Rohan Mahy draft-ietf-sip-join and Semantics of REFER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIPPING WG Status IETF 57 The Chairs Gonzalo Camarillo, Rohan Mahy, Dean Willis.
Advertisements

MARTINI WG Interim draft-kaplan-martini-with-olive-00 Hadriel Kaplan.
SIMPLE Open Issues Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft IETF 52.
Early Media Authorization Under what conditions should negotiated media flow prior to 200 OK (INVITE)? Richard Ejzak.
SIP Working Group Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
Service Identification Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco. Agenda Service Identification Architecture draft (draft-rosenberg-sipping-service- identification) Media.
Extended REFER draft-olson-sipping-refer-extensions-01 draft-mahy-sip-remote-cc-01 François Audet
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. sip and sips General problem –What should gruu say about relationship of sips to gruu? Specific questions –If the.
GRUU Mechanism Jonathan Rosenberg. Status Draft-rosenberg-sipping-gruu-reqs-01 defines the problem Draft-rosenberg-sip-gruu submitted with proposed solution.
July 30, 2010SIPREC WG1 SIP Call Control - Recording Extensions draft-johnston-siprec-cc-rec-00 Alan Johnston Andrew Hutton.
Proposed Fix to HERFP* (Heterogeneous Error Response Forking Problem) Rohan Mahy * for INVITE transactions.
IETF-61 draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-03.txt 1 SIP Call Control - Transfer Robert Sparks Alan Johnston Dan Petrie.
A SIP Call Control Model draft-mahy-sip-cc-models-00.txt Rohan Mahy
SIP Action Referral Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cullen Jennings Alan Johnston Francois Audet 1 IETF 80, SPLICES WG, Prague March 29, 2011.
SIP working group status Keith Drage, Dean Willis.
Draft-audet-sipping-feature-ref Feature Referral in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-audet-sipping-feature-ref-00 François Audet -
SIP OAuth Rifaat Shekh-Yusef IETF 90, SIPCore WG, Toronto, Canada July 21,
@ IETF 68. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement.
Explicit Subscriptions for REFER draft-sparks-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-00 SIPCORE – IETF90 Robert Sparks.
IETF 60 - San Diegodraft-ietf-sipping-kpml-041 KPML Updates Open Issues Eric Burger, Brooktrout Martin Dolly, AT&T.
Author(s) Politehnica University of Bucharest Automatic Control and Computers Faculty Computer Science Department Implementation of GRUU in SIP Vladut-Stefan.
1 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. Course Number Presentation_ID Peer-to-Peer 3rd party call control Rohan Mahy—Cisco Systems
1 Diameter SIP application draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-03.txt 60 th IETF meeting August 3 rd, 2004 Status.
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 2G IMS CAVE Based Security Replay Protection Alec Brusilovsky, Zhibi Wang Alcatel-Lucent, July 24, 2007.
Deterministic Fast Router Advertisement Configuration Update draft-daley-dna-det-fastra-01.txt Presenter: Greg Daley.
App Interaction Framework Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
SIP INFO Event Framework (draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00) Hadriel Kaplan Christer Holmberg 70th IETF, Vancouver, Canada.
SIP working group IETF#70 Essential corrections Keith Drage.
SIP and SIPPING WGsMay, IETF Interim Meeting Orit levin Conferencing Requirements for SIP Based Applications.
Update on SIP Conferencing SIPPING WG IETF 59 Seoul, Korea March 3, 2004.
IETF 69 SIPPING WG Meeting Mohammad Vakil Microsoft An Extension to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Events for Pausing and Resuming.
SIP Call Package Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Three Separate Pieces Call Leg State Package Conference Package To-Join/To-Replace.
Caller Prefs and Friends Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
SIP Extensions for Network-Asserted Caller Identity and Privacy within Trusted Networks Flemming Andreasen W. Marshall, K. K. Ramakrishnan,
SIP WG Open Issues IETF 50 Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
1 © NOKIA Presentation_Name.PPT / DD-MM-YYYY / Initials Company Confidential Conveying Policy URI in Call-info purpose Hisham Khartabil Aki Niemi SIP WG.
Open issues from SIP list Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
App Interaction Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Context Param INVITE Call-ID:A From:caller;tag=B To:callee;tag=C Supported: context INVITE/200 REFER sip:gruu.
SIP PUBLISH Method Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
RFC3261 (Almost) Robert Sparks. SIPiT 10 2 Status of the New SIP RFC Passed IETF Last Call In the RFC Editor queue Author’s 48 hours review imminent IMPORTANT:
DORSET ALERT A new way of messaging. Click Read and agree terms and conditions Click to proceed.
March 20, 2007BLISS BOF IETF-681 Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol.
Agenda and Status SIP Working Group IETF 61. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF.
July 28, 2008BLISS WG IETF-721 The Multiple Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-02 Alan Johnston.
July 28, 2009BLISS WG IETF-751 Shared Appearance of a SIP AOR draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-03 Alan Johnston Mohsen Soroushnejad Venkatesh Venkataramanan.
SIP Events: Changes and Open Issues IETF 50 / SIP Working Group Adam Roach
Call Completion using BFCP draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp IETF 67 – San Diego November 7, 2006.
Outbound draft-ietf-sip-outbound-01 Cullen Jennings.
Slide #1 Nov 6 -11, 2005SIP WG IETF64 Feature Tags with SIP REFER draft-ietf-sip-refer-feature-param-00 Orit
1 Recording VoiceXML sessions with SIPREC draft-lum-siprec-vxml-00 July 30, 2013 IETF 87 Author: H. Lum.
Caller Preferences Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
SIPPING Drafts Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Conferencing Package Issues Only one – scope Depends on broader work in conferencing May include –Participant.
SIP Working Group IETF 72 chaired by Keith Drage, Dean Willis.
Call and Conference Package Jonathan Rosenberg. Status Draft-rosenberg-sip-call-package to be split into two RSN –Draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package Dialog.
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Main Changes Up front discussion of URI properties Opaque URI parameter for constructing GRUU Procedure for EP.
SIP PUBLISH draft-ietf-simple-publish-01 Aki Niemi
Andrew Allen ROUTING OUT OF DIALOG REQUESTS draft-allen-dispatch-routing-out-of-dialog-request-01 Dispatch IETF 92 March 23 rd 2015.
MSRP (The Message Session Relay Protocol) 姓名:張文萍 日期: 2007/04/02.
SIP Working Group IETF Chairs -- Rohan MAHY Dean WILLIS.
Message Waiting for SIP Rohan Mahy
SIP wg Items Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft Caller Preferences: Changes Discussion of Redirects –Previous draft only proxy –Nothing different for redirect.
End-to-middle Security in SIP
SIP Configuration Issues: IETF 57, SIPPING
Phone numbers and dial strings
App Interaction Framework
Examining Session Policy Topologies
Request-URI Param Delivery
Agenda and Status SIP Working Group
Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft
Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-00.
Presentation transcript:

Rohan Mahy draft-ietf-sip-join and Semantics of REFER

Join draft finished WGLC last week: ZERO comments — Does anyone care? No open issues Who’s read it? Who’s implemented it? Who’s planning to implement it? Join Header Status

RFC 3515 says it is OK to put almost any arbitrary URI in a Refer-To header arbitrary schemes specific SIP methods in or out of a dialog preloaded SIP headers What does that mean? How do I authorize this? Semantics of REFER

REFER in a dialog, Refer-To method=INVITE REFER outside dialog, Refer-To method=INVITE REFER with other methods: REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, MESSSAGE Nested REFERs Refer-To: (targeted to dialog) Refer-To: (not to a dialog) Refer-To: What semantics make sense? Transfer Click to Dial Move Sub Remote Transfer Fetch content Send Busy

Option 1: Send REFER on existing dialog Option 2: Use a separate GRUU per conversation. (This gets cumbersome very fast. Requires lots of target refresh requests.) Option 3: Use explicit Refer-To header parameters: Refer-To: ;call-id=123 ;remote-tag=abc;local-tag=xyz How do you put REFER requests in a context?

Most uses of REFER other than transfer are unlikely to work on today’s UAs Suggest that we define semantics of cohesive baskets of REFER functionality. Use option- tags to make sure these are supported. Propose that we add the explicit dialog parameters to Refer-To header Provide guidance: to what extent is remote call control, and remote UI invocation (app interaction) OK. How do we proceed?