Educational Characteristics of Prisoners: Data from the ACS Stephanie Ewert & Tara Wildhagen U.S. Census Bureau Population Association of America Washington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How College Shapes LivesFor detailed data, see: trends.collegeboard.org. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013, Tables 222, 306, and.
Advertisements

Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
Sponsored by: CCSU’s Women’s Center; Center for Public Policy & Social Research and the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado The Public Agenda 5 Years Later Illinois.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Patterns of Age Mixing among American Men and Women Julie R. Kraut-Becher University of Pennsylvania Sevgi O. Aral Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
U.S. Hispanic Population: 2000 Helping You Make Informed Decisions.
Demographic Trends and the Education Pipeline: Implications for Educating Latinos for the Future of America.
Re-Entry and Recidivism
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
What does PIC stand for?. The Post-Secondary Schooling and Labor Market Experiences of Class of 2003 Boston Public High School Graduates at the Time of.
An Assessment of the Labor Market, Income, Health, Social, Civic and Fiscal Consequences of Dropping Out of High School: Findings for Massachusetts and.
Changing Demographics in Texas
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2013 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
Cornell University Institute for Policy Research A Review of Disability Data for the Institutional Population of Working Age Peiyun.
The Characteristics of Employed Female Caregivers and their Work Experience History Sheri Sharareh Craig Alfred O. Gottschalck U.S. Census Bureau Housing.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Mutual Insurance Companies October 7, 2010 Round Rock, TX 1.
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Colorado Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Variation by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity in the United States Sarah R. Crissey, U.S. Census Bureau Nicole.
The Changing Population of Texas Government Finance Officers Association of Texas October 25, 2012 San Marcos, TX.
Volunteering in 2007 Current Population Survey Bureau of Labor Statistics Stephanie White June 19, 2008.
Employment and Earnings Outcomes for Young Adult Bachelor’s Degree Holders: Findings From the American Community Survey 25th Annual STATS-DC 2012 Data.
Persistence in High School and College: What Does the Research Have to Say? Future of Children Conference Princeton University April 30, 2010.
Ohio Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Exhibit 1. Uninsured Rates for Blacks and Hispanics Are One-and-a-Half to Two Times Higher Than for Whites (2013) Notes: Black and white refer to black.
Reynolds Farley The University of Michigan Population Studies Center Institute for Social Research 426 Thompson Ann Arbor, Michigan August 1,
Roomers and Boarders: Melissa Scopilliti, University of Maryland, Maryland Population Research Center; Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
West Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Post-Secondary Success – the Growing Challenge… A Closer Look Prepared by the Community Service Council with support from the Metropolitan Human Services.
North Star Summit Susan Brower, MN State Demographer December 2014.
Demographic Characteristics and Trends in Texas North and East Texas Press Association Convention April 10, 2015 Denton,
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
New York Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Texas Demographic Data Users Conference May 22, 2014 Austin, Texas.
Hispanic Trends Project A Portrait of Latino Students Mark Hugo Lopez Director of Hispanic Research September 4, 2014.
Utah Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Tennessee Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
South Dakota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary education policy Wendy Erisman Institute for Higher Education Policy Washington, DC.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce The Foreign-Born Population in New Mexico Size, Distribution, and.
Iowa Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Hispanic Trends Project The Nation’s Changing Demographics Mark Hugo Lopez Director of Hispanic Research October 2014.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Minnesota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Education Reporting and Classification.
Chief Financial Officers of Public Universities in Texas November 5, 2013 Galveston, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Higher Education.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Education
Rhode Island Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Legislative Working Group on Economic Disparities in Minnesota SUSAN BROWER, MINNESOTA STATE DEMOGRAPHER January 2016.
Washington Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Illinois Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS July 23,
New Hampshire Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
North Carolina Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Oregon Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Kansas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Prisoners: Characteristics of U.S. Inmate Populations
The Public Agenda 5 Years Later
Presentation transcript:

Educational Characteristics of Prisoners: Data from the ACS Stephanie Ewert & Tara Wildhagen U.S. Census Bureau Population Association of America Washington, DC April 1, 2011

Why Care about Prisoner Educational Attainment? Dramatic growth in size of prison population –Disproportionately male, black, poorly educated –Little current data on prisoner characteristics –Educational attainment associated with numerous sociodemographic outcomes Use 2009 American Community Survey (ACS) data –New and current data source –Includes individuals in households and adult correctional facilities

