Stephen P. Mattingly Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Texas at Arlington Supporting Researchers: Katie Larsen, UT - Austin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Advertisements

Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
May 9 th, The Marshall. Mission Statement To develop a regional consensus for capacity investments to secure higher speed rail for the 8 million residents.
The travel solution for our time 1 High-Speed Rail at Amtrak Frank Vacca, Chief Engineer June 24, 2011.
Cost-Effectiveness of Reductions in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from High- Speed Rail and Urban Transportation Projects in California Juan Matute and Mikhail.
Rusty Roberts, Vice President – Corporate Development Florida East Coast Industries AASHTO: Standing Committee on Rail Transportation General Session:
America’s intercity provider
First Statewide Comprehensive Rail Plan for MN Commissioned by 2008 Legislature Compliant with 2008 PRIIA Federal Rules 6 Months to prepare, 10 Months.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Arizona’s Sun Corridor: What is Happening on the Ground? Robert Lang, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology Research Director, Brookings Mountain West Interim Director,
Oregon Passenger Rail EIS Project Leadership Council Hal Gard, Rail Administrator, ODOT John Sibold, Cascade Rail Corridor Director, WSDOT Salem, OR June.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Passenger Rail-Intercity and Commuter Rail Source: AREMA Ch. 10, REES Module 5 “Transportation exists to conquer space and.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
HSRD Systems Diagram Ten FRA Criteria 1.Ridership Forecasts: Calculated using a logit model that incorporates the reliability, cost, and travel time of.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
High Speed Rail on the Horizon State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Westin Hotel, Seattle, WA August 3 - 5, 2010 Paula Hammond Secretary.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 11 Mass Transit.
Hashimoto: Casino Management: A Strategic Approach © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 LOCATION AND.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
High Speed Passenger Rail for Indiana August 21, 2012.
Transportation Today Policy, Freight, Intercity Travel Norman W. Garrick Lecture 2 CE 2710.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When is high speed rail economically justified? Chris Nash
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
“President Obama’s vision for high-speed rail mirrors that of President Eisenhower, the father of the Interstate highway system, which revolutionized.

EurailSpeed milano 2005 Which market for high speed rail ? - The experience of Paris-Charles de Gaulle airport Jean Marie Chevallier Director of Airport.
Public Transit in Sacramento
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE from Passenger Perspective or… I n t e r m o d a l i t y from Passenger Perspective or… PhD Thesis EUROCONTROL Experimental.
Background Research on High Speed Rail Kumar and Wencan.
Midwest High Speed Rail Case StudySeptember 29th, 2004 Andy Inserra, Kristin Thompson, T.J. Thurlow, Natalie Villwock.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
FLORIDA HIGH SPEED RAIL Presented by: Nazih K. Haddad Florida Department of Transportation USHSR Conference March 4, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Krum Amtrak Stop Status September 21, 2010 Mayor Terri Wilson Krum, TX.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Intermodality and the Economy: Seamless Transport Stephen Perkins ECAC Forum 14 December 2011.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
Rusty Roberts, Vice President – Corporate Development Florida East Coast Industries Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Summit Thursday, October 10, 2013.
Florida High Speed Rail Authority Update for Orange County Board of County Commissioners April 7, 2009.
How Citrus County can lead rural America back to prosperity -Richard Fernley BLAZING NEW RAILS.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Airport and Airline Access Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental.
Oklahoma City to South Texas Passenger Rail Corridor SCORT Presentation March 2010.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Amtrak: America’s Railroad Todd Stennis, Director Government Affairs, South.
Impact of the California High Speed Rail System Lee Ann Eager, Chief Operating Officer Economic Development Corporation serving Fresno County.
Transportation and Areal Specialization The main role of transportation is to connect places and move things and people (and ideas) from place to place.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Does the Passenger Train have a Future? DAVID BURNS RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CHICAGO, USA.
RAIL TRANSPORT. 1.1 BACKGROUND OF RAIL TRANSPORT.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
Travel by Rail Standard 3 Objective 2
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Stephen P. Mattingly Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Texas at Arlington Supporting Researchers: Katie Larsen, UT - Austin Antonio Massidda, Univ. of Vanderbilt Sunil Madanu, UTA September 3, 2014

