Building Consensus among Diverse Stakeholders Unique customer service opportunities in capital project delivery General Services Academy VI October 9,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contract Management and Regulation Vickram Cuttaree The World Bank St. Petersburg – May 24, 2008.
Advertisements

Public-Private Partnerships for infrastructure in the European Union Chris Hurst Director, Infrastructure Department.
MONEY BUDGET ISSUES, REPORTING ISSUES, THE AUDIT PROCESS, ACCOUNTABILITY ISSUES.
Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
Bid Manager Working Links Samantha Naumowicz Personal Employment Accounts.
HB1438 Update & Statewide Capital Planning Initiative Office of State Finance Department of Central Services November 8, 2011.
Livable Communities Program, East Bay Community Foundation Fostering Socially Equitable, Environmentally Healthy, Economically viable development across.
Madison’s Sustainable Design and Energy Committee: Notes from Portland, Oregon October 3, 2005.
BUDGETING & ACCOUNTING FOR GRANTS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS 2011 Municipal Professionals’ Institute Patrick Callahan, Snyder & Associates, Financial Consultant.
Gainesville’s Solar Feed In Tariff: Lessons Learned Diane Wilson Managing Utility Analyst Gainesville Regional Utilities.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Questions for Organizational Phase Presented to APEC TPT-WG Workshop on Air Cargo Security June 24, 2008; Bangkok Phil Hollingdale Chief, International.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Financial Policies You Cannot Live Without - Setting Priorities in a new Job at a PUI NCURA FRA 2013 Conference New Orleans, LA.
Public-Private Partnerships: State of Practice and Research Needs The 14 th Annual Public Private Partnership Conference World Bank, Washington, DC September.
Procurement Functions - Service Service Function - Provides client department with procurement services so clients can focus on their core responsibilities.
BUDGETING & ACCOUNTING FOR GRANTS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS 2013 Municipal Professionals’ Institute Patrick Callahan, Municipal Consultant.
Project Delivery Overview June 2015 Final PD Training FMD WUSM 6/15/15 1.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
This Presentation is a Copyrighted Property of Waller S. Poage, AIA, CSI, MAI, CVS – All Rights are Reserved Session CDT 01 – Fundamentals Lesson CDT 1.3.
Dave Head County of Sonoma, CA Fleet Manager Doug Bond Alameda County, CA Fleet Manager How to Benefit From a Diverse Local Agency Partnership.
1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan.
American Model. Public-Private Partnerships Public Development Private Development Public-Private Partnerships PrivatizationSubsidization.
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
© Huron Consulting Services LLC. All rights reserved. © Huron Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Huron Consulting Group Inc. nor any of.
School Closure Moratorium Committee September 27, 2011.
Iraq Finance 2012 Public Private Partnerships Abraham Akkawi September 18, 2012.
Presented by Linda Martin
Competitive Sourcing Overview DOI Annual Business Conference May 24, 2006 The Department of the Interior (DOI)
Maintenance Review 2004 A review of the procurement of repair and maintenance works for Hertfordshire County Council.
1 Project Management Introduction. 2 Chap 1 What is the impact? 1994: 16% of IT projects completed “On-Time” 2004 : 29% of IT projects “On- Time” 53%
Construction Engineering and Management 1 Cost Benefits Structural Safety Architect Feasibility Assessment of architects Functional Aesthetic constructability.
THE 1102 CONTRACT SPECIALIST AS A “BUSINESS MANAGER”
Chapter 43 Construction Supervision Procedures. 2 Links for Chapter 43 Contracts Completion Notices Bids Inspections Loans Appraisals Change Orders Building.
Choosing the Route To Traveler Information Systems Deployment by ITS America ATIS Committee USDOT ITS Joint Program Office Washington State Transportation.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshop1.  Definition: Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are a form of legally enforceable contracts between the public and.
MAKING IT HAPPEN. TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships January 14, 2009 Statutory and Public Policy Approaches to PPP.
1 Monitoring and Evaluation in ECA Region Land Thematic Group Retreat November 19-20, 2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation ERCOT Board Of Directors – August 15, 2006 TPTF Meeting August.
Introduction to Project Management
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
Financial Partnership Unit (FPU) Training Seminar 14 June 2006 Brian Howarth
OneSource – The Way Forward Caroline Nugent Director of Human Resources and Organisational Development.
Business Cases 15 th March What is a business case? Statement of total impact (quality and financial) of undertaking a proposal – what will change.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM RECENT PIPELINE INCIDENTS FLORIDA NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION (FNGA) OPERATING & MARKETING CONFERENCE ROD WALKER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT.
THE ALMO SECTOR IN ENGLAND Dublin City Council 3 June 2015.
Introduction to SPA Trade Services PDA Work Flow Management Systems The Era of Change.
City of South Gate Administrative Services Dept. FY Proposed Budget Presentation.
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND PLAN 2010 Emerging Energy Solutions 1.
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
The information presented today has been compiled from data shared by:
Listen engage advise deliver The Facilities Master Plan Process Dorothy McCarty, AIA, LEED AP October 12, 2016 ICCCFO FALL CONFERENCE.
Harness the Power of your Operating Budget to Enhance your Learning Environment MASBO Winer Conference – Jackson, MS.
Building the case Opportunity for change Developing the concept
2016 SAME Small Business Conference - Atlanta
Procurement Policy & Procedures Presented by Office of Purchasing.
Allen Independent School District November 7, 2016
KEY STEPS IN A LOCATION CHOICE
6/12/2018 Grant Programs Review.
Coordinating & Scheduling
Information Technology (IT) Department
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
Procurement Policy & Procedures Presented by Office of Purchasing.
Improvement in Project Delivery
VeNí Service-focused Approach
Design-Build Process Utilizing Negotiated Selection
Defining project management
Water Utility Performance
Presentation transcript:

Building Consensus among Diverse Stakeholders Unique customer service opportunities in capital project delivery General Services Academy VI October 9, 2008

Panelists  Mike Lango, Contra Costa County  Kanon Artiche, Solano County  Gerald Leoper, Alameda County  Mike Wagner, Sonoma County  Moderator: Robert Kambak, Sonoma County

Topics  Defining the Customer  Layers of Approval  Defining the Project  Public vs Private Sector  Measuring Customer Satisfaction

Defining the Customers 1  Depends on who you ask  Client department User groups  Stakeholders CAO “Budgetarians” A lot more stakeholders than customers  Building maintenance and operations

Defining the Customers 2  Public at large  Political interests – public relations  Electorate It all rolls up to the electorate  Consultants  Regulators  Contractor – help them be successful Different motivations

Defining the Customers 3  Everyone is a customer  People that use the building Departments and staff that work in the bldg  Size and complexity of the project has different customer groups  Developer and or brokers

Layers of Approval 1  Funding approval Grants  Client agency/user approval Client’s project manager – single contact Critical involvement  CAO  Feed back from consultants and contractors  CEQA/NEPA

Layers of Approval 2  Regulatory Agencies – outside Some counties are self regulated Building permits  Internal controls and procedures  Risk Management  Not linear/like a maze  Consensus is difficult to pin down

Layers of Approval 3  Every county is unique in how they fund and manage capital projects Whoever has the money gets their project Capital improvement plans vs. funding Capital cost vs. operating costs  Other jurisdictions (cities, etc)

Defining the Project 1  Real asset management plan Total inventory and total life of the project Leased or owned  Design and construction Small part of the overall cost, but major impact on service delivery and life cost  Needs assessment/master planning Space standards  Programming and planning Beware of preconceived solutions

Defining the Project 2  Need to consider the big picture – the entire portfolio and county needs Space assignment and use (CAO drives space utilization)  Needs vs. wants  Sign off by stakeholders at phases

Public vs. Private Sector 1  Organization structure Private sector – investors Public sector – constituents  Private sector – competition for services (customer has a choice)  Public sector – no competition; no choice  Permitting process Varies by county More stringent in public sector

Public vs. Private Sector 2  Project labor agreements  Policy  Private = profit; Public = public service  Public sector = longer life of facilities  Contract award (negotiation vs. bidding)  Perception by the public Image (Taj Mahal)  Different level of scrutiny

Measuring Customer Satisfaction 1  Post project surveys/briefings  Post occupancy assessment  Regular meetings with customers  On budget, ahead of schedule = everyone is happy  Quality of project  How can it be improved  Roof projects – does it leak? quantifiable

Measuring Customer Satisfaction 2  Public wants good services delivered in an efficient manner  Each customer is different  Under promise and over delivery – set realistic expectations  Audit meeting 90 days after completion – customer, contractor, designer Lessons learned Website  Media reports can affect how the project is judged

Wrap Up

Where’s my handout? Completed PowerPoint to be posted on CGSA website (