LBDS Kicker Electronic and Slow Control Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Uythoven, AB/BTLHCCWG, 3 May 2006 Page GeV Commissioning Machine Protection Needs to be commissioned to: Prevent damage with the used, higher.
Advertisements

André Augustinus 15 March 2003 DCS Workshop Safety Interlocks.
“LHC Controls for Sector Test” Planning SPS Extraction Kicker and Septa LHC Injection Kicker and other equipment (beam stoppers, dumps,...) Etienne CARLIER.
01/11/2002SNS Software Final Design Review1 V123S Event Link Encoder, Transmission System and PLL Receiver Thomas M. Kerner (BNL) SNS Global Controls.
8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC
N. Voumard, AB-BT-EC LBDS Audit, CERN LBDS Trigger Signal Distribution Trigger Synchronization Unit (TSU) Trigger Fan Out (TFO) Power Trigger Unit.
1 MKBH Erratic Jan Uythoven On behalf of the ABT team (Viliam, Nicolas M., Etienne, Laurent, Francesco etc…..) MPP meeting 8/5/2015.
Failure mode impact studies and LV system commissioning tests
LECC 2006 Ewald Effinger AB-BI-BL The LHC beam loss monitoring system’s data acquisition card Ewald Effinger AB-BI-BL.
Technical review on UPS power distribution of the LHC Beam Dumping System (LBDS) Anastasia PATSOULI TE-ABT-EC Proposals for LBDS Powering Improvement 1.
The TIMING System … …as used in the PS accelerators.
The Architecture, Design and Realisation of the LHC Beam Interlock System Machine Protection Review – 12 th April 2005.
SNS Integrated Control System EPICS Collaboration Meeting SNS Machine Protection System SNS Timing System Coles Sibley xxxx/vlb.
LHC Beam Dump System Technical Audit Trigger Synchronisation Unit.
ITER – Interlocks Luis Fernandez December 2014 Central Interlock System CIS v0.
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Timing Master LA-UR Eric Bjorklund.
Distribution of machine parameters over GMT in the PS, SPS and future machines J. Serrano, AB-CO-HT TC 6 December 2006.
V. Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet AB/OP1Nov 08, 2007 LHC Injection System V.Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet, AB/OP Input from: E. Carlier, B. Goddard, J. Wenninger What do.
1 LBDS Testing Before Operation Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Based on the work of many people in the KSL, EC and TL sections.
LBDS Power Triggering Etienne CARLIER & Jean-Louis BRETIN AB/BT/EC.
1N.Voumard, AB/BT/ECLBDS Audit, CERN 2008 Presentation of the Beam Energy Tracking System Definition : The Beam Energy Tracking System (BETS) monitors.
Controls-related R&D options Etienne CARLIER 18 th ABTEF meeting
B. Todd et al. 25 th August 2009 Observations Since v1.
MKI Erratics: Hardware and Electronics Related Aspects M.J. Barnes Acknowledgements: A.Antoine, R.A. Barlow, P. Burkel, E. Carlier, N. Magnin, V. Mertens.
SNS Integrated Control System Timing Clients at SNS DH Thompson Epics Spring 2003.
LHC Collimation Project Integration into the control system Michel Jonker External Review of the LHC Collimation Project 1 July 2004.
Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 LBDS Environmental Aspects EMC, radiation, UPS… Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC.
Timing Requirements for Spallation Neutron Sources Timing system clock synchronized to the storage ring’s revolution frequency. –LANSCE: MHz.
Kicker generator and controls installation in ECA5? Etienne CARLIER
1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team.
The LBDS trigger and re-trigger schemes Technical Review on UPS power distribution of the LHC Beam Dumping System (LBDS) A. Antoine.
Friday morning Dump fill due to the trip of the RQF.A78  intervention had been just planned for the morning on the circuit Access, interventions:  RQF.A56/78,
1 Will We Ever Get The Green Light For Beam Operation? J. Uythoven & R. Filippini For the Reliability Working Group Sub Working Group of the MPWG.
1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.
LHC Beam Dumping System Experience from reliability run and Re-commissioning procedures MPP Nicolas Magnin – TE/ABT/EC.
‘Review’ of the machine protection system in the SPS 1 J. Wenninger BE-OP SPS MPS - ATOP 09.
TRIGGER DELAY 100µs. G. Gräwer AB/BT/ECLBDS Trigger Delay2 The trigger delay is a back-up system that generates an asynchronous dump trigger for MKD and.
CEA DSM Irfu SIS LDISC 18/04/2012 Paul Lotrus 1 Control Command Overview GBAR Collaboration Meeting Paul Lotrus CEA/DSM/Irfu/SIS.
Thesis: Introduction Study for a failsafe trigger generation system for the Large Hadron Collider beam dump kicker magnets prepared by Martin Rampl.
LIU-ABT systems: PSB BI.DIS controls prepared by R.A.Barlow (September 2014) 1 CERN TE-ABT-EC.
IPOC Software for LBDS Data Acquisition & Analysis LBDS Technical Audit CERN - AB/BT/EC - N.Magnin.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Tobias Stadlbauer Special Magnets MedAustron 7-8 October 2010 Special Magnets Controls Status and Plans IntroductionPower SupplySlow ControlsAOB.
LHC machine protection close-out 1 Close-out. LHC machine protection close-out 2 Introduction The problem is obvious: –Magnetic field increase only a.
EtherCAT based RF Interlock System for SwissFEL LLRF 2015 Abstract As part of the overall development effort for SwissFEL's RF and LLRF systems, the RF.
Programmable Logic Controller & Distributed Control System Yoon-Je Choi 17 th June 2006.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
BIS main electronic modules - Oriented Linac4 - Stéphane Gabourin TE/MPE-EP Workshop on Beam Interlock Systems Jan 2015.
New PSB beam control BIS Interlocks A. Blas PSB Beam Control 20/01/ BIS: Beam Interlock.
23/06/2011 Linac4 BCC meeting. 23/06/2011 Linac4 BCC meeting Watchdog = Machine protection element whose function is to cut the beam if losses exceed.
Failure Analysis Tools at DESY. M. Bieler, T. Lensch, M. Werner, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Outcome of BI.DIS Fast Interlocks Peer Review
Data providers Volume & Type of Analysis Kickers
Dependability Requirements of the LBDS and their Design Implications
The LHC Beam Dumping System
LHC Beam Dumping System Reliability Run Summary
MKD/MKB Review Meeting Scope and Definition
LHC Risk Review: Kicker Magnet Reliability
Commissioning and Testing the LHC Beam Interlock System
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
Combiner functionalities
LHCCWG Meeting R. Alemany, M. Lamont, S. Page
Interlocking of CNGS (and other high intensity beams) at the SPS
Beam Dumping System and Abort Gap
The LHC Beam Interlock System
Ola Ingemansson Electrical & Instrumentation Engineer
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Presentation transcript:

