Certification and Professional Learning Rule Changes: Impact on Special Educators in Georgia Georgia Council for Administrators of Special Education Fall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACESetters! Alternative Teacher Evaluation
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Teacher Certification Assessor Information Session November 27, 2014.
Performance management guidance
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
An Overview of Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures Georgia Assessment Directors’ Association Fall 2013 Meeting Chuck McCampbell.
Update Session with GaPSC Spring 2012 Update from the Educator Preparation and Certification Division.
Welcome! Day with GaPSC West Georgia RESA February 7, 2013.
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
What is the Curriculum/Program Development Process? What leadership will you offer? How does it work in your organization? Share with your group…..
C ERTIFICATION IN G EORGIA NASDTEC Conference June 2015.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
ADEPT Framework
Leadership Through An Instructional Lens Dr. Krista D. Parent Oregon Leadership Network Institute April 22, 2009.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Educational Leadership Update Certification Officials Drive-in Conference December 1, 2008.
National Board Certification Awareness Meeting Presented by: Tammy Kirkland, NBCT.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Professional Learning Changes for Georgia Educators Moving to Implementation
Tiered Certification and GaTAPP Jeffrey Homan, Ed.S. Stefan McCain, M.A.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Certification Division A Day With The GaPSC. AGENDA 1 Certification Update 2 Pre-Service 3 Tiered Certification Reminders 4 Educational Leadership 5 Upgrade.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Los Angeles Unified School District Human Resources Division Teacher and Administrator Development Branch Teacher Leadership Certification Program.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Professional Learning for School Counselors
Update Session with GaPSC
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Licensure Overview and Master Teacher Program
Redesign of Professional Learning
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Proposal for Redesign of Education Leadership Preparation
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

Certification and Professional Learning Rule Changes: Impact on Special Educators in Georgia Georgia Council for Administrators of Special Education Fall Conference, November 2014

Session Overview Demonstrate how the puzzle pieces of school improvement are being put together to improve teaching and learning in Georgia Identify resources available to help navigate complex changes in certification and professional learning.

Session Overview Provide an overview of the tiered certification system Review recommendations from the GaPSC Professional Learning Task Force regarding changes to professional learning and certificate renewal, and Discuss connections among various state reforms recently put in place Identify helpful resources

Tiered Certification Overview From a flat profession to a four-tier system for teacher certification

Does Tiered Certification Add Value? What is the value-added for teachers and for the profession? What is the value-added for students, parents, taxpayers? What in this new system increases rigor? During preparation & entry? During service? Does the system simplify certification? How might tiered certification interact with the salary structure?

Challenges Created by Tiered Certification Which educators are impacted by the system? Which are not? Are there any unforeseen challenges related to tiered certification? Example: As currently structured, only a teacher of record can attain advanced level certification (advanced professional or lead professional)

Why Tiered Certification? Focuses on performance rather than just hanging around Eliminates the “flat” profession by creating tiers & the chance for professional growth while remaining in the classroom Supports what research tells us about effective schools – learning communities support student achievement

Why Tiered Certification? Tiered certification is built around motivation theory Being given meaningful work Being recognized in a meaningful way Working in a collaborative environment

Four-Tier System Pre-Service level Induction level Professional level Advanced level includes Advanced Professional AND Lead Professional Four tiers w/ advanced tier having two pathways

Pre-Service Certificate Advantages Consistent method for criminal history checks Brings candidates under Code of Ethics Focuses attention on preparation of “learner ready” teachers See HO for more information

Induction Certification Advantages Recognizes novice teachers need to grow in a safe environment supported by teacher leaders, administrators, & others Creates a statewide system for quality induction Links to the teacher induction guidance document developed by a DOE/PSC – led task force. Induction programs have been piloted by RTTT districts See HO for more information

Professional Certificate Teachers demonstrate effectiveness to qualify for the professional certificate (formerly clear renewable) Two types – performance-based & standard Validity period for five years; only renewed if performance continues to meet or exceed performance standards

Professional Certificate Demonstrate performance (TKES) for performance-based; standard will be evaluated, but not under TKES Successful remediation if necessary Currently working to define “successful” Professional learning requirements must be met See HO for more information

Advanced/Lead Professional The fourth certification tier has two different pathways Each pathway has a very specific purpose, one to recognize outstanding performance, the other to identify teachers capable of leading improvement of teaching & learning

Advanced Professional Certificate An expert teacher who has demonstrated exemplary performance for a specified number of years during the five year validity period See HO for more information

Lead Professional Certificate An expert teacher who has demonstrated exemplary performance for a specified number of years during 5-yr validity period A teacher who desires to lead other professional in improving teaching and learning See HO for more information

Tiered Certification Phase-in Currently issued certificates: Induction and Standard Professional Certificates that will be issued beginning July 2015: Pre-Service and Lead Professional No implementation date yet for Advanced Professional Advisory panel appointed and active beginning January 2015

TKES/LKES Phase-in Teacher & Leader Evaluation One-year delay in full implementation – for certificate renewal purposes, this year only the observational data will be used; we will not use student performance data this year Next year? At this time we don’t know Remember educator evaluations determine whether or not the educator is eligible for certificate renewal

Tiered Certification Questions?

Professional Learning Changes Yea, but I loved collecting PLUs!

Changes in Professional Learning Background House Study Committee on Professional Learning – after moratorium on PLUs, what then? Task Force – 40 members responsible for developing a new system not dependent on PLUs Task Force recently completed its work New rules are being written now

PL Task Force Recommendation Link professional learning & certificate renewal & educator performance TKES/LKES data plus additional evidence to support PL that addresses areas where growth is needed Other measures for those not covered under the state evaluation system

PL Task Force Recommendation Stop using PLUs as evidence of professional learning PLUs are used to count seat time – professional learning research does not support a focus on seat time Rather than PLUs, shift the focus to professional judgments made by the educator, colleagues, and the supervisor

PL Task Force Recommendation Primary location of professional learning will move from workshops to job- embedded learning Job-embedded speaks to working on the work Professional learning communities become the vehicle for professional learning

PL Task Force/Staff Recommendations Learning goals for all educators Formal Professional Learning Plans (PLPs) for some educators All Induction level teachers Educators placed in position for which they are not fully certified at Professional level Absent from profession for 5 years & returns In a new position or from out of state Needs Development, Ineffective, Unsat rating

PL Task Force Recommendation Professional learning goals will be collaboratively developed PLP will be collaboratively developed Role of individual educator Role of colleagues Role of supervisor

PL Task Force Recommendation Principals & superintendents will attest that professional learning is a continuous improvement process for all educators in the building

PL Task Force Recommendation In addition to assurance through attestation Title IIA monitoring TKES/LKES evaluation system 50% of teacher evaluation based on student performance 70% of leader evaluation based on student performance Professional ethics suggests we should put the child first

PL Task Force Work Rule Development Adoption of professional learning standards Guidelines Development Development of Training Materials Change on this scale presents many challenges Issues of capacity Changing the school/district culture Developing adult learning skills Rule initiation by Commission, Jan. 2015

PL Changes Questions?

Connections Among Georgia Education Reforms Tiered certification, professional learning, state evaluation system, changes in educational leadership – all four of these changes interact and impact the others Tiered certification is the organizer; professional learning & evaluation determined renewal; & leadership determines if implementation is effective

Resources Available now GaPSC guidelines on tiered certification GaPSC guidelines on certificate upgrades GaDOE guidelines on Induction Available in the future GaPSC guidelines on professional learning GaPSC web resources on professional learning

Contact Information David M. Hill, Ph.D., Division Director, Educator Preparation & Certification