© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Making Your Own Luck with PGES: “What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity” Overview by Jill Cabrera, PhD Educational Administration, Leadership.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
PGES SUMMER ADMINISTRATOR’S TRAINING 2014 Mark & Debbie.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Differentiated Supervision
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Plan Training.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (PGES) Webcast July 24, 2013.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
RI Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting October 25, 2010.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Requirements PCBOE 8/5/2015.
Certified Evaluation Plan Training Module Products of Practice, Student Voice Surveys December 2014.
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN TRAINING FOR TEACHERS August 2015 ©2015 Harlan Independent School District.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Student Voice and Peer Observation in the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Authentically Integrating Student Voice Into Your Classroom
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Have you created your PBS account yet? If not, go to account.pbs.org/accounts/openid/register/ 1.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TPGES SUMMATIVE OVERALL PERFORMANCE CATEGORY The Whole is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts…Putting It All Together.
© 2014, KDE and KLA. All rights reserved. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND SELF-REFLECTION.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Kentucky Department of Education Professional Growth and Effectiveness System PGES Webcast March 18, 2015.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Target  Understand and communicate to certified staff the timeline, process and sources of evidence that will be used for implementing the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) 2

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. The vision for the Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (PGES) is to have every student taught by an effective teacher. The goal is to create a fair and equitable system to measure teacher effectiveness and act as a catalyst for professional growth. Model District Certified Evaluation Plan 3.0: KDE 3

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Framework for Teaching  Domain 1: Planning & Preparation  Domain 2: Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. What are we looking for?  Who is doing the work?  Flow  Understanding  Atmosphere  “The Why”  Data  Procedures  Reflection

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Performance Levels  Exemplary  Accomplished  Developing  Ineffective

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Framework for Teaching Overview

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. CEP Certified Evaluation Plan Teachers (pages 8 – 43)

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. August / September October / November December / January February/March April/May T P G E S Teacher creates: Student Growth Goal/Plan Professional Growth Goal/Plan Meets with principal to collaborate on both goals/plans Mid-Year Conference Student Voice Survey End-of-Year Conference 4 observations  1 full observation by supervisor  3 mini observations  1 peer observation  2 supervisor observations  Pre/post-conferencing protocols Timelines: p.11 of CEP At least one full observation must be conducted by the principal AND the peer observation must be done during the final year of the district’s evaluation cycle. 9

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Observations  One-Year Cycle Teachers  four observations in the summative year  Three-Year Cycle Teachers  Peer observation and Full observation during summative year  Mini observation can be spread out during the three-year cycle  Mini observations will be announced, however will be scheduled in a 5 day window span.  All documentation will be completed in CIITS (Continuous Instructional Improvement Technology System)

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Trainings  Observer  Calibrate every year  Recertified every four years  Peer Observer  Every three years  All Certified Teachers will be trained as Peer Observers

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. Student Voice Survey p.41  Feedback that collects feedback yearly on specific aspects of the classroom experience and teaching practice.  Results will be used as a source of evidence for Professional Practice. Formative years’ data will be used to inform Professional Practice in the summative year.  Principal will determine the sections to participate in the survey, with consistency building-wide.  10 or more students must respond for the data to be considered. Students must be enrolled a minimum of 15 days