Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Advertisements

Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
Water Quality Standards Section Water Permits Division Office of Environmental Services Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality December 2, 2010.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Gulf Restoration Network Decision. Nutrients Nitrogen (N) Phosphorus (P) Sources include: NPS: fertilizer/manure runoff, septic tank overflow Point sources:
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
Water Quality Benchmarks The What’s and Why’s of Their Application 2007 Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 17, 2007.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
Wetland Soils Phosphorus Criteria Development V.D. Nair*, M.W. Clark, K.R. Reddy, and S.G. Haile Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida,
Nutrient Criteria for New Hampshire’s Estuaries Background Information Phil Trowbridge NH DES / NHEP September 30, 2005.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Florida Numerical Nutrient Criteria Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Scott I. McClelland Vice President November 20, 2009.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Developing Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs: How it May Impact You J. Warren Schlechte and John B. Taylor - Inland Fisheries Patricia L. Radloff – Coastal.
Nutrient Criteria for the plains regions of Missouri.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Central Plains Center for BioAssessment Debbie Baker An overview of our projects. Sept
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Aquatic GAP program in Kansas Keith Gido, Walter Dodds, Chris Guy, Jessica Kemp, and Bob Oakes Kansas State University The Gap Analysis Program
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
CyAN (Cyanobacteria Assessment Network) Project Work Package 1: Field Data Collation/Interpretation Keith Loftin, USGS PI and WP1 team lead.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.
RESERVE DETERMINATION STUDIES FOR SELECTED SURFACE WATER, GROUNDWATER, ESTUARIES AND WETLANDS IN THE GOURITZ WMA – PSC MEETING NO 1 OVERVIEW OF THE RESERVE.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs – A Review of Missouri’s Proposed Approach Daniel V. Obrecht Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences University of Missouri.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Draft California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy PUBLIC MEETING Oakland, California June 27, 2012 Korie Schaeffer NMFS Habitat Conservation Division.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
FASOM and Agricultural Regions
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Nutrient Benchmark Development
Drww general membership meeting
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
Rich Batiuk U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office
EU Water Framework Directive
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division

Nutrient Criteria - Background Clean Water Action Plan: Restoring and Protecting America’s Waters (February, 1998) National Strategy for the Development of Regional Nutrient Criteria (USEPA Office of Water / Office of Science & Technology; June, 1998)

Key Elements of the National Nutrient Strategy 1. Ecoregional and waterbody-type specific. 2. Technical guidance by waterbody-type. 3. Regional Technical Advisory Groups (RTAG) and National Nutrient Team. 4. Ecoregional nutrient criteria for nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a and turbidity (i.e. causal & response variables). 5. Nutrient criteria development plans submitted by States/Tribes by December 31, 2004.

Technical Advisory Groups National Nutrient Workgroup –USEPA Headquarters (Dr. Amy Parker), USEPA Regions, States, Universities Region 7 Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG) –Federal, States, Tribes, Universities Central Plains Center for BioAssessment –Kansas Biological Survey (University of Kansas) –Facilitate/Field Work/Data Base/Data Analysis Assist States/Tribes in Criteria Development

Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG) - Region 7 - Missouri Department of Natural Resources Iowa Department of Natural Resources Kansas Department of Health & Environment Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians University of Missouri Iowa State University University of Kansas Kansas State University University of Nebraska Natural Resources Conservation Service US Geological Survey US Environmental Protection Agency Central Plains Center for BioAssessment

Regional Databases (Region 7 RTAG) Nutrient database –Raw records (>54,000) of chemistry parameters –Includes TN, TP, Chlorophyll-a, secchi, periphyton, phytoplankton Biological database –Macroinvertebrate and fish data

RTAG Mission Statement The mission of the Region 7 Nutrient Workgroup is to develop scientifically defensible numeric nutrient benchmarks for lakes/reservoirs, streams/rivers and wetlands in the Central Great Plains (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri & Nebraska).

RTAG Ground Rules Nutrient benchmarks are to protect Streams & Rivers and down stream receiving waters against adverse impacts of cultural eutrophication (excess nutrient levels above natural or minimally impaired conditions). Nutrient benchmarks are to be protective of aquatic life - Economics, technology, attainability, social values are not part of the benchmark development process. Benchmarks developed by the RTAG are by group consensus and are developed for the purpose of assisting and providing guidance to States and Tribes in the development of their own nutrient criteria.

‘Need to Protect the Use’ Waters in which naturally occurring water quality and habitat conditions allow the maintenance of a wide variety of warm-water biota…

Region 7 RTAG Lake Benchmark Development Approach –Classification variables –Nutrient values –Benchmarks

Lake Classification Variables Assessed by RTAG included: Ecoregions (Levels II, III, IV) Lake type –Glacial, ox bows, sandpits, reservoirs, Sand Hills, etc.) Depth Turbidity Surface Area Retention time

Lake & Reservoir Nutrient Values & RTAG Benchmarks Reference Lakes Trisection Method Literature Values RTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l) TP (ug/l) TN (ug/l)

Kansas Reference Values (Lake & Wetland Monitoring Report. KDHE. January 2001) ER 25/26ER 27ER 28ER 40ER 47StatewideRTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l) TP (ug/l) TN (ug/l) ER 25/26 = High Plains & SW Tablelands Ecoregion ER 27 = Central Great Plains Ecoregion ER 28 = Flint Hills ER 40 = Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion ER 47 = Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion

USEPA Ambient Water Quality Recommendations for Lakes and Reservoirs (Ecoregions that overlap Region 7) ER IVER VER VIER VIIER IXER XER XIRTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l) NA2.88 TP (ug/l) NA835 TN (ug/l) NA ER IV = Great Plains Grass & Shrublands (Sand Hills & Flint Hills) ER V = South Central Cultivated Great Plains (Western KS & NE) ER VI = Corn Belt & Northern Great Plains (IA; Eastern NE; Northeast KS; Northwest MO) ER VII = Glacial Dairy (Northeastern IA) ER IX = SE Temperate Forested Plains & Hills (Northern MO & Eastern KS) ER X = Texas-Louisiana Coastal & Miss. Alluvial Plains (Southeastern Missouri) ER XI = Central & Eastern Forested Uplands (Ozarks)

RTAG Next Steps... Stream & Rivers data analysis Biological impairment –convergence of nutrients & biological regional data sets Draft streams benchmarks Lakes Document Streams Document Wetlands –inventory, classification, reference selection process, monitoring

Website and Contact Information USEPA website: N-STEPS website: Gary Welker, USEPA Region 7 Nutrient Coordinator Center for BioAssessment Website –