MAP-21: Bridges and Structures Moderated By Joey Hartmann Team Leader, Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration HIBT Webinar on MAP-21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Advertisements

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
An Overview of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings And TAM Plans MAP-21 National Performance Management Measures.
Performance Elements National Goals Performance Measures Performance Targets Performance Plans Target Achievement Special Performance Rules Performance.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
JULY 23,  Legislative Update ◦ Highway Trust Fund status ◦ Reauthorization proposals ◦ FY15 Appropriations  TTP Safety Funding  TTP Bridge Funding.
MAP Washington State Public Transportation Symposium August 26, 2013.
January 16, 2014 Federal Highway Administration Arizona Rural Transportation Summit.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged 07 August 2013 Jennifer Hibbert Director FTA Office of Planning and Program Development.
© 2015 AMPO 444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 345 Washington, DC tel: fax: Washington Update MAP-21 Reauthorization, Highway.
Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Audit Subcommittee Meeting Phoenix,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Irene Rico Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century ~ MAP-21.
1 SAFETEA: Transportation System Management, Operations and ITS Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
MAP-21 and Other Issues FHWA Update IFTA/IRP Manager’s / Law Enforcement Workshop September 2012.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Division of Budgets August 22, 2012 Tab 15 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)
Surface Transportation Authorization AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley SCOH Subcommittee on Construction Chicago, Illinois August 4, 2009.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
1 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 St Century (MAP-21) Public Law Preliminary Briefing Pioneer Valley MPO Joint Transportation Committee September.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
MAP-21 Implementation and Reauthorization May 6, 2013 Providence, Rhode Island.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’’ or ‘‘MAP–21’’ Signed into Law July 6, 2012 Implications for Infrastructure Asset Management, Pavement.
Nelson Castellanos Federal Highway Administration March 12, 2013.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
MAP-21 Performance-Based Planning: A Focus on Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Presentation to the Transportation.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Presented by: Peter Loughlin September 23, THE PAST YEAR September 30, 2009 Program Expired Short Term Extensions – GF Transfers $8b in 08, $7b.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
November 8, MAP-21 themes 2 Strengthens America’s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Federal-Aid Funding County Highway Accountants Conference May 10, 2007 zpowerpoint/ProjManagersCriticalIssuesBOB Feb07.ppt.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
FAST, What does the new transportation bill mean to you April 6, 2016.
UW - Madison Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) David L. Kopacz, P.E. Wisconsin Division Office February 20, 2015.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
Developed from a summary prepared for the New York State Association of MPOs 1.
TIBC Meeting Rapid City, SD Bob Sparrow Designated Federal Official – Tribal Transportation Self-Governance Office, FHWA/USDOT July 14, 2016.
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
TTP Update COLT Meeting Rapid City, SD Bob Sparrow
River to Sea TPO Board Meeting September 28, 2016
River to Sea TPO Board Meeting October 26, 2016
Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator
River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC Meetings September 20, 2016
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Presentation transcript:

MAP-21: Bridges and Structures Moderated By Joey Hartmann Team Leader, Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration HIBT Webinar on MAP-21 HQ Room E :00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., September 13, 2012

Agenda F 1. Opening Remarks by the Moderator–Joey Hartmann F 2. Overview of MAP-21 - Myint Lwin, Director, Office of Bridge Technology F 3. MAP-21 for Bridges and Structures–Tom Everett, Team Leader, Safety, Preservation and Management Team, Office of Bridge Technology F 4. Research, Technology Deployment, Training and Education - Ian Friedland, Assistant Director, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development F 5. Questions & Answers - Moderated by Joey Hartmann

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st. Century (MAP-21) 1. Creates jobs and supports economic growth 2. Simplifies programs 3. supports safety 4. Accelerates program delivery 5. Promotes innovation 6. Strengthens America’s Highway and Transportation System 7. Performance-based Federal programs

