Underwater Robotic Fish Week 3 Review Presentation Project #15029 Multidisciplinary Senior Design Rochester Institute of Technology Phase II: Buoyancy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEES Project Management Workshop June 16 June 18 1 Segment 2.
Advertisements

Project Scope Management
MSD-I Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
P08456-LED Lighting for an Underwater ROV Jeremy Schiele-Project Manager Jonathan Lent-Mechanical Engineer Ryan Seeber-Computer Engineer Justin VanSlyke-Mechanical.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
EDGE™ Wireless Open-Source/Open-Architecture Command and Control System (WOCCS) Group Members: –Eric Hettler –Manuel Paris –Ryan Miller –Christian Moreno.
LABVIEW INTERFACE CONTROL LOGIC DESIGN FEATURES Pneumatic power source encapsulated by single connection Opposable muscles for full range of motion Independent.
P14311: PCB Isolation Routing System Problem Definition Review.
Rochester Institute of Technology Kate Gleason College of Engineering Presents …
Project Scope Management
1 M&S Teachers Seminar: Project Management Presented by: Paul E. Paquette September 26, 2013.
Other Planning Processes: Final Planning Touches
AAT Injector Nozzle Test Chamber P15681 Calibration Fluid Exhaust System.
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems Aaron Heyman (IE) Shijo George (ME) Stephanie Malinowski (ME) Alex Sandy (ME) Greg Wall.
Project Management – The Project Charter
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
Chris Monfredo Chris Johnson Jon Holton Greg Davis Scott Hambleton 09/10/13Rochester Institute of Technology1 P14251 Underwater Acoustic Communication.
Problem Definition Review Reciprocating Friction Tester.
Project Scope Management Process
Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project Charles Alexander, Tom Christen, Kim Maier, Reggie Pierce, Matt Fister, Zach Mink Underwater Thermoelectric Power.
Biochar Concrete Roofing Sheets for Nicaragua
Marcos Esterman, Associate Professor Industrial and Systems Engineering Department Rochester Institute of Technology Multidisciplinary.
Overview Project Goals Background & Motivation Importance Design Process Design Features Results.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Cook Stove for Haiti Enhancements System Level Design Review Friday, January 14 th :00 AM – 12:30 PM Project
Use Scenarios Multi-Disciplinary Senior Design I Rochester Institute of Technology.
P14215 AUTONOMOUS WANDERING AMBASSADOR Michael Gambino – Hardware Specialist Nick Nguyen – Software/ Hardware Specialist Apurva Shah – Project Leader Peichuan.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 09/10/15.
Digital Microfluidics Control System II P Agenda ● Introduce Team ● Background ● Problem Statement ● Stakeholders ● Use Scenario ● Customer Requirements.
Underwater Robotic Fish Phase II: Buoyancy P15029 Project Summary The objective of this project is to create an underwater robot that looks and swims like.
 RoboFish 3.1: Navigation and Tail Redesign MSD Team Week 3 Review Presentation.
P16415: Human Powered Centrifuge Amanda Johnson Nathan Corr Pieter Werner Joanna Jayawickrema Laura Pratt.
SPX Data Acquisition PROBLEM DEFINITION REVIEW John Dong David Haller Adam Johnson Thomas Klaben Luke Kranz.
Project Goals Prove feasibility of hydraulic McKibben muscles Build a fully submersible robotic platform Execute realistic fish motion with a fish-like.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System Bryce Mowers Jessica Reed Maria King Nicole Anklam Philip Couturier Samantha Orlando.
P15080: Flow Culture System Multi-Disciplinary Senior Design Problem Definition Review September 11, 2014 Collin Burkhart – Lead Mechanical Engineer Katelyn.
P Magnetically Levitated Propeller Group Members: Eli, Zach, Mike, Joe, & Bernie.
MSD1 Group P Introductions NameMajor/Role Corey RothfussTeam Leader Kayla KingMechanical Engineer Josh HornerMechanical Engineer Ryan DunnElectrical.
Automated Microfluidic Cell Separator
Project Goals Design and build a fully submersible robotic fish platform powered by McKibben muscles Execute realistic fish motion with a fish-like appearance.
Project Manager: Zachary Novak Mechanical Design Lead: John Chiu Team P14029: McKibben Muscle Robotic Fish Lead Engineer: Seaver Wrisley Controls Lead:
P15051: Robotic Eye Project Definition Review TIM O’HEARNANDREW DROGALISJORGE GONZALEZ KATIE HARDY DANIEL WEBSTER.
P16104 Microfluidic Spectroscopy for Proteins within CubeSats.
Magnetically Levitated Propeller Bernie Garcia (ME, Team Leader), Joe Bernardini (ME, Scribe), Elijah Sensenig (EE, System Integrator), Zachary Louison.
Project Goals Design and build a fully submersible robotic fish platform powered by McKibben muscles Execute realistic fish motion with a fish-like appearance.
MSD 1 WEEK 6 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P /2/
Smart Power Supply Test Bench P16203 ANDRE PELLETREAU, KERRY OLIVIERA, JEREMY WILLMAN, RADOSLAW MASLANKA, VINCENT STOWBUNENKO.
Magnetically Levitated Propeller Bernie Garcia (Me, Team Leader), Joe Bernardini (ME, Scribe), Elijah Sensenig (EE, System Integrator), Zachory Louison.
Tim Southerton Brian Grosso Matthew Morris Lalit Tanwar Kevin Meehan Alex Reid.
Automated Microfluidic Cell Separator Project Group:
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
Randy Draeger Grant Stockton David Upp
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P09001 – RFID Reader & Active Tag Philip Davenport (Industrial and Systems Engineering)
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Week 3 Review Team P14029 McKibben Muscle Robotic Fish Zak Novak John Chiu Seaver Wrisley Felix Liu.
P16512 – 3D Printing Ink Development Test Rig
Robofish Charging Station (RCS) P17250
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I: Problem Definition Review
MSD: Underwater McKibben Muscle Manipulator [P14253]
P15001: Soft Ankle-Foot Orthotic
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems
Problem Definition Review
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
Tub Lift Rev. 2 Dom Group
Heart Pump and the Circulatory System P17080
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter
P18325: Automated Breast Pump Cleaning System (Team ABC’s)
P15661 Reciprocating Friction Tester Base Subsystem Problem Definition Review Matt.
Presentation transcript:

Underwater Robotic Fish Week 3 Review Presentation Project #15029 Multidisciplinary Senior Design Rochester Institute of Technology Phase II: Buoyancy

Team Members and Roles NameMajorRole Sarah BaileyMEProject Manager, ME Support Mark PitonyakEEElectrical Engineering Lead Chloe BohlmanEEWebmaster, EE Support Frederick CookhouseMEMechanical Design Lead Igor DrobnjakMESystems Lead, ME Support Brandon MicaleBMEBiomedical Lead 1

Agenda 2 Feel free to ask questions throughout the presentation  Customer Constraints  Engineering Requirements  House of Quality  Issues and Risks  Interviews and Connections  Project Plan  Problem Statement  Background  Benchmarking and Research  Customer, Sponsors, and Stakeholders  Use Scenario  Customer Requirements

Problem Statement The objective of this project is to create an underwater robot that looks and swims like a fish. The fish is to achieve these biomimetics by utilizing McKibben muscles to hydraulically propel the fish. The fish will be able to swim forward and turn, and have depth control using active buoyancy in both RC and autonomous modes. 3 Deliverables  Robotic fish that meets requirements  Detailed instruction manual Objectives  Design an active buoyancy system  Add underwater remote controlling  Program an autonomous swim mode  Improve physical aesthetics of the fish

Background 4

Benchmarking and Research 5 RIT MIT FESTO

Customer, Sponsors, Stakeholders 6 Customer Dr. Kathleen Lamkin-Kennard Sponsor Stakeholders Researchers Military personnel Future MSD students Underwater explorers

Use Scenario 1.User turns on fish and places into body of water 2.User swims fish remotely, testing forward, turning, ascent, and descent movement 3.User turns on autonomous mode 4.Fish exhibits autonomous control of forward, turning, ascent, and descent movement 5.User turns off autonomous mode 6.User retrieves fish from water and turns off 7

Customer Requirements 8

Customer Constraints 9  Fish uses McKibben muscles for propulsion.  Muscles actuate with water pumped in from surroundings.  Both RC and autonomous operation

Engineering Requirements 10

House of Quality 11

Issues and Risks 1.Buoyancy  Creating a system for active buoyancy 2.Communication  Remote controlling underwater 3.Aesthetics  Modeling Silicone skin 4.Air Leaking  Waterproofing the fish 5.Muscle Failure 6.Electronics Failure 7.Battery Life 8.Barrier Detection Failure 9.Damage Survival 12

Risk Management 13 IDRisk ItemEffectCauseLikelihoodSeverityImportanceAction to Minimize RiskOwner Describe the risk briefly What is the effect on any or all of the project deliverables if the cause actually happens? What are the possible cause(s) of this risk? L*S What action(s) will you take (and by when) to prevent, reduce the impact of, or transfer the risk of this occurring? Who is responsible for following through on mitigation? 1 Fish buoyancy doesn’t work The project is a failure Improper calculations Overlooked information 236 Test buoyancy on non-essential parts before integrating with electrical components; have stand-in weights Lead Mech. Eng. and Mech. Eng. 2 Fish leaks and ruins electrical components Wasted resources and time Improper sealing, wrong sealant, unseen cracks in case 326 Ensure proper sealants are used. Use a double wall system to reduce risk of leaks. Maintain work documents to prevent improper closing techniques Mech. Eng. And Elec. Eng. 3 Project Scope is too large Project deliverables are not met on time Ineffective Project limits 339 Frequent (weekly) meetings to ensure goals are on track and met All

Interviews and Connections 14 Dr. Lamkin-Kennard Dr. WalterDr. SchrlauDr. Sciremammano Primary contact for air muscles, aesthetic qualities, and lab usage. Contact for buoyancy calculations and aspects to improve from last year’s prototype. Contact for underwater applications and communications, as well as buoyancy. Contact for buoyancy calculations and fluid movement throughout pump and fish.

Project Plan Example 15

Questions? 16