Motivation: much of the deep ocean floor is uncharted by ships high spatial resolution gravity can reveal tectonic fabric, uncharted seamounts, and seafloor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECCO-2 and NASA Satellite Missions Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory January 22-23, ECCO-2 Meeting.
Advertisements

CP4O Progress meeting 1 - Frascati November WP 5000 – Impact Assessment S. Labroue, T. Moreau, P. Thibaut (CLS) N. Picot, F. Boy (CNES)
Draft Recommendations subtitle here. Recommendation 1 The study groups from this workshop continue to collaborate with the goal of reporting progress.
“SAMOSA” an ESA SAR Altimetry Ocean, Coastal Zones and Inland Water Development Study Jérôme Benveniste ESA Jérôme Benveniste ESA Presented at the Coastal.
Application of coastal altimetry to storm surge studies Paolo Cipollini National Oceanography Centre, UK Global Storm Surge Networking Forum, Venice,
Increasing the accuracy of Arctic gravity field modelling using Cryosat-2 SAR altimetry. Ole B. Andersen, L. Stenseng and J. Maulik.
Tolman and friends, Feb. 6, 2008Coastal Altimetry 1/23 Altimeter wave data Deep ocean and coastal use and issues Hendrik L. Tolman NOAA / NWS / NCEP /
Satellite Altimetry Ole B. Andersen..
Radar Altimeter Fundamentals and Near-Shore Measurements A brief commentary on well-known concepts, presented to help unify terminology and focus discussions.
IGARSS 2003 Toulouse, France 1 Abyss-Lite: Improved Bathymetry from a Dedicated Small Satellite Delay-Doppler Radar Altimeter R. K. Raney 1, W. H. F. Smith.
04 Feb 2008_rkraney COASTAL ALTIMETER WORKSHOP 1 The Delay-Doppler Altimeter R. K. Raney Briefing for the Coastal Altimetry Workshop Johns Hopkins University.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
SAR Altimetry in Coastal Zone: Performances, Limits, Perspectives Salvatore Dinardo Serco/ESRIN Bruno Lucas Deimos/ESRIN Jerome Benveniste ESA/ESRIN.
Page 1 Singular Value Decomposition applied on altimeter waveforms P. Thibaut, J.C.Poisson, A.Ollivier : CLS – Toulouse - France F.Boy, N.Picot : CNES.
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission (SWOT)
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
GRAVITY Analysis & Interpretation GG 450 Feb 5, 2008.
Active microwave systems (1) Satellite Altimetry
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems (1) Satellite Altimetry IMCS Building Room 214C ext
The Physical Setting Physical oceanography Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung University Last.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 Sea Surface Temperature Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds.
The ESA NRT River&Lake System J.L. Wheeler P.A.M. Berry R.G. Smith J.L. Wheeler P.A.M. Berry R.G. Smith.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
HY-2A Satellite Altimetric data Evaluation in the Arctic Ocean Yongcun Cheng Ole Baltazar Andersen.
ODINAFRICA/GLOSS Sea Level Training Course
SIO Bathymetry Workshop, October 24-26, 2002WHFSmith-1 Bathymetry from Space: New capabilities, new questions Walter H. F. Smith NOAA Lab for Satellite.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX data SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon data M.Ablain, S.Philipps,
Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.
Exploring the Deep Ocean Basins with Satellites and Ships Needs for improved bathymetry What is missing? How can we do better? David T. Sandwell - Scripps.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Satellite Altimetry - possibilities and limitations
“ Combining Ocean Velocity Observations and Altimeter Data for OGCM Verification ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
GEOF334 – Spring 2010 Radar Altimetry Johnny A. Johannessen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway.
CryoSat Workshop, March 9, CryoSat: showing the way to a future of improved ocean mapping Walter H. F. Smith NOAA Lab for.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Altimetric Bathymetry Model Excels Global bathymetry model combines depths.
Mapping Ocean Surface Topography With a Synthetic-Aperture Interferometry Radar: A Global Hydrosphere Mapper Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena,
FIGURE 2.1 TALLEY Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved Map of the world based on ship soundings and satellite altimeter derived gravity at.
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
Improved Satellite Altimeter data dedicated to coastal areas :
Case study on heterogeneous geoid/ quasigeoid based on space borne and terrestrial data combination with special consideration of GOCE mission data impact.
Data for Plate Tectonics Earthquakes –World wide network for detecting nuclear tests Magnetic stripes –From World War 2 submarine detection Bathymetry.
Ocean Surface Topography Science Team, Reston, VA, USA, October, 2015 References Feng et al., Splin based nonparametric estimation of the altimeter.
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
Joint OS & SWH meeting in support of Wide-Swath Altimetry Measurements Washington D.C. – October 30th, 2006 Baptiste MOURRE ICM – Barcelona (Spain) Pierre.
The Global Ocean The Vast World Ocean.
2600 High Latitude Issues Data Editing AlgorithmInterestApplicability E1E2ENTPJ1J2G1C2 MSS based editingImproved data editingXXXxxxxx Fine tuned.
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.
1 July 20, 2000 Geosat Follow-On An examination from an operational point of view Impact on operational products Overall system performance (from sensor.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
Ocean Floor Features. Label the Ocean Floor K. J. G. E. C. B. D. H. I. F. A. L.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Marine Provinces Chapter 1 Clickers Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014.
Backscatter overs ocean
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
Satellite Altimetry for Gravity, geoid and marine applications (MSS + LAT) Dr Ole B. Andersen, DTU Space, Denmark,
Mapping the Ocean Floor AND Ocean Exploration
‘Aquarius’ Maps Ocean Salinity Fine-scale Structure
Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser
Can fully-focused altimeter range data provide enhanced detection of coastal currents in the Nova Scotia Shelf?: Preliminary diagnosis Hui Feng1, Alejandro.
Objectives and Requirements of SWOT for Observing the Oceanic Mesoscale Variability (based on a workshop held at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, April.
Mesoscale/sub-mesoscale dynamics and SWOT
Altimeter sea level anomaly data in the Middle Atlantic Bight and the Gulf of Maine Assessment and application H. Feng1, D. Vandemark1, R. Scharroo2,
Coastal Altimetry Challenges
Presentation transcript:

motivation: much of the deep ocean floor is uncharted by ships high spatial resolution gravity can reveal tectonic fabric, uncharted seamounts, and seafloor roughness objectives: spatial resolution < 6 km (1/2 wavelength) accuracy < 2 mGal (* published in: The Leading Edge, August, 2013) Towards 1 MilliGal Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat, Envisat, and Jason-1* David Sandwell Emmanuel Garcia Khalid Soofi Paul Wessel Walter H. F. Smith

higher accuracy = improved range precision + improved coverage why retracking is essential for optimal gravity accuracy retracking improves range precision by 1.5 times and reduces “spectral hump” current gravity accuracy (V22.1 grid) some tectonic examples Towards 1 MilliGal Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat, Envisat, and Jason-1

Geosat – descending (18 mo. old)

ERS-1 – descending (12 mo. old)

Envisat – descending (new)

CryoSat-2 – descending (34 mo. new)

Jason-1 – ascending (14 mo. new)

higher accuracy = improved range precision + improved coverage why retracking is essential for optimal gravity accuracy retracking improves range precision by 1.5 times and reduces “spectral hump” current gravity accuracy (V22.1 grid) some tectonic examples Towards 1 MilliGal Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat, Envisat, and Jason-1

1 Hz data has inadequate spatial resolution

2-pass retracking to improve range precision 1) retrack waveforms with standard 3-parameter model 2) smooth wave height and amplitude over 40-km 3) retrack waveforms with 2- parameter model Note: this assumes wave height varies smoothly along track. [Sandwell and Smith, GJI, 2005 ]

jason w.r.t. V22 - 3par

jason w.r.t. V22 - 2par

20 Hz range precision of all altimeters 3-parameter 2-parameter

2-pass retracking reduces “spectral hump”

higher accuracy = improved range precision + improved coverage why retracking is essential for optimal gravity accuracy retracking improves range precision by 1.5 times and reduces “spectral hump” current gravity accuracy (V22.1 grid) some tectonic examples Towards 1 MilliGal Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat, Envisat, and Jason-1

Global Gravity Anomaly V22.1

Gravity Anomaly V22.1 (10 mGal contours)

comparisons in the Gulf of Mexico ship gravity satellite gravity with CryoSat LRM, Envisat and Jason-1 5 mGal contour interval source: EDCON

GPS Navigated Gravity survey of Alaminos Canyon (Alan Herring, personal communication, Dec )

spatial comparisons in the Gulf of Mexico Noise contribution from the EDCON data is 0.51 mGal. V18 Geosat ERS- 1 V22 CryoSat-2 Jason-1 Envisat Geosat ERS- 1

spectral comparisons in the Gulf of Mexico

along track slope difference in microradian (0.98 mGal)

current gravity accuracy accuracy ~1.6 mGal latitudes < 66˚ accuracy ~3.5 mGal in Arctic

higher accuracy = improved range precision + improved coverage why retracking is essential for optimal gravity accuracy retracking improves range precision by 1.5 times and reduces “spectral hump” current gravity accuracy (V22.1 grid) some tectonic examples Towards 1 MilliGal Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat, Envisat, and Jason-1

vertical gravity gradient

old V18 vertical gravity gradient

new V22 vertical gravity gradient

new V22 vertical gravity gradient

Conclusions “newer” altimeters have 1.4 times better range precision and 2 times better coverage. 2-pass waveform retracking provides 1.5 times range precision for all altimeters and reduces “spectral hump”. Marine gravity accuracy is currently 1.6 – 3.5 mGal with most improvement in the 13 – 40 km wavelength band. Most academic fleet ship gravity is less accurate than altimeter gravity. The new V22 gravity has less filtering but lower noise so subtle tectonic features are now apparent. We have not performed any long-wavelength corrections to the data so some corrections may improve areas of high mesoscale variability.

V22 – CryoSat-2, Jason-1, Envisat, ERS-1, Geosat V18 – ERS-1, Geosat What is the contribution from each altimeter? Do we still need ERS-1 and Geosat? actual gravity improvement total improvement

CryoSat-2 provides significant noise reduction over all latitude bands. Jason-1 mainly improves east component between +/- 66. improvement

Envisat provides greatest noise reduction in Arctic and Antarctic. Geosat improves east component at low latitudes and east component in latitude band improvement

First attempt at comparing all academic fleet ship gravity (1500 cruises) with V21.1 satellite gravity courtesy of Paul Wessel. The median absolute deviation between academic fleet gravity and satellite gravity is 2.75 mGal.  Most academic fleet cruises are less accurate than the satellite gravity.