LBDS Kicker Electronic and Slow Control Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Outline Control Architecture State Control and Surveillance System Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution System Beam Energy Tracking System Operational Check

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Architecture General State Kick Time Kick Strength State Control & Surveillance System SCSS Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution System TSDS Beam Energy Tracking System BETS AlarmLoggingTrending Operational Check Static & Pulse modes Fast Analog Acquisition System

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Architecture Functional Power Supplies Power Triggers Pulse Generators & Kicker Magnets Re-Trigger Beam Energy Tracking System State Control and Surveillance System Trigger Synchronisation and Distribution System

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Performance of LHC Extraction Kickers Typical Possible Failures Generator failurein static mode  SCSS  Less than 15 pulse kickers are able to respond to a dump request Energy tracking failure  BETS  Kick strength outside tolerance window Kick is too large Kick is too small Synchronisation failure  TSDS  A spontaneously triggering of a kicker  A drift or shift of the synchronisation pulse train w.r.t. the beam abort gap Generator failure in pulse mode  POC  One missing branch

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 State Control & Surveillance State management Interlock –Switches –Power supplies (over- voltage, over-current, short-circuit –Electrical circuit closure… Monitoring –Power supply (current, voltage) –HV dividers… Personal Safety Electrical distribution StateKick TimeKick Strength State Control & Surveillance System Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution System Beam Energy Tracking System

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 State Control & Surveillance Architecture PROFIBUS-DP PROFIsafe DP / DP Coupler CP416F-2DP Ethernet Simatic S7-400 S7-300 modules used in standard mode S7-300 fail-safe modules used in safety mode Generator 15 PROFIBUS-DP PROFIsafe ET200M Simatic S7-300 CP315F-2DP Generator 1 PROFIBUS-DP PROFIsafe

