G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Georgetown Ag Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA 2013 Genomic.
Advertisements

2008 Advances in DNA genotyping and sequencing genotyping and sequencing Tad S. Sonstegard USDA, ARS, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory BARC-East Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Curt Van Tassell USDA Agricultural Research Service AIPL – Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory BFGL – Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory Recent Developments.
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.K. Matukumalli 1,2, R.D. Schnabel 3, J.F. Taylor 3, J.P. Chesnais 4, F.S. Schenkel 5, and C.P. Van.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and J. B. Cole 2, * 1 Bovine Functional Genomics and 2 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratories Agricultural Research Service, USDA.
Training, Validation, and Target Populations Training, Validation, and Target Populations Mark Thallman, Kristina Weber, Larry Kuehn, Warren Snelling,
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2002 Curt Van Tassell Gene Evaluation and Mapping Laboratory and Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, George Wiggans 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2010 G.R. WiggansDCRC.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans Cornell.
Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle K. M. Olson 1, P. M. VanRaden 2, D. J. Null 2, and M. E. Tooker 2 1 National.
2007 J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. O'Connell 3, C. P. Van Tassell 1,2, T. S. Sonstegard 2, R. D. Schnabel 4, J. F. Taylor 4, and G. R. Wiggans.
Wiggans, 2013Japanese Genomics Tour (1) Dr. George R. WiggansDr. H. Duane Norman Acting Research LeaderInterim Administrator Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAg Discovery.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
2007 Paul VanRaden, Curt Van Tassell, George Wiggans, Tad Sonstegard, and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory and Bovine Functional Genomics.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
WiggansBritish Cattle Conference 2015 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansGenomics:
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Curt Van Tassell, Tad Sonstegard, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory USDA.
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.K. Matukumalli 1,2, R.D. Schnabel 3, J.F. Taylor 3, F.S. Schenkel 4, and C.P. Van Tassell 1 1 Agricultural.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCouncil.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker*, George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2009 Can you believe those genomic.
Wiggans, 2014ASAS-ADSA-CSAS Joint Annual Meeting (1) G.R. Wiggans* 1, T.A. Cooper 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, D.J. Null 1, J.L. Hutchison 1, O.M. Meland 2, M.E.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 AIPL Centennial.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
2007 Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2010 Gains in reliability from combining subsets.
Future Research in Genomics Curt Van Tassell AIPL Centennial Celebration November 28, 2008.
WiggansARPAS-DC meeting, Beltsville, MD – Dec. 9, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansSelect Sire.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans* 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.R. Bacheller 1, F.A. Ross, Jr. 1, M.E. Tooker 1, J.L. Hutchison 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, and C.P. Van Tassell 1,2 1 Animal.
G.R. Wiggans,* 1 P.M. VanRaden, 1 T.A. Cooper, 1 C.P. Van Tassell, 2 T. Sonstegard, 2 and B. Simpson 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs and 2 Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Considering.
G.R. Wiggans 1, T. A. Cooper 1 *, K.M. Olson 2 and P.M. VanRaden 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Biological Insights.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans DNA.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD What can we do.
Bull Selection Strategies Using Genomic Estimated Breeding Values L. R. Schaeffer CGIL, University of Guelph ICAR-Interbull Meeting Niagara Falls, NY June.
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Can you believe those genomic evaluations for young bulls?
Percent of total breedings
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Presentation transcript:

G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Georgetown Ag Systems (1) G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Animal Biotechnology

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (2) Application of biotechnology l Identify superior animals early l Increase rate of genetic improvement l Detect abnormalities l Improve understanding of mechanisms of genetic control l Determine parentage

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (3) Applications in genetic improvement l Find easily detected genetic differences among animals l Develop SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) panels to detect those differences l Relate SNP differences to productivity differences l Rank animals on their economic merit l Use best animals as parents of the next generation

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (4) What is genomics? l Study of how the genome (DNA) of any species is organized and expressed as traits l New technologies allow examination of an organism’s genome as a whole rather than 1 gene at a time l Livestock and poultry genomes sequenced to understand how various genes function (functional genomics)

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (5) Bovine genome sequence

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (6) Federal support for genomics l Cattle l Sheep l Swine l Poultry l Horses l Aquaculture (fish and other water animals)

