A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Meaningful Use Stage I Class III Menu Objectives
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Improve Quality Safety, Efficiency and Reducing Health Disparities Subgroup 1 Meaningful Use Workgroup Improve Quality Safety,
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
Presenter James S. Dunnick, SESEDN LLC. Credentials: MD. FACC. CHCQM. CPC. Contact Information:
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
REC support is. provided under cooperative agreement 90RC0025/01 from the Office of the National Coordinator for HIT, US Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Behavioral Health providers are being challenged to adopt health information technology with very limited resources. There is a need to prepare for increased.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
WV HFMA January 23,  Understand Stage 1 changes starting in 2014  Understand Stage 2 Objectives & Quality Measures – changes from Stage 1 and.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible Professionals Carol Kulczyk October 10,
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Robert Anthony HITPC
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Presentation transcript:

A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD

Overall requirements EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives and 3 of 5 menu objectives. (Stage 1 was 15/5 of 10) Eligible hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 16 core objectives and 2 of 4 menu objectives. (Stage 1 was 14/5 of 10) EPs to report 12 CQMs (Stage 1 was 6) Eligible hospitals and CAHs to report 24 CQMs (Stage 1 was 15) Alignment with other Quality Measurement initiatives

Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities More than 60 percent (Stage 1 was 30%) of medication, laboratory, and radiology orders created by the EP or authorized providers of the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. More than 65 percent (Stage 1 was 40%) of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are compared to at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology. More than 80 percent (Stage 1 was 50%) of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) have demographics recorded as structured data.

Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities More than 80 percent (Stage 1 was 50%) of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) have blood pressure (for patients age 3 and over only) and height/length and weight (for all ages) recorded as structured data More than 80 percent (Stage 1 was 50%) of all unique patients 13 years old or older seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) have smoking status recorded as structured data Implement 5 clinical decision support interventions (Stage 1 was one) related to 5 or more clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period. The EP, eligible hospital or CAH has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug- allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period. (Stage 1 required implementation)

Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities More than 55 percent (Stage 1 was 40%, menu set) of all clinical lab tests results ordered by the EP or by authorized providers of the eligible hospital or CAH for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23 during the EHR reporting period whose results are either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in Certified EHR Technology as structured data Generate at least one report listing patients of the EP, eligible hospital or CAH with a specific condition. (Stage 1 was same) More than 10 percent of all unique patients who have had an office visit with the EP within the 24 months prior to the beginning of the EHR reporting period were sent a reminder, per patient preference (Stage 1 was 20%, menu set) More than 10 percent of medication orders created by authorized providers of the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period are tracked using eMAR. (New)

Engage patients and families in their health care More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information (Stage 1 was 10%, menu set) More than 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) view, download, or transmit to a third party their health information (New) More than 50 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge (Stage 1 was 10%, menu set) More than 10 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the reporting period (New)

Engage patients and families in their health care Clinical summaries provided to patients within 24 hours for more than 50 percent of office visits. (Stage 1 was 3 days) Patient-specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology are provided to patients for more than 10 percent of all office visits by the EP. More than 10 percent of all unique patients admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) are provided patient- specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology (Stage 1 was menu set) A secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of Certified EHR Technology by more than 10 percent of unique patients seen during the EHR reporting period (New)

Improve Care Coordination The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 65 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23). (Stage 1 was 50%, menu set) The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 65 percent of transitions of care and referrals. (Stage 1 was 50%, menu set) The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care electronically transmits a summary of care record using certified EHR technology to a recipient with no organizational affiliation and using a different Certified EHR Technology vendor than the sender for more than 10 percent of transitions of care and referrals. (Stage 1 was one test)

Improve Population and Public Health Hospital and EP - Successful ongoing submission of electronic immunization data from Certified EHR Technology to an immunization registry or immunization information system for the entire EHR reporting period (Stage 1 was a single test, menu set) Hospital - Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from Certified EHR Technology to public health agencies for the entire EHR reporting period as authorized. (Stage 1 was a single test, menu set) Hospital - Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from Certified EHR Technology to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period (Stage 1 was a single test, menu set)

Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR (a)(1), including addressing the encryption/security of data at rest in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR (d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider's risk management process. (added data at rest)

Menu Set - Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities More than 50 percent of all unique patients 65 years old or older admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient department (POS 21) during the EHR reporting period have an indication of an advance directive status recorded as structured data. (Stage 1 was advance directive indicator only) More than 40 percent of all scans and tests whose result is an image ordered by the EP or by an authorized provider of the eligible hospital or CAH for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 and 23) during the EHR reporting period are accessible through Certified EHR Technology (New) More than 20 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have a structured data entry for one or more first- degree relatives (New) More than 10 percent of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions (for new or changed prescriptions) are compared to at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology (New)

Menu Set - Improve Population and Public Health EP - Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from Certified EHR Technology to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period (Stage 1 was a single test) Successful ongoing submission of cancer case information from Certified EHR Technology to a cancer registry for the entire EHR reporting period (New) Successful ongoing submission of specific case information from Certified EHR Technology to a specialized registry for the entire EHR reporting period (New)

Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals Option 1a - EPs would report 12 clinical quality measures from those listed in Table 8, including at least 1 measure from each of the 6 domains: Patient and Family Engagement. Patient Safety. Care Coordination. Population and Public Health. Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources. Clinical Process/Effectiveness. Option 1b- EPs would report 11 "core" clinical quality measures listed in Table 6 plus 1 "menu" clinical quality measure from Table 8. Option 2: Submit and satisfactorily report clinical quality measures under the Physician Quality Reporting System's EHR Reporting Option." Table 6 is based upon analysis of several factors that include: conditions that contribute the most to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries' morbidity and mortality; conditions that represent national public/population health priorities; conditions that are common to health disparities; those conditions that disproportionately drive healthcare costs that could improve with better quality measurement; measures that would enable CMS, States, and the provider community to measure quality of care in new dimensions with a stronger focus on parsimonious measurement; and those measures that include patient and/or caregiver engagement. Table 8 lists all of the clinical quality measures that we are considering for EPs to report for the EHR Incentive Programs beginning with CY 2014.

Quality Measures for Hospitals Requires eligible hospitals and CAHs to report 24 clinical quality measures from a menu of 49 clinical quality measures, including at least 1 clinical quality measure from each of the 6 domains: Clinical Process/Effectiveness. Patient Safety. Care Coordination. Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources Patient & Family Engagement. Population & Public Health. The measures in Table 9 are based on statutory requirements, the HITPC's recommendations, alignment with other CMS and national hospital quality measurement programs such as the Joint Commission, the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program and Hospital Value- Based Purchasing Program, and the National Quality Strategy.

Questions