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 State Control & Surveillance Implementation Based on fail-safe SIEMENS SIMATIC S7-F Programmable Logic Controllers and on fail-safe communications between PLC via PROFIBUS-DP fieldbuses using PROFIsafe protocol. –Surveillance based on a hierarchical design based on failure severity Analogue inputs based on redundant 4-20mA current loop sensors, digital inputs based on non-equivalent sensors and redundant digital outputs used for actuators control. –“Passivation” of inputs and outputs (i.e. dump request) in case of sensor failure or discrepancy between sensors (redundant, non- equivalent) –Manual “Re-integration” after a failure involving a safety elements –Reaction time is typ. 20ms (max 50ms) –

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution StateKick TimeKick Strength State Control & Surveillance System Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution System Beam Energy Tracking System Synchronisation of dump requests with beam abort gap Distribution of dump requests up to HV generator Protection of the machine against spontaneous firing State management Interlock –Switches –Power supplies (over- voltage, over-current, short-circuit –Electrical circuit closure… Monitoring –Power supply (current, voltage) –HV dividers… Personal Safety Electrical distribution

LBDS Fault-tolerant Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Fail-safe Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution Architecture Re-trigger lines Branch A Branch B Branch A Branch B Generator 1 Generator 15 TFO Trigger Fan-out PTU Power Trigger Unit RTB Re-trigger Box RTD Re-trigger Delay TSU Client Interface F rev Trigger Synchronisation Unit

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution Dump Request Distribution Energy required to distribute the dump request up to the kicker HV generator is –Pre-stored within capacitor at each stage of the triggering chain, –Used to trigger the next stage, and –Checked before a beam permit signal is issued, But, somebody has to trigger the chain… to push the first domino stone!  Interface to the LBDS Clients Propagation of the trigger pulse through the different stages of the triggering chain relies either on an active fail safe logic up to the synchronisation with the abort gap and on a passive redundant fault tolerant logic up to the HV generator in order to avoid asynchronous beam dumps. Dump request uses the “domino effect” for trigger distribution

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution LBDS Clients BIS8.315 MHz & MHz Frequencies BLM BETS LBDS MKD Ready MKB Ready TSU Ready BETS Ready IPOC Ready LASS Ready Yes Non-Ambivalent Redundant Contact (SCSS) Client No Yes Current Loop 10 MHz Frequency Fibre Optic < 250 ns Opto-coupled copper cable < 1 us 50  galvanic signal < 250 ns Floating Relay ~ 20 ms Signal Redundancy Response TimeSignal Media Signal Type Injection Prepulse No1us logic pulse 50  galvanic signal < 150 ns

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution Implementation 1oo2 ‘Trigger Synchronisation Unit’ systems can synchronise the dump request. –Both systems are independent. –The mission time for tests is 89 µs. 1oo4 independent trigger channels can issue the dump trigger. Each branch has 5 re-trigger sources which feed 2 re-trigger distribution lines. –Twice 1oo5. –Each source can deliver sufficient energy to trigger all power triggers of all magnets MKD/MKB. Continuity of the re-trigger lines is continuously checked (pulse train).

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Beam Energy Tracking StateKick TimeKick Strength State Control & Surveillance System Trigger Synchronisation & Distribution System Beam Energy Tracking System Acquisition and distribution of the beam energy Generation of kick strength reference signals Surveillance of the charging voltages w.r.t. the beam energy Synchronisation of dump requests with beam abort gap Distribution of dump requests up to HV generator Protection of the machine against spontaneous firing State management Interlock –Switches –Power supplies (over- voltage, over-current, short-circuit –Electrical circuit closure… Monitoring –Power supply (current, voltage) –HV dividers… Personal Safety Electrical distribution

LBDS Beam Energy Tracking System Functions Acquisition of the machine “beam energy”, Generation of the kick strength reference signals for LBDS extraction and dilution kicker high voltage generators w.r.t. the beam energy, Continuous surveillance that the charging voltages of the different capacitors within the kicker high voltage generators follow their references within predefined tolerance windows (extraction trajectory aperture), Continuous surveillance that the LBDS extraction septa and ring quadrupole Q4 currents are within predefined tolerance windows (extraction trajectory aperture), Generation of a dump request after detection of an upcoming tracking fault if the measured values are not within predefined tolerance windows relative to the beam energy, Distribution of the beam energy to external clients. Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008