MAP-21 Authorizations (billions of dollars) Agency Total% FHWA % FTA % FMCSA % NHTSA % Total %

$37.7 Billion/Year in Formula Funding 5 National Highway Performance Program ($21.8) Surface Transportation Program ($10.0) HSIP ($2.2) CMAQ ($2.2) Transportation Alternatives ($0.8) Metro Planning ($0.3) Railway-Highway Crossing ($0.2) Note: Amounts in $Billion

Most Discretionary Programs Eliminated F Highways for LIFE Pilot F Innovative Bridge Research & Deployment F National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation 6

Performance Management Process National goals (MAP-21) National measures (USDOT) State targets (set in individual program plans) State & MPO plans address national goals 7 National Goal for Infrastructure Condition is: Maintain in a “State of Good Repair”

Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) 8 F Lending capacity expanded – up to $17 billion in credit assistance over 2 years F Notice of Funding Availability released July 27, 2012 F Program reforms –Letters of Interest / applications accepted throughout the year –Allows TIFIA participation for up to 49% of eligible project costs –Master credit agreement for programs of projects (secured by a common pledge) or phased single projects –Allows up to 10% to be set aside for rural projects; for these projects, increased eligibility and lower interest rates

Thank You for Working Together In Keeping Our Bridges & Tunnels in a “State of Good Repair”!

Tom Everett Leader, Safety, Preservation and Management Team Office of Bridges and Structures 10

 Signed by President July 6, 2012  2 year Bill (2013 & 2014)  Effective date: October 1, 2012  Unless otherwise provided, effective date is the date of enactment  What happens between now and October 1 st ?  Follow SAFETEA-LU programs, rules, etc. 11

MAP-21Current Law National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)NHS, IM, & Bridge (portion) Surface Transportation Program (STP)STP & Bridge (portion) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) CMAQ Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)HSIP (incl. High Risk Rural Roads) Railway-Highway Grade Crossing (takedown from HSIP) Railway Highway Grade Crossing Metropolitan Planning Transportation Alternatives (setaside from NHPP, STP, HSIP, CMAQ, and Metro Planning) TE, Recreational Trails, and Safe Routes to School 12

 Four primary programs  National Highway Performance Program  Surface Transportation Program  Highway Safety Improvement Program  Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program  Funding for these programs  $37.5 billion in 2013  $37.8 billion in 2014  Continue under extension until October 1, 2012 (2011 funding levels) 13

 Apportionment process (SEC 1105)  Apportioned to states based on total Federal apportionment in 2012  Process differs for 2013 and 2014  Adjusted for minimum tax payments into the trust fund (95% minimum)  Can transfer up to 50% among programs (SEC 1509)  National Highway System expanded (SEC 1104)  Now includes all urban and rural principal arterials and other connector highways and all STRAHNET routes and connectors 14

 Apportionment process (SEC 1105)  Determine amount for CMAQ and metropolitan planning following process in law  From the remaining amount… o 63.7% for NHPP o 29.3% for STP o 7% for HSIP 15

 National Highway Performance Program (SEC 1106)  Eligible facility = any facility on the NHS  Eligible project = supports the national performance goals and meets at least one listed purpose  NHS Performance targets set by state as part of an asset management plan o Risk and performance based o In line with national goals, specified in law (SEC 1203) 16

 National Highway Performance Program (SEC 1106)  Includes bridges and tunnels on the NHS o Eligible - construction, replacement (including with fill), rehabilitation, preservation, protection, inspection, evaluation, inspector training o NEW TERM – Protection – scour countermeasures, seismic retrofits, impact protection, security, extreme events  Includes inspection and evaluation of other infrastructure assets (signs, walls, drainage structures) 17

 National Highway Performance Program (SEC 1106)  Includes costs associated with obtaining, updating, and licensing software and equipment required for asset management  Asset management plan must include specific features such as objectives and measures, investment strategies, risk analysis, and a summary listing of all pavement and bridge assets on the NHS, including a description of their conditions 18

