What we know about academic users of e- journals (Virtual Scholar) Professor David Nicholas CIBER, UCL Centre for Publishing School of Library, Archive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use your bean. Count it. Thomas Krichel
Advertisements

Effective Searching Strategies and Techniques
The Research Agenda for E-content David Nicholas CIBER University College London
The first (and most important) driver of change – the virtual user (consumer) Professor David Nicholas CIBER, UCL Centre for Publishing School of Library,
I 3 conference, June 2013 A typology of e-book interactions and the e-book literacy and tools required for achieving students study goals Dr Laura.
Researchers and academic libraries Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK Quebec universities libraries sub-committee conference, Quebec, 9 May 2008.
Who needs libraries anyway? Researchers use of academic libraries and their services Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK Research Information Network.
Academics as information consumers David Nicholas CIBER UCL Centre for Publishing School of Library, Archive and Information Studies
What we can learn about virtual scholars from usage data obtained from deep log analysis Professor David Nicholas, Dr Tom Dobrowolski and Paul Huntington.
Researching academic literacies in a digital age: issues of meaning making
The information-seeking behaviour of the virtual scholar: from use to users David Nicholas CIBER University College London
1 Working with Social Media in Research Settings Victoria Wade Careers Consultant.
Who are young librarians? Millennials as academic librarians Jenny Emanuel Taylor Digital Resources & Reference Librarian; Reference, Research, and Scholarly.
1 ONESEARCH/ WRITING A THESIS STATEMENT ENGLISH 115 Hudson Valley Community College Marvin Library Learning Commons.
Consumers & Online Privacy: Agenda Background and objectives General attitudes to the internet Attitudes to online data and privacy Attitudes to.
JISC National E-Books Observatory Mark Carden, Ingram Digital With thanks to Prof. David Nicholas CIBER, UCL Centre for Publishing University College London.
If we do not understand our users, we will certainly fail David Nicholas and Paul Huntington CIBER UCL Centre for Publishing School of Library, Archive.
Use of Open Access Electronic Journals by Chinese Scholars, and an Initiative to Facilitate Access to Chinese Journals Ruoxi Li, Fytton Rowland, Zichuan.
Literature Review. Theory and Research: Three Models The theory before research model The theory before research model Ideas-Theory-Design Study-Data.
Information Literacy Jen Earl: Academic Support Librarian- HuLSS.
Internet Research Finding Free and Fee-based Obituaries Online.
Online Resources From Oxford University Press This presentation gives a brief description of Oxford Journals. It tells you: what the journals are; how.
INTRO & SEARCH TIPS GOOGLE SCHOLAR Please view on full screen. Press F5 on your keyboard.
Standard Grade Modern Studies Enquiry Skills - Investigating Questions -
Trends in Online Publishing New Pricing Models for 2003 as Online Dominates Print John Ben DeVette Asst. Vice President EBSCO Information Services November.
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Summer School on E-publishing: The digital transition and all that David Nicholas CIBER University College London
1 Use of electronic information resources among the Croatian scientists in the field of social sciences in a pre-digital library environment: obstacles.
Swapan Deoghuria Scientist-II, Computer Centre Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Kolkata , INDIA URL:
Using sources in your Advanced Higher Investigation.
How to do Quality Research for Your Research Paper
SCHOLARLY JOURNALS AND ARTICLES BY: JENNY FUDICKAR Click Here 1st Click here to type your name.
Information Use Pattern and User Expectations in the Digital Environment at Kasturba Gandhi DegreeCollege for Women: A Study Presented By: Dr.K.H.Sunitha.
Bio-Medical Information Retrieval from Net By Sukhdev Singh.
Using the Web  For your graduation project you were able to select the topic that you were interested in, so that should make writing your paper a little.
EVALUATING SOURCES. THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE SOURCES Lend credibility to your arguments Support your points with researched information A source is only.
ENG 102 Finding Information Martin J. Crabtree MCCC Library.
University of Antwerp Library TEW & HI UA library offers... books, journals, internet catalogue -UA catalogue, e-info catalogue databases -e.g.
Implications of the digital transition for libraries (especially Swedish ones!) Professor David Nicholas
Becoming a geographical researcher I will have to be a good ‘hunter-gatherer’ and get myself organised to keep things….. I will need to think like a detective….finding,
Information seeking in cyberspace Professor David Nicholas CIBER research group University College London
Moving from Ideas to a finished Research Paper. Brainstorming: Beginning the Process Make a list of any subjects that you find interesting - Anything.
Anytime, any place, anywhere Yvonne Nobis, Head of Science Information Services.
1 The ALPSP Learned Journals Collection and the place of scholarly publishers in the 'information jigsaw'. Nick Evans ALPSP Member Services Manager.
The Google Generation: Information behaviour of the researcher of the future Maggie Fieldhouse CIBER School of Library Archive and Information Studies,
Topic Selection: Information available on the web Debates about Information Seeking Behaviour Investigate the presence of the academic library.
Strategies for Conducting Research on the Internet Angela Carritt User Coordinator, Oxford University Library Services Angela Carritt User Education Coordinator,
Maximizing Library Investments in Digital Collections Through Better Data Gathering and Analysis (MaxData) Carol Tenopir and Donald.
How Scientists Use Journals: Electronic and Print Carol Tenopir Donald W. King
TASK 6 PREPARATION By Max Williams. TOPIC  The topic of the current affairs programme is possibly the most important part to bare in mind, it should.
Connecting researchers and research organisations with data publication metrics the visibility and value of data publications in bibliometrics and altmetrics.
Weaving Data into the Scholarly Information Network UNECE Work Session on the Communication of Statistics OECD Conference Centre, Paris June 30 - July.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
Scatter and Decay: E- Journal Usage Patterns Carol Tenopir, UT SIS Gayle Baker, UT Libraries David Nicholas,University College London.
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee.
Developing Smart objectives and literature review Zia-Ul-Ain Sabiha.
Research Skills for Your Essay Where to begin…. Starting the search task for real Finding and selecting the best resources are the key to any project.
Information Literacy Learn to find and critically evaluate information sources. Increase your information literacy skills, to more effectively search,
The virtual scholar: essential context for understanding social media users and use Professor David Nicholas CIBER Research Group
Promoting e-resources Gintarė Tautkevičienė Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania.
Searching for sources: Creating a bank of information.
King’s College London Pre-Sessional Programme Searching for sources: Creating a bank of information.
Introduction to SHERPA RoMEO and its Significance for Publishers
The digital transition, information behaviour and information literacy
How does a person read and use an Academic Paper?
The Craft of Research, Ch. 5
Ruoxi Li, Fytton Rowland, Zichuan Xiong and Junping Zhao
Simon Pawley Market Research, Oxford University Press
HMMMMMM….. So Many Resources, So Little Time! By: Mrs. Papiano.
Use Patterns of Print and Electronic Journals
Presentation transcript:

What we know about academic users of e- journals (Virtual Scholar) Professor David Nicholas CIBER, UCL Centre for Publishing School of Library, Archive and Information Studies University College London

Massive environmental changes –From control to no-control, from mediated to non mediated –From bibliographic systems to full-text, visual, interactive ones –From niche to universal systems –From a few searchers to everybody –From little choice to massive choice –From little growth to massive growth –From stability to volatility

Paradigm shift, no grip, floundering Existing knowledge base obsolescent, flawed, wholly inadequate. Hard-copy paradigms We don’t even know what questions to ask anymore We are left generalising about too many people Should be spending lots of time and money researching the user…but [still] are not

What is going on then? Came from the Media and Heath fields with a proven methodology deep log analysis

Deep log analysis: attractions Size and reach. Enormous data set; no samples Direct/immediate record of what people have done: not what they say they might, or would, do; not what they were prompted to say, not what they thought they did Data are unfiltered and provide a reality check sometimes missing from questionnaire and focus group Data real-time and continuous. Creates a digital lab environment for innovation and the monitoring of change Raises the questions that need to be asked by questionnaire, focus group and interview. These methodologies are an essential part of DLA

Virtual Scholar programme Emerald Insight Blackwell Synergy ScienceDirect OhioLINK Oxford University Journals

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar - big and growing appetite Seemingly massive demand for scholarly information, and rising – improved access the driver. That is the good news. Not only are more people being drawn into the scholarly net, also existing users can search much more freely & flexibly. However, this is the bad news, while librarians have been responsible for many access initiatives, their contribution has not been widely recognised (to put it mildly).

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar - bouncing Widespread, pronounced and endemic form of digital information seeking in which a high proportion of users view only few web pages from vast number available and a high proportion (usually same ones) do not return to the same website often, if at all. Suggests, at best, a checking-comparing, dipping sort of behaviour that is a result of search engines, shortage of time and huge digital choice; or, at worse, massive failure at the terminal.

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar - ‘reading’ People appear to be skimming rather than reading. Download a devalued currency? Fact 1. People do not ‘read’ online. However, users spend more time ‘reading’ shorter articles online than longer ones. Neither of times, respectively, 42 and 32 seconds, suggested anyone was doing anything more than scanning. Fact 2. As length of article increases greater chance it will only be viewed as an abstract and less chance that it will be viewed full text. Implications. a) shorter articles have better chance of being read; b) users must be downloading and reading offline, but all the time? Digital osmosis? Fact 3. In answer to Q ‘Do you always read the full paper before you cite it in your work’, over half of researchers said it depended/didn’t. Implication. Seems to support usage data

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar - diversity Move away from hits to users. Nobody works with millions of diverse users. Real differences between various types of user, especially in regard to their subject field; academic status and geographical location. We have also found, in some cases, big differences - according to gender, type of organisation worked for, type of university, and attitudes towards scholarly communication. We should rejoice in this.

Some diversity examples Age of material. Users from Economics (71%) and Engineering (71%), made most views to current (one-year old) material in session; Material Science (51%) and Mathematics (52%) users the least. Scholars from Spain and China more likely to view current material. Increased visibility has meant a large increase in usage of older material Return visits (over 5 months). Mathematicians most frequent visitors, with 41% coming back 15+ times. Engineers made least returns, with 54% making 1 visit. Repeat visits increased with age.

More diversity Abstract use. Increased markedly with age of users - 14% of those aged undertook an abstract-only session, which was half that recorded for those aged over 56. Searching. E. Europeans (47%) recorded a relatively high % of searches resulting in zero returns. N. Americans appeared to be ‘successful’ searchers - 74% of their searches resulted in one or more matches. However, overall, Germans most ‘successful searchers (more hits, less zero searches).

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar - trust Authority and relevance to be won (and checked). Determining responsibility/authority a problem, take a researcher working from office: Conducting Google search to find Synergy. On connection cookie identifies them and full text access provided. Now that researcher used a Microsoft Browser, then Google, then Synergy and then arrived at Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Might or might not have known that: a) the Library had paid the subscription, hence full-text access; b) Synergy came from Blackwell and journal was published on behalf of International Communication Association. Where does authority lie and what does it mean? Differences between age groups. Tesco example.

Key characteristics of the virtual scholar – increasing dominance of search engine searching Big implications Key usage driver – Nucleic Acids Research People using search engine were: –far more likely to conduct a session that included a view to an older article; –more likely to view more subject areas, more journal titles, and also viewed more articles and abstracts too. Undergraduates most likely to have used the search facility: 46% had compared to 26% of postgraduates, 19% of researchers and 15% of professors or teachers.

Nucleic Acids Research: article views

Challenges - decoupling From users. Anonymous, work remotely. Not even conscious of library involvement. Publishers have got closer. We have COUNTER, but not enough From Faculty. As the library ‘tax’ increases and information seen to be ‘free’ and ubiquitous, impact and outcome data increasingly demanded. The car park question. From publishers. Librarians have alienated their old mates, the publishers, over OA and repositories. Had such a cosy relationship. Between rock and a hard place somehow comes to mind

Challenges – getting closer to the user Have been bleating on about users for years, but have not made anywhere near as much progress here as we have with technology Libraries full of technological & processing people. How many have a department dedicated to following the users every move and relating that to academic outcomes and impacts? Even in face of a possible melt down (for some) there is a sense that only technological innovation is the answer –federated searching the latest solution or the last hurrah? The big challenge is understanding/accommodating the concept of the digital information consumer and dealing with questions arising from the logs

Challenges – information literacy, brand etc Problems in information seeking suggests that information literacy programmes could be evidence-led and outcomes tested People searching horizontally – implications for information providers? Accreditation, trust, brand, authority – what can be done and is federated searching the answer?

Conclusion Warning. What I have been talking about does not come from the opinions/perceptions of small numbers of people. Not talking it up, just sharing data and ideas with you. It is not too late, still more to be won than lost But not much time, e-books (and we are studying the impact) could be the tipping point Need leaders, demonstrating best practice through a genuinely evidence-based, user-focussed, consumer-friendly, Google- compatible and flexible service

Some illustrative readings Huntington P, Nicholas D, Jamali HR, Rowlands I. Article decay in the digital environment: a usage analysis by date of publication employing deep log methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology, 57(13) 2006, pp Nicholas D and Huntington P. Digital journals: are they really used? Interlending and Document Supply, 34(2), June 2006, pp74-77 Nicholas D and Huntington P. The virtual scholar. Online Information 2006, Nicholas D, Huntington P, Jamali HR, Dobrowolski T. Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: spotlight on the 'bouncer' Information Processing & Management 43, 2007, pp [in press] Nicholas D, Huntington P, Jamali HR, Tenopir, C. Finding information in (very large) digital libraries: a deep log approach to determining differences in use according to method of access. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32 (2), March 2006, pp Nicholas D, Huntington P, Jamali HR, Tenopir C. OhioLINK – ten years on: what deep log analysis tells us about the impact of Big Deals. Journal of Documentation, 62 (4) July 2006, Nicholas D, Huntington P, Jamali HR, Watkinson A. The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 2006, pp Nicholas D and Rowlands I. Towards evidence-based publishing. Science in Parliament, 63(4), Autumn 2006.