April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
Advertisements

© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
By: Rachel Sorna and William weinlandt
Finite Element Analysis and Testing Correlation of the Mercury Laser Altimeter Craig L. Stevens Mechanical Systems Analysis & Simulation.
WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
PACE Emerging Market Vehicle Suspension Design University of Cincinnati.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure Craig L. Stevens, Jana L. Schwartz, and Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia.
Finite Element Primer for Engineers: Part 2
Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Structure Design Dr. A. Sherif El-Gizawy.
Final Project1 3/19/2010 Isogrid Buckling With Varying Boundary Conditions Jeffrey Lavin RPI Masters Project.
Harmonic Analysis Workshop 10. Workshop Supplement Harmonic Analysis March 29, 2005 Inventory # WS10-2 Workshop 10 – Goals Goal: –In this workshop.
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Axisymmetric Analysis of a Pipe Assembly
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
? ? ? ? ? ?.  3 POINT BENDING TEST :  Varying loads and spans  Variables measured in the gravity center:  Deflections with vision machine  Strains.
© 2011 Autodesk Stressed Up: From Inventor Simulation to Simulation Mechanical Wasim Younis Senior Application Engineer, Symetri UK James Herzing Technical.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
IMPACT Phase II – 9/13/00 Activity Report Slide 1/20 University of Louisville IMPACT Architecture Team Glen Prater, Jr., Associate Professor Ellen G. Brehob,
Effect of Structure Flexibility on Attitude Dynamics of Modernizated Microsatellite.
ANSYS Workbench: Mechanical Examples. Step 1. Opening ansys workbench Overview: – Start > ANSYS Workbench – Create Static Structural analysis system.
The Physics of Sound. Sound: a series of disturbances of molecules within, and propagated through, an elastic medium or… Sound: is an alteration in the.
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Rene Herrmann Compounding and Composites. FEM static load analyzes The purpose of the static test is to define areas of large strain. It is these areas.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
In these tutorials the use adaptive mesh refinement will be review Workbench 12.1 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
1 Nanosat-5 Progress Report 26 February Structural / Design Tenant Design Review ( ) –Rounds changed to 1/8 th inch (.4 cm) Applies to isogrid,
9.0 New Features New Coupled-Field Material Property allows Analysis of Peltier Cooling Workshop 6 Thermoelectric Cooler.
Finite Element Analysis
9.0 New Features Metal Shaft with Rubber Boot Workshop 7 Load Steps in Workbench.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Shape Finder Appendix Thirteen. Training Manual Shape Finder August 26, 2005 Inventory # A13-2 Chapter Overview In this chapter, using the Shape.
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 5/25/  What are the main functions of structure subsystem?  Provide support all other subsystems and attach the spacecraft to launch.
Bolted Joint Assembly. Advanced Solid Body Contact Options Goal – In this workshop, our goal is to study the effect that contact stiffness specification.
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
1 HOW MANY ELEMENTS? How to choose element size? –Critically important in obtaining good results –Mesh refinement improves solution accuracy. –How small.
Finite-Element Analysis
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
General Troubleshooting Nonlinear Diagnostics. Goal – In this workshop, our goal is to use the nonlinear diagnostics tools available in Solution Information.
Mesh Control Winter Semester PART 1 Meshing.
1/31 Correlation and Error Localization Analytical versus Experimental Dynamics of a Large Structural Assembly Thesis presentation, Herman Marquart, 2013.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Winter Semester
Metal Plasticity. Goal – Introduce a nonlinear metal plasticity material to the same large deflection model from the first workshop regarding the non-linear.
1 YamSat Bus Structures Analysis Tsai Ming-Hsien 蔡明憲 2005/03/24 YamSat.
Error calculations and error convergence Winter Semester
Engineering Design of Raon SC Cavities Myung Ook Hyun SCL Team Myung Ook Hyun SCL Team.
WS2B-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. April 30, 2009 Inventory # Workshop 2B Assembly Contact Workbench-Mechanical.
Finite element mesh and load definition
LHCb RICH2 Analysis of Super-Structure
ILC MDI Platform Concept
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.
Workshop 5A Metal Plasticity
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.
Crab Cavity support system update
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
Structures March 13, 2004.
The First Free-Vibration Mode of a Heat Exchanger Lid
Presentation transcript:

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Analysis Overview Structural and Vibrational stress analysis proves design meets mission critical requirements –Isolate, possibly alter weak areas of satellite design Analysis performed using ANSYS Workbench 11.0 at Minnesota Supercomputing Institute –ProE geometric assembly converted to.iges files and imported into ANSYS –Given Help and Suggestions for meshing and analysis from a contact at Honeywell

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Analysis Priorities Stiffness of the structure critical requirement –>100Hz 1 st Fundamental Frequency is hard requirement Limit Acceleration Load Factors –AFRL decision makes loading omnidirectonal –20g loading results should satisfy 2.0 (yielding) safety factor if stiffness requirement is met Random Vibration and Acoustic Noise –Sine sweep and burst tests give idea for performance during AFRL random vibration test

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Simplification of Model for Analysis Done with consulting from an engineer at Honeywell Satellite solid model too detailed to mesh –Limited processing power and time Model heavy internal components as “bricks” or simple masses Suppress components that don’t affect the structural integrity –Solar panels, mounting plates, and spacers –Screw threading and indentations –Payload (electronics, sensors, computers)

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Meshing Conditions ANSYS auto-generates mesh based on input of element sizes –ANSYS picks element geometry type: octahedral (cube) or tetrahedral (pyramid) Specify different element sizes based on complexity of certain aspects of the design –Satellite panels: 0.4 cm –Torque Coils and Mounts: 2.0 cm –Component and Battery Box Bottoms: 0.5 cm –Component and Battery Box Lids: 2.0 cm –Component and Battery Box Sides: 2.0 cm

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Boundary Conditions Fixed Support: Lightband ring –Bottom Surface (ring) of Satellite doesn’t move –Interior surface of screw holes in ring also fixed

Loading Conditions Static Structural Conditions –20g acceleration loading along principal axes Applied as a body force at the center of gravity Modal Analysis Conditions –Vibrate structure at all frequencies between 0 and 1000 Hz Determines first 3 fundamental frequencies Harmonic Analysis Conditions –Vibrate the structure at 100Hz and at fundamental frequencies Look at stress and deflections caused by vibrations April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Z X Y

Acceleration Load Results Direction:XYZ Load20g Minimum Saftey Factor Maximum Stress (MPa) Maximum Deflection (mm) Meets Requirements?Yes No! April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Modal Analysis (Current Work) Issues with getting the modal analysis to solve –Simulation restarts itself (sign of error) –Tried restricting the analysis Restricting the range of frequency ANSYS sweeps Lowering the number of fundamental frequencies ANSYS tries to solve for Altering the conditions of contact surfaces We know from z-direction 20g loading that top panel will have largest deflection –Stiffen top panel by thickening isogrid bars from 0.4 to 0.6 centimeters

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Current Work Work (Cont.) Altering the top panel and running the simulations again under same conditions Refining the mesh and solving again –Change element sizes for finer mesh –Results should converge to accurate values Harmonic Analysis –More detailed solution of deflections and stresses caused by a certain frequency or multiple vibration frequencies applied to the structure

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR QUESTIONS???