Non-Word Repetition 37-924-01 Theoretical Approaches to Specific Language Impairment (SLI) Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar Ilan University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing spoken language development in Gaelic Medium Education Morag Donaldson School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences.
Advertisements

Specific Language Impairment in the Regular Classroom
How Children Acquire Language
How Critical is the Critical Period: The Acquisition of Definiteness in L2 Hebrew by Children with L1 Russian Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar-Ilan University ISB5,
Working Memory Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
 What is Short-Term Memory?  How can you fit more information into STM?  Is STM different from LTM?  How does STM compare to Working Memory?
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 8 Aphasia: disorders of comprehension.
Handwriting performance of children with dyslexia
Sentence Repetition Challenges to Language Acquisition: Bilingualism and Language Impairment Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar Ilan University.
Nonword Repetition and Sentence Repetition as Clinical Markers of SLI: The Case of Cantonese Stokes, F. S., Wong, M.Y.A., Fletcher, P., & Leonard, B. L.
Every child talking Nursery Clusters. Supporting speech, language and communication skills Nursery Clusters Cluster 3 Expressive Language.
Chapter (7), part (2).  Intentions in words. First words fulfill the intentions previously expressed through gestures and vocalization. Very different.
Profile of Phoneme Auditory Perception Ability in Children with Hearing Impairment and Phonological Disorders By Manal Mohamed El-Banna (MD) Unit of Phoniatrics,
Read: Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for April 14 Idea Journals due on the 16th.
Opportunities for extra credit: Keep checking at:
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Acquisition: Morphology.
1 The syntactic abilities of children with SLI: The Passive.
Non-Word Repetition Challenges to Language Acquisition: Bilingualism and Language Impairment Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar Ilan University.
Plans: Read About False Memories (Beth Loftus) for Thursday (April 7th) Read About Amnesia (Oliver Sacks) for Tuesday (April 12th) Read about Subliminal.
False Memories (Beth Loftus) Lost Mariner (Oliver Sacks)
The Effects of Increased Cognitive Demands on the Written Discourse Ability of Young Adolescents Ashleigh Elaine Zumwalt Eastern Illinois University.
BHS Memory and Amnesia Working Memory. Baddeley’s Model Baddeley and Hitch’s (1983) tripartite (three-part) model Central executive Control center.
1 Indicators of SLI in bilingual children: inflections and prepositions Sharon Armon-Lotem & Joel Walters The Bilingual SLI Project Bar-Ilan University,
Verb inflections as indicators of Bilingual SLI Sharon Armon-Lotem, The Bilingual SLI project* Bar Ilan University *This project is funded by ISF grant.
1 Substitution and omission of prepositions as indicators of SLI in bilingual children Sharon Armon-Lotem The Bilingual SLI Project Bar-Ilan University,
Psyco 350 Lec #5 – Slide 1 Lecture 5 – Psyco 350, B1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.
Alloway Working Memory Assessment 2
Wilson, “The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory” Wilson’s thesis: Items held in short-term verbal memory are encoded in an “articulatory” format.
Psycholinguistics 11 Later language Acquisition. Acquisition of Morphology Order of Morpheme acquisition OrderMorpheme 1Present progressive 2-3Prepositions.
Review of three tests of children’s narrative ability [Poster presented at Narratives, Intervention, and Literacy conference, Paris, France, Sept. 2012]
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Language and Speech of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Characteristics and Concerns Language Acquisition.
CSD 2230 HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
Communication Disorders
Emergence of Syntax. Introduction  One of the most important concerns of theoretical linguistics today represents the study of the acquisition of language.
Learning the passive in natural(istic) settings Katie Alcock, Ken Rimba, Manizha Tellaie, and Charles Newton Thanks to Kamil ud Deen.
1 ROLE OF WORKING MEMORY IN TYPICALLY DEVELOPING CHILDREN’S COMPLEX SENTENCE COMPREHENSION AUTHORS; Shwetha M.P.,Deepthi M. Trupthi T, Nikhil Mathur &
N ON WORD REPETITION OF TARGET AND NON TARGET LIKE WORDS [ BY MONOLINGUAL A RABIC PRESCHOOLERS ] Instructor: Dr. Sharon Armon Lotem This long paper was.
Language Acquisition.
Working Memory Deficits as They Relate to Academic Growth of Students with RD Olga Jerman, Ph.D. Director of Research Frostig Center, Pasadena, CA Minyi.
Chapter 9: Language and Communication. Chapter 9: Language and Communication Chapter 9 has four modules: Module 9.1 The Road to Speech Module 9.2 Learning.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Learning Words and Rules Abstract Knowledge of Word Order in Early Sentence Comprehension Yael Gertner.
Assessment of Morphology & Syntax Expression. Objectives What is MLU Stages of Syntactic Development Examples of Difficulties in Syntax Why preferring.
Language and Communication Definitions Developmental scales Communication disorders Speech Disorders Language Disorders Interventions.
MethodMethod References Introduction Kindergarten predictors of reading skills Papadimitriou Artemis, Vlachos Filippos, University of Thessaly
Language and Phonological Processes
Where in the brain is autism? At least four biological variants of autism? –Early brainstem/cerebellar associated with severe secondary problems –Midtrimester.
Presented by: Odelya Ohana. Gathercole & Baddeley, 1989 NWR phonological short-term memory. Gathercole, 2006 Phonological storage is the key capacity.
Language and Communication Definitions Developmental scales Communication disorders Speech Disorders Language Disorders Interventions.
The Critical Period for Language Acquisition: Evidence from Second Language Learning CATHERINE E. SNOW AND MARIAN HOEFNAGEL-HÖHLE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM.
Working Memory and Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study of Trilingual Children Pascale Engel Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
How Phonological and Language Deficits Impact Literacy Proficiency Sherry Comerchero ASHA Certified Speech-Language Pathologist April 4, 2007.
Heilmann, J., Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J. and C. Hollar. (2005). Utility of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory in Identifying Language.
Reinforcement Look at matched picture after sound ends & it moves 10 trials (5 of each pairing) 2 or 4 blocks (2 pairs of words, 2 pairs of swoops) Participants.
Language Development. Four Components of Language Phonology sounds Semantics meanings of words Grammar arrangements of words into sentences Pragmatics.
A. Baker, J. de Jong, A. Orgassa & F. Weerman Collaborators: VARIFLEX project: Elma Blom & Daniela Polišenská (NWO-research grant : Disentangling.
1 First Language Acquisition, Developmental Language Disorders and Executive Function Anne Baker (ACLC) Michiel van Lambalgen (ILLC)
Working memory and second language learning Graham Hitch, Meesha Warmington & Swathi Kandru.
Phonological Loop, Visuospatial Sketchpad & Articulatory Suppression Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 04/25/2016: Lecture.
Read: Loftus for April 1 Sacks for April 3 Vokey for April 10 Idea Journals due on the 10th.
Chapter 5 Short-Term and Working Memory. Some Questions to Consider Why can we remember a telephone number long enough to place a call, but then we forget.
Elvira Masoura School of Psychology
Methods: Characterization
Child Syntax and Morphology
Mental Retardation & Language
Late talkers (Delayed Onset)
The acquisition of morphophonology
Verbal inflection: why is it vulnerable in SLI?
Evaluating the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis in Preschool Children
CHAPTER 8: Language and Bilingual Assessment
A perceptual investigation of prosodic accuracy in children with typical language and specific language impairment Peter Richtsmeier
Presentation transcript:

Non-Word Repetition Theoretical Approaches to Specific Language Impairment (SLI) Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar Ilan University

What is a Non-Word Repetition task? In a non-word repetition task the child in asked to repeat pseudo words and/or non- words of 1-5 syllables, with or without a cluster at the onset, middle or coda. Pseudo word: target-like Non-word: not target-like

GAPS - Grammar and Phonology Screening Test Gardner, H., Froud, K., McClelland, A. & van der Lely, H. (2006) The development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language difficulties in young children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders dep, pif, dremp, klest, tobilf, difimp, bademper, fakester, padrepper, difrimple What contributes to the complexity of these words? Are they English like? Could they be used as is in a Hebrew test? Which considerations should apply?

The processing involved in NWR NW >> Auditory processing >> Phonological Analysis >> Phonological storage (and learning for real words) >> Speech motor planning >> Output These can be influenced by : Hearing loss Phonotactic frequency Language dominance Stimulus length STM deficit Complexity Articulatory deficit

What is NWR testing then? Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. ANNA 13/12

Phonological working memory (phonological loop) “Working memory (WM) according to Baddeley (1986) is a multicomponent, capacity-limited system that comprises a controlling ‘‘central executive’’ and that includes an articulatory loop system. The central executive... is thought to regulate information flow within WM, retrieval of information from other memory systems, and the processing and storage of information. The articulatory loop … includes a capacity-limited phonological short-term store and an articulatory control process … that acts to refresh and maintain speech material in the store for a brief period. The articulatory loop’s function is to store verbal input temporarily, especially novel phonological input (Baddeley, Gathercole, & Papagno, 1998), while other cognitive tasks such as auditory comprehension take place. The ability to temporarily store novel material also allows the listener the opportunity to create long-term phonological representations of that material (Baddeley et al1998).” (Montgomery 2003, p. 222)

Digit Span Gray, S Diagnostic accuracy and test-retest reliability of nonword repetition and digit span tasks administered to preschool children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication disorders 36,

Linguistic Knowledge Knowledge of lexical composition  Size of vocabulary  Abstract representation / Poor representational system  Less efficient mechanism for using lexical knowledge Speech output

Non-word repetition & word learning – TLD, L1 At the age of 4 (Gathercole, Service, Hitch, Adams and Martin 1999)

At the age of 5 & 13 (Gathercole, Service, Hitch, Adams and Martin 1999)

L2 Acquisition (Masoura and Gathercole 1999)

Success on NWR reflects vocabulary size in childhood Success on NWR correlates with the rate of learning new words even to adulthood

Chiat, S. (2006). The developmental trajectory of nonword repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, ODELYA 13/12

NWR & SLI

NRT - Nonword Repetition Test Dollaghan, C., and Campbell, T. F Nonword Repetition and Child Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol

What contributes to the complexity of these words? Are they English like? Could they be used as is in a Hebrew test? Which considerations should apply?

