Technology Development for ELTs Steve Strom Terry Herter Doug Simons GSMT SWG April 28, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek.
Advertisements

GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities
CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
LMS, 3/07/00 GSMT Systems Task Group MeetingBoulder, CO Systems Issues: Optical Design & Fabrication GSMT Working Group on Optical Design & Fabrication.
DESpec spectrographs Jennifer Marshall Darren DePoy Texas A&M University.
Maximizing GSMT Science Return with Scientific Figures of Merit.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
AURA New Initiatives Office S.C. Barden, M. Liang, K.H. Hinkle, C.F.W. Harmer, R.R. Joyce (NOAO/NIO) September 17, 2001 Instrumentation Concepts for the.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Adaptive Optics Model Anita Enmark Lund Observatory.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO Instrumentation Preliminary Design Phase Planning September 2008 Sean Adkins.
1 NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 1: NIRC2 NGAO IWG December 12, 2006.
Build to Cost Meeting: Major NGAO system cost savings ideas Don Gavel NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Adaptive Optics Road Map An Adaptive Optics Road Map Presentation to the AURA Board 7 February 2001 A Renaissance in Groundbased IR (even Optical) Astronomy?
Enabling a GSMT for the US Community: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom 04 June, 2004 Tucson, AZ National Optical Astronomy Observatory Tucson.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
July 2001Zanjan, Iran1 Atmospheric Profilers Marc Sarazin (European Southern Observatory)
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
Characterizing Exoplanets: The Challenge. GSMT Potential GSMT will detect & classify Jovian mass planets, from ‘roasters’ to ‘old, cold’ Jupiters located.
SALT Technology Development Lisa Crause India-South Africa Astronomy Workshop – SAAO 6 August 2012.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
1 FRIDA Engineering Status 17/05/07 Engineering Status May 17, 2007 F.J. Fuentes InFraRed Imager and Dissector for Adaptive Optics.
Advancing GSMT SWG Recommendations: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom AURA New Initiatives Office Presented to the GSMT SWG 12 February, 2004.
AO4ELT - Paris Giant Magellan Telescope Project Science Drivers & AO Requirements Patrick McCarthy - GMT Director Phil Hinz & Michael Hart - GMT.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Multiplexed High Res Spectroscopy at Keck – J. Cohen (PI), H. Epps (Optical Design), M. Rich (Project Scientist) Keck instruments for optical spectroscopy.
Modern Universe Space Telescope Visions 2003 Proposal Dennis Ebbets Ball Aerospace UV Optical Space Telescope Workshop STScI February 26, 2004.
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
3.1 Optomechanical systems (1) Scientific and engineering resources are available to carry out the optomechanical work on DECam. The highly distributed.
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
NEXT GENERATION OPTICAL SPECTROGRAPH FOR NOAO Samuel Barden, Charles Harmer, Taft Armandroff, Arjun Dey, and Buell Jannuzi (National Optical Astronomy.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
MAXIM Periscope ISAL Study Highlights ISAL Study beginning 14 April 2003.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
FELT 1 Study of the capability and configuration of a fixed mirror Extremely Large Telescope (FELT) Low cost path to large telescope Primary concern is.
Technology Development for ELTs Doug Simons GSMT SWG April 28, 2003.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Forming High Mass Stars Probing the Formation Epoch.
1 Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6.5m (and 4m) NGST NAS Committee of Astronomy & Astrophysics 9 th April 2001 Matt Mountain Gemini.
Science with Giant Telescopes - Jun 15-18, Instrument Concepts InstrumentFunction range (microns) ResolutionFOV GMACSOptical Multi-Object Spectrometer.
GMT’s Near IR Multiple Object Spectrograph - NIRMOS Daniel Fabricant Center for Astrophysics.
Giant Magellan Telescope Project Status and Relationship with the NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee February 8, 2007 Patrick McCarthy -
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
6 May 2009Lynn Baker AWG Meeting LA1 TDP Antenna and Feed Plan Lynn Baker Antenna Working Group Meeting Los Angeles, CA May 6, 2009.
Big Bear Solar Observatory Some ground-based technology developments that will propel solar physics Phil Goode for Jeff Kuhn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Phil Goode for Jeff Kuhn Big Bear Solar Observatory
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
MASS-DIMM – a turbulence monitor for Adaptive Optics
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
LSST Camera Detector Status
Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Technology Development for ELTs Steve Strom Terry Herter Doug Simons GSMT SWG April 28, 2003

