The treatment of animals Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Morality: constitutive of or overcoming self-interest?
Advertisements

Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights
Ethics Across the Curriculum.  Values Clarification  Presenting students cases and asking: “What do you think?”
Philosophers on why be moral Michael Lacewing
Our Duties to Animals Animal Liberation: All Animals Are Equal —Peter Singer  A prejudice or bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species.
Animal Welfare and Animal Rights Based on Kernohan, A. (2012). Environmental ethics: An interactive introduction. Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press, Chapters.
HUMANS AND NON-HUMANS A Spectrum “ Western ” paradigm emphasizes gulf between humans and animals ■ Religious traditions: humans as “the crown of creation”,
The Case for Animals Singer’s Utilitarian Argument  What is morally relevant?  What makes someone/somethi ng worthy of moral consideration?  What.
Secular Responses Use of the Embryo. Utilitarianism Based on the idea of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or majority Also based on hedonism.
Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
ETHICAL THEORIES: OVERVIEW. Universal Moral Theories Utilitarianism Egoism Deontology Rules-based Rights-based Virtue ethics.
Practical wisdom Michael Lacewing
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is defined in terms of the consequences of actions l Deontological Ethics: morality.
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Aristotle on eudaimonia Michael Lacewing
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
Michael Lacewing Simulated killing Michael Lacewing
Utilitarianism: happiness and preferences
Michael Lacewing Virtue Ethics Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Kant’s deontological ethics
Aristotle’s virtue ethics: three issues
PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE) Notes on Dale Jamieson, Ethics and the Environment, chapter 4.
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
Deontology in practical ethics
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Error theory Michael Lacewing
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
 ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational.
Why Philosophy?. Philosophy: A study of the processes governing thought and conduct. A system of principles for the conduct of life. A study of human.
Module 4: Introduction to Animal Welfare Ethics Concepts in Animal Welfare © 2012 Module 4: Introduction to Animal Welfare Ethics Concepts in Animal Welfare.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
Philosophy 220 Animal Rights. Regan and Animal Rights Tom Regan makes clear his commitment to the animal rights movement. As he articulates it, that movement.
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Animals and Persons. Ethical status for animals Kantian and utilitarian ethics traditionally extended to all people, but only people Kant: all rational.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Hume’s emotivism Michael Lacewing
Aristotle on three virtues Michael Lacewing
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Animal rights and personhood Studium Generale October 4, 2016Bernice Bovenkerk.
Philosophical approaches to animal ethics
Humanist perspective: Animal welfare
Michael Lacewing Eating animals Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The logical problem of evil
Stage 2 Philosophy Moral Theories St John’s Grammar School
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Animal Welfare PHI 2630.
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Michael Lacewing Virtue Ethics Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Animals and Persons.
PHI 208 RANK Education Your Life - phi208rank.com.
PHI 208 RANK Lessons in Excellence-- phi208rank.com.
Aristotle on eudaimonia and philosophy
Where do you draw the line?
On Whiteboards: Do animals have any moral status (should they be considered when making moral decisions)? Whether you answered yes or no, say why. On what.
Theories of Ethics.
Lecture 09: A Brief Summary
Environmental Ethics Do other animals have rights? Do we have duties and obligations to them? Or are they simply there to be used however we see fit.?
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
Kant’s view on animals is ‘anthropocentric’ in that it is based on a sharp distinction between humans and non-human animals. According to Kant, only.
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Kant and Regan.
Presentation transcript:

The treatment of animals Michael Lacewing

Utilitarianism Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain –Bentham: The question is not ‘Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?’ Singer: speciesism is immoral discrimination against animals just because they are not human –But surely there are important differences here, e.g. reason, emotional depth, self-awareness, moral agency –Reply: true, but these are not relevant to causing suffering

Implications Should we stop eating meat, wearing leather, conducting animal experiments? Would doing so reduce the amount of (animal) suffering in the world more than it would increase (human) suffering? Suffering is wrong, but killing is not –Happy animals that are replaced

Kant Human beings are ends in themselves. –We have a rational will and can adopt ends. –This is the only thing that is unconditionally good. –The goodness of every other end depends upon being adopted by a will. Animals are not rational, and so are not ends in themselves. –So they can be treated as means to our ends.

Kant We have no duties to animals, but we do have duties – to people – regarding animals –We must not become unkind through how we treat animals Objection: the harm to the animal, not ourselves, is what is wrong Objection: do we have duties to other human beings who aren’t rational?

Regan’s deontology Creatures who are a ‘subject of a life’ have rights –For such creatures, there is a way its life goes for it, and this matters to it Therefore, we can’t kill them for any reason less important than saving life. All right to life is equal –We should discriminate between more and less valuable lives

Aristotle Animals are not rational and cannot share in eudaimonia –So our moral concern with eudaimonia has little place for considering animals Recent virtue theory: there are virtuous and vicious ways of treating animals What matters is not just capacities, but relationship –We are not wrong to privilege those closest to us –But we do form bonds with animals, and we share aspects of our form of life with them

Virtue ethics Compassion requires that we take account of animal suffering –Reducing animals to ends is selfishness Implications?