THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM. 1. 300 elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Use of OPU-IVP and SO at CRV breeding program in the genomic era

Advertisements

Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.

Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.

Colorado Agriscience Curriculum

Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);

Artificial Insemination Part 2 Created By Haley Vrazel.

ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.

AI Promotion Breeding Future Profits. Breeding Workshop for Stakeholders. March 2006.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.

How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.

But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.

Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,

Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.

George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.

Sperm are sorted. “X” sperm are saved “Y” sperm and “undetermined” sperm are discarded.

2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.

Artificial Insemination GCSE Module 14 Biotechnology Lesson Ouch!

CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.

 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.

Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.

2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.

Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Semenzoo Italy Holstein HOLSTEIN BREED IN ITALY ( The past ) First holstein cattle has been imported from North America on 1930 Since 1930 to 1980.

AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Dairy Management Chris Ellason. 4 groups of dairy cows  Far- off dry cows: Cows from time quit producing milk until 21 days before calving  Close up.

Ottensmeier Angus A DECADE OF EXCELLENT ANGUS CATTLE.

John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.

2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.

2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.

2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.

Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.

2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.

2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.

Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.

Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.

ANIMAL BREEDING IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN AGRICULTURE FROM SCIENCE TO PRACTICE May 2009 PERINATAL MORTALITY IN DAIRY CATTLE Szűcs, E., Gulyás, L.,

Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.

2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference

H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.

2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Contributions.

H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.

CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.

Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.

IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.

Alderston Broiler ALEX JH1C

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry

Using EPDs in Selection

EPTA April 2016 (Friesian base)

THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY

EPTA December 2015 (Ayrshire base)

A National Sire Fertility Index

Daughter Proven or Genomic Bulls?

EPTA December 2015 (Friesian base)

Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US

Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.

Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings

Extent of sexed-semen usage

Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.

Measures of Fertility: Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations

Expected Progeny Differences

Young Genomic Pedigree Index

EPTA December 2015 (Shorthorn base)

Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth

Presentation transcript:

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM

elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and the remainder with elite foreign bulls. 2. About 60 bulls calves sons of elite cows are purchased by the AI institutes yearly.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM 3. All first parity cows are inseminated with semen from young bulls. About 100 milk daughters are produced from each sire. 4. In addition, 20,000 cows are inseminated with semen from high P.I. Bulls.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM 5. About five elite sires are selected based on first parity daughter evaluation, and are returned to general service. 6. These five sires are mated to about 1,000 virgin calves to test for dystocia and calf mortality.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM 7. All other virgin calves are mated to proven sires with favorable evaluation for dystocia. 8. All later parity cows are inseminated with semen from proven bulls at a flat rate fixed to cover operational costs of the AI institutes and the ICBA.

The Israeli breeding program, selection index. Dau. Fertility SCSProtein Kg. Fat Kg. Milk kg. Year < >2001

Genetic Trends