2 Driving Science Themes The Birth of Galaxies: The Archaeological Record The physics of young Jupiter's Characterize Exo-Planets The Birth of Planetary Systems The Birth of Galaxies: Witnessing the Process Directly The Birth of Large Scale Structure

3 And Science Themes Drive Needed Performance… The physics of young Jupiter's The Birth of Galaxies: The Archaeological Record Near-diffraction limited performance over ~ 2 arc-minute fields Characterize Exo-Planets High dynamic range imaging High sensitivity Mid-IR spectroscopy The Birth of Galaxies: Witnessing the Process Directly Enhanced-seeing over ~ 5 arc-minute field The Birth of Large Scale Structure Wide-field, seeing-limited multi- object spectroscopy The Birth of Planetary Systems

4 Achieving Needed Performance Requires Technology Development Multiple ELT programs have identified key technology investments and studies required to achieve desired performance Four key areas require investments For each of the above we summarize –The need for new or enhanced technology –Potential performance enhancements –Relationship to science enabled –Other investment returns: e.g. reliability; cost Telescope Systems Wind Site Characterization Adaptive Optics SystemsInstrumentation

5 Telescope Systems & Key Technologies CELTMagellan 20GSMT Adaptive Secondary Mirrors High Performance Durable Coatings Advanced Primary Mirror Materials Active Optics Control Systems

6 Requirement –Control primary segment alignment errors and secondary mirror misalignments due to gravity, temperature, and windshake Need –Inexpensive and reliable sensors and actuators; robust control Potential performance enhancements –Essential for telescope concepts with small segments Potential science gain – Reduced PSF artifacts; improved Strehls with AO Potential cost/reliability gains –Reduced costs/simplified fabrication of small segments

7 Alternate Mirror Technologies Requirement –Light weight, readily molded + polished segments of size 1-2m –SiC? Need –Reduce complexity and cost for primary mirror system Potential performance enhancements –Higher bandwidth for active control system Potential science gain – none Potential cost/reliability gains –Major savings in life-cycle costs

8 Alternative Technologies: Adaptive Primary Requirement –Smaller segments (~ 0.5 – 1 m) –Bandwidth to handle wind buffeting Need –First element of AO system for GSMT, CELT & LAT designs Potential performance enhancements –Higher throughput, lower emissivity –Larger primary mirror (for given cost) Potential science gain –Reduced time to complete all programs Potential cost/reliability gains –Major savings in mount costs (lighter weight system)

9 Alternative Technologies: Adaptive Secondaries Requirement –~ 2m deformable mirror with ~2000 actuators and 5-10 micron stroke Need –First element of AO systems –For Magellan 20: key to phasing optical elements –For GSMT: wind-buffeting compensation Potential performance enhancements –Efficient ground-layer compensation –Low emissivity, high throughput AO feed for mid-IR Potential science gain –Wide-field studies of high z galaxies –Imaging and spectroscopic studies of YSOs

10 High Performance, Durable Coatings Requirement –High reflectivity from microns –Retain coating performance for ~10 years Need –Minimize time between coatings; mirror handling Potential performance enhancements –Higher throughput, lower emissivity Potential science gain –Reduced time to complete all programs Potential cost/reliability gains –Major savings in life-cycle costs

11 Facility AO Systems

12 Systems & Key Technologies Multi-conjugate adaptive optics system –Systems design studies and performance simulations –Low cost, ultra-reliable Na lasers ( W power) –Deformable mirrors with up to 5000 actuators –Fast readout, low-noise optical and infrared detectors –Advanced wavefront control algorithms and processors MCAO Model

13 Systems & Key Technologies Extreme AO system –Systems design studies and performance simulations –Deformable mirrors with up to (or more) actuators Ground-layer adaptive optics system –Systems design studies and performance simulations –Site studies to identify those best suited to GLAO –Pathfinder systems to verify proof of concepts Natural Compensated Pachon Cn 2 Profile V J K GLAO Model