Wide-Ranging Research Agendas Related to Prisoners and Education Association between low education and incarceration (Lochner and Moretti 2004; Harlow 2003) Measurement of population characteristics and racial inequality (Western and Pettit 2005; Heckman and LaFontaine 2010) Link between enrollment in prison education programs and low recidivism rates (Klein et al. 2004; Coley and Barton 2006) 3

American Community Survey (ACS) Population Universe: U.S. domestic population with an address Annual Survey: Data are collected monthly, and released annually Large sample size (over 48,000 prisoners) –27,200 state prisoners –3,900 federal prisoners Provides detailed demographic, social, and economic estimates for household and group quarters population 4

Bureau of Justice Statistics Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities (SISFCF) Population universe: inmates in state and federal correctional facilities Periodic: 2004 is most recent Small sample size –14,500 state prisoners –3,700 federal prisoners Detailed questionnaire 5

Methods – Comparison Groups SISCF – State Correctional Population ACS Adult Correctional Population –Total ( federal detention centers, federal prisons, state prisons, local jails, correctional residential facilities, military disciplinary barracks and jails) ACS Household Population –Adults (18 and over) living in households ACS At Risk Household Population –Adults who are unemployed or not in the labor force –Adults with a personal income less than $14,000/year 6

Characteristics Race/ethnicity: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Other, Hispanic Male/female Age group: 18-24, 25-44, 45+ Educational attainment: less than high school diploma; high school diploma; GED; some college or more Educational enrollment: dichotomous variable for enrollment in last 3 months 7

Comparison of Educational Attainment Questions ACS “What is the highest grade of school…has completed, or the highest degree… has received?” SISCF “Before your admissions, what was the highest grade of school that you ever attended?” “Did you complete that year?” 8

Comparison of Enrollment Questions ACS “At any time in the last 3 months, has…attended school or college? Include … [that] which leads to a high school diploma or a college degree.” “What grade or level was…attending?” SISCF “Since your admission, have you ever been in any other education program? Exclude vocational training.” “What kind of program was that...?” 9

Whites, Females, and Older Adults Underrepresented in Prisons 10 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009

ACS and SISCF: Prisoners have high rates of HS non-completion 11 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009; Bureau of Justice Statistics, Survey of Inmates in State Correctional Facilities, 2004

SISCF shows higher rates of enrollment 12 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009; Bureau of Justice Statistics, Survey of Inmates in State Correctional Facilities, 2004

Prisoners: More likely to drop out of high school/get GED 13 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009

Across races, prisoners more likely to drop out of high school 14 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009

Differences in enrollment vary by age 15 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009

Among prisoners, whites least likely to be enrolled 16 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009

Educational characteristics of female prisoners similar to patterns for males 17 Compared to women living in households: –Female prisoners have lower levels of attainment –Young women in prison are less likely to be enrolled; women aged 45+ are more likely to be enrolled Compared to male prisoners: –Female prisoners have higher levels of educational attainment

Educational characteristics differ by prison status Prisoners, on average, have lower levels of educational attainment –More likely to drop out of HS, and more likely to have GED as highest level of attainment Overall, prisoners are less likely to be enrolled in a program leading to a degree than their counterparts in households – Relationship varies by age; among persons 45 and older, prisoners are more likely to be enrolled in school 18

Prisoners’ educational characteristics vary by race Among all race groups, prisoners drop out of high school at a faster rate than persons living in households –Whites experience the largest percent increase in HS dropout rate Difference in enrollment rates is smallest for Hispanics Among prisoners, whites are least likely to be enrolled 19

Using the ACS to examine the characteristics of the prison population The ACS is uniquely suited for analyzing the characteristics of the population living in group quarters –Data provided annually, so characteristics can be tracked regularly –Large sample size allows for analyses of subgroups within prison population –Inclusion of household and group quarters populations in the same survey enables comparisons 20

What’s available to the Public American Fact Finder Tables –National Level: Social/Economic/Demographic characteristics for adult correctional population –Sub-national Level: Social/Economic/Demographic characteristics for institutional population PUMS (Public Use Microdata Sample) –Smaller sample than internal microdata sample (approximately 66% of the total sample included in PUMS) –Only GQ variable available collapses GQ types into two broad categories: Institutionalized and Noninstitutionalized 21

Options for accessing internal data U.S. Census Bureau’s Research Data Centers (RDCs) –External users can apply to gain access to restricted data through an RDC – Collaborate with Census Bureau employees 22

Please contact us with additional comments or questions Stephanie Ewert: Tara Wildhagen: 23

Appendices 24

Percent institutionalized by facility type 25

26

Comparison of analyses for men in institutions and correctional facilities, age 21 to 45 27