 National Highway Performance Program (SEC 1106)  Timing of actions o 18 months after October 1 st - Secretary to issue regulations defining the process for developing an asset management plan o 18 month transition period beyond publication of final rule o Total = 36 months 19

 National Highway Performance Program (SEC 1106) – other details  If no approved asset management plan, Federal share is 65%  Penalty if > 10% of deck area on structurally deficient NHS bridges for the prior 3 years o 50% of 2009 Highway Bridge Program apportionment equals the amount that must go to bridges under the NHPP 20

 When will the bridge condition penalty under section 1106 (23 U.S.C. 119(f)(2)) be applied?  In order to allow the States three complete years under the NHPP as required by 119(f)(2), FHWA will examine bridge condition data submitted by the States in April 2014, 2015, and If the deck area on structurally deficient NHS bridges exceeds 10 percent for all three years, the penalty will be imposed on October 1, 2016 (the start of FY 2017). 21

 Surface Transportation Program (SEC 1108)  Includes bridges and tunnels on public roads of all functional classifications  Eligible – construction of new bridge or tunnel on a Federal-aid Highway, replacement (including with fill material), rehabilitation, preservation, protection, application of de-icing chemicals, inspection, evaluation, inspector training 22

 Surface Transportation Program (SEC 1108)  Also includes… o construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other transportation modes o costs associated with obtaining, updating, and licensing software and equipment required for asset management o inspection and evaluation of other infrastructure assets (signs, walls, drainage structures) 23

 Surface Transportation Program (SEC 1108)  15% of 2009 Highway Bridge Program apportionment set aside for bridges not on Federal- aid highways o waiver still allowed when State has “inadequate needs”  Credit for bridges not on Federal-aid Highways 24

 National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory and Inspection Standards Program (SEC 1111)  Congress determined that it is in the vital interest of the U.S. to use performance based bridge management systems  Establish tunnel inspection standards and an inventory  Revisit Sufficiency Rating – consider emergency and freight mobility 25

 National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory and Inspection Standards Program (SEC 1111)  Determine cost of rehabilitating or replacing each SD bridge  Annually update bridge and tunnel inventories  New Report to Congress on inventories  Element level data: o Issue guidance and begin collecting w/i 2 years of enactment for NHS bridges o Study cost-effectiveness, benefits, feasibility of collecting for non-NHS bridges – report results to Congress 26

 National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory and Inspection Standards Program (SEC 1111)  Establish and maintain inspection standards for bridges and tunnels o Specify method for carrying out inspections o Establish max time between inspections o Establish qualifications o Require written reports and inventory data o National inspector certification process 27

 National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory and Inspection Standards Program (SEC 1111)  Establish procedures for compliance reviews  Establish procedures for reporting critical findings and monitoring corrective actions  Requirement to conduct annual compliance reviews o Issue report with review results by December 31 st o Implement “penalty” if no resolution or plan of corrective actions within 45 days 28

 National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory and Inspection Standards Program (SEC 1111)  Update the Inspection Standards within 3 years to cover o Methodology, training, and qualifications o Frequency of inspection o Consider risk-based approach to setting inspection intervals  Maintain a bridge and tunnel inspection training program o Keep training up-to-date o Need to develop training program for tunnel inspectors 29

 National Goals and Performance Management Measures (SEC 1203)  7 national goal areas defined in law  Infrastructure condition – maintain a state of good repair  18 months after enactment – rulemaking to “establish performance measures and standards.”  12 months after the rule, states set their targets o Targets can differ for rural and urban areas 30

 National Goals and Performance Management Measures (SEC 1203)  For bridges, limited to standards and measures for bridge conditions on the NHS  Establish minimum standards for States to use in developing and operating bridge and pavement management systems  4 years after enactment and biennially thereafter, states report on conditions and progress 31

 QUESTIONS 32