Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Needs in the Intercity Bus and Rail Transportation Industry Chapter 28 Research Methodologies.
Advertisements

Analysis of Small Aircraft As a Transportation Mode Samuel M. Dollyhigh Swales Aerospace, Hampton, VA Presented at: Oshkosh, WI July 29 - August 3, 2003.
Eastern Virginia Airport I. Introduction The Eastern Virginia Airport System Study (EVASS) was an analysis designed to help the Commonwealth identify a.
Airport Forecasting. Forecasting Demand Essential to have realistic estimates of the future demand of an airport Used for developing the airport master.
Introduction to TransportationSystems. PART III: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
1 Northeast Corridor Cost Benefit Assessment Status Mark Kipperman SAIC July 14, 2003.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Introduction to the EPATS and CESAR -- EPATS Synergy by Maciej Mączka Source: Alfred Baron, Krzysztof Piwek, Small aircraft requirements & potential demand,
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Impact of capacity constraints on airport choice of air travellers Dr. Marc Ch. Gelhausen Paris,
Planning Process ► Early Transport Planning  Engineering-oriented  1944, First “ O-D ” study  Computational advances helped launch new era in planning.
Transportation Planning CE 573 Lecture 2. Issues for Today Transportation planning and decision making Multimodal transportation planning Travel behavior.
Air Transportation A Management Perspective
Textbook Reviews By Aj.Weerawit Lertthaitrakul Logistics & Supply chain management Business Administration Air Transportation A Management Perspective.
Aviation Fuels Forecast Methodology Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop on Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts March 19, 2015.
Preliminary Aviation Fuel Demand Forecast Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop Preliminary Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts June 24, 2015 Gordon Schremp.
United Airlines Cost and Productivity Analysis Nahid Boustani Spring 2013.
Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1)
The Role of Business Aviation in the European Economy Philip Thomas Oxford Economics 13 March 2013.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Route Planning and Evaluation
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
Dr. A.A. Trani Virginia Tech November 2009 Transportation Systems Analysis Modeling CEE 3604 Introduction to Transportation Engineering.
Airport Forecasting NOTE: for HW, draw cash flow diagram to solve and review engineering economics.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Introduction to Network Planning Concepts and Practice Course Outline Dynaston Inc.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Nov. 3, SMAAC’s Concerns SAFETY – MSP operations at peak hours are risky. MAC should compare the hub safety risks and costs to more balanced operations.
Lecture 1 Introduction- Manifestations of Transport and Tourism.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO THE UTILITY OF GENERAL AVIATION TROY D. DOWNENR.
PASSENGERS’ CHOICE BETWEEN COMPETING AIRPORTS Radosav Jovanovic Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
AST 205 Chapter 1 Notes. Home Previous Next Help FBO What does FBO stand for? Fixed Based Operator How did that term originate? Originated from the early.
TEAM 1 – Airbus AXX Future of Air Transportation and Possible Air Response.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
A Model for Joint Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6-10, 2007, Daytona Beach,
SATS Transportation Systems Analysis Overview Virginia SATS Alliance TSAA Group Meeting October 29-30, 2002.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Auto, Air, and Rail Tables March 18, 2013 Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith Colin Smith, RSG Bhargava Sana, RSG.
Revolutionizing Aviation Pres Henne Senior Vice President, Programs Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation.
Route and Network Planning
Passengers‘ Airport Choice Marc Ch. Gelhausen Aachen, 13. June 2007.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
D. DeLaurentis 1 School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Stated Preference Analysis of a On-Demand Air Service Employing Very Light Jets JTRP Road School.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
NCAM Ken Hespe, Manager, Outreach & External Affairs National Consortium for Aviation Mobility, Hampton, Virginia 30TH ANNUAL AVIATION FORECAST CONFERENCE.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
MGMT 203 Aeronautical Science, Aviation Professionalism, Careers, and Certification Module 1.
Airport Forecasting NOTE: for HW, draw cash flow diagram to solve and review engineering economics.
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program

Credits Dr. A.A. Trani (Project Lead) Dr. H. Baik and H. Swingle (Research Scientists) A. Ashiabor, S. Seshadri, K. Murthy, and N. Hinze (Graduate Research Associates)

Integrated Transportation System Decision Support Model Blue = Dynamic Model Yellow = Aerospace Technology NAS Metrics Travel time Economic benefits Noise Traffic densities Energy use