CNRep - Children's Test of Nonword Repetition Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., and H. Emslie H. (1994) The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: a test of phonological working memory. Memory 2(2): (Tables from Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. (2006))

How are they different?

Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. (2006). Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 970–983. Subjects: 36 native speakers: 12 SLI (9;8), 12 TD age (9;9), 12 TD language (6;1). Same SES Scores on standardized test:

Which one is easier?

Within group: CNRep is easier than NRT Across group: The gap is more significant on CNRep

What influences these results?

How does NWR fairs with other tasks? Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1029–1037.

Children with SLI are significantly worse on all four markers NWR and past tense marking yield the best results (sensitivity & specificity). Adding past tense to NWR raises the predictive ability (from 81% to 87%) While verb morphology is useful for 4-5 y.o. in English, NWR might be more promising for other languages

Sentence Repetition Theoretical Approaches to Specific Language Impairment (SLI) Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar Ilan University

1. Child: Want other one spoon, Daddy 2. Father: You mean, you want THE OTHER SPOON 3. Child: Yes, I want other one spoon, please. 4. Father: Can you say “the other spoon”? 5. Child: Other … one … spoon. 6. Father: Say … “other”. 7. Child: Other. 8. Father: “Spoon”. 9. Child: Spoon. 10. Father: “Other … spoon.” 11. Child: Other … Spoon. Now give me other one spoon? 12. (From Pinker1994, p. 281)

Elicited imitation as an experimental technique Filling the gap Word order (e.g. in relative clauses)

Filling the gap (Slobin & Welsh 1973, from Lust et al. p. 58) Adult: The red beads and the brown beads are here Child: Brown beads here and red beads here

Relative clauses (Friedmann & Lavi, 2006) נסיין: זו הילדה שסבתא נשקה ילד: זו הילדה שנשקה את סבתא

Sentence repetition as a linguistic evaluation tool How does SR work? (Bley-Vroman and Chaudron, 1994):  The subject hears the input, processes it, and forms a representation.  The representation includes information at various levels.  The representation is kept in STM  The subject formulates (and produces) a sentence based on the representation, comparing it to the model.

What influences success on SR? What does it check?  Verbal memory  Word length  Sentence length  Syntactic complexity  Predictability

Verbal memory span Devesovi, A. & Caselli, M. C Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, Subjects: 100 Italian preschoolers. Method: SR, spontaneous speech, verbal memory span Findings:  MLU, articles omission and use of the verbs in the sentence imitation task correlated with the same measures of their free speech.  Positive correlations between verbal memory span and performance of both the imitation task and the free speech.

Word length Willis, C.S. & Gathercole, S.E. (2001). Phonological short-term memory contributions to sentence processing in young children. Memory, 9,

Subjects: 30 children, 4-5 (Mean 4;6, SD, 4.28 months) Material: SR followed by picture selection with sentences containing either short or longer words (different in number of syllables), and varied in syntactic structure.

Repetition but not comprehension of the sentences was significantly influenced by word length.

Sentence length (Armon-Lotem et al. under revisions( Substitution with code interference: The baby laughed on the clown. Substitution with no code interference: The baby laughed to the clown. Omission with code interference: The elephant pulled *(down) the zebra's pants. Omission with no code interference: The baby laughed *(at) the clown.

Syntactic complexity Friedmann, N., & Lavi, H. (2006). On the order of acquisition of A-movement, Wh-movement and V-C movement. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico, & I. Ferrari (Eds.), Language acquisition and development (pp ). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press/CSP.

Subjects: 60 Hebrew speaking children aged 2;2-3;10: 21 children aged 2;2-2;9, 19 children aged 2;10-3;2, and 20 children aged 3;3-3;10. Task: SR - 80 sentences (8 categories by syntactic complexity), 4 words.

"No correlation was found between repetition of any of the movement types and age (Rpb < 0.22 for all the sentences with movement), and no significant difference in repetition was detected between the three age groups: For example, a 2;3 year old girl succeeded in repeating all the V-C sentences, whereas a 3;10 boy failed in them. Two girls aged 2;5 succeeded in repeating Wh sentences, whereas 4 children aged 3;7 failed in them." (p. 214)

Predictability Valian, V. Prasada, S. & Scarpa, J Direct object predictability: effects on young children's imitation of sentences. Journal of Child Language, 33, Predictability- It is easier to repeat sentences with highly predictable objects than sentences with less predictable objects. a. The dog chews a bone. b. The dog chews a crayon Subjects: 24/23 two-year-olds (mean 28 month, range 25-32) with TLD Task 1: Sentence repetition 6-8 morphemes. Task 2: Sentence repetition 6-8 morphemes + a stickers game

SR & SLI Gardner,H., Froud,K., McClelland,A., van der Lely,H. K. J. (2006). The development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language difficulties in young children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 41(5),

A significant effect of age group: F(4, 618)547.53, p,0.001