2 ICO www.ico.uni-jena.de R. Filter, K. Słowik, J. Straubel, F. Lederer, and C. Rockstuhl Institute of Condensed Matter Theory and Solid State Optics Abbe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APRIL 2010 AARHUS UNIVERSITY Simulation of probed quantum many body systems.
Advertisements

Quantum Optics Seminar
Parametric Down-conversion and other single photons sources December 2009 Assaf Halevy Course # 77740, Dr. Hagai Eisenberg 1.
Emergent Majorana Fermion in Cavity QED Lattice
Shanhui Fan, Shanshan Xu, Eden Rephaeli
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 8. Semiclassical Radiation Theory 8.1 Introduction Semiclassical theory of light-matter interaction (Ch. 6-7)
Durham University – Atomic & Molecular Physics group
Non-equilibrium dynamics in the Dicke model Izabella Lovas Supervisor: Balázs Dóra Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Patrick Sebbah Nicolas Bachelard, Sylvain Gigan Institut Langevin, ESPCI ParisTech CNRS UMR 7587, Paris A. Christian Vanneste, Xavier Noblin LPMC – Université.
Non-equilibrium physics Non-equilibrium physics in one dimension Igor Gornyi Москва Сентябрь 2012 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University.
TWO-PHOTON ABSORPTION IN SEMICONDUCTORS Fabien BOITIER, Antoine GODARD, Emmanuel ROSENCHER Claude FABRE ONERA Palaiseau Laboratoire Kastler Brossel Paris.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
PG lectures Spontaneous emission. Outline Lectures 1-2 Introduction What is it? Why does it happen? Deriving the A coefficient. Full quantum description.
IMT INSTITUT DE MICROTECHNIQUE NEUCHÂTEL Optical cavity with high quality factor Q Photonic crystals course final presentation Karin Söderström.
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene PolzikLECTURE 5.
Cavity QED as a Deterministic Photon Source Gary Howell Feb. 9, 2007.
CAVITY QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS IN PHOTONIC CRYSTAL STRUCTURES Photonic Crystal Doctoral Course PO-014 Summer Semester 2009 Konstantinos G. Lagoudakis.
PG lectures Spontaneous emission. Outline Lectures 1-2 Introduction What is it? Why does it happen? Deriving the A coefficient. Full quantum description.
Crystal Lattice Vibrations: Phonons
Guillaume TAREL, PhC Course, QD EMISSION 1 Control of spontaneous emission of QD using photonic crystals.
Wave Nature of Light and Quantum Theory
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Anharmonic Oscillator Derivation of Second Order Susceptibilities
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Generation of Mesoscopic Superpositions of Two Squeezed States of Motion for A Trapped Ion Shih-Chuan Gou ( 郭西川 ) Department of Physics National Changhua.
Nanophotonics Class 4 Density of states. Outline Spontaneous emission: an exited atom/molecule/.. decays to the ground state and emits a photon Emission.
A nonequilibrium renormalization group approach to turbulent reheating A case study in nonlinear nonequilibrium quantum field theory J. Zanella, EC Part.
Average Lifetime Atoms stay in an excited level only for a short time (about 10-8 [sec]), and then they return to a lower energy level by spontaneous emission.
Superradiance, Amplification, and Lasing of Terahertz Radiation in an Array of Graphene Plasmonic Nanocavities V. V. Popov, 1 O. V. Polischuk, 1 A. R.
0 APS-Sherwood Texas 2006-April Study of nonlinear kinetic effects in Stimulated Raman Scattering using semi- Lagrangian Vlasov codes Alain Ghizzo.
Czesław Radzewicz Warsaw University Poland Konrad Banaszek Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń, Poland Alex Lvovsky University of Calgary Alberta, Canada.
Degree of polarization in quantum optics UCMUCM Luis L. Sánchez-Soto, E. C. Yustas Universidad Complutense. Madrid. Spain Andrei B. Klimov Universidad.
1 Controlling spontaneous emission J-J Greffet Laboratoire Charles Fabry Institut d’Optique, CNRS, Université Paris Sud Palaiseau (France)
Interference in BEC Interference of 2 BEC’s - experiments Do Bose-Einstein condensates have a macroscopic phase? How can it be measured? Castin & Dalibard.
Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions in a cavity and free space Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions.
Waves, Light & Quanta Tim Freegarde Web Gallery of Art; National Gallery, London.
Quantum pumping and rectification effects in interacting quantum dots Francesco Romeo In collaboration with : Dr Roberta Citro Prof. Maria Marinaro University.
Early quantum optics Blackbody radiation Planck 1900: EM wave amplitudes/energies work as though they were quantized Photoelectric effect: Einstein.
Spontaneous Emission in 2D Arbitrary Inhomogeneous Environment Peng-Fei Qiao, Wei E. I. Sha, Yongpin P. Chen, Wallace C. H. Choy, and Weng Cho Chew * Department.
Strong coupling between a metallic nanoparticle and a single molecule Andi Trügler and Ulrich Hohenester Institut für Physik, Univ. Graz
Microscopic model of photon condensation Milan Radonjić, Antun Balaž and Axel Pelster TU Berlin,
LPHYS’07 – Leon – August 22 nd 2007 Alessandro Zavatta, Valentina Parigi, Myungshik Kim, and Marco Bellini Istituto Nazionale di Ottica Applicata (INOA)
Purdue University Spring 2014 Prof. Yong P. Chen Lecture 16 (3/31/2014) Slide Introduction to Quantum Optics.
Pablo Barberis Blostein y Marc Bienert
Chapter 11. Laser Oscillation : Power and Frequency
For long wavelength, compared to the size of the atom The term containing A 2 in the dipole approximation does not involve atomic operators, consequently.
Quantum Theory of the Coherently Pumped Micromaser István Németh and János Bergou University of West Hungary Department of Physics CEWQO 2008 Belgrade,
International Scientific Spring 2016
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
Tunable excitons in gated graphene systems
Early quantum optics Blackbody radiation
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
Coherent and squeezed states of the radiation field
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Production of an S(α,β) Covariance Matrix with a Monte Carlo-Generated
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Coupled atom-cavity system
Quantum Information with Continuous Variables
Ehud Altman Anatoli Polkovnikov Bertrand Halperin Mikhail Lukin
Lattice Vibrational Contribution to the Heat Capacity of the Solid
Lattice Vibrational Contribution
Advanced Optical Sensing
Kenji Kamide* and Tetsuo Ogawa
Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian
Presentation transcript:

2 ICO R. Filter, K. Słowik, J. Straubel, F. Lederer, and C. Rockstuhl Institute of Condensed Matter Theory and Solid State Optics Abbe Center of Photonics Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany

3 ICO „There‘s Plenty of Room at the Bottom“ Feynman, Caltech goal: arrange atoms on the nanoscale -new opportunities for design -laws of quantum mechanics Conclusion: Nanoantennas – a dream becoming reality Feynman’s Dream

4 ICO Outline 4 Nanoantennas for ultrabright single photon sources Nonclassical light basics

5 ICO Nonclassical Light light properties that cannot be explained using classical theories 5 Han et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008)Ates et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) squeezed light Oka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (2013) single photonsentanglement nonlin. vs. loss time scales coupling to non- bosonic systems enhanced emission via interaction of quantum systems

6 ICO Nanostructures: Single Photon Sources enhanced single-photon em. quantum properties survive Claudon et al., Nat. Phot. 4 (2010) Akimov et al., Nature 450 (2007) Goal: Ultra-bright integrated single-photon sources -quantum computation -quantum Cryptography -single-photon interactions -…

7 ICO Single-Photon Source Characterization – g²(τ) Usual quantification: second-order correlation function Why? Compare possible classical and quantum values. Classically: Order not impartant: at :

8 ICO Quantum g²(τ) Cannot ignore order of operators! assumption: single mode field (otherwise summation)

9 ICO Quantum g²(τ) - examples Thermal Radiation: Boitier et al., Nat. Comm. 2 (2011) Coherent Radiation: (Poisson) interpretation: the photons arrive in bunches (Boltzmann) Öttl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 95 (2005)

10 ICO Quantum g²(τ) - examples n-photon source:all light is in the n‘th (Fock) state: n = 1: g²(0) = 0! no classical analogon – antibunching Kimble et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977)

11 ICO Why Nanoantennas for Single-Photon Sources? Far field ↔ Near field (passive): enhanced interaction H. Yagi & S. Uda, 1926 Bharadwaj et al, Adv. Opt. Phot. 1 (2009) Utikal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) Nonlinear Processes (aktive)

12 ICO main aspects: Emission Rate & Nonclassicality Esteban et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) Busson et al., Nat. Comm. 4 (2012) sub GHz Michler et al., Science 290 (2000)