Integrated Transportation System Decision Support Model Socio-economic Data Airports and Characteristics Aircraft Performance and Cost Characteristics Baseline year Horizon Time Air Traffic Structure and CONOPS Air Transportation Network and Schedules

The Role of Aerospace Technology in the Transportation DSM Hypersonic Helicopter Tiltrotor/RIA Subsonic GA / Corporate Supersonic NAS Metrics Travel time Economic benefits Noise Traffic densities Energy use

Questions to be Answered with the Decision Support Model Reduce the travel time from door-to-destination by n percent What price for aerospace technology x is needed to achieve y(%) increase in air transportation demand? Use the integrated transportation systems model to investigate what aerospace technologies are needed to achieve the goal What is the impact of aerospace technology x in the fuel, energy consumption and the environment?

Trip Demand Generation Given: Socio-economic characteristics for each county (for all states) Predict: a) Number of trips produced per household/year for various income levels b) Trips attracted to a county Use: Trip rate tables Annual Household Income ($) Years After High School Person-trips per Year per Household

Intercity Trip are Influenced by Income and Trip Purpose Data: ATS 1995 High Income Medium Income Low Income One-Way Trip Distance (miles) Percent Travelers by Air (%)

U.S. County Population Forecast ( ) Woods and Poole Economic Model

Average U.S. County Household Income Forecast ( ) Woods and Poole Economic Model

Originating Intercity Trip Forecast ( )

Trip Distribution Analysis Given: Trips produced from and attracted to each county Predict: a) Number of person-trips from each origin to every destination (county to county) Use: Gravity Model

Transportation Modal Split Given: Trips from each origin to each destination Predict: a) Number of person-trips for every mode of transportation available Use: Nested Multinomial Logit Model and Diversion Curves Key variables: travel cost, door-to-door travel time, perceived safety

Location of Airports and Population Influences Mode Split Towered Airports (474) Hub Airports (135) Census 1990 and 2000 Data with 61,224 tracts in NAS 3348 Airports Large Hub Airports (30) Travel patterns are heavily influenced by cost economics

Airline Fares Travel costs including airline fares are needed to understand where SATS might be competitive with airline travel. We analyzed 12,000,000 million airline tickets using several statistical models.

Airline Fare Model Parameters Distance traveled Number of passengers traveling between the origin and destination Number of airlines serving the origin and destination Low cost carrier service at the origin and/or destination Origination from hub or non-hub airport Destination at hub or non hub airport

SATS vs. Other Modes: Very Light Jet Aircraft Cost Assumptions on SATS travel: jet aircraft, less than 10,000 pounds total weight, utilized 500 hours per year, no deadhead legs, 3 passengers, two pilots.

SATS vs. Other Modes: Very Light Jet Aircraft Cost Assumptions on SATS travel: jet aircraft, less than 10,000 pounds total weight, utilized 500 hours per year, no deadhead legs, 3 passengers, one pilot.

Air Transportation Cost Models 400 nm stage length 600 nm stage length 1 Professional Pilot, $2.5/gallon fuel cost, 75% load factor Very Light Jet Aircraft Model National Commercial Airline Fare Model

Intermodal Link Analysis: Ground Connection and Access Times ATS NPTS NTAD Trip to Airport SpeedAnalysis AirportProximityAnalysis TimeAnalysis Airport Processing Time Analysis Airport Slack Time Analysis Airport Access and Egress Time Analysis High Population Density Low Population Density

Transportation Network Analysis

Flight Trajectory Aircraft Model Airbus A320 Jacksonville - Miami Flight trajectory module employs the Eurocontrol’s BADA model

Coach Fare Markets (> 75,000 trips / year) Longitude (deg.) Latitude (deg.) 1059 Airport ODs

Transportation Model Outputs

Concluding Remarks An integrated transportation model has been developed The model can be used in the evaluation of future aerospace technologies The model is flexible enough to incorporate new assumptions and models developed elsewhere National-level environmental impacts require a model capable of expressing spatial demand and supply patterns (I.e., equivalent to FEM/CFD techniques used in aerospace)

Acknowledgements and Disclaimer The authors would like to acknowledge the support of NASA Langley Research Center (Stuart Cooke and Jerry Hefner) in this endeavor The opinions expressed in this presentation and the paper are those of the authors and not those of NASA or any other Federal Agency