14 Deformable Mirrors Requirement –Wavefront correction elements with >>1000 degrees of freedom; high stroke –Multiple technology paths need exploration (MEMS; thin face sheet DMs) Need –Enable high order correction and high Strehls over desired FOV Potential enhancements –Significant improvement in delivered Strehl compared to current DMs –Extension of AO performance to shorter wavelength Potential science gains –Improved photometric accuracy; higher fidelity imaging of high contrast scenes Potential cost/reliability gains –Must reduce costs of conventional DM approaches (~$1.5K/actuator) Xinetics, ~12” clear aperture MEMS (~ 1 cm)

15 Sodium Lasers Requirement –~50 W Na lasers with good beam quality –Low-cost, robust commercialized product (solid-state; fiber options); multiple vendors –Good wall plug efficiency and small footprint Need –Provide all-sky coverage for SCAO systems –Provide multiple beacons to enable wavefront reconstruction for MCAO systems Potential enhancements –Strehl ~ 0.7 images at K-band over several arc-minute FOV Potential science gains –Enable accurate photometry in crowded fields –Extend AO performance to shorter wavelengths Potential cost/reliability gains –Increased reliability and reduced cost through investment in 2 or more product lines Prototype Fiber Laser

16 Wavefront Sensors Requirement –512x512 optical CCD with (1-3 e - readout noise); kHz readout rate –Larger arrays with 3-5 e - read noise for LGS wavefront sensing –128x128 near-IR detector (~5 e - readout noise); kHz readout rate Need –Fast, well-sampled wavefront sensing –Fast tip-tilt correction in optically-obscured fields Potential enhancements –Improved delivered Strehl –Supports extension of AO performance to shorter wavelength Potential science gains – Improved image quality for all programs Potential cost/reliability gains –TE-cooled NIR AO sensors avoid complex cryo-environments

17 Wavefront Control Algorithms and Processors Requirement –Process ~30-50K WFS measurements to drive ~10K actuators at ~1KHz Need –Advanced, computationally efficient reconstruction algorithms –Implementations on parallel processors with low latency Potential enhancements –Enables MCAO –Supports extension of ExAO performance to shorter wavelength Potential science gains – Improved image quality for all programs

18 Site Evaluation Remote sensing Wind CFD SimulationsWeather stationsTurbulence MASS

19 Key Requirement Uniform evaluation information + data for multiple sites –Cloud cover –Precipitable water vapor –Long-term weather patterns –Wind flow and turbulence modeling –in situ measurements of temperature; wind –Ground-layer and upper atmospheric turbulence measurements –Seismicity and geotechnical characteristics –Light pollution; demographic and ownership issues

20 Need for Investment Site choice is a key element in overall system performance –AO performance –Atmospheric transmission –Structure, enclosure and controls systems implications Delivered science is intimately linked with site characteristics At this stage a range of sites should be evaluated –Wide range of prime science cases among ELT groups –Final selection requires life-cycle cost vs science value trade Program must begin immediately –Site selection is on the critical path for CELT/GSMT A minimum 2-year base is desirable –Mag20 favoring Las Campanas though still interested in comparing that site’s quality vs. alternatives before committing

21 First Steps - Remote Sensing Survey of Cloud Cover and PWV Survey uses meteorological satellite images Long time baseline Well-defined methodology provides: –Photometric, spectroscopic, unsuitable conditions based on cloud cover –Precipitable water vapor above the sites Dispassionate comparison thus possible Areas studied: –Northern Chile –SW USA-Mexico –Mauna Kea – Chile comparison Finish August 2003 Various Sites Studied Thus Far

22 First Steps - Computational Fluid Dynamics Characterize wind flow to allow pre- selection of sites –Wind intensity –Turbulence characteristics –Down-wind wakes NIO has recruited CFD modeling expert -- Konstantinos Vogiatzis Characterization of Chilean sites well underway Analysis of other sites planned for 2nd Qtr 2003 Wind Las Campanas Peak m Turbulent Kinetic Energy

23 First Steps - Weather Station on Honar

24 Measuring Turbulence Layers with MASS

25 Combining MASS + DIMM Results Free atmosphere seeing steady at ~ 0.25” for 4 nights

26 GSMT Site Evaluation: Status NIO collaborating with Carnegie, CELT, Cornell, ESO, UH, UNAM; to test: –Las Campanas –Chajnantor –One or two additional Chilean Sites –Mauna Kea ELT site –San Pedro de Martir Status of “First Steps”: –Erasmus remote sensing studies (cloud cover; water vapor) nearly complete MK / US / Chile comparison to finish in August –CFD modeling of sites: good progress on first three sites –Weather stations deployed on several mountains –Multi-Aperture Scintillation Sensor (MASS): Performance verified by SCIDAR comparison Manufacturing instruments for all sites

27 Site Evaluation: Needed Investment MASS and DIMM purchase and deployment Weather station purchase and deployment Common data analysis tools Manpower to install and operate site evaluation stations Manpower to compile and distribute common database All of this proposed new investment builds upon previously described “First Steps”

28 Instrumentation

29 Representative Science Instruments Multi-Object Multi-Fiber Spectrograph –Requires VPH gratings ~1 m in size Mosaic of diffraction gratings is possible fallback but this still requires tech-dev –Photometric stability of ~60 m long fiber assemblies on moving telescope –Mass production of fiber/lens coupling optics with high throughput –Fiber-to-fiber coupler to simplify removal from telescope

30 Million Element Integral Field Spectrograph –Large format cylindrical lenslet arrays need to be developed –Mass production of individual spectrograph components - atypical for astronomical instruments –Complex high accuracy/capacity mechanism design replicated many times throughput instrument Major cost factor Representative Science Instruments

31 Deployable Integral Field Spectrograph –Mass produced IFU technology –Cryogenic robotic arms need development –Large format infrared arrays in significant numbers (~30) Need to get cost per pixel down… Representative Science Instruments

32 Mid-IR High Dispersion Spectrograph –Large format mid-IR buttable detectors –Advanced gratings Immersed Si? –Large cryogenic mechanisms and high capacity cooling system Representative Science Instruments

33 MCAO Imager –Large cryogenic optics for full field imaging ~500 mm CaF 2 lenses –Need ~1 Gpixel focal plane to sample full MCAO field ~50 4x4k detectors Drives need to reduce cost per pixel through tech-dev Representative Science Instruments

34 Design Concept Studies Additional investment in design concepts is critical –Engage university and private sector groups –Encourage innovative designs –Key step to resolving uncertainties in performance, cost, and science trades –Used to develop firm cost estimates before proceeding to build instruments Given enormous costs of these instruments, this is an important risk reduction strategy Parallel funding of technology development and instrument design studies –Need to fund detector development soon, independent of instrument design studies, since this is a long-lead effort with “dividends” applicable to most ELT instrumentation –Some tech-dev best handled through design studies

35 Common Technology Needs Adaptive Secondary Durable Coatings Alternate Segment (SiC) AO system studies & simulations Deformable Mirrors Na Lasers Detectors for Wavefront Sensors Site Evaluation Large format near-IR detectors Large format mid-IR detectors? Image multiplexers? VPH; immersed Si gratings?? Fiber Positioner? Large Mosaic Grating Advanced Optical Nulling Technology Instrument Concept studies Mag 20GSMTCELTLAT

36 Conclusions Investment in key technologies critical to all ELT programs Large overlap in technology developments needed by all ELT programs The GSMT SWG should strongly endorse the following recommendation from the decadal survey: “The committee recommends that technology development for GSMT begin immediately and that construction start within the decade.” Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee

38 System Design Studies & Simulations Requirement –Modeling/Simulation tools that enable evaluation of AO system performance –Evaluation of alternative approaches to wavefront sensing; reconstruction Need –Design optimized AO systems tailored to science requirements –Guide system-wide trade studies (e.g. controls; instrument design) Potential enhancements –Improved wavefront correction Potential science gains –Improved sensitivity for all science programs Potential cost/reliability gains –Exploration of multiple design efforts prior to costly prototyping programs