Research universities and their regions Observations from visits to UBC and Lund John Tibbitt PASCAL Observatory / Glasgow University
Background 5 days in Vancouver and Lund Interviews with key staff in each university Guided by benchmarking tool developed by David Charles and used in PURE Supplemented by experience in PURE and working in Glasgow
Domains of engagement City and regional planning Support to business Social inclusion and cohesion Qualifications and skills Heritage and culture Sustainability Management
Focus of engagement Global International (regional) National Local region/state Local city
Context Location History and heritage Size
UBC - strengths and weaknesses Good at: Business innovation Culture and heritage CPD and continuing education Social inclusion Promoting public debates Could improve: Responding to local business needs Responding to govt training programmes Student internships and enterprise opportunities
Lund – strengths and weaknesses Good at: Business innovation Business incubation Enterprise training Commissioned education Widening access Could improve: Culture and Heritage Local business links Regional skills agenda Links with regional authorities Links with local HEIs
Issues - strategic Clarity of the strategy Centralised or decentralised Focus Supply or demand driven
Issues: Practice Partnership: - regional & local public authorities - other HEIs - business Media Marketing and market research Enterprising approach
Some challenges Understanding the complexity Inter-connectedness of domains and levels Quality of engagement activity Understanding the ‘engagement gap’