13 ICO Characteristics of Nanoantennas Mühlschlegel et al., Science 308 (2005) Size Description Filter et al., Phys.Rev.B 85 (2012) Akimov et al., Nature 450 (2007) Receiver/Emitter

14 ICO nonclassical light properties: nanoantenna quantization inevitable

15 ICO Nanoantenna & Quantum System Interaction Time Dependent Density Functional Theory treatment -exhaustive and demanding -internal properties of nanoantenna, “exact” near-field Filter et al., Opt. Expr. 21 (2013) & Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) Semiclassical Description -back-action of quantum system negligible Zuolaga et al., Nano Lett. 9 (2009) Cavity QED description -back-action of quantum system taken into account -nonclassical field dynamics Słowik, Filter et al., Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013)

16 ICO Nanoantenna cQED cQED working horse: atom in a cavity Parameters: -loss rate Γ -coupling constant ϰ -cavity and atom frequencies ω c & ω at Nanoantennas can be treated similar -Loss rate Γ = Γ rad + Γ diss -coupling constant ϰ -nanoantenna mode and atom frequencies ω na & ω at -assumption: bosonic excitation, i.e. harm. oscillator

17 ICO Cavity Quantization also for Nanoantennas? -cQED approach appealing vs involved Green‘s function quantization -open cavity: losses! -Mode usage justified? Yes, quasinormal modes -Basics: Ching et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998), plasmonics calculations: de Lasson et al., JOSA B 30 (2013) -quantization not trivial approximate determination: 1.eigenmode frequency ω n via scattering analysis 2.normalize scattered near fields to energy ħω n  E n (r) & B n (r) 3.calculate loss rates via Poynting‘s theorem e.g. dipole interaction: Słowik, Filter et al., Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013)

18 ICO Single-Photon Sources – Real Quantum Approach Is it possible to build a miniaturized ultra-bright single photon source with nice nonclassical properties? Answer so far: of course, just a matter of high Purcell factor! But: Things are not that easy… Need fully quantum approach! Quantum dot coupled to nanoantenna in cQED formalism, Jaynes-Cummings Heisenberg picture with incoherent pump of QD and loss of nanoantenna: Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014)

19 ICO Quantum Single Photon Source – Emission rate cold reservoir solution: with nanoantenna efficiency Two limiting cases of R vs. : -weak pump: -strong pump: But usually far away from strong pump! Purcell factor connection: Emission Rate: Purcell & pumping rate Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014)

20 ICO Nanoantenna Design two-ellipsoid nanoantennas, varying conformal ratios a/d parameter determination trade-off: efficiency vs. coupling strength Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014)

21 ICO Quantum Calculations density matrix formulation -include losses All quantum observables can be calculated! Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014)

22 ICO Emission Rate Theory Check Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014) vs. fully quantum computation

23 ICO Check for nonclassicality – quantum simulations trade-off: Purcell factor vs. g²(0) Filter et al., Opt. Lett. 39 (2014)

24 ICO Conclusion Plasmonics: Electrical engineering – nanoantenna design Nanofabrication – physical, chemical Nanophotonics – theoretical description Quantum optics nanoantenna cQED: parameters from classical simulations true quantum phenomena

25 ICO Appendix

26 ICO Cavity Quantization in a Nutshell I Single-mode cavity, Volume Hamilton function from energy density and with Hamilton eqs:

27 ICO Cavity Quantization in a Nutshell II Canonical commutation relation → annihilation & creation operators → Hamilton & interactions : fully quantum fields:

28 ICO Squeezed Light - Heisenberg 28 Heisenberg: with std. deviation example: Possibility: improve one standard deviation at cost of the other - ex.: defined state with respect to position, but high uncertainty in momentum Squeezed states: amplitude vs. phase deviation trade-off

29 ICO Squeezed Light - Operators Quadrature Operators: Connection to amplitude and phase: Squeezed State:

30 ICO Squeezed State Generation - Theory Squeeze Operator: Squeezed vacuum state i.e. amplitude squeezing for Variances of quadrature operators, squeezing strength ~ r:

31 ICO Squeezed State Generation - Physics Two different nonlinear effects are used to generate squeezed states: -degenerate parametric down conversion -degenerate four-wave mixing Connection to squeezed states: -assume coherent (classical) state in pump b, with amplitude β -define and -interaction can be written as Unitary time evolution: squeezed states

32 ICO Squeezed states – Opportunities?! Karr et al, Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) cavity polaritons – strong nonlinearity Nanoantennas? Nonlinearities vs. losses very small negligible squeezing