Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C OMMON C ORE S TATE S TANDARDS I NITIATIVE March 2010.
Advertisements

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
The New Alaska Standards for English/Language Arts & Mathematics: What Impact on CTE?
CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
Alaska’s English Language Arts and Mathematics Standards Need for Change 1.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
Common Core State Standards What are they? Why do we need them? What do they mean to us? Prepared by Grace Lee-Sim.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Task Force Literacy Task Force Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson, Sarah Breed, Phil Tucher, Elizabeth Macias,
Transition To The Common Core Transforming Teaching & Learning Santa Clara County Office of Education August 27, 2012.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Common Core State Standards A Primer for Parents 1.
1 Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative  Who’s behind it?  What’s it all about? 
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Instructional Focus Meeting, September 22  Goals for today:  Overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) ▪ What are they? ▪ Where did they come.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.
Common Core Standards By Holly Blankenship What is the Common Core? Newly revised academic state standards for school districts Formed by: National Governors.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
Common Core State Standards Norman Public Schools Dr. Joe Siano, Superintendent.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Common Core State Standards Where we are as a district and as a state 1.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Common Core State Standards Initiative State Board of Education January 28, 2010.
Common Core State Standards A Brief Overview for Staff Members of Public Schools of Petoskey September 2011.
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
EARLY LEARNING & KINDERGARTEN STANDARDS ALIGNMENT: A CLEAR PATH TO SUCCESS THROUGH ALIGNED STANDARDS August 18, 2015.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Finding Common Ground – A Convocation for Leadership: the New Jersey Standards and PARCC September 28, 2015 Kimberley.
What is the Common Core State Standards Initiative? A state-led effort to establish a single set of clear standards for ELA and math Informed by the best.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
Using the Standards for Mastery Learning September 7, 2010 Math & ELA.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Please enjoy breakfast provided by the Common Market courtesy of our wonderful PTA. We will begin at 8:00 a.m. Please sit with your assigned.
Common Core Standards Overview. The Common Core Standards (CCS) were developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Implementing the Common Core State Standards in Arkansas Jennifer Gonzales SPDG Positive Behavior Support Coordinator
Achieving a Common Core
Common Core for Parents/Families
California Common Core Standards
Overview of the Initiative
Common Core State Standards
Overview of the Initiative
Common Core State Standards Initiative
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
Common Core State Standards Initiative
Common Core State Standards May 2011
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
Presentation transcript:

Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards

Objectives Understand the three phases toward implementation of the new standards Identify current level of implementation for each of the phases Learn about specific tools to assist with building awareness of and transitioning to the ELA and math standards Identify next steps to take toward implementation of the ELA and math standards.

Schedule 8:30 – 9:00 Overview of standards 9:00 – 10:00 Current status Needs assessment Where to begin Phase placement survey 10:00 – 11:00 2 options 11:00 – 11:30 Wrap-up

Assumptions Everyone is already working hard. We are willing to make changes if those changes are good for students. We are more effective working together than alone, particularly given the amount of work that there is to be done. There is no formula or prescription. Local values, history, and current circumstances must inform the work.

Alaska’s New ELA & Math Standards How did we get here?

History of Standards in Alaska 1990s: Alaska standards in reading, writing, and mathematics were developed by age spans 2004: Grade Level Expectations (GLEs) in reading, writing, and mathematics were developed to further define standards at each grade level (grades 3 – 10) 2006: Grade Level Expectations were expanded to include kindergarten through second grade 7

A Nation-Wide Look at Content Standards Spearheaded by Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association July 2009 work groups from higher education, K – 12 education, and the research community March 2010 first public draft June 2010 final version – Common Core 8

Don’t states have standards? Long lists of broad, vague statements Assessments that “sampled” the standards Coverage mentality Focused on teacher behaviors – “the inputs”rather than on student learning 9

Alaska Standards Timeline June – November 2011, Alaska educators along with national experts shared their knowledge and assisted with the revision to create the proposed standards. They knew: 1.the GLEs were over six years old. 2.the GLEs did not extend beyond grade the GLEs were broad and open to teacher interpretation. 4.the GLEs were lower in rigor than other standards. 10

Stakeholder representation Classroom teachers in reading, writing, and mathematics –kindergarten through high school University instructors representing multiple content areas Career and technical education instructors Alaska industry and business representatives District administrators Educators representing students with disabilities, English language learners, economically disadvantaged, and ethnic groups 11

Stakeholder Demographics by Attendance 12

Adoption of New Standards New English Language Arts & Math Standards adopted in June, 2012 Align with college and work readiness. Include rigorous content. Build upon strength and lessons of the GLEs. Outline instructional expectations for grades K-12. Equal in rigor to national common standards. Relate to real world application. 13

Alaska Standards & CCSS Principles Fewer - can be learned in a year; little repetition Clearer - more precisely describe outcome expectations Higher – meant for all students each year Based on evidence of what is needed to be successful in college and careers Honest about time 14

Alaska Standards & CCSS Very similar Equal in rigor Equivalent but not identical Clarity to ensure that teachers would easily understand the focus and purpose of each standard Wanted key Alaskan standards retained, especially math standards in measurement in the elementary 15

Grade 5 Standard 10 for Reading Literature CC – By the end of the year, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poetry, at the high end of the grades 4-5 text complexity band independently and proficiently. Alaska – By the end of the year, read and comprehend a range of literature from a variety of cultures, within a complexity band appropriate to grade 5 (from upper grade 4 to grade 6), with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. 16

Current Status For ELA and math, consider the current status of instructional materials, curriculum, and professional development. Take notes regarding Recent district- or school-level work (i.e. district-wide training regarding new materials in September 2012) General impressions (i.e. very outdated instructional materials) Complete Needs Assessment to Guide Planning document Share your thoughts with a partner

As a group… Address ELA first in Curriculum Materials Professional development Address math first Curriculum Materials Professional development Address ELA & math Curriculum Materials Professional development

Alaska Standards Phases Awareness Transition Implementation

Awareness All district leaders and teachers understand the rational for Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards the language of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards the structure of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards the major shifts of the Alaska’s ELA and Math Standards

Transition Teachers are adjusting instruction to be consistent with Alaska ELA and Math Standards. District has a plan to address curricula, materials, and professional development for implementation of the Alaska ELA and Math Standards.

Implementation District has aligned curricula and materials to the Alaska ELA and Math Standards. District is providing ongoing professional development and monitoring of instruction regarding implementation of the Alaska ELA and Math Standards.

Phase Placement Survey Complete Phase Placement Survey identifying your current level of implementation for each of the three phases Each team member should complete the survey independently.

Discuss With your team, discuss your general impressions of “where you are” with each phase. Are you mostly in Awareness, Transition, or Implementation?

Options Complete Multi-Year Planning Template & Standards Planning Template For now, work on identifying staff groups, phase of focus, and dates for work to occur Learn about Materials’ Review Tool and Instructional Practice Guide

Wrap-up As a team, agree on One thing you learned that is valuable One clear next step Something you’ve already done toward implementing the standards that you’d like to share One question you have or way you need help