Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis of the Brain Check Survey: Screening Students for TBI Melissa A. Rieger, OTS Advisors: Pat L. Sample, PhD. & David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Indianas Special Education Rules Professor Daniel J. Abbott ED 242 Fall 2009.
Advertisements

The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
Caseload Study: Preliminary Results Ann M. Sebald, Ed.D. Bob Pearson, Doctoral Candidate National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Improving The Clinical Care of Children and Adolescents With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Madeline Joseph, MD, FACEP, FAAP Professor of Emergency Medicine.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Parent Perspectives on Screening Young Children for Autism Within the Medical Home Paul Carbone, M.D., Tracy Golden, Ph.D., Jeff Hall, Ph.D., Elizabeth.
IDEA (Special Education) & 504 The interface with School Health Services ******* Cheri Dotson, Retired SFPS Lead Nurse
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Secondary Goals and Transition Strategies Speech and Language Support.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
CORRELATIO NAL RESEARCH METHOD. The researcher wanted to determine if there is a significant relationship between the nursing personnel characteristics.
BrainSTEPS Return to School Concussion Management Teams (CMT) Brenda Eagan Brown, M.S.Ed., CBIS Program Coordinator
 According to data from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, during 2009 there were 774 youth under 21 years old were hospitalized.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
RESULTS INTRODUCTION Laurentian_University.svgLaurentian_University.svg‎ (SVG file, nominally 500 × 87 pixels, file size: 57 KB) Screening for Developmental.
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
Colorado Department of Education Every Student Every Step of the Way Tanni L. Anthony, Ph.D., Project Director Colorado Services for Children and Youth.
Back to School Identifying the needs of students following head injury Ann Glang, Ph.D. & Bonnie Todis, Ph.D. Principal Investigators The Teaching Research.
Chapter 13 Understanding Students with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Disruptive behavior disorders constitute the most prevalent childhood disorders in the United States, with rates in the normal population of up to 10%,
Seminar on Mid Term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions Lessons from the Mid Term Evaluation of Merseyside Objective One.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Low Incidence Disabilities. Prevalence Very low incidence disabilities include those with prevalence rates between 1/10 th and ½ of a percent Three very.
On Parenting: An Examination of Older Adolescents’ Perceptions of Parenting Styles and Success in College Results ANCOVA (controlling for ethnicity, religion,
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Special Education 547 Unit Five Special Topics Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
An Intervention to Help Practitioners Address Overweight/Obese Pediatric Patients Allen G. Strickler PhD 1, Susan B. Cluett CRNP, 2 Angela J. Hasemann.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
IDEA and the Vocational Rehabilitation 1997 Presented by Guganesh, Carina, Ridah, Rachel, Maisy & Jenney.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
Polices Shaping School Reform
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Relationship between Participation and Initiation of Therapy Services among Children with ASD Diana Amend, OTS & Ruth Benedict, DrPH, OTR RESEARCH DESIGN.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Mountain BOCES. Definition of APD A deficit in the processing of information that is specific to the auditory modality. The problem may be exacerbated.
Chapter 7 Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorders (ADHD) © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Assistant Instructor Nian K. Ghafoor Feb Definition of Proposal Proposal is a plan for master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation which provides the.
Crystal Reinhart, PhD & Beth Welbes, MSPH Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Social Norms Theory.
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
The Clinical Utility of the LANSE- A and LANSE-C Jennifer L. Harrison, M.A., Megan Pollock, M.A., Amy Mouanoutoua, M.A. Ashley Brimager, M.A., & Paul C.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Concussion Recognition And Neurological Intervention United Management
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Module 1 Federal Legislation and Florida State Process
Post-Acute Rehabilitation Length of Stay and Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Jessica Ashley, Ph.D. 42nd Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Conference.
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis of the Brain Check Survey: Screening Students for TBI Melissa A. Rieger, OTS Advisors: Pat L. Sample, PhD. & David P. Greene, PhD. Department of Occupational Therapy Colorado State University Improving educational results for children with disabilities is an essential goal of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (P.L ), in order to ensure, “equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency” (20 U.S.C. § 601.C.1). Though traumatic brain injury was added into IDEA law in 1990 (P.L ), as a separate category, children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain under- identified in schools and therefore lack appropriate educational supports to ensure optimal participation and subsequent educational achievement. Because TBI can greatly impact a student’s school and future success, there is a need for an effective and efficient way to screen for TBI in students who are struggling in school. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Brain Check Survey (BCS); and establish a cut-off score, in the parent-report tool designed to help school personnel screen students for possible TBI. In searching to identify students for possible TBI, the BCS can act as a starting point in the process for qualifying students for Special Education, a 504 plan, or Response to Intervention (RTI) assistance. Methods: Data for this study were gathered from parents from five different school districts in Colorado, who completed the BCS for their child whom was selected from one of two groups: 1) child was receiving special education services for a medically-diagnosed TBI, or 2) child was considered typically developing. This study used the data from 479 completed surveys to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the BCS tool using receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. Results & Discussion: Analysis determined the BCS to have strong sensitivity and specificity. These findings, combined with recent findings from factor, reliability, and validity analysis, have resulted in the determination that the BCS can be used effectively in screening students for possible TBI. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): “caused by a bump, blow or jolt to the head or a penetrating injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain”; and may be classified from “mild” to “severe” CDC, 2013) TBI is one of the leading causes of death and disability among children. An estimated 680,000 children sustain a TBI each year TBI can significantly impact a student’s ability in multiple areas of functioning TBI symptoms and resulting problems continue long after a youth’s initial incident and tend to persist or even worsen as the child ages and progresses through school TBI was added to IDEA as a category in 1990 Low Identification of Children with TBI in Schools Lack of protocols for screening and evaluating students Participants: Parents from five different school districts in Colorado who completed the BCS for their child whom was selected from one of two groups: 1)Child was considered typically developing or 2) Child was receiving special education services for a medically-diagnosed TBI Instrument- Brain Check Survey: A parent-report questionnaire developed via consultation with experts in the field of pediatric TBI & through exploration of TBI-related research. The form of the BCS used to collect data was organized into 2 topic areas: symptoms and behaviors which has been further divided in to 4 factors via factor analysis 1) Behaviors, 2) Cognitive Processes, 3) Symptoms-Sensory, 4) Symptoms- Motor/Output. Data analysis: Completed using SPSS version 21 receiver Operator Characteristic Curves (ROC) were constructed to diagram the relationship between true positives/ sensitivity and false positives/ 1 – specificity. ROC curves were constructed for each of the four factors individually (Cognitive Processing, Behavioral Control, Symptoms- Sensory, and Symptoms- Motor/Output) and of the combined total of the four factors ROC curve analysis allowed for the determination of a cut-off score (8) for suspected TBI, thus supporting the use of the BCS as a screening tool BCS demonstrates strong sensitivity and strong specificity in distinguishing between students with a TBI and those considered typically developing The BCS fills the need for a TBI screening tool for use in schools in the process of educational-identification of TBI The BCS screening tool has been fully tested and is ready for wide-spread use throughout the U.S Designed for use as part of a comprehensive identification protocol ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS DATA ANALYSIS & RESULTS PUROPSE DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION DATA ANALYSIS & RESULTS To examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Brain Check Survey (BCS); and establish a cut-off score, to help school personnel screen students for possible TBI. Figure 1. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of each factor. Table 1. Results of ROC curves Table 2. Specificity and sensitivity for BCS. Figure 2. BCS total factor score frequencies and normal for typical (n=428) and TBI (n=51) groups. Department of Occupational Therapy Life Outcomes after Brain Injury (LOBI) Research Program