From Maunder Minimum to the recent Grand Solar Maximum 11:45 Tuesday November 18 auditorium Roger Session: 6. Key solar observables for assessing long-term.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uncovering the Global Slow Solar Wind Liang Zhao and Thomas H. Zurbuchen Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan.
Advertisements

An analysis of long-term variations of Sq and geomagnetic activity. Relevance in data reduction for crustal and main field studies Crisan Demetrescu, Venera.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
1 Comments on Leif Svalgaard Journal Club Discussion Stanford University Wed. 19 Feb
An Analysis of Heliospheric Magnetic Field Flux Based on Sunspot Number from 1750 to Today and Prediction for the Coming Solar Minimum Introduction The.
Centennial Variations of Near-Earth IMF and Solar Wind Speed 09:50, Friday November 21 auditorium Reine Elisabeth Session: 14 Space Climate Time allowed.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
The Independency of Stellar Mass-Loss Rates on Stellar X-ray Luminosity and Activity Space Telescope Science Institute – 2012.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Global Distribution of Slow Solar Wind N. U. Crooker, S. W. Antiochos, X. Zhao, Yi-M. Wang, and M. Neugebauer.
Occurrence and properties of substorms associated with pseudobreakups Anita Kullen Space & Plasma Physics, EES.
Long Term Measurements of Solar Wind Fe Charge States: Charge State Distributions Mark Popecki, A. Galvin, L. M. Kistler,H. Kucharek, E. Moebius, K. Simunac,
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
Extreme Space Weather Events th June 2014 The Maunder minimum: An extreme space climate event? Mathew Owens, Mike Lockwood,
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
Space Weather Forecast Models from the Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling The Solar Wind Forecast Model Carrington Rotation 1896Carrington Rotation.
Synoptic maps and applications Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA HMI team meeting, Jan 27, 2005, Stanford.
Solar activity over the last 1150 years: does it correlate with climate? S.K. Solanki 1, I. Usoskin 2, M. Schüssler 1, K. Mursula 2 1: Max-Planck-Institut.
1. Background2. Flux variation3. Polarity reversal4. Electron evolution5. Conclusions The role of coronal mass ejections in the solar cycle evolution of.
Prediction on Time-Scales of Years to Decades Discussion Group A.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
1 Heliospheric Magnetic Field Leif Svalgaard Stanford University, CA
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
The Sun. Solar Prominence Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
The exposure of the Moon to the Earth’s plasmasheet Mike Hapgood STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Case Studies of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections – Different Phases of the Cycle Of particular interest to the.
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Faraday Rotation: Unique Measurements of Magnetic Fields in the Outer Corona Justin C. Kasper (UM), Ofer Cohen (SAO), Steven Spangler (Iowa), Gaetan Le.
1 The Geo-Response to Extreme Solar Events: How Bad Can it Get? Leif Svalgaard Stanford University, California, USA AOGS,
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 2: Corona & Heliophere.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
Solar Cycle Variation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Flux, Solar Wind Flux and Galactic Cosmic Rays Charles W. Smith, Nathan A. Schwadron Ken G. McCracken,
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
Long Term Measurements of Solar Wind Fe Charge States Mark Popecki, A. Galvin, L. M. Kistler,H. Kucharek, E. Moebius, K. Simunac, P. Bochsler, L. M. Blush,
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Cosmic Rays at 1 AU Over the Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24 Cosmic Ray Transport in the Helioshealth: The View from Voyager AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco,
WSM Whole Sun Month Sarah Gibson If the Sun is so quiet, why is the Earth still ringing?
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
Mike Lockwood (Southampton University & Space Science and Technology Department, STFC/Rutherford Appleton Laboratory ) Open solar flux and irradiance during.
1 ~130 Years of Solar Wind Data: The Floor and More E.W. Cliver Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory AGU May 2008.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Ahmed A. HADY Astronomy Department Cairo University Egypt Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle23 and its Impact and its Impact.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
1 The Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Coupling Function and Nowcasting of Geomagnetic Activity Leif Svalgaard Stanford University AMS-93, Austin, Jan
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna M. Yamauchi 1 Different Sun-Earth energy coupling between different solar cycles Acknowledgement:
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
Using the paleo-cosmic ray record to compare the solar activity during the sunspot minimum of with those during the Spoerer, Maunder, and Dalton.
CME rate: 1/3 (4) day -1 at solar min (max) [LASCO CME catalogue. Yahsiro et al., 2005] |B| at 1 AU: 5 (8) nT at solar min (max) [OMNI data] D (fraction.
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
SLIDE SHOW 6. SOLAR WIND (Mariner 2, 1962)
Geomagnetic activity indicates large amplitude for sunspot cycle 24
Solar cycle variation of the heliospheric magnetic field
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
MDI Global Field & Solar Wind
~130 Years of Solar Wind Data: The Floor and More
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

