January, 2009 1 Steve Moore Lynn Felhofer Connectathon Patient Identifiers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathfinding Session: Cardiology IHE North America Webinar Series 2008 Harry Solomon IHE International Board GE Healthcare.
Advertisements

Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Patient Identifier Cross-referencing for MPI (PIX) Profile Mike Henderson.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update
Cross Community (XC) Profiles November 2006 ITI Planning committee meeting Karen Witting.
IHE Profile Proposal: Dynamic Configuration Management October, 2013.
Cross Community (XC) Profiles Karen Witting. Outline Vision – as described in 2006 IHE White Paper on Cross Community Exchange Existing – what has been.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Karen Witting IBM Cross-Community: Peer- to-Peer sharing of healthcare information.
Extending XDW in Cross-Community Editor: Charles Parisot Notes for the March 19 th, 2013 – ITI Tech Committee.
Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology IT Infrastructure Co-Chair.
This presentation prepared for Now is the time to initiate the one change that will have the most leverage across your business systems Patient Identity.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
IHE Cardiology Domain Overview Harry Solomon 27-July-2010.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Document Registry and Repository Implementation Strategies IHE Vendors Workshop 2006 IHE IT Infrastructure Education.
Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology IT Infrastructure Co-Chair.
NIST XDS Toolkit SOURCE NIST XDS Toolkit SOURCE VENDOR “ B ” RESPONDING GATEWAY VENDOR “ B ” RESPONDING GATEWAY BLUE REGISTRY REPOSITORY PIX/PDQ/XCPD/etc.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon Prior to the 2010 European connectathon, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon Prior to the 2010 European connectathon, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Overview of IHE IT Infrastructure Patient Synchronized Applications.
Configuration Management Issues in IHE Asuman Dogac, SRDC, METU, Turkey
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past North American connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID assigning.
Afdasfdasfd Adfasdfasfd asd Software Inventory Connectathon Manager Training Steve Moore Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology.
Charter: IHE Server Components project Requesting approval in principle.
Internet testing prior to the Connectathon Welcome!! Please must your line as you enter. We will have Q&A at the end.
Publication and Discovery XDS IHE IT Infrastructure Webinar Series.
Annual Cycle Review for Returning Participants IHE Test Cycle Lynn Felhofer / Steve Moore (MIR) Eric Poiseau (INRIA)
Cross-Enterprise User Assertion IHE Educational Workshop 2007 Cross-Enterprise User Assertion IHE Educational Workshop 2007 John F. Moehrke GE Healthcare.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Simple Image & Numeric Report Access to Radiology Information IHE Vendors Workshop.
Afdasfdasfd Adfasdfasfd asd Connectathon Timeline Connectathon Manager Training Steve Moore Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology.
NA 2009 Connectathon Support Description of Services Provided for Connectathon Participants.
CS 493 Project Definition The project assignment is a simplified version of the Integrating Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update Karen Witting – IBM IT Infrastructure Technical Committee co-chair.
Review and update of IHE The Future & XDS–I. Overview - IHE Updates IHE Organisational Changes The Infrastructure Domain Radiology Update XDS-I.
XDW in a multi-community environment and back-linking to Workflow Documents A high-level analysis to avoid design choices that would make XDW Trial Implementation.
Dynamic Document Sharing Detailed Profile Proposal for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting November 10, 2009.
Implementing the XDS Infrastructure Bill Majurski IT Infrastructure National Institute of Standards and Technology.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update Karen Witting – IBM IT Infrastructure Planning Committee co- chair.
Cross-Enterprise User Authentication John F. Moehrke GE Healthcare IT Infrastructure Technical Committee.
Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Cross-Community Patient Identification (XCPI) Brief Profile Proposal for 2009 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting November.
IHE Cardiology – Technical Committee Telephone Conference Sept. 14, 2009 IHE Cardiology – Technical Committee Telephone Conference Sept. 14, 2009 Antje.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Patient Identifier Cross-referencing Charles PARISOT GE Healthcare.
Bill Majurski National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)‏ IT Infrastructure: Profiles for Health Information Exchange.
System Directory for Document Sharing (SDDS) Vassil Peytchev, Epic February 1, 2010.
MV-ECON Revised Schema Decision made at the Profile Kick-off Conference on Tuesday, 3/11/08 regarding MV- ECON  To do a whitepaper this year in preparation.
Document Consumer Patient Identity Source Document Registry Document Repository Document Source MHD Document Recipient MHD Document Responder MHD Document.
IHE IT Infrastructure Domain Update Karen Witting – IBM IT Infrastructure Technical Committee co-chair.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Karen Witting – Ready Computing XDS & XCA: On-Demand Documents.
© 2016 California Association of Health Information Exchanges Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 LicenseCreative Commons Attribution.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
IHE Cardiology Displayable Report (DRPT) Profile Harry Solomon, Tom Dolan February 16, 2005 Rev 0.3.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past North American connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain, with one Patient ID assigning.
Report on Japanese Activities Makoto Suzuki / JIRA Takashi Nakashima / JAHIS 2009/DEC/03 Chicago, USA.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Patient Index and Demographic Implementation Strategies IHE Vendors Workshop 2006 IHE IT Infrastructure Education Rick.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers IHE Cardiology Profiles for Electronic Healthcare Record systems ITI Meeting Dec 5 th, 2006.
June 28-29, 2005IHE Interoperability Workshop Keith W. Boone Dictaphone Corporation IHE ITI Technical Comittee Notification of Document Availability (NAV)
PIX/PDQ – Today and Tomorrow Vassil Peytchev Epic.
Cross Community Access Profile Karen Witting IBM Co-chair ITI technical committee.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain and one Patient ID assigning authority.
Publish Subscribe for XDS-b Vassil Peytchev Epic Systems Corporation.
Using 3 XDS Affinity Domains at the Connectathon At past connectathons, we chose to test with one Affinity Domain and one Patient ID assigning authority.
June-September 2009www.ihe.net North American 2010 Connectathon & Interoperability Showcase Series Paul Seifert/ Kinson Ho Solution Architects Agfa HealthCare.
Connectathon 2009 Gazelle: HL7 V2 EVS, PIX Tests Agents, Automated Testing Project plans for Connectathon 2009 (February 23 rd -27 th 2009 ) November 14.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
Patient Demographics Query (PDQ) Didi Davis Director, Eclipsys Corporation Co-Chair, IT Infrastructure Planning Committee.
NIST XDS Toolkit CONSUMER
Patient Identifier Cross-Referencing for MPI (PIX)
Connectathon Patient Identifiers
System Directory for Document Sharing (SDDS)
Connectathon Patient Identifiers
Presentation transcript:

