Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Associate Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Advertisements

West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
Genetic evaluation under parental uncertainty Robert J. Tempelman Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI National Animal Breeding Seminar Series December.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Assistant Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
RFLP DNA molecular testing and DNA Typing
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Beef Relationships using 50K Chip Information L.A. Kuehn, J.W. Keele, G.L. Bennett, T.G. McDaneld, T.P.L. Smith, W.M. Snelling, T.S. Sonstegard, and R.M.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics Sinead McParland Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2010 G.R. WiggansDCRC.
Managing the business through data collection. What is data collection in a business? Data collection in a business is when a business manager collects.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Male reproductive investment and success in a Larix occidentalis seed orchard population Tomas Funda Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia,
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
Commercial Ranch Project and DNA testing John Pollak Cornell University.
Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.
2007 Melvin Tooker and Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2009 Happy Bulls, Happy Cows,
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
G. R. Wiggans and P. M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Tibial Hemimelia (TH) and Pulmonary Hypoplasia with Anasarca (PHA) _____________________ What are they, where are they and how are they relevant Jonathan.
Low-Cost, Low-Density Genotyping and its Potential Applications K.A. Weigel, O. González-Recio, G. de los Campos, H. Naya, N. Long, D. Gianola, and G.J.M.
The Many Measures of Accuracy: How Are They Related? Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
Quantitative Genetics
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Obj: Discuss reproductive management terms used in the animal science industry.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
2007 Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2010 Gains in reliability from combining subsets.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
WiggansARPAS-DC meeting, Beltsville, MD – Dec. 9, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
Animal Genetics. ANIMAL GENETICS Differences in animals are brought about by 2 groups of factors: genetic and environmental factors. One set of differences.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
My vision for dairy genomics
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
J.R. Thomasen, H. Liu and A.C. Sørensen
DNA Sire Identification Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE
Sijne van der Beek and Henk Geertsema
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using recombination to maintain genetic diversity
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Using Haplotypes in Breeding Programs
Unit: Animals at the Cellular Level
The Basic Genetic Model
Principles of Dairy Cattle Breeding
Presentation transcript:

Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Associate Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry

 Basics of DNA Parentage Tools  Panel types  Principle of exclusion  Pedigree validation vs. construction  Once I have parentage then what?  Seedstock  Commercial

 Based on Mendelian inheritance  Exclusion based  Exploits violations in Mendelian inheritance pattern  Dependent on variation in population  Allows development of probabilistic statements of parentage  Useful for pedigree validation or construction

 SNP or Microsatellite Panels  SNP- ~100 biallelic markers-Standardized Panel  Microsatellite - ~12 Polymorphic dinucleotide tandem repeats (Older and phasing out)  Need all animals you plan to use for inference tested on same panel  If using stored genotypes at Breed Association make sure you use the same vendor

Tools for Improving Beef Production Systems MW-ASAS Meeting--Des Moines, IA  Validation  Given progeny, do sire and dam qualify as parents (non-exclusion)  Pedigree integrity checks by breed associations of significant animals   03/20/20125

Tools for Improving Beef Production Systems MW-ASAS Meeting--Des Moines, IA  Testing  Assignment of paternity (or maternity)  One or both alleged parents unknown 03/20/20126

Possible Sires: Bull A: AA BB Bull C: aa bb Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb ??

Possible Sires: Bull A: AA BB Bull C: aa bb Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb

Possible Sires: Bull A: AA BB Bull C: aa bb Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb X

Possible Sires: Bull A: AA BB Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb

Possible Sires: Bull A: AA BB Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb X

Possible Sires: Bull B: Aa bb Progeny Genotype: AA bb

Tools for Improving Beef Production Systems MW-ASAS Meeting--Des Moines, IA03/20/201213

 Establish genetic value of calves  Computed weighted average pedigree estimate of group(s)—sort off high merit calves?  Replacement females  Selection of AI sired females  Selection of half sib groups ▪ Simplify future mating decisions  Defect management-calves of only non-carrier bulls

 Progeny test of young sires  Large integrated ranch that produces own bulls  Strategically mate yearlings to known age group of cows  Establish paternity  Genetic evaluation for ERT based on inferred pedigree and phenotypes collected

 Outlier management  Strategic culling of sires the produce problem calves ▪ Dystocia ▪ Docility ▪ Feet/leg issues ▪ Defects?

 Enable use of multi-sire breeding pastures  Bad bull risk management  Better pasture utilization  Assured pedigree

 Make DNA sample collection part of SOP  Collect tissue samples from: ▪ Natural service sires ▪ Custom collected AI sires ▪ Donor dams

03/02/201299th K-State Cattlemen's Day23 SNP markers allow identification of regions of chromosome and tracking of inheritance of specific region