What is High Speed Rail? Current Status of High Speed Rail in Texas Texas vs. Other Established Systems A Unique Opportunity Issues to Resolve/Address What Does High Speed Rail Really Mean for Texas? High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda Overview

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly Background U.S. DOT: “Rail service that is time-competitive with air and/or auto for travel markets in the approximate range of 100 to 500 miles.” European Union: Minimum Operating Speeds 120 mph – Existing Rail Lines 160 mph – New HSRs Definition of High Speed Rail (HSR): HSR Lines Scenarios High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Japan Early efforts : 1964 Japan: HSR line Toyko to Shin-Osaka High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Europe Early efforts : 1977 Italy: HSR line Rome – Florence High Speed Train (HST) “Pendolino” operated at speeds up to 155 mph

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Europe 1981 France – HSR line Paris – Lyon HST Train à Grand Vitesse (TGV) operated at speeds up to 160 mph High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Intended for regional (intercity trips) –Not intra-region (cannot maintain maximum speed for long periods before needing to brake) –Typically, mile trips –Example: Houston – Atlanta, ~ 790 miles, 2 hours by air Over 4 hours at maximum HSR speed with no stops May be subsidized or funded by the government Passengers pay by the person-trip (fare) rather than vehicle Version of public transport even if operated by private firm or concession –Similar to air –Dissimilar to auto Outcome: HSR competes with air in limited niche –Limited SOV vehicles –Minimum fare Washington DC to Philadelphia, $111 High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda What Role Does High Speed Rail Serve?

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in USA: The Northeast Corridor 2000 USA – The Northeast Corridor Acela Express HST Maximum Operating Speed 150 mph Average Operating Speed 72 – 125 mph HSR length 450 miles High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in USA: The Northeast Corridor The impact of the Acela Express on airlines Air/HSR Market Share Analysis Route Distance (miles) Air/HSR market share for Acela Express Acela Express Travel time (h:min) NYC – Washington DC23065%2:45 NYC – Boston22552%3:30 Boston – Philadelphia32018%4:56 High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in USA – The Future The Proposed HSR Lines in the USA South Central, San Antonio – DFW – Tulsa/Little Rock Gulf Coast: Houston – New Orleans – Southeast (Atlanta & eastern seaboard) California Corridors, Florida: Tampa – Orlando – Miami, Northeast Region, Chicago Hub: Detroit – Chicago, Kansas City – St. Louis – Chicago Southeast, Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Many Competing Voices –Texas High Speed Rail Corporation (Texas T- bone) –Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) Texas Central Railway (Houston to Dallas line) Regional Issues: –NCTCOG –Commission for High-Speed Rail in the Dallas/Fort Worth Region –Tarrant vs. Dallas County High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Current Status

Texas Central Railway (Houston to Dallas line) –FRA and TxDOT Lead agencies for EIS –Downtown Dallas station –No public money –Subsidiary of Japan Central Railway Regional Issues: –HSR in Tarrant County –Station in Arlington near entertainment district –Coordination and consideration of complete transportation system –How to fund? High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Current Status

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Current Status Existing HSR Systems’ Experience: HSR Stations Near Downtown Access: Transportation –Bus –Rail (urban and commuter) Access: Activities(dense urban cores) –Businesses (high value business in core) –Entertainment (most in core) –Urban housing (high value property)

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Current Status Texas/American Experience Access: Transportation –Bus –Rail (urban and commuter) –Automobile Access: Activities(dispersed) –Businesses (multiple centers) –Entertainment –Housing (suburban)

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Current Status Note: Travel Times do not include station dwell times Any origin to destination service does not have intermediate stops

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Europe – Case Study: The TGV Today, France has approximately 1,000 miles of HSR lines High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Europe – Case Study: The TGV The impact of the TGV on airlines in France Air/HSR Market Share Analysis Route TGV Market Share Journey Time (hours) Paris-Lyon91%1:55 Paris-Nantes89%2:00 Paris-Bordeaux62%3:00 Lyon-Lille60%3:00 Paris-Marseille60%3:10 Route type TGV Market Share Journey Time ≤ 2 hours90% Journey Time ≥ 2 hours60% Total on domestic routes81% High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Potential Ridership Based on international and US(Acela Express) experience –HSIPR can get 80% - 90% of the Air/HSIPR market share when travel time is up to 2 hours –HSIPR can get 50% - 80% of the Air/HSIPR market share when travel time is up to 3.5 hours –As the service is introduced, the HSIPR can expect to capture between 60 and 85 percent of existing airline ridership after five years of operation The ridership becomes sensitive to the location of the station

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda HSR in Texas: Potential Ridership Ridership (Passengers/Year)

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda A Unique Opportunity Access = Economic Opportunity Regional air profitability is limited Rail replaces regional air service and creates economic and development opportunities outside the major urban areas Integrated transportation system

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda A Unique Opportunity European Experience: HSR Stations Near Airports Airlines are offering combined air and rail ticketing Rail passengers have expedited check in to airport terminals HSR Airport to Airport Connections Source: Raileurope.com

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda A Unique Opportunity AIRail Station Frankfurt Airport Terminal 1 AirportAIRail HSR Station

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda A Unique Opportunity Ticketing Benefits –Some airlines like Lufthansa and Air France offer online booking for combined flight and HSR train Access to destinations beyond the arrival airport. Other Benefits: –Replace air trips Lower environmental impact Similar safety –New stations = economic development –Access to smaller urban areas (Waco, College Station, Temple/Belton) Less frequent service Each stop adds dwell time and lost time

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Texas – The Future The Texas HSR and Higher Speed Rail Network and Airlines: A Cooperative Approach On short-haul routes, the HSR may be a substitute for “feeder” flights operated by regional airlines Cooperation agreements between HSR operator and airlines may produce benefits for: Major Airlines Dismiss less profitable routes, Maintain an extensive regional network HSR Operator Increase ridership and revenues Passengers Relatively convenient service, Cheaper fares for business journeys High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

Revisiting High Speed Railways in the US A. Massidda S. Mattingly HSR in Texas – The Future New Strategies to Establish a Cooperative Approach Between HSRs and Airlines HSR as part of the overall wider transportation network – that includes airports and airlines An integrated HSR – Airlines system would: Improve performance Provide passengers with better service Increase HSR ridership and revenues Reduce expenses or losses for airlines Operating strategies: Code sharing on select HSR routes Potential integration of airlines check-in and baggage handling at HSR stations Airlines operating HSTs to diversify investments High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda Challenges Optimal placement of rail stations a challenge –Placement of near other transportation modes provide access –Population catchment –Activity catchment Urban mileage expensive Activities are dispersed Possible land use issues Integration with existing transportation system (i.e. access) No funding for Dallas – Arlington – Fort Worth extension

High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda Challenges Profitability –HSR is the most “profitable” type of rail. The TGV high speed rail of France has a 1.3 billion dollar annual profit. (LesEchols.fr, Renaud Honore, 2011) –The AMTRAK Acela Express only operationally “profitable” line 45% profit margin (Brookings Institute, 2013) –Does not include debt so may be lower (Brookings Institute, 2013) –Most HSR is at least capital subsidized Same as other modes Not perceived the same

Texas is different than the East Coast and Europe –Population –Activities HSR not a solution for urban congestion –May compete with new managed lane on I-30 –Managed lane SOV toll vs. fare –May void a concessionaire agreement Continuing rural interstate highway congestion High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda What Does HSR Really Mean for Texas?

Economic development opportunities near stations New transportation system challenges near stations to provide an adequate and integrated system Not the “public transit” answer to intercity travel due to high cost A political solution to extending HSR beyond Texas Central Rail initial investment –Public money spent on expensive to construct track –Winners and missed opportunities High Speed Rail Viability in Texas S. Mattingly w/Larsen, Madanu and Massidda What Does HSR Really Mean for Texas?