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (7) How do we use genomics? l Identify DNA sequences associated with disease resistance and production traits l Animals can be evaluated as soon as DNA can be obtained (even before birth) l Best animals to be parents can be determined earlier and more accurately

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (8) Dairy cattle selection before genomics l Slow! w Progeny testing for production traits takes 3 – 4 years from insemination w Bull will be at least 5 years old before first evaluation is available l Expensive! w Progeny testing costs $25,000 – 50,000/bull w Only 1 in 8 – 10 bulls graduate from progeny test w At least $200,000 invested in each active bull

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (9) Background: Genetic markers l Segment of DNA at a unique physical location in the genome that varies sufficiently between individuals that its inheritance can be tracked through families l Markers not required to be part of a gene

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (10) Genetic markers l Allow inheritance to be followed in a region across generations l SNPs are the markers of choice l Need lots – 3 million in the genome!

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (11) Cattle SNP collaboration – iBMAC l Develop 60,000-bead Illumina iSelect assay w Agricultural Research Service, USDA − Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Bovine Functional Genomics Lab. Animal Improvement Programs Lab. − Meat Animal Research Center w University of Missouri w University of Alberta l Starting 60,800 beads – 54,000 usable SNPs

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (12)

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (13) Illumina  Marylinn Munson  Cindy Lawley  Christian Haudenschild BARC w Curt Van Tassell w Lakshmi Matukumalli w Tad Sonstegard Missouri w Jerry Taylor w Bob Schnabel  Stephanie McKay Alberta w Steve Moore USMARC – Clay Center w Tim Smith w Mark Allan 13 l USDA/NRI/CSREES w w w l USDA/ARS w D w D w D l Merial w Stewart Bauck l NAAB w Gordon Doak w ABS Global w Accelerated Genetics w Alta Genetics w CRI/Genex w Select Sires w Semex Alliance w Taurus Service iBMAC ConsortiumFunding agencies Participants

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (14) Genomic evaluation – US dairy cattle l Cooperating organizations w Breed associations (Holstein, Jersey, Brown Swiss) w Artificial-insemination organizations − Own bulls − Collect and market semen l Full sharing of genotypes and research with Canada l Trading of genotypes with Switzerland, Germany and Austria – expect to share with more countries l Over 60,000 animals genotyped starting in 2008

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (15) Getting DNA samples l Animals selected w Artificial-insemination organizations identify male and female calves to genotype w Farmers request breed association to arrange for genotyping l Animal nominated at Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory – insures pedigree information is in database l Sample sent to genotyping laboratory w Hair follicles (most common) w Blood  Nasal swab w Semen  Ear punch

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (16) History of application for US dairy cattle l Dec. 2007BovineSNP50 BeadChip available l Apr. 2008First unofficial evaluation released l Jan. 2009Genomic evaluations official for Holstein and Jersey l Aug. 2009Official for Brown Swiss l Sept. 2010Unofficial evaluations from 3K chip released l Dec K genomic evaluations become official

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (17) International implications l All major dairy countries investigating genomic selection l International Bull Evaluation Service (Interbull) working on how genomic evaluations should be integrated l EuroGenomics – European collaboration to share genotypes l Large number of predictor animals increases prediction accuracy l Importing countries changed rules to allow for genomically evaluated young bulls

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (18) Developed countries l 100 years of records w Phenotypes w Pedigree l Progeny testing for 50 years l Plentiful crop systems l Animals developed for temperate climate Developing countries l No records l No pedigree l Marginal production systems – tropical l No national testing systems to evaluate germplasm l No cash for investing in value-added animals Challenges of technology transfer

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (19) Priorities from Gates Foundation l Develop tools and reagents that are applicable to underdeveloped areas l Collect DNA for breeds to understand current genetic distances and admixture l Identify critical populations for preservation and selection – high density chip l Enhance local adapted breeds using combinations of crossbreeding and selection – low density chip

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (20) l Identified a set of parentage markers for testing at University of Lahore l Sequenced a native breed animal for SNP discovery in water buffalo l Lead role in Water Buffalo Genome Project (Italy) l Great training opportunity PAKUS – Water buffalo genomics

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (21) Summary l Genomics is revolutionizing animal breeding l Genomic selection used extensively in dairy cattle breeding l High quality genotypes support detection of parentage and other errors l International collaboration has been important for the success

G.R. Wiggans, 2010 Georgetown Ag Systems (22)