ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems: Chapter 6 November 1, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
Advertisements

ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison Discontent is the first necessity of.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 February 2, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “My own business always bores me to death;
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Inverse Dynamics Equilibrium Analysis Various Odd Ends March 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 4, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Cam-Follower Constraints – 3.3 Driving Constraints – 3.5 October 11, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 February 9, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “In England, if you commit a crime, the.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations
Ch 2.4: Differences Between Linear and Nonlinear Equations
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Implicit Integration Methods BDF Methods Handling Second Order EOMs April 06, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Initial Conditions for Dynamic Analysis Constraint Reaction Forces October 23, 2013 Radu Serban University.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Newton-Raphson Method October 04, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a Point fixed in a Ref Frame – 2.6 Absolute vs.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Introduction January 21, 2010 Dan Negrut University of Wisconsin, Madison © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a point fixed in.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
February 21, 2000Robotics 1 Copyright Martin P. Aalund, Ph.D. Computational Considerations.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Sept. 08 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Singular Configurations of Mechanisms 3.7 October 26, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Numerical Solution of DAE IVP Newmark Method November 1, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, Feb. 5, 2009 Section 2.2 and 2.6 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 11, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 1, 2011 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2011.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, March 26, 2009 Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Tu, Sept. 07 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
LURE 2009 SUMMER PROGRAM John Alford Sam Houston State University.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 16, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “Courage is fear holding on a minute.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.6 February 25, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “In China if you are one in a million.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 September 06, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Vel. And Acc. of a Fixed Point in Moving Frame Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics February.
KINEMATIC CHAINS & ROBOTS (I).
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics 3.1, 3.2 September 18, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 October 19, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Introduction to Dynamics 6.1 October 09, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Singular Configurations 3.7 October 07, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 September 30, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Differential Calculus 2.5, 2.6 September 11, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 10, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 February 17, 2009 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems May 07, 2009 EOM in non-Cartesian Reference Frames ~ not in textbook~ Quote.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, April 16, 2009 Chapter 6: Multi-degree of Freedom (MDOF) Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison Quote of the Day:
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 16, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 6, 2011 Equilibrium Analysis & Inverse Dynamics Analysis ME451 Wrap.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 6, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Newton-Raphson Method 4.5 Singular Configurations of Mechanisms 3.7 March 5, 2009 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Numerical Integration October 28, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 February 26, 2009 © Dan Negrut,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 October 21, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, Feb. 3, 2009 Sections , © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 October 5, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Absolute Constraints 3.2 September 20, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.4 February 23, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “When You Come to a Fork in the Road,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Newton-Raphson Method 4.5 October 28, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts used in.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Constraints 3.3 September 23, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel and Acc of a Point fixed in a Ref Frame – 2.6 Jan. 29, 2009 ©
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 4, 2010 Chapter 6 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
Equations and Inequalities involving Absolute Value
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
KINEMATIC CHAINS & ROBOTS (I)
CHAPTER 3-2. Planar Cartesian Kinematics
Presentation transcript:

ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 October 13, 2011 “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” Alan Kay © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison

Before we get started… Last Time Today: Discussed driving constraints To carry out Kinematics Analysis you need to have zero net degrees of freedom NDOF=0 Driver constraints Absolute: x, y,  Relative: distance, motion on a revolute joint, motion on a translational joint Today: Excavator example, setting up driving constraints Kinematic Analysis Wrap-up: Position, Velocity, and Acceleration Stages Midterm exam coming up on November 3 Assignment due on Th, Oct. 20: Textbook: 3.4.7, 3.4.8, 3.4.9 ADAMS & MATLAB emailed to you 2

Example: Specifying Relative Distance Drivers Generalized coordinates: Motions prescribed: Derive the constraints acting on system Derive linear system whose solution provides velocities 3

Mechanism Analysis: Steps Step A: Identify *all* physical joints and drivers present in the system Step B: Identify the corresponding set of constraint equations (q,t)=0 Step C: Solve for the Position as a function of time (q is needed) Step D: Solve for the Velocities as a function of time ( is needed) Step E: Solve for the Accelerations as a function of time ( is needed) 4

Position, Velocity, and Acceleration Analysis (Section 3.6) The position analysis [Step C]: It’s the tougher of the three Requires the solution of a system of nonlinear equations What you are after is determining at each time the location and orientation of each component (body) of the mechanism The velocity analysis [Step D]: Requires the solution of a linear system of equations Relatively simple Carried out after you are finished with the position analysis The acceleration analysis [Step E]: What is challenging is generating the RHS of acceleration equation,  Carried out after you are finished with the velocity analysis 5