January, Steve Moore Lynn Felhofer Connectathon Patient Identifiers

2 Connectathon Patient IDs – 2 areas of concern This presentation explains the use of Patient IDs at the Connectathon: In departmental workflow tests: SWF, CATH, ECHO, STRESS – Slides In XDS tests – Slides 6-16

3 Patient IDs in Departmental Workflow tests

4 Patient Identifiers: IHE, Department IHE manages identifiers in the departmental workflows through SWF, Cath and other workflow profiles  An ADT system is the source of patient identifiers  Emergency, unidentified patients have special cases  This is not the ID that is used in XDS (XDS.a, XDS.b)

Identifiers: Connectathon, Department For Departmental workflow tests  We do not always have enough ADT systems to make things work smoothly  Connectathon management supplements the participant ADT systems with a separate application (RIS Mall) that generates ADT messages with identifiers used for departmental workflow These are Connectathon tests, not Demonstration choices 5

6 Patient IDs in XDS.a & XDS.b tests

Identifiers: XDS Affinity Domain An XDS Affinity Domain requires a unique patient identifier IHE gives these choices (but does not mandate)  PIX  PDQ  Other Affinity Domains are free to choose, and they can choose “other” 7

Meta Data vs Document XDS requires that the Patient ID in a document’s XDS meta-data be the value known by the Affinity Domain Documents themselves are not required to use that ID within their content In fact, documents may have internal, department identifiers inside the document and never reference the Affinity Domain Patient ID 8

Identifiers: Connectathon, Affinity Domain In theory, each XDS Registry would warrant a separate Affinity Domain, and a separate domain of patient identifiers In practice, at the Connectathon, we bundle all XDS Registry actors into a single Affinity Domain with one domain of patient identifiers  This is a huge simplification that makes switching from one Registry to another possible  Otherwise, there would be unmanageable confusion 9

Connectathon Affinity Domain ID Source We use the HIMSS Registration Tool as the source of Patient Identifiers in the ‘Affinity Domain’ at the Connectathon If a vendor participant wants to step up and take that responsibility, we would be glad to share or turn that over That source of Affinity Domain Patient Identifiers (HIMSS tool or vendor participant) is responsible for sending ADT messages to the Registry actors, PIX Managers and PDQ Servers 10

Connectathon: Doc Source, Doc Consumer To obtain an Affinity Domain Patient ID, what are my Connectathon choices as a Doc Source or Doc Consumer?  Get an ADT feed from the Patient ID source There is no IHE transaction defined to the Doc Source or Doc Consumer, but we can use ITI-8 (or ITI-44)  Use PDQ query  Use PIX query  Configure the ID by hand The operative term is “Connectathon test”. IHE/XDS does not require a specific solution. These are your choices. 11

Two Models For PIX If you choose PIX… Model 1: My Local Identifier  Affinity Domain Patient ID Source sends master Patient ID to PIX Manager  I send my local ID to the PIX Manager  I ask the PIX Manager: “For my local ID, what is the Affinity Domain ID?” Model 2: Delegated Identifier  See next slide 12

PIX Delegated Identifier Affinity Domain Patient ID Source sends master Patient ID to PIX Manager Some other patient ID source (my delegate) sends a local identifier to the PIX Manager and to me I send a query to the PIX Manager: “Given the local identifier sent by my delegate, what is the Affinity Domain identifier?” 13

PIX Models You can choose either model for Connectathon testing Demonstration rules are not the same as Connectathon testing rules Demonstration committee makes decisions/documents requirements Your use of PIX, PDQ, ADT feeds is governed by the demonstration committee. You need to have a clear understanding of their requirements. 14

Identifier Challenges XDS-I presents a challenge because departmental Image Managers are accustomed to receiving local identifiers  Now, they have to manage the local identifier and get an identifier for the Affinity Domain  This is no different than requirements on other Document Source actors 15

What About XCA? Until the method for Cross-Community Patient Identification is defined by the ITI TC in the ‘09-10 season, we will use the same Affinity Domain patient identifier in the Initiating and Responding Gateways’ domains. HIMSS demonstration requirements may be different. 16