Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Key Improvements and Initial Findings in 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Steven Beningo Adapted from a presentation that.
Advertisements

The Impacts of Temporary U.S. Port Closures on International Supply Chains Paul Bingham CDM Smith FHWA Talking Freight Webinar January 23, 2013.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/Plan Ohio Department of Transportation with Parsons Brinckerhoff SCORT.
Final Round - Question 2 In the United States, which of the following modes was deregulated first? A.railroads B.trucking C.air passenger service D.air.
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Freight Transportation Economic Regulation Transportation Logistics Spring 2009.
Office of Freight Management and Operations (HOFM) - Status and Future Directions Tony Furst, Director.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
State Freight Transportation Data Needs Rolf R. Schmitt Office of Freight Management and Operations September, 2006.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
1 CEE Areas of Specialization Transportation Construction Geotechnical Structures Environmental Water Resources.
RITA/BTS International Data Improvements Steven Beningo International Transportation Specialist USDOT/RITA/BTS Telephone Presentation to the Texas Border.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Randy Mullett Vice President - Government Relations & Public Affairs, Con-way Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Webinar February 16, 2011 Riding the U.S. and Global.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
TRANSPORTATION PL201 FUNDAMENTAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Freight Performance Measures Crystal Jones FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
IHS Consulting U.S. Economic Outlook FHWA Talking Freight Seminar Steve Owens Consultant, Commodity Flow Analysis & Forecasting February 16, 2011.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Transportation Analysis Maritime Program November 19, 2009.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Transportation—Managing the Flow of the Supply Chain Lecture 8.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Transportation of Hazardous Goods in the United States: Data from the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Steven Beningo Presented to the UNECE WP.6 Geneva, Switzerland.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Freight Data and Decision-Making Tools Talking Freight Seminar Series September 17, 2003 Felix Ammah-Tagoe,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Estimating Economic Impacts of Border Wait Times in the San Diego-Baja California Region February 24, 2006.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Technology and the National Freight Action Agenda U.S. Department of Transportation Richard M. Biter Deputy Director US DOT, Office of Intermodalism November.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
EQUIPMENT REVIEW RSTAC May 20,2014. Concluding Summary Equipment Review What the Future Holds  Continued rapid growth in goods movement with increasing.
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
Materials Management Systems
11DSCI4743 Physical Distribution Definition Physical distribution is the movement & storage of finished goods from the end of production to the customer.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Microsimulation of Commodity Flow in the Mississippi Valley Region The Microsimulation Team of the Center for Freight Infrastructure Research and Education.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
European Strategic Traffic Forecasts and possible contribution for the TEM Master Plan Bratislava 9 February 2004 Benno Bultink DG Public Works, the Netherlands.
Chapter 13 Transportation in the Supply Chain
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Inter-American Development Bank Freight Transport and Logistics Observatories October 19, 2010.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Transportation in the Supply Chain
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Physical Distribution Definition
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation To inform policy and investment, we need to understand How does the movement of freight affect the transportation system?  Contributions to congestion, infrastructure wear, safety, the environment, revenues How does the transportation system affect freight movement?  Expected and unexpected delay, costs How does the economy adjust?  Economic productivity, shifting economic activity among regions, global competitiveness

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation To answer these questions, we need to understand How much freight moves from place to place?  Type of commodity  Weight  Value How is the freight carried?  Mode of transportation  Route used When is the freight carried?  Season  Time of day

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation The big picture Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) integrates data from many sources into:  Region-to-region tons and value by all modes for shipments in 1997 and 2002, provisional estimates for most recent year, and forecasts through 2035  Average number of long-distance, freight-hauling trucks on individual highway segments for 2002 and 2035 Freight Performance Measures Program  Speeds of 400,000 trucks on 25 Interstate Highways by time and place  Crossing delay at major border crossings

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation What FAF does Estimate total volume of freight moving between and within FAF regions by mode and commodity Assign longer distance flows (among places at least 50 miles apart) to corridors with reasonable accuracy Forecast total volume of freight moving between and within FAF regions by mode and commodity Forecast the pressure future freight flows would place on the existing network

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation What FAF does not do Estimate flows accurately for areas smaller than FAF regions Estimate flows accurately for individual routes with alternative paths and for places less than 50 miles apart Estimate temporal variations in freight flows Estimate or be sensitive to costs of transportation Include effects of capacity limitations in forecasts of future demand Forecast future capacity expansion

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Bottom line FAF provides a comprehensive national picture of freight flows and a baseline forecast to support policy studies FAF indicates to states and localities their major trading partners and the volumes and sources of through traffic at the corridor level Local planning and project analysis requires supplemental data collection to provide local detail Policy analysis requires supplemental models to make forecasts sensitive to cost and other variables

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF versions Version 1 covers longer distance flows for 1998, 2010, and 2020 by all modes except pipeline, with available public detail and transparency limited by proprietary data Version 2 makes the most of the 2002 Economic Census and is based on public data and transparent methods Version 2.2 corrects problems encountered with international flows the initial release of version 2 Version 2.3 will include ton miles estimates and final adjustments to version 2 Version 3 will be based on the 2007 Economic Census

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: region-to-region flows Origin-Destination Database  Value and weight for all domestic shipments, exports, and imports (excludes only foreign-to-foreign via US)  6 modes (truck, rail, water, air, intermodal, pipeline and unknown)  114 domestic CFS regions, 17 additional international gateways, 7 international regions  43 commodity classes (2-digit SCTG codes)  Estimates for Economic Census years (1997 and 2002), forecasts for 2010 through Provisional estimates for most recent year

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: the 114 CFS regions

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: trucks on the network Network Flow Database  FAF trucks (which carry commodities between locations at least 50 miles apart), other trucks, passenger vehicles, and selected capacity measures for individual highway segments  Covers over 240,000 miles of highways (46,000 miles of the Interstate System plus 115,000 for balance of National Highway System, plus 47,000 miles for balance of National Truck Network plus 35,000 of other roads)  Estimate for 2002, forecast of traffic with no change to capacity for 2035

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: trucks on the network

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: data sources Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) Transborder Freight Transportation Data Rail Waybill Waterborne Commerce Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey Highway Performance Monitoring System National Transportation Atlas Database Transportation Satellite Account

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: relationship with CFS The CFS is the major data source for the FAF and provides domestic geography and definitions of modes/intermodal The CFS has greater commodity detail and identifies hazardous cargo, but does not include imports, shipments from farms, shipments of crude petroleum and municipal solid waste, etc. The FAF estimates tons and value of freight not covered by the CFS

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: relationship with the Rail Waybill Shipments by more than one railroad are counted more than once in the Rail Waybill and only once in the FAF Shipments by rail and one or more other modes are counted as rail in the Rail Waybill and as Intermodal in the FAF

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: relationship with Waterborne Commerce Shipments by a combination of deep sea, inland water, and intra-port are counted once in the FAF and multiple times in Waterborne Commerce Crude petroleum from off-shore platforms is counted as water in Waterborne Commerce and pipeline in FAF Shipments to and from Puerto Rico are counted as domestic in Waterborne Commerce and as part of Latin America in FAF

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: what is intermodal? FAF intermodal is more than TOFC-COFC  All 2+ modal combinations reported in CFS, including bulk products  Postal and courier services for packages weighing less than 100 pounds reported in CFS  Excludes air-truck combination for shipments weighing more than 100 pounds, which is not separated from air only FAF intermodal does not include single mode segments of a supply chain involving multiple shippers FAF classifies intermodal shipments across borders with Canada and Mexico by the mode of entry

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: what is intermodal? Domestic only  1.1 percent of tons and 8.9 percent of value in 2002 Domestic leg of imports and exports  1.3 percent of tons and 2.6 percent of value in 2002 Imports and exports  66.1 percent of tons and 45.9 percent of value in 2002 Domestic plus imports plus exports  6.6 percent of tons and 14.7 percent of value in 2002

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF details: relationship with GDP The value of FAF shipments exceeds GDP  FAF counts each commodity move during the year: grain worth $1,000 from farm to grain elevator which becomes grain worth $1,200 from elevator to bakery which becomes bread worth $2,000 from bakery to store is three tons of freight.  GDP counts net value: the value of bread consumed by households during the year and the value grain still in storage and bread still on the shelves at the end of the year.

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Building on FAF Improved forecasts  Quick Response Freight Manual  NCFRP project on freight forecasting  Links to HERS and other policy models Improved data  More accurate truck counts  Links to freight performance measures and vehicle classification data for understanding consequences and temporal variation  Local data collection for local detail

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF quality depends on customer feedback Do the estimates match observations?  FAF databases are huge, and unexpected results do not appear until users dig into the details  Most unexpected region-to-region flows have plausible explanations, but some flows appear to be improperly assigned among modes or commodities.  Adjustments will be made where feasible in version 2.3 Does the de facto Freight Data Architecture make sense?  Architecture includes modal definitions, commodity classification systems, and other means of linking across national data sets and between national and local data  NCFRP project will specify what should be in an architecture

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Questions and feedback FAF Rolf Schmitt FAF design, freight modeling, and freight data architecture Michael Sprung FAF products and data sources Freight performance measures Crystal Jones Travel times in freight-significant corridors and border crossing delay