Position Analysis Framework: Somebody presents you with a mechanism and you select the set of nc generalized coordinates to position and orient each body of the mechanism: You inspect the mechanism and identify a set of nk kinematic constraints that must be satisfied by your coordinates: Next, you identify the set of nd driver constraints that move the mechanism: NOTE: YOU MUST HAVE nc = nk + nd 6

Position Analysis We end up with this problem: given a time value t, find that set of generalized coordinates q that satisfy the equations: What’s the idea here? Set time t=0, and find a solution q by solving above equations Then advance the time to t=0.001 and find a solution q by solving above equations Then advance the time to t=0.002 and find a solution q by solving above equations Then advance the time to t=0.003 and find a solution q by solving above equations … Stop when you reach the end of the interval in which you are interested in the position What you do is find the time evolution on a time grid with step size t=0.001 You can then plot the solution as a function of time and get the time evolution of your mechanism 7

Position Analysis Two issues associated with the methodology described on previous slide: The first issue: related to the fact that you are solving nonlinear equations. Does a solution exist? Example: x2+4=0 (no real number x will do here) Is the solution unique? Example: x2-4=0x (both 2 and -2 are ok solutions) The second issue: The equations that we have to solve at each time t are nonlinear. How do you actually solve them? For instance, how do you find the solution (x=-1.2) of this nonlinear equation: Deal with this issue next week (discuss Newton-Raphson method) 8

Position Analysis: Implicit Function Theorem Is the solution of our nonlinear system well behaved? That is, does it exist, and is it unique? A sufficient condition is provided by the Implicit Function Theorem In layman’s words, this is what the Implicit Function Theorem says: Assume that we are at some time tk, and we just found the solution q(k) and we question the quality of this solution If the constraint Jacobian is nonsingular in this configuration, that is, … then, we can conclude that the solution is unique, and not only at tk, but in a small interval  about time tk. Additionally, in this small time interval, there is an explicit functional dependency of q on t, that is, there is a function f(t) such that: 9

Quick Comments… What does it mean “the solution is unique, and not only at tk, but in a small interval  about time tk”? It means that if you look back in time a little bit (a value ±), or if you look ahead in time a little bit (a value ±), the mechanism during this period is guaranteed to be “healthy” (the constraint equations are well defined and around tk the mechanism assumes a unique configuration) Notation used on previous slide: note that the subscript is in parentheses It indicates that that quantity is evaluated at tk If no parentheses, can be mistaken for the coordinates associated with body “k” 10

End Position Analysis Begin Velocity Analysis 11

Velocity Analysis This is simple. What is the framework? You just found q at time t, that is, the location and orientation of each component of the mechanism at time t, and now you want to find the velocity of each component (body) of the mechanism Taking one time derivative of the constraints leads to the velocity equation: In layman’s words, once you have you can find at time tk by solving the linear system 12

Velocity Analysis Observations: Note that as long as the constraint Jacobian is nonsingular, you can solve this linear system and recover the velocity The reason velocity analysis is easy is that, unlike for position analysis where you have to solve a nonlinear system, now you are dealing with a linear system, which is easy to solve Note that the velocity analysis comes after the position analysis is completed, and you are in a new configuration of the mechanism in which you are about to find out its velocity 13

End Velocity Analysis Begin Acceleration Analysis 14

Acceleration Analysis This is also fairly simple. What is the framework? You just found and at time tk, that is, where the mechanism is at time tk, and what its velocity is You’d like to know the acceleration of each component of the model Taking two time derivatives of the constraints leads to the acceleration equation: 15

Acceleration Analysis In other words, you find the acceleration (second time derivative of q at time tk) as the solution of a linear system: Observations: The equation above illustrates why we have been interested in the expression of , the RHS of the acceleration equation: Note that you again want the constraint Jacobian to be nonsingular, since then you can solve the acceleration linear system and obtained the acceleration 16

SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 3 We looked at the KINEMATICS of a mechanism That is, we are interested in how this mechanism moves in response to a set of kinematic drives (motions) applied to it What one has to do: Step A: Identify *all* physical joints and drivers present in the system Step B: Identify the corresponding set of constraint equations (q,t)=0 Step C: Solve for the Position as a function of time (q is needed) Step D: Solve for the Velocities as a function of time ( is needed) Step E: Solve for the Accelerations as a function of time ( is needed) 17