Curriculum-Based Measurements The What. Curriculum-Based Measurements  Curriculum-Based Measurements (CBM) Assessment tools derived from the curriculum,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Curriculum Based Measurements
Advertisements

Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
 EC Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
Assessment and Tier III RtI Foundations Training June-September 2010 Erin Banks and Amy Roberts, School Psychologists.
Growing Success Overview
Cleveland County Schools
Alternative and Informal Assessments
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
Educational Consultation Services, LLC
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Curriculum-Based Assessment and Other Informal Measures
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring?
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
RCBM MAZE MCAP MCOMP.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
CEDS 2005 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Educational Assessment: Looking Forward, Reaching Further November 17, 2005 When Assessment Isn’t Enough: Understanding Student.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
1 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT: Curriculum-Based Measurement Progress Monitoring NC Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division Program Improvement.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
Response to Intervention The Implementation Process “Plans and Strategies” Part I.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
◦ Demographics  Grades K and 1  130 Kindergarten students  166 First Grade students  51% Economically Disadvantaged  29% Title 1  15%
Maurice McInerney OSEP 17 th Annual TA&D Conference February 11, 2008 Using TA&D Frameworks to Inform Delivery and Practice.
1 Curriculum Based Measures Improving Student Outcomes through Progress Monitoring.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Using Data for Decisions Points to Ponder. Different Types of Assessments Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) Guided Reading (Leveled Reading) Statewide.
LIGHTS, CAMERA …. ACADEMIC DATA at the Elementary Level Cammie Neal and Jennifer Schau Forsyth County Schools.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
ASSESSMENT, STANDARDS, & ACCOUNTABILITY. WHY IS ASSESSMENT IMPORTANT? Used to gather information and make decisions about student learning Formal tests.
Universal Screening Rosemary Santos John Staumont Lydia Narcisse Sylvia Cadena.
 1. What is MAP?  2. Share how PCPS uses data from MAP to plan for instruction, track student progress, and provide formative feedback  3. Dr. David.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Easy Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM). What is Easy CBM? EasyCBM® was designed by researchers at the University of Oregon as an integral part of an.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education Introduction to Using CBM for Progress Monitoring.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
Progress Monitoring Elementary Intervention Coaches November 22, 2011.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services.
Making Progress Monitoring Work at Tier 2 February, 2014 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG)
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Considerations for Choosing Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures from K-12 Anne Foegen, Ph.D. Pursuing the.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services (717)
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Reactions Dealing & Guiding. Example of a Good Meeting It was March before this meeting took place. So remember to be patient with your school.
Progress monitoring Is the Help Helping?.
Curriculum-Based Measurement for Student Assessment
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Method for Monitoring Student Academic Progress in Basic Skills.
Link Smarter, Not Harder: How Good Student Academic Assessment Leads to Better Classroom Interventions Jim Wright
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
Formative Assessments Director, Assessment and Accountability
CHAPTER 14: Assessing Written Expression
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum-Based Measurements The What

Curriculum-Based Measurements  Curriculum-Based Measurements (CBM) Assessment tools derived from the curriculum, used in conjunction with a problem-solving model. Possess the necessary specificity. Administered in a short period of time. Sensitive to the small increases in the student’s academic skills. Allows for peer referencing. Used to progress monitor

Progress Monitoring  Focuses on individual decision making with respect to academic skill development.  Designed to Estimate rates of improvement Identify students who are not demonstrating adequate progress and therefore require additional or alternative forms of instruction. Compare the efficacy of different forms of instruction and thereby allow teachers to design more effective, individualized instructional programs for learners.

CBM - Goals & Purpose  Purpose: Assist teachers in monitoring and improving instruction  Goal: To create a formative assessment method that teachers can use to systematically test alternate instructional approaches

CBM: The Benefits  CBM allows us to look at foundational skill development (i.e. letter sound correspondence, phonemic awareness, etc.)  CBM helps us to design specific, tarteted interventions.  CBMs can be administered frequently and can show us even the smallest intervals of growth.  CBMs are short and quick to administer and score.  CBM assists in data based decision making.

Research Shows:  CBM produces accurate, meaningful information about students’ academic levels and their rates of improvement.  CBM is sensitive to student improvement.  CBM corresponds well with high-stakes tests  When teachers use CBM to inform their instructional decisions, students achieve better

The Science of CBM  The most robust measures of academic performance have reliability and validity. Reliability - the extent to which the measurements of a test remain consistent over repeated tests of the same subject under identical conditions Discriminate Validity - Doe sit appear to measure what it’s suppose to measure? Does it minimize assessment of unrelated constructs?

Reliability  CBM has been shown to possess high levels of reliability  42 one-minute CBM type assessments in reading, math, and written expression for grade K-5 were found to have reliability coefficients between with just three one-minute administrations (Jenkins, 2002)

Validity  Because CBMs measure very specific skills, it demonstrates a high level of validity.  Several studies have demonstrated the ability of CBM to differentiate between students receiving special education services, students receiving Chapter 1 services, and students not receiving any of those services (Deno, Marston, shinn, and Tindal, 1983; Marston and Deno, 1982; Shinn and Marston, 1985; and Shinn Tindal, Spira, and Marston, 1987).