Developing Travelshed TAZ Using ArcGIS 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2015 Erich Rentz, RSG Vince Bernardin,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Advertisements

ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
From portions of Chapter 8, 9, 10, &11. Real world is complex. GIS is used model reality. The GIS models then enable us to ask questions of the data by.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
GIS methodology for bicycle parking planning in BRT systems: Case study in Bogota - Colombia Daniel PáezUniversidad de los Andes.
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
FBRMPO Data Gathering Process : Population, Employment and Land Use November 2012.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Border around project area Everything else is hardly noticeable… but it’s there Big circles… and semi- transparent Color distinction is clear.
Planning Applications: A City- wide Microsimulation Model for Virginia Beach Craig Jordan, Old Dominion University Mecit Cetin, Old Dominion University.
Let’s pretty it up!. Border around project area Everything else is hardly noticeable… but it’s there Big circles… and semi- transparent Color distinction.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
GIS 2, Final Project: Creating a Dasymetric Map for Two Counties in Minnesota By: Hamidreza Zoraghein Melissa Cushing Caitlin Lee Fall 2013.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
THE PLANET99 MODEL DEMAND AND REVENUE FORECASTING TOOL FOR RAIL OPERATORS 8th EUROPEAN EMME/2 USERS CONFERENCE Jeremy Douch GIBB Transport Planning May.
SourceHess, D.B Reconciling Incompatible Zone Systems in Metropolitan Planning. Ann Arbor, Mich.: ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. ContactDaniel.
Introduction to Census Geography Presented by Jane Traynham and Dan Veroff SDC Boot Camp, October 13, 2009.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
COMMUTE Atlanta A Comparison of Geocoding Methodologies for Transportation Planning Applications Jennifer Indech Nelson Dr. Randall Guensler Dr. Hainan.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
RPS Land Use and Transportation Modeling Results Presentation to RPS TAC & MPO TAC Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit May 17, 2006.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
GIS Tutorial 1 Lecture 9 Spatial Analysis.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
Transportation Analysis Zones Changing Boundaries For Our Future.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Leveraging Web-Based GIS for Managing Transportation Model Network Information TRB Planning Applications Conference May 10 th, 2011 Reno, Nevada Steve.
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
Taking a Walk: Modeling Pedestrians and Bicycles at the Street Level 15th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May Atlantic.
Tennessee Statewide Model Subarea Model Development and Analysis Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dean Munn Senior Transportation.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
CEGR697: Geographic Information Systems Application in Transportation Chapter 3: Data Acquisition and processing Instructor: Min-Wook Kang
Establishment of Freeway Link Volume Validation Targets based on Traffic Count Distributions in the Dallas-Fort Worth Region Behruz Paschai, Arash Mirzaei,
Multimodal Analysis Using Network Analyst. Outline Summarizing accessibility Summarizing accessibility Adding transportation modes to a network Adding.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Mid-term Prepared by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate.
Multi-Point Loading in the Pedestrian Trip Assignment
Tennessee Statewide Model Integration with the National Long Distance Passenger Model and Calibration to AirSage Data Vince Bernardin, PhD, RSG Hadi.
Connecting Freight and Land Use Planning Through a Regional Freight Priority Network Christine Sherman, RSG Wednesday, May 17, 2017.
Network Attributes Calculator
Robust Estimation Techniques for Trip Generation in Tennessee
Statewide Mode Choice Models for Tennessee
12th TRB National Planning Application Conference Xiaobo Liu, Ph.D.
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Network Development and Zone Definition
Using GIS to Create Demand Response Service Schedule Zones and Times
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
School of Civil Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Developing Travelshed TAZ Using ArcGIS 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2015 Erich Rentz, RSG Vince Bernardin, PhD, RSG Brian Grady Robert Rock, TDOT

RSG Outline Introducing Travelshed Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) ‒ Traditional 4-Step Travel Demand Model TAZ ‒ Traditional vs. Travelshed TAZ ‒ Advantages of Travelshed TAZ ‒ Case Study Introduction: Tennessee Statewide Model Developing Travelshed TAZ ‒ Delineation Process Outline ‒ Common Boundary Identification ‒ Automated Delineation ‒ Manual Review and Revision Concluding Thoughts Questions?

Introducing Travelshed TAZ

RSG Traditional 4-Step Travel Demand Model TAZ Traditional Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Definition Limitations: Zones defined and delineated by the transportation network Opposite sides of the same street are often split into different Zones In urban areas, assessment of walkability difficult In rural areas / statewide models, assessment of area type difficult

RSG Traditional vs. Travelshed TAZ What is a travelshed? View road facilities and their catchment areas as akin to rivers and their basins in a hydrological system

RSG Advantages of Travelshed TAZ Clearer relationship between zones and underlying roadways –Less ambiguity around placement of loading points (centroid connectors) Walkability clearer in urban areas Area type much clearer in rural areas Naturally takes into account other boundaries and barriers to travel

RSG Case Study Introduction: Tennessee Statewide Model New Network and Zone System has ~3x as much detail Roadmiles in TN: 9,421 to 32,546 TAZ in TN: 1,222 to 3,293 Original 2005 Model New Version 2 Model

RSG Case Study Introduction: Delineation Approach Urban (MPO) areas Emphasis on consistency with MPO TAZ −Statewide TAZ developed from aggregated MPO TAZ Part travelshed, part traditional delineations Rural areas Emphasis on delineating area types /small towns −Statewide TAZ developed from aggregated census blocks Predominantly travelshed delineations

Developing Travelshed TAZ

RSG Delineation Process Outline Common Boundary Identification Automated Delineation Manual Review and Revision

RSG Common Boundary Identification Boundaries & Travel Barriers Boundaries –Counties –Census Designated Places (CDP) –National & State Parks Barriers –Roadways –Railroads –Rivers –Ridgelines

RSG Automated Delineation Prepare Source Data Identify Travelsheds Generate Output Polygon TAZ Layer

RSG Automated Delineation: Identify Target TAZ Count by CBL Polygon

RSG Automated Delineation: Identify Corridors

RSG Automated Delineation: Assign Blocks to Corridors

RSG Automated Delineation: Block Assignment Where, i = range of buffers from 500 feet to maximum distance required to tag all blocks or MPO zones j = unique travelshed corridors (zones) desired for each common boundary polygon For i = Buffer distance (500 foot increment to max) For j = Corridor (high AADT to low AADT) Assign Blocks or MPO zones to Corridor Next j Next i

RSG Automated Delineation: Generate Output Polygon TAZ Layer

RSG Manual Review and Revision

RSG Manual Review and Revision: What was changed?

RSG Manual Review and Revision: Environment

Concluding Thoughts

RSG Concluding Thoughts The version 2 Tennessee statewide model is now in use Using Travelshed TAZ, the model achieved great base year validation statistics for a statewide model Volume Range Number of Count Stations Percent Error Correlation Coefficient MAPE %RMSE ModelStandard 15,0007, ,00010,0001, ,00020,0001, ,00030, ,00040, , Total12,

RSG …and Sumit Bindra, Christine Sherman, and Kaveh Shabani for supplying the manual review and revision… Acknowledgments …Vince Bernardin and Brian Grady of RSG for their vision, insights, and leadership… I’d like to thank Bob Rock and the GIS staff at TDOT who supplied key data, direction, and patience…

Questions?

Contacts Contact ERICH RENTZ SENIOR ANALYST