LBDS Beam Energy Tracking System Relations Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Beam dump Other users DCCT Dipole Magnet 4-5 Power Converter Right 4 DCCT Dipole Magnet 5-6 Power Converter Left 6 DCCT Dipole Magnet 7-8 Power Converter Left 8 DCCT Dipole Magnet 6-7 Power Converter Right 6 DCCT Septum Magnet Beam 1 Power Converter Septum Beam 1 DCCT Quadrupole Q4 Beam 1 Power Converter Q4 Beam 1 HVD Kicker Magnet Ext. Beam 1 Kicker HV Gen. Ext. Beam 1 Kicker Magnet Dilution Beam 1 Kicker HV Gen. Dilution Beam 1 Beam Energy Tracking System (BETS) HVD

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Beam Energy Tracking System Architecture Main Bends I meas AE beam A U ref K i Kicker HV Generators Beam Energy Meter Main Bends I meas B E beam B U meas K i Kicker HV Generators E beam K i Tracking Interlock Logic |E beam B – E beam K i | > 0.5% * E beam B Dump Trigger Request Beam Energy Meter Reference Interlock AcquisitionSettings AcquisitionTracking

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Beam Energy Tracking System Implementation Based on four redundant and independent measurements of the main bends magnet current to get the beam energy. Generation of the kick strength reference signals is integrated within the SCSS. Tracking interlock logic is based on two redundant systems built on the basis of two different technologies –One on fail-safe SIEMENS SIMATIC S7-F Programmable Logic Controllers  Feedback Tracking –The other one on dedicated hardware  Real-time Tracking Both systems have to be continuously in agreement. In case of discrepancy between the two systems, a dump request will be issued immediately.

LBDS Beam Energy Tracking System Real-Time Vs Feedback Dedicated VME hardware Surveillance of o MKD Principal circuit Compensation circuit o MKB o Q4 o MSD 1 ms surveillance cycle 10 µs response time Dump request through redundant 10 MHz connections to the TSU Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Integrated within SCSS Surveillance of o MKD Principal circuit Compensation circuit Triggering circuits o MKB 20 ms surveillance cycle 10 ms response time Dump request through the general “LBDS ready” signal Real Time TrackingFeedback Tracking

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Post-Operational Check Post-Operationnal analysis is the only way to verify the correct execution of the last dump action. Despite a perfectly dumped beam, it remains possible that damage has been caused to one or more components of the dump system during the previous dump action (e.g. the solid state switches). The beam dump system will be declared ready for the next mission if, and only if, it can be expected that all the hardware, including all the redundant components, will respond correctly to the next dump request.

LBDS Post-Operational Check Data Acquisition Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Trending –Continuous sequential data logging at a fixed acquisition frequency Alarm –Acquisition and archiving of unforeseen process events detected by equipment surveillance programs Transient Recording –Pre & Post trigger data acquisition after reception of an external asynchronous trigger Logbook –Record of actions performed on equipment hardware and software by CCC and equipment specialists

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Post-Operational Check Transient Signals Principal Switches Currents Compensation Switches Currents Free wheel Diodes Currents Magnet Current

LBDS Post-Operational Check Transient Recording Analysis Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Two different levels of Analysis –XPOC – External Post Operation Check What happened during the dumping process with the beam? What is the evolution of the performance of the system –IPOC – Internal Post Operation Check How performed the different sub-systems during the dumping process? IPOC analysis for LBDS extraction kicker –Kick Synchronisation Analysis Kick rise-time, kick length, Kick synchronisation with beam. –Kick Amplitude Analysis Kick normalization with beam energy 100 % kick measurement, Kick first overshoot, second overshoot.

LBDS Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 Post-Operational Check Implementation High precision acquisition and analysis of the 15 magnet current pulse shapes will be performed after each dump action. –2 different types of acquisition sensors: Pearson PU (passive) and Rogowski PU (active) The acquisition system is based on two CompactPCI crates running SCL4 and housing: –NI-PXI 5122 digitizers with 14 bit resolution and 100 MS/s sampling rate for the kick strength & kick synchronisation surveillance and monitoring Acquisition and verification of the current in the different branches of the generator in order to identify the faulty circuit will be available in a second phase (prototype available) –Principal circuit –Compensation circuit –Freewheel circuit