If = 10 and = 0.05 per experiment = 0.5 Type I Error Rates I.Per Comparison II.Per Experiment (frequency) = error rate of any comparison = # of comparisons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2 – PART III POST-HOC TESTS. POST HOC TESTS When we get a significant F test result in an ANOVA test for a main effect of a factor with more than.
Advertisements

Lesson #24 Multiple Comparisons. When doing ANOVA, suppose we reject H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k Next, we want to know which means differ. This does.
One-Way BG ANOVA Andrew Ainsworth Psy 420. Topics Analysis with more than 2 levels Deviation, Computation, Regression, Unequal Samples Specific Comparisons.
Planned Comparisons & Post Hoc Tests
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Thirteen Inferential Tests of Significance II: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with More than Two Groups.
One-Way ANOVA Multiple Comparisons.
More on ANOVA. Overview ANOVA as Regression Comparison Methods.
Comparing Means.
Lesson #23 Analysis of Variance. In Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we have: H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k H 1 : at least one  i does not equal the others.
Chapter 3 Analysis of Variance
Simulation Modeling and Analysis Session 12 Comparing Alternative System Designs.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
PSY 1950 Post-hoc and Planned Comparisons October 6, 2008.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
One-way Between Groups Analysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Quantitative Methods in HPELS 440:210.
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Comparisons among groups within ANOVA
1 Multiple Comparison Procedures Once we reject H 0 :   =   =...  c in favor of H 1 : NOT all  ’s are equal, we don’t yet know the way in which.
ANOVA Greg C Elvers.
Stats Lunch: Day 7 One-Way ANOVA. Basic Steps of Calculating an ANOVA M = 3 M = 6 M = 10 Remember, there are 2 ways to estimate pop. variance in ANOVA:
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
1)Test the effects of IV on DV 2)Protects against threats to internal validity Internal Validity – Control through Experimental Design Chapter 10 – Lecture.
Statistics 11 Confidence Interval Suppose you have a sample from a population You know the sample mean is an unbiased estimate of population mean Question:
Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) PSY Spring 2003.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts
Two-Way Balanced Independent Samples ANOVA Computations.
Post Hoc Tests. What is a Post Hoc Test? Review: – Adjusting Alpha Level – Multiple A Priori Comparisons What makes a test Post Hoc? – Many tests could.
Jeopardy Opening Robert Lee | UOIT Game Board $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 10 0 $ 10 0 $ 10 0 $ 10 0 $ 10 0 $ 300 $
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Comparisons among groups within ANOVA. Problem with one-way anova There are a couple issues regarding one-way Anova First, it doesn’t tell us what we.
Three Statistical Issues (1) Observational Study (2) Multiple Comparisons (3) Censoring Definitions.
Chapter 8 1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design.
Chapter 13 For Explaining Psychological Statistics, 4th ed. by B. Cohen 1 Chapter 13: Multiple Comparisons Experimentwise Alpha (α EW ) –The probability.
Psy 230 Jeopardy Related Samples t-test ANOVA shorthand ANOVA concepts Post hoc testsSurprise $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
ANOVAs.  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Difference in two or more average scores in different groups  Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor);
One-Way Analysis of Variance Recapitulation Recapitulation 1. Comparing differences among three or more subsamples requires a different statistical test.
Remember You just invented a “magic math pill” that will increase test scores. On the day of the first test you give the pill to 4 subjects. When these.
Tests after a significant F
Introduction to ANOVA Research Designs for ANOVAs Type I Error and Multiple Hypothesis Tests The Logic of ANOVA ANOVA vocabulary, notation, and formulas.
Chapters Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design.
Stats/Methods II JEOPARDY. Jeopardy Estimation ANOVA shorthand ANOVA concepts Post hoc testsSurprise $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400.
F73DA2 INTRODUCTORY DATA ANALYSIS ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
Posthoc Comparisons finding the differences. Statistical Significance What does a statistically significant F statistic, in a Oneway ANOVA, tell us? What.
Six Easy Steps for an ANOVA 1) State the hypothesis 2) Find the F-critical value 3) Calculate the F-value 4) Decision 5) Create the summary table 6) Put.
Week 2 – PART III POST-HOC TESTS.
Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles
Comparing several means: ANOVA (GLM 1)
Multiple comparisons
Comparing Three or More Means
Multiple Comparisons Q560: Experimental Methods in Cognitive Science Lecture 10.
Psych 706: Stats II Class #2.
Planned Comparisons & Post Hoc Tests
Ch. 14: Comparisons on More Than Two Conditions
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Studentized Range Statistic
Comparing Several Means: ANOVA
1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests
Factorial ANOVA 2 or More IVs.
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests
Conceptual Understanding
SPSS SPSS Problem (Part 1). SPSS SPSS Problem (Part 1)
1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design
Post Hoc Tests.
Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

if = 10 and = 0.05 per experiment = 0.5 Type I Error Rates I.Per Comparison II.Per Experiment (frequency) = error rate of any comparison = # of comparisons (frequency) III.Familywise (for independent comparisons) Per ComparisonFamilywisePer Experiment probability of at least one Type I error. Multiple Comparison

Complete vs. Restricted H =141 Treatments Independent Samples MS Treat MS error Complete H 0

Restricted H 0 e.g., A Priori Comparisons Post Hoc Comparisons The role of overall F - might NOT pick up - changes Familywise

A Priori Comparisons - replace individual or with MS error Multiple t tests (compare two conditions) - test t with df error Comparing Treatments 1 and 3 n.s.

Linear Contrasts Compare:  two conditions  a set of conditions and a condition  two sets of conditions Let for equal n’s

(1) Contrasting Treatments 1 & 3 again = = = = SS contrast = SS error = MS contrast = always = 1 MS error = MS contrast = SS contrast = MS error = F (1,12) = (Look at t- test)

(2) Contrasting Treatments 1 & 2 with 3 = = = = = = SS contrast = = SS error = MS contrast = = F (1,12) =

(3) Contrasting Treatments 1 & 3 with 2 = = = = = = SS contrast = SS error = MS contrast = = F (1,12) =

Orthogonal Contrasts = = # of comparisons = df Treat if n’s are equal df Treat = 2 in our example contrasts 1 and 2 = = = 2 and 3 = = = 1 and 3 = = = SS contrast1 SS contrast3 = = SS Treat =

Bonferroni’s Control for FW error rate (  ) use  = 0.01 Bonferroni Inequality e.g.: if, per comparison  = 0.05 and if, 4 comparisons are made then, the FW  CANNOT exceed p = 0.02 EW  or FW   c(PC  ) c = # of comparisons Thus, we can set the FW  or the per experiment  to a desired level (e.g., 0.05) and adjust the PC  If we desire a FW  = 0.05 then: 0.05 = PC  (4) = PC 

Bonferroni’s (comparing 2 means) using t 2 = F and moving terms This allows us to contrast groups of means. (linear contrasts) if

Multistage Procedures Bonferroni: divides  into equal parts Multistage (Holm): divides  into different size portions ifor heterogenous S 2 ’s

compare next largest to critical value C = C-1 compare largest s to critical Multistage 1.calculate alls 2.arrange in order of magnitude 3. value (Dunn’s Tables) ONLY if significant C = total # of contrasts to be made and so on FW  is kept at 0.05 (  )

Subject X Treatment Design I Weight each observation by its assigned condition weight II Compute D i for each subject III Sum D i across subjects IV Compute SS contrast V Compute SS SsXC(error) Linear Contrast

Subjects Treatments Contrast 1 with 3 F (1,4) = SS con = SS SsXcon = MS con = MS SsXcon = df = 4 DiDi Di2Di2

Subjects Treatments Contrast 1 & 3with 2 DiDi Di2Di2 SS con = SS SsXcon = MS con = MS SsXcon = F (1,4) = 36

SS con1 = = SS Treat Total = Orthogonal Contrasts Error term could be SS res or error SS SsXcon1 + SS SsXcon2 = ? ??=+ df con1 + df con2 = df Treat 1+ 4 = 2 df SsXcon1 + df SsXcon2 = df ? 4+=8 SS con2 =