thomas Rundall,
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
What have I learnt from GEMSS II? Using a reflective practice model to identify key learning points. Aim: To demonstrate the personal and professional.
HRSA Health Disparities Collaboratives 2006: Perinatal & Patient Safety Pilot Ada Determan, M.P.H Division of Clinical Quality Bureau of Primary Health.
1 Establishing Spanish- and English- Speaking CBT Groups for Depression in a Training Clinic Velma Barrios, Ph.D. Margareth Del Cid Ashley Elefant Palo.
5 Ways to achieve parity in mental health Karen Turner Director of Mental Health, NHS England 9 th December.
Gaps in Substance Use Treatment Presented by: Rhonda G. Patrick, LCSW, MPA Amy C. Traylor, MSW, Ph.D.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
Agency Introduction Detailed Session – Day 2.  Intake Evaluations/Assessments ◦ Clinical eligibility  Diagnostic Justification Rationale ◦ Risk assessment.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
'Taking me seriously': research evaluation of a service (SCAN) that links primary care with secondary services when clients are in suicide crisis. Stephen.
R&D Report to SL&M Board 17 September 2002 Graham Thornicroft Director of Research & Development Gill Dale Research & Development Manager.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
© 2012 Behavioral Tech KEY COMPONENTS IN DBT IMPLEMENTATION: A SURVEY FROM THE GROUND UP Linda A. Dimeff, Ph.D. 1, Andre Ivanoff, Ph.D. 2, 3, & Erin Miga,
Private and confidential Community Pharmacy Future Four-or-more medicines support service Update on progress and next steps Approved18 th June 2012 This.
The Learning Collaboratives at PDI Leads Workshop Wave Hill March 25, 2014.
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
Preventing HCAI’s through an education programme for nurses
MUHC Innovation Model.
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
Component 11 Unit 7: Building Order Sets
Allied Health Statistics
SAMPLE ONLY Dominion Health Center: Your Community Healthcare Home (or another defining message) Dominion Health Center is a community health center.
Presentation transcript:

Daniel Flynn 1, Mary Kells 1, Mary Joyce 1&2, Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Implementation Project Deliberate self-harm has been and continues to be a significant problem amongst Irish men and women. In 2012 alone, 9,483 people were treated for deliberate self-harm episodes, with more than 1 in 5 of these individuals repeatedly self-harming (Griffin et al., 2013). It has been identified that individuals who engage in repetitive self-harm behaviours often present with symptoms associated with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). BPD is recognised as one of the most distressing disorders for clients and most difficult for clinicians to treat. In terms of treatment, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is an intervention that has a strong evidence base in working with this client population. A number of implementation studies demonstrate its effectiveness in treating BPD and reducing self-harm/suicidal behaviours (e.g. Brassington & Krawitz, 2006). In view of the high incidence of deliberate self-harm repetition across Ireland, the current lack of specialised services available for the treatment of these behaviours, and the results of a recent pilot project undertaken in Cork Mental Health Services (2010), a proposal was put forward to the National Office for Suicide Prevention. This proposal requested funding to establish a National DBT Project which aims to implement DBT at multiple sites across Ireland in a coordinated manner. The primary aim of the National DBT Project is to train 16 teams nationwide over a period of two years (8 teams per year; adult/ adolescent mental health teams), to implement DBT within their services. This initiative will be extensively evaluated over the two year period. The National DBT Project is coordinated by a DBT project team based in Cork Mental Health Services. Engagement In order to generate knowledge and interest about the National DBT Project, Mental Health Service Managers and Executive Clinical Directors across Ireland were contacted by the National DBT Project team. This involved outlining the availability of funding for training in DBT, and providing detailed information about DBT and its requirements. Services and teams who were then interested in training in DBT were required to apply to the National DBT Project office in order to participate in the implementation project. The teams for year one were formally selected by a steering group committee comprising representatives from various professions and backgrounds within mental health. The criteria for the selection of teams were: -Evidence of need (NSRF Registry Data) -Meeting of DBT training requirements -Evidence of team commitment -Evidence of evaluation/ research commitment -Commitment from local management In order to implement DBT in a coordinated manner and evaluate the implementation effectively at each site, the National DBT Project team would liaise regularly with the DBT project champion for each team (team leader), provide support and guidance to the new teams in implementing the programme into their service, and coordinate the evaluation of the implementation at each site. Evaluation In addition to coordinating the training and national implementation of DBT, the National DBT Project team is responsible for comprehensively designing the evaluation of the initiative in line with research best practice. This procedure involved completing a comprehensive literature review, conducting data analyses of the pilot project data, applying for ethical approval from multiple ethics committees, and at a later point, disseminating the findings of the evaluation nationally and internationally. Three strands for the evaluation of the implementation of DBT were thus identified: The evaluation of the effectiveness of DBT The effectiveness of DBT will be evaluated through the collection and analysis of information gathered from a battery of client self-report measures examining change in life-threatening behaviours, skill utilisation, and quality of life. These assessments will be carried out at baseline, midway through the programme (adult sites only), end of programme, and follow-up. The evaluation of the implementation process of DBT The multi-site implementation process will be evaluated by collecting information regarding each sites’ implementation of DBT (DBT implementation logs), coding of DBT session tapes to examine therapists’ adherence to the DBT model, and focus groups/ interviews with DBT therapists and clients. The evaluation of the economic benefit of DBT A comprehensive economic evaluation will be carried out by comparing information collected in the battery of measures and healthcare records of both DBT clients and Treatment-As-Usual clients. Evaluation of DBT Implementation Effectiveness Evaluation Multi-Site Implementation Process Economic Evaluation Conclusion This project will result in the delivery of an evidence-based intervention at a national level for increasingly complex clients presenting with self-harm behaviours. By comprehensively evaluating the implementation of DBT nationally, it is envisioned that this initiative will contribute significantly to the evidence base of DBT. In addition, it is anticipated that the project will continue to grow, ensuring the positive impact of DBT is accessible to more mental health services across Ireland. American Psychiatric Association (2001). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, Brassington, J. & Krawitz, R. (2006). Australasian Dialectical Behavior therapy Pilot Outcome Study: Effectiveness, Utility and feasibility. Australian Psychiatry, 14 (3), Department of Health & Children (2006). A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin: Stationary Office. Flynn, D. & Kells, M. (2013). The Road to Endeavour : Development and evaluation of a programme for those presenting with repeated self-harm and chronic suicidality. Griffin, E., Arensman, E., Wall, A., Corcoran, P. & Perry, I.J. (2013). National Registry of Deliberate Self Harm Annual Report Cork: National Suicide Research Foundation. National Health and Medical Research Council (2012). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Borderline Personality Disorder. Australia. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2009). Borderline Personality Disorder: Treatment and Management. Leicester: BPS National Suicide Research Foundation DBT has been endorsed by the Irish expert group on mental health (Vision for Change, 2006), and has been recommended by the American Psychiatric Association (2001), the NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009), and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) as being part of any comprehensive treatment programme for persons with Borderline Personality Disorder and co-morbid presentations. HSE’s 4 Administrative Areas & 32 Local Health Offices in Ireland This project is supported by funding from the National Office for Suicide Prevention (NOSP).