1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
A Guide to Implementation
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist,
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
1 Components Preparation  Traditional higher education  Alternative certification  District-based preparation Sourcing  Marketing  Recruitment  Screening.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
TEAM Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. What is the TEAM Program? Legislation passed in October 2009 has established a Teacher Education and Mentoring.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW

“…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about their practice and their role in the system, how school systems function, and what they do to support instructional excellence. Getting this right is essential to driving improvement in instruction and student learning.” - The Aspen Institute,

3 PROJECT OVERVIEW BACKGROUND 5 year ($16M) grant awarded to MSFE (September, 2010) Districts with qualifying schools (50% + free/reduced) were invited to take part in the initiative (Summer, 2010) Five districts, representing 18 schools and 458 teachers are currently participating Grant highlights – Rigorous, transparent and fair teacher and principal evaluation using observation-based assessments, peer review, and student achievement data

4 PROJECT OVERVIEW BACKGROUND Grant components (cont.) – School-wide, instructionally focused professional development for teachers – School-wide, leadership focused professional development for principals – Enhanced mentoring and induction program for all beginning teachers (3 years) with a focus on teacher quality and student achievement – Incentives for student growth based on multiple measures – Incentives for teachers who assume additional responsibilities and leadership roles – Extensive stakeholder involvement and communication around the design and implementation of this performance system

5 PROJECT OVERVIEW GOAL To enhance educator effectiveness and student growth. For the benefit of all stakeholders including students, educators, parents, and the community. By developing a performance system that is aligned with district mission and includes the following components: regular, specific measurement and feedback; on-going, instructionally focused professional development; fair and sensible recognition and reward. So That schools can better attract and retain high performing educators and all stakeholders can benefit from teachers and administrators who are aligned in purpose, teamed in their efforts, and motivated to succeed in delivering high quality instruction to students.

6 PROJECT OVERVIEW COLLABORATIVE APPROACH Teachers, including association reps Association president Administrators Special Ed staff Curriculum Coordinator School Board reps 10

PROJECT OVERVIEW TIMELINE / / /132013/142014/15 Reflect Refine We will be working together throughout the 5 year grant period to build on our work, test new ideas, and continually strengthen the system.

PERFORMANCE SYSTEM KEY COMPONENTS 8 Measurement Feedback Accountability Culture

Professional Development Recognition and Reward Performance Management Professional Development /12 Take One! Whole school teachers participating statewide High quality, job embedded Additional leadership opportunities (e.g., facilitation, mentoring, etc.) – 79 Facilitators 9

Through Take One! Teachers will... Learn the standards Create a video of classroom practice Describe, analyze, and reflect on their video Submit their video and commentary Collaborate 10

Professional Development Recognition and Reward Performance Management and Career Growth “The core of evaluation reform efforts should be human capacity building at all levels so that states, districts, and schools can identify and learn from top- performing teachers, support discouraged and less successful teachers, and continue to develop all teachers toward their full potential.” - National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, May

Teacher and Principal Evaluation and Professional Growth Program The overarching purpose of the TEPG and PEPG programs will be to improve student learning and achievement across the district by : Serving as a measurement of performance of individual teachers and principals Serving as a guide as they reflect upon and improve their effectiveness Serving as a basis for identifying areas where professional development can improve effectiveness Focusing the goals and objectives of schools and districts as they support, monitor, and evaluate teachers and principals Serving as a tool in developing coaching and mentoring programs Enhancing the implementation of the approved curriculum 12

Total Performance System 13 Professional Development Recognition and Reward Performance Management and Career Growth

14

15

CLOSING REMARKS PERFORMANCE SYSTEM BENEFITS High-quality, job-embedded professional development with a focus on effective instructional practices and the opportunity to obtain national certification Promotion of school-wide learning communities that change the learning culture of the school to increase student learning growth and promote measureable, systemic reform that can inform change efforts elsewhere Regular access to relevant and specific performance data that can inform continuous improvement efforts 16

CLOSING REMARKS PERFORMANCE SYSTEM BENEFITS Intensive mentoring and induction for all beginning teachers (3 years) with a focus on teacher quality and student achievement using formative assessment and instructional coaching Opportunities for teachers to serve as instructional leaders without having to leave the classroom Opportunity for educators to develop and shape local policy Opportunity for additional recognition and reward 17

CLOSING REMARKS YEAR ONE EXPECTATIONS The system WILL Be a first step toward integrating measurement and feedback, professional development and incentives into a unified and coherent system Align ALL educators toward a common goal of improved student learning Pay teachers incentives that are above and beyond base pay Distribute incentives based on group (school and/or district) performance 18

CLOSING REMARKS YEAR ONE EXPECTATIONS Provide time and resources to fine-tune the measurement and reporting system Provide time and resources to learn more about the national standards for accomplished teaching Provide time and resources to build the Teacher and Principal Evaluation and Professional Growth Program, one ‘Core Proposition’ at a time Involve everyone in its development and on- going refinement 19

20 Success CommitmentCollaboration Communication Continuous Improvement 20

“The quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers – but neither will the quality of teaching exceed the quality of the systems in place to recruit, train, develop, and advance teachers.” - Improving Teaching Quality Around the World 2011 Summit 21