Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
GIS and Transportation Planning
Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to MTF Data Committee presented by Capton Siluvairajan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Date: 10/17/2008.
Empirical Study of Urban Commercial Vehicle Tour Patterns in Texas Wei Zhou, Jane Lin University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Civil and Materials.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
MAG New Generation Freight Model SHRP2 C20 IAP Project Vladimir Livshits, Ph.D AMPO Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA October 23, 2014 Freight Session.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 ANALYZING LONG-DISTANCE TRUCK TRAVEL FOR STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLANNING IN OHIO Presented by:
FREIGHT PLANNING – MPO’S ROLE Ms. Pragati Srivastava Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) February 27, 2014.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Transportation Planning and Modeling Transportation planning is a field involved with the evaluation, assessment, design and siting of transportation facilities.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
RPS Land Use and Transportation Modeling Results Presentation to RPS TAC & MPO TAC Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit May 17, 2006.
Iowa Statewide Travel Demand Model A Status Report Paul Hershkowitz Wilbur Smith Associates Dane Ismart The Louis Berger Group Mary Lupa Wilbur Smith Associates.
Behavioral Micro-Simulation 1 Jose Holguin-Veras, Ph.D., P.E. William H. Hart Professor VREF’s Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
A Tour-Based Urban Freight Transportation Model Based on Entropy Maximization Qian Wang, Assistant Professor Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Microsimulation of Commodity Flow in the Mississippi Valley Region The Microsimulation Team of the Center for Freight Infrastructure Research and Education.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
University of Wisconsin – Madison Memphis Overview Dan Pallme, Acting Director Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute University of Memphis 10/26/2012.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Developing External and Truck Trips for a Regional Travel Model
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2015 Anurag Komanduri, Daniel Beagan, Thomas Rossi Andrew Ray, Kwasi Agyakwa, Memphis MPO

Why Model Trucks? Trucks move goods and provide services in urban areas » Contribute to congestion » Impact air quality and emissions » Affect roadway wear-and-tear and safety Federal requirements to study freight - CFR Title 23 Part 450 » 320.c.1 Identify & evaluate alternative strategies » 306.a.4 Increase accessibility & mobility of people and freight » 306.a.6 Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system,..., for people and freight 2

Memphis Region Major freight and logistics hub » Five Class I railroads serve Memphis » Busiest cargo airport in the US – second only to Hong Kong » Major river port on the Mississippi River Federal Express is headquartered in Memphis » Major distribution center » Truck traffic “in” and “out” of the distribution center Freight expected to keep growing… 3

Memphis Truck Model Develop model based on “reality” » Use as much data as possible to build models Use FAF3 to assess VMT from freight trucks » Total trucks reported on links from HPMS » FAF trucks are assigned – 35% of total VMT » Therefore, 65% of VMT by service trucks » 64% of truck tonnage is EI/IE/EE Modeling data needs » Internal trucks – combination of freight and service trucks » External trucks – freight (commodity) trucks 4

Memphis Truck Model External truck model database - TRANSEARCH » Commodity flow database » Provided by Tennessee DOT » County-level information Internal truck model database – ATRI » Includes both freight and service trucks » Processed ATRI GPS data provided by Tennessee DOT » Trip ends available at statewide model TAZ level » Use QRFM as a basis for model development 5

Memphis Truck Model Step 1. Clean and prepare estimation datasets Step 2. Develop detailed employment datasets for estimation Step 3. Identify top commodity groups/QRFM employment categories for freight model Step 4. Estimate trip production/attraction rates Step 5. Estimate parameters for trip distribution model Step 6. Combine truck trips and assign to network 6

Step 1. External Estimation Database Obtain and process TDOT TRANSEARCH data Assign to FAF3 highway network Window to Memphis MPO model boundary Identify I-E/E-I/E-E trips County-level estimation TAZ-level application 7

Step 1. Internal Estimation Database 8 Weighted ATRI truck trip ends assigned to TAZ » ATRI only contains heavy trucks » QRFM has equations for heavy, medium, and light Differences found in average travel times » QRFM heavy trucks = 33.3 minutes » ATRI heavy trucks = 10 minutes Differences in Memphis region potentially driven by industry and local land use

Step 2. Develop NAICS Employment Databases Obtain TDOT Infogroup data » Purchase 2013 data for Memphis region Obtain and process Infogroup data for AR & MS Counties Perform manual corrections to develop baseline employment data Assigned to both Memphis MPO model TAZ and statewide Model TAZ 9

Step 3. Commodity Groups – External Model 10 Commodity GroupSCTG Daily IE Trucks Produced from Region Daily EI Trucks Attracted to Region Farm Products %1,12228% Food Products %2426% Sand and Gravel %99024% Gasoline & Fuel %3248% Chemicals %471% Non-Durable Manufacture %1343% Clay, Concrete, Glass %1684% Durable Manufacture %1413% Waste %742% Secondary and Mixed Freight SCTG 43 SCTG 50 1,85948%82720% Total 3,850100%4,068100%

Step 3. QRFM Model Trip Rates – Internal Model Employment Categories Light Trucks Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks Agriculture, Mining and Construction Manufacturing, TCU and Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Office and Services Households

Step 4. External Trip Generation Models 12 Internal (TAZ) Truck Trips ends » Develop NAICS employment by TAZ as explanatory variables » Use most suitable NAICS for each commodity group External (Station) Truck Trip Ends » Estimate from windowed TRANSEARCH » Match observed truck counts – get splits between EI/IE/EE Apply modeled internal trip end results to all TN counties » Assess whether model estimates are reasonable » All work fine – except “secondary and mixed freight” » Impact of FedEx probably causes Shelby County to be outlier

Step 4. External Trip Generation Models 13

Step 4. Internal Model Trip Generation Models Variable QRFM Heavy Truck Rate ATRI Heavy Truck Rate Agriculture, Mining and Construction Manufacturing, TCU and Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Office and Services Households Employment Categories – Scaled Rates Light Trucks Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks Agriculture, Mining and Construction Manufacturing, TCU and Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Office and Services Households

Step 4. Internal Model Trip Generation Models Outlier analysis » Observed trips more than +/- 34% ( ½ SD) of estimated trips Difference between observed trips and ½ SD tested as special generator adjustment 15 TAZATRI From Model Special Generator Addition Revised Estimates Facility ,9055,751 11,93917,690 BNSF Memphis IM Yard ,3556,662 8,80115,463 BNSF Memphis IM Yard ,1193,518 4,7208,238 BNSF Memphis IM Yard ,9971,682 8,83910,522 Port of Memphis

Step 5. Trip Distribution Models 16 Gravity model used for trip distribution » Distance used as the friction factor for the external model » Travel time used as the friction factor for the internal model Productions and attractions from trip generation results Friction factor coefficient is the inverse of the average trip length » For external model, internal and external distance skims developed for each CG » For internal model, congested travel time skims used Models estimated and then applied…

Step 5. Trip Distribution Models External model behaves reasonably well Allows for forecasts using… » Future year TRANSEARCH/FAF projections at external stations » Socio-demographic data in internal zones Internal model has interesting elements » Trip generation in model – much higher than QRFM » Average travel time in model much lower than QRFM » Many intra-TAZ trips found in processed ATRI database » Possibly low threshold set for “truck stop durations” » Overall “assignable” truck trips comparable to QRFM estimates 17

Step 6. Truck Model Assignment Tables from internal and external truck models combined prior to assignment Key points… » Internal truck trip ends are function of SED in each TAZ » External truck trip ends controlled by traffic counts » Distribution of trips within Memphis model is based on network skims Model results calibrated to truck counts in region 18

Conclusions High-performance truck models can be developed from aggregate and passive sources of data collection Collaborative data purchases can support multiple projects and reduce costs Processing of passive data must be customized to local behavior Understand special generators and account for them during modeling 19

20 Questions?