From Maunder Minimum to the recent Grand Solar Maximum 11:45 Tuesday November 18 auditorium Roger Session: 6. Key solar observables for assessing long-term changes of the Geospace Time allowed 25 min

Mike Lockwood, C.J. Scott, M.J. Owens, & L. Barnard (Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, & Space Science and Technology Department, STFC/Rutherford Appleton Laboratory ) From Maunder Minimum to the recent Grand Solar Maximum 11 th European Space Weather Week, Liege, 18th November 2014 Session: 6. Key solar observables for assessing long-term changes of the Geospace

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

Sunspot numbers and cosmogenic isotope records  Annual means of corrected sunspot number, R C & group sunspot number, R G (Lockwood et al, 2014)  22-year means of R C & R G with  22  22-year means of modulation potential from 14 C (  14C ) & 10 Be (  10Be ) and the mean of the two,  22 = )/2 (Usoskin, 2013)

Sunspot numbers on a logarithmic scale  Annual means of corrected sunspot number, R C & group sunspot number, R G  Top: R C & R G on log e scale along with 11-year means of R G in black - highlights the Maunder minimum.  Bottom: R C & R G to the power e, along with 11-year means of R c e - highlights the recent grand maximum

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

Millennial Variation  composite (22-year means) from cosmogenic isotope 10 Be cores by Steinhilber et al. (2008) Year AD  Solar Modulation Potential,  (MV)  composite from S olanki et al., 2004; Vonmoos et al., 2006 & Muscheler et al., 2007 we have just left the most recent grand maximum, defined by   600 MV Maunder minimum  = 168 MV

Distribution of  over 9300 years (22-year means) from cosmogenic isotope 10 Be cores by Steinhilber et al. (2008)  Red lines are at 168 MV and 600 MV, near deciles of distribution (50 of 424 samples (12%) have   600 MV and 12% have   168 MV  Using   600 MV defines 24 grand maxima  Using   168 MV defines 22 grand minima Peak of recent grand maximum  = 694 MV Low point of Maunder minimum  = 123 MV

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

Dependence of different geomagnetic activity indices on IMF B  (V SW ) n  all indices depend on B  but depend on (V SW ) n with different n  We use pairings with different n to reconstruct B and V SW n = 1.7±0.8 r = n = 1.6±0.8 r = n = −0.1±1.1 r = best fit aa C best fit IHV best fit IDV(1d) n = −0.1±1.1 r = best fit IDV interplanetary data (annual means)

Geomagnetic Reconstructions of near-Earth IMF, B, solar wind speed, V SW, and the Open Solar Flux (OSF), F S  Sunspot number, R  near-Earth IMF, B  near-Earth solar wind speed, V SW  Open Solar Flux (OSF) (from Lockwood et al., Annales Geophys, 2014)

Geomagnetic Reconstructions of near-Earth IMF, B, solar wind speed, V SW, and the Open Solar Flux (OSF), F S  note that first calibrated magnetometer made in 1832  available reliable continuous and usable data starts in 1844  need models based on sunspot number to get back to Maunder minimum

Geomagnetic Reconstructions of near-Earth IMF, B, solar wind speed, V SW, and the Open Solar Flux (OSF), F S  systematic difference only before 1870 when IDV index (the IDV-aa C combination is in red) is not IDV at all but is Bartel’s q index which is both different & inhomogeneous

Geomagnetic Reconstructions of near-Earth IMF, B, solar wind speed, V SW, and the Open Solar Flux (OSF), F S  the minima in annual mean V SW at 1878 and 1900 are only slightly greater than the lowest hourly means in the satellite data  suggests slow and fast solar wind speeds the same but Earth continuously in slow solar wind

Solar wind speed at Earth and the streamer belt width: concept  streamer belt comprises dipole streamers (DS) and pseudostreamers (PS) and is filled with slow solar wind  during the solar cycle streamer belt width varies  thinnest around sunspot minimum so Earth spends more time solar in continuous fast solar wind of polar coronal holes  We infer it was thicker when solar activity was low so Earth remained almost continuously in slow solar wind

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

Streamer belt width: a model  Divides total open flux into coronal hole and streamer belt components: F S = F CH + F SB  Applies Solanki et al (2000) continuity concept to both F CH & F SB  All new open flux emerges into streamer belt and that emergence is dominated by CMEs – emergence rate quantified as a function of sunspot number by Owens et al. (2011)  Streamer belt flux that escapes disconnection transfers to coronal hole on a fixed distribution of timescales

Solar wind speed at Earth and the streamer belt width: model  Disconnection of streamer belt flux such that fractional loss rate varies over the solar cycle with current sheet tilt as predicted by Owens et al. (2012) and found by Owens and Lockwood (2013)  Disconnection of coronal hole flux occurs at a constant fractional rate  Ratio F SB /(F CH + F SB ) gives streamer belt width

Model results: total open solar flux (one free fit parameter)  Reproduces total open solar flux F S from reconstructions very well with just two free fit parameters (the ratio of HCS tilt to the streamer belt fractional loss rate and the coronal hole fractional loss rate)

Model results: streamer belt width in recent cycles (3 free fit parameters)  Top: modelled coronal hole flux F CH (in blue) consistent with polar field from date from magnetographs (in red)

 Bottom: modelled streamer belt width (in blue) consistent with streamer belt from magnetograph data (Owens et al., 2012) and from eclipse images (cyan dots)  Note model has captured the variation in width at sunspot minimum Model results: streamer belt width in recent cycles (3 free fit parameters)

Model results: streamer belt width since the Maunder minimum  Lower panel shows streamer belt width modelled for corrected sunspot number composite R C (in black) and group sunspot number R C (in mauve)

Model results: streamer belt width since the Maunder minimum  Model matches SB widths from eclipse images (dots: coloured dots relating to the examples shown for sunspot minimum along the top and sunspot maximum along bottom)  Grey dots are from the catalogue of Loucif & Koputchmy (1989)  Open circles are from written reports

Model results: streamer belt width since the Maunder minimum  Model predicts streamer belt was broader at all phases of remnant cycles during the Maunder minimum  such that Earth would have remained continuously within streamer belt and seen only slow solar wind

The past 400 years Use of geomagnetic data Streamer belt width Solar change on timescales of days to millennia The past 9300 years The future

Superposed epoch study of the end of grand maxima time after end of grand maximum (yrs)   end of grand solar maximum (24 previous events in 9300 yrs) Solar Modulation Parameter,  (MV) 

Probabilities of  after the end of a Grand Solar Maximum Years after end of GSMax  This century Modulation Potential,  (MV)  GSMax GSMin  Recent grand solar maximum (GSMax,  600MV) ended in 2006  Recent descent faster than in all previous 24 cases  5% chance another GSMax starts in 50 years  15% chance a GSMin (  168MV) starts in 50 years

Predictions for the future: Probabilistic analogue forecasts from cosmogenic isotope data by Barnard et al. (2011)  Sunspot number, R  Near-Earth IMF, B  Oulu neutron monitor GCR counts  aa geomagnetic index

as cycle 24 develops all are following the blue lines: i.e. in the top 5-15% most rapid descents seen in the last 9300 years  Sunspot number, R  Near-Earth IMF, B  Oulu neutron monitor GCR counts  aa geomagnetic index

Conclusions  formed a grand solar maximum (GSMax defined by  600MV)  Variation between Maunder minimum and this GSMax seen in several reconstructed solar and heliospheric parameters  Solar wind speed lower when open solar flux is low, suggests a broader streamer belt  Small (5%) chance of another GSMax within 50 years but decline in parameters thus far is as expected for a new GSMin in 50 years time (15% chance)

Space Weather Implications  Not known!  Past experience from the space age may be of limited value  Lower heliospheric fields may allow greater SEP escape from inner heliosphere but may also limit SEP acceleration  Effect on solar wind number density, Alfvén speed & Alfvén Mach number of events?  Many Ground Level Events have been seen when solar activity is lower (